I think people are missing the point here. This is just my $0.02, but
the effort is akin to kernel.org. They are maintaining a fully-open
base system in which others may build a distribution from. It is a lot
of userland too, but its most akin to being kernel, libc, and what one
expects in /sbin. T
I also tested a B95 driver that failed, so its likely between B85 and
B95 that things stopped working. Still trying to isolate...
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Joe Little wrote:
> I still end up with the same error:
>
> ifconfig :SIOCSLIFNAME for ip: bge0: Invalid argument
>
>
-i '"pci14e4,1648"' bge
> reboot -- -r
>
> Hopefully it will work for you. Any problem, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Carson
>
>
> Joe Little wrote:
>>
>> I have a supermicro-based motherboard, Supermicro H8DA8/H8DAR, in
>> three
I have a supermicro-based motherboard, Supermicro H8DA8/H8DAR, in
three separate systems with is likely an AMD-8131 chipset. It includes
broadcom gig-e interfaces that worked fine with my B85 and earlier
based opensolaris versioned systems. I moved up to B102, B103, and
B104-based solutions recentl
That would be nexenta
On May 5, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Salokine Terata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you think it's possible one day to have a Debian repository like
> Debian/Linux, Debian/Hurd or Debian/kfreebsd ?
>
> I think it could be intersting to centralize distribution
> proble
Sorry, isnt that nexenta?
On May 5, 2008, at 12:00 PM, "Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Salokine Terata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Do you think it's possible one day to have a Debian repository like
>> Debian/Linux, Debian/Hurd or D
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Mike DeMarco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please note: You will not want to leave zil disabled as this could and would
> lead to nfs client corruption.
>
> Disabling zil for a test will allow you to see if zfs write cache of many
> small files on large FS is caus
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:59 AM, RBell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cant you say the same about opensolaris? Light, slim, fast install, small
> distribution size ++ Headless is not a must for me. I have to admit that I
> like apt-get, but it is not a must either.
>
> I would not oppose to paying
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:34 PM, RBell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've discovered that Nexanta is not an option:
> NexentaStor Developer Edition is time-unlimited and full feature product
> that can be deployed with up to one terabyte of user data.
>
> I plan to use way more than 1TB. (For ins
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Runar Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in need of a NAS at home, I am currently running Linux (ubuntu), but I
> would like to have a look at opensolaris and especially ZFS and Zones. My
> problem is that I don't really know what hardware to buy, sin
If you want just x86, then nexenta as a distro has all necessary
OpenLDAP and various language/db supported packages.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Edwin Goei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In particular, I'm looking for binary packages for an LDAP server that
> runs on opensolaris sparc mainly,
I had 5 quad-opteron celestica grey boxes, and successfully flashed 2.
2 failed and are brinks. The final one I left unflashed to resolve
these issues, and its been as stable as the rest. flasher beware. No
fixing a failed flash with these.
On 10/17/07, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On 6/21/07, Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
when are we gonna see the same ZFS/Boot integrated on OpenSolaris ?
does anyone know ?
well, Nexenta is OpenSolaris, as are other distributions of the
OpenSolaris code drop.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
On 6/7/07, Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Erast Benson wrote:
> Announcing new direction of Open Source NexentaOS development:
> NexentaCP (Nexenta Core Platform).
>
> NexentaCP is Dapper/LTS-based core Operating System Platform distributed
> as a single-CD ISO, integra
On 5/27/07, Ignacio Marambio Catán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/27/07, Brandon Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just heard about http://www.openlina.com/ (as I'm sure many others here
have). Has anyone looked in to getting Solaris on board as well?
>
solaris has branded zones to run nat
On 5/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Back to the main point though: Solaris is (apparently) unable to
>grow RAID-Z arrays. And to be fair, neither can Linux ;)
You can grow a RAID-Z array as long as you just add a new RAID-Z
concatenation; is that not usually what you wan
On 5/20/07, a b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One picks Linux "as the best choice" only if one doesn't know what one is
doing. It is as simple as that.
>
>
>
> This kind of thing is coming across more and more as irrational hatred.
> Take it elsewhere, it's not helpful.
It's not hatred, it's
On 5/14/07, Brian Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I proposed in an earlier thread that there I felt there should be two
products/distros developed within OpenSolaris.org.
- OpenSolaris Enterprise Edition (classic Solaris)
- OpenSolaris Community Edition (swiss army knife distro)
It would be Su
On 3/19/07, David Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason,
> <3rd grade chanting>Packing's gonna get fixed...packaging's gonna get
> fixed...!
Indeed, apt-get for Solaris would be quite useful :P
Isn't that Nexenta? Had to say it.
DSL
___
opensol
On 2/14/07, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-14 09:05]:
> Joe Little wrote:
> >The recent fix-only release of B54 and B55 were a breath of fresh air.
> >We utilize OpenSolaris builds in one fashion or another in produc
On 2/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That sounds like a great idea especially for people who are planning on
>deploying Solaris Nevada or building software solutions out of it. Would
>it be sufficient to have, say, two builds of stabilitzation every 3 months
>or so?
What t
If its every three months, I would sort of want a good solid two or
three weeks of stabilization. However, personally I feel something
closer to every two months. But yes, once per quarter seems to gel
with peoples calendars.
Adam
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:15:56PM -0800, Joe Little wrote:
The recent fix-only release of B54 and B55 were a breath of fresh air.
We utilize OpenSolaris builds in one fashion or another in production
both at Stanford in my role there as well as where I consult for use
in file servers. Again, I look upon recent features, fixes, and I'd
like to jump to newe
Some further joy:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6504404
On 12/20/06, Joe Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/20/06, Joe Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We just put together a new system for ZFS use at a company, and twice
> in one week we've ha
On 12/20/06, Joe Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We just put together a new system for ZFS use at a company, and twice
in one week we've had the system wedge. You can log on, but the zpools
are hosed, and a reboot never occurs if requested since it can't
unmount the zfs vol
We just put together a new system for ZFS use at a company, and twice
in one week we've had the system wedge. You can log on, but the zpools
are hosed, and a reboot never occurs if requested since it can't
unmount the zfs volumes. So, only a power cycle works.
In both cases, we get this:
Dec 20
On 12/1/06, Doug Leavitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Joe,
Thanks for joining the e-mail list and bringing this issue to our
attention.
My suspicion is that the core dumps you might have been seeing previously
might have been one of these:
6482827 nscd dumps core when doing getent passwd in co
I posted the below to the sparks-discuss list but only heard the
crickets chirping. So, I'm hoping the wider audience may be able to
help:
I've joined the sparks list just to bring up the fact that even with
B54, we are seeing major problems with nscd handling ldap requests.
Prior to the sparks i
To my knowledge, mtx and amanda (chg-zd-mtx changer facility, as well as
chg-scsi) use sgen on solaris.
http://www.amanda.org/docs/tapechangers.html
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@o
I am responsible for asking Nexenta about the apparent lack of sgen. I was
surprised that such a standard component wasn't included at this stage. At
issue is that any tape changer management requires this driver. Either we need
to have that a part of ON, or if not, make sure its allowable to pa
30 matches
Mail list logo
