in a way i'm glad that we are not being cut off in a
cold way sounds like we are getting invited to
participate:
I don't think so. It's an internal memo, remember?
quote:
We will be asking all of you to participate in this
ndeavor, bringing with us the benefit of previous Sun
Platinum
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:26:15AM -0500, Dave Miner wrote:
Andrew Watkins wrote:
The preview is absolutely an experiment. Indiana itself is an
experiment. OpenSolaris? Well, I don't know what to call it ;-)
I see Indiana is an experiment well I think it is more than that!
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:53:27PM -0800, Chandan Maddanna wrote:
Guys to be more clear, look at the diagram below, and tell me how to get a
single load spread 2 Gbps link with IP Multi Pathing on Solaris 10 ?
Note : Please see Image Below .
img
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:52:15AM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 02/11/2007, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:28:52AM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 02/11/2007, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:58:53AM +0100, Joerg Schilling
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:28:52AM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 02/11/2007, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:58:53AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Not true: OpenSolaris is not even a complete basic OS.
This has been a nagging concern for me for some time
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 07:46:41AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Ceri Davies wrote:
The compiler isn't a big issue for me, but the contents of closed/ and
SUNWonbld definitely are; for one our codebase is somewhat of a lame
horse without them and for two it's a PITA to have to check for new
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 03:29:36PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:58:53AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Not true: OpenSolaris is not even a complete basic OS.
This has been a nagging concern for me for some time.
I
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:58:53AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Not true: OpenSolaris is not even a complete basic OS.
This has been a nagging concern for me for some time.
I find it somewhat uncomfortable that OpenSolaris (or rather, ON) is not
self-hosting.
The compiler isn't a big issue
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 07:56:14PM -0700, Ch?? Kristo wrote:
SXCE (and SXDE) are going to be Sun Solaris 11
eventually, or at least
their aim is to provide an unstable testing bed
for Solaris 11
Note: The C stands for Community.
I think that this has changed now...SXCE and SXDE
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 05:59:30PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did already send this list many times, let me send it again. This is
missing:
Not to me :)
Then you appeared recently on this mailing list.
I've been here a while, but I don't
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 04:04:08PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 02/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then you shouldn't say you speak with one voice because that implies
unanimity which is not the case here. You should say the majority of
the OGB feels X way.
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 04:48:42PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 02/11/2007, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn, abstain only has one meaning. It's perfectly consistent and in
layman's terms as it stands.
Abstain has only one meaning but was not used in the context given
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 07:59:35PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
MC wrote:
Not that I care for bureaucracy, and not that I know what is happening
here, but...
I think if you strong-arm past the OpenSolaris community bureaucracy (and
again, not saying you are, because I don't know much
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 12:08:12PM -0600, Jon Trulson wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More than 2 years ago, we did agreee that noone except Sun has the
right to call a distro OpenSolaris and that Sun shoul/would not do this.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 03:32:23PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 31/10/2007, Alan Burlison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
I just realized the above has lost some context, so just to be
clear... When I say push above, I'm referring only to the
naming of the today's
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 09:49:16PM +, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Oct 31, 2007, at 21:23, Alan Burlison wrote:
The normal way a democracy works is
Framing OpenSolaris as a republic, constitutional monarchy or other
political system doesn't help much in my view. This is an open
What happens to a bug after it is submitted to bugs.opensolaris.org?
After hitting submit I'd expected to be given a bug id, but although I
was told that the bug report was created, I have no idea what the id is
and searching does not find it.
Should I consider it missing and resubmit, or is
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:33:51PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Ceri Davies wrote:
What happens to a bug after it is submitted to bugs.opensolaris.org?
After hitting submit I'd expected to be given a bug id, but although I
was told that the bug report was created, I have no idea what
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:08:34AM -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
How can I make BASH the root's default shell?
Please, pretty please with sugar on top, don't modify the root's SHELL. Even
though nothing *should* break, it could.
Instead, modify /.profile:
Shell=/bin/tcsh
Options=-l
if
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 05:50:34PM -0400, Ian Murdock wrote:
On 5/12/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:05:38AM -0400, Ian Murdock wrote:
On 5/10/07, Frank Van Der Linden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter C. Norton wrote:
You may continue to be snarky
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 04:53:16PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 05:50:34PM -0400, Ian Murdock wrote:
On 5/12/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:05:38AM -0400, Ian Murdock wrote:
On 5/10/07, Frank Van Der Linden [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 06:46:39PM -0400, Ian Murdock wrote:
On 5/13/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 03:01:32PM -0700, MC wrote:
Two things:
Improvement can only take place with change or supplementation. If
something does not improve
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 02:35:49AM -0400, Stefan Teleman wrote:
On Saturday 12 May 2007 17:48, Ceri Davies wrote:
I assume the community reserves its right to reject Project
Indiana?
Ceri
You do not speak for the community. You speak for yourself, and
yourself *only*. You certainly
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 02:52:53AM -0700, Doug Scott wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 02:35:49AM -0400, Stefan
Teleman wrote:
On Saturday 12 May 2007 17:48, Ceri Davies wrote:
I assume the community reserves its right to
reject Project
Indiana?
Ceri
You do
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:37:34AM +0100, a b wrote:
Last time I used tcsh there was no way to do redirection properly, and
therefore it sucked. It did everything else brilliantly, but every now
and then I would find myself needing to redirect something and falling
back to another
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:29:19AM -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
( ( cd /src/dir/ find . -depth -print | cpio
-pvdmu /dst/dir/ ) /tmp/cpio.stdout )
/tmp/cpio.stderr
Ha ha, that's the ugliest thing I ever saw.
The beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder(TM).
The parenthesis in the
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:19:12PM +0100, a b wrote:
Well yes, I can see that, no need to shout. :)
I wasn't shouting, STDOUT and STDERROR are traditionally written in UPPERCASE.
Now I don't wish to be contrary, but even if that were true, the same
cannot be said of the word all.
Ceri
--
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:44:26AM -0400, Bill Rushmore wrote:
There was one bit of news from CommunityOne (i.e. the JavaOne pre-show) that
I thought might have interesting consequences for the OpenSolaris community.
That was the proposal to pay open source developers for their work.
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 03:49:52AM -0700, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Firstly, let me state that upfront that I'm not sure
that I have much
sympathy for the familiarity problem; one problem
for the non-Linux
world is that a large proportion of free software
developers have been
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:35:19PM -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
And usually with Linux. However, Even though I prefer
tcsh, I don't think it's light-years ahead of bash.
I've seen arguments on both sides.
Did you read `tcsh`s man page?
Last time I used tcsh there was no way to do redirection
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:05:38AM -0400, Ian Murdock wrote:
On 5/10/07, Frank Van Der Linden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter C. Norton wrote:
You may continue to be snarky if ls -h became a common solaris
invocation, but I doubt your users would be upset at no longer having
to
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:50:21AM -0400, Ian Murdock wrote:
On 5/10/07, Christopher Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it too much to ask for the community 'behind' the future operating
system to be informed of such decisions? Even proposals??
And that's exactly what you're
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:53:00AM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
Not a grant of copyright, but clause #3 reads:
You hereby grant to Sun, and to any party who receives Your Contribution,
a perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, worldwide, no-charge, royalty-free,
license under any patents
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:27:44PM -0700, Gueven Bay wrote:
http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/-Sun-hopes-for-Linux-like-Solaris/0,130061733,339276057,00.htm
http://news.com.com/Sun+hopes+for+Linux-like+Solaris/2100-1016_3-6182526.html?tag=nefd.lede
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:58:06AM -0700, shay wrote:
Why I cannod download the FCode into the HBA QLA2342
I must download the FCODE qlc23xxFcode1.16 in order to see the Luns from the
PROM.
why?
NOTE : solaris10(11/06), server type V240.
Some outputs :
#luxadm qlgc_s_download
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 06:19:20PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 25/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:43:14PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
Again, I don't agree with your interpretation. However, if you wish to
pursue this further, I suggest
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:25:54PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or move your star tool, which is frankly not nearly as important and
useful a tool, perhaps.
I would encourage you to inform yourself about star. It will be your favorite
tar program
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 03:22:27PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would encourage you to inform yourself about star. It will be your
favorite
tar program after you discovered all the features ;-)
Oh, it's a good tar, don't get me wrong
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:55:55PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 20/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:13:16PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 19/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, and I don't have a problem with that. However, I
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:01:08PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Tom Haynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While doing this is a really good idea, I see potential name conflicts
with older softare.
Since 20..25 years, I create and publish programs like:
smake, star, sformat,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 02:57:09PM -0500, Ted Pogue wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:43:14PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 25/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:55:55PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 20/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:13:16PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:13:16PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 19/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, and I don't have a problem with that. However, I will also
grant an irrevocable license to everyone who receives my contribution
to do whatever they like
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:22:24AM -0400, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 13:23 +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
Am I correct in my interpretation that, had I signed this agreement,
that would include this email? Does mail on an OpenSolaris mailing list
constitute a submission
Section 1 of the Contributor Agreement [1] states:
1. Contribution means any source code, object code, patch, tool,
sample, graphic, specification, manual, documentation, e-mail,
comment, posting, communication or any other material posted or
submitted by You to a Project.
Am I
Dennis,
Hear, hear.
Ceri
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
46 matches
Mail list logo
