Hi,
I've got exactly the same issue as Jerry, i.e. files created from Windows are
not accessible to local users (I don't have any local users as such but
also access the shares over NFS on other machines).
In additional, any folders/files that were pre-existing on the zfs dataset when
it was
Afshin Salek wrote:
Jerry,
The problem is that none of the ACEs in the parent directory
are inheritable. As I mentioned before, when you create a file
or folder from Windows, you'll get Windows inheritance rules not
Solaris/POSIX rules. In Windows, if a directory's ACL doesn't have any
David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
(truth time: I'm going to be *so* happy when there's a decent ZFS
implementation in Linux and I can ditch this archaic pile of kludges.)
David,
I too am from a linux world, moving to Solaris because of zfs.
Sure - things are different, and some of the default
Orvar Korvar wrote:
I know Solaris 10 is closed source and OpenSolaris is not. I think it will be
hard to review all code and compile it yourself to be sure against back doors.
It seems that NSA has released a Linux distro. Wonder why? ;o)
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/
Point of information:
Hi,
I've got a SXCE b77 install running with a zfs root.
I'd like to upgrade to b78 and I wondered if the live upgrade tools
support using zfs snapshot/clone to create the BE?
Is this possible yet?
Thanks,
R.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
You can use GAIM to log into gtalk.
Thanks, Tirthankar
What do I select as the server - the default is jabber.org, but I
assume I will need to change that to a Google one?
server is talk.google.com
Does this support VIOP or just instant messaging? It looks
Stefan Gaertner wrote:
me too. Need WPA2 AES for wpi, included build 78.
And I'm waiting to see what CIFS support is like in b78 before I install
Samba!
R.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Gaertner wrote:
me too. Need WPA2 AES for wpi, included build 78.
And I'm waiting to see what CIFS support is like in b78 before I install
Samba!
Samba is still installed in b78 also.
s/install/setup/ :p
R.
___
UNIX admin wrote:
This is piece of cake stuff. Normally all of this is set up during
the install, if you chose not to do so, then it's all in all 45
seconds to enter the interace names in /etc/hosts and create the
corresponding /etc/hosname.e1000g[0-n] files. You might be
experiencing a
Al Hopper wrote:
I'm thinking you may have a bad motherboard
Re-evaluate your Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) protection procedures
before you work on the 2nd motherboard.
Al,
The motherboard is fine - I have installed both CentOS5 and run the
Fedora 8 live CD on it.
R.
Robin Bowes wrote:
Al Hopper wrote:
I'm thinking you may have a bad motherboard
Re-evaluate your Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) protection procedures
before you work on the 2nd motherboard.
Al,
The motherboard is fine - I have installed both CentOS5 and run the
Fedora 8 live CD
Has nobody got any idea about this?
R.
Robin Bowes wrote:
Hi,
I've just got a couple of Supermicro PDSME boards to build a couple of
Solaris boxes to use as NAS devices.
These boards have 2 x Intel single-port 82573 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet
Controllers.
I've installed SXCE b77 on one
Jürgen Keil wrote:
Did you try ifconfig -a plumb ?
With Solaris, network interfaces are not shown until
you plumb them...
Jürgen,
Thanks for the reply.
Yes, I tried ifconfig -a plumb. It didn't change anything; I still
just see the two lo0 devices (IPv4 IPv6)
prtconf -pv shows two
Hi,
I've just got a couple of Supermicro PDSME boards to build a couple of
Solaris boxes to use as NAS devices.
These boards have 2 x Intel single-port 82573 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet
Controllers.
I've installed SXCE b77 on one of these boards and no driver seems to be
loaded for these NICs.
14 matches
Mail list logo
