ixed by TT.
The workaround for now is to use QT 4.3.1 which does not have the memleak bug.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
able to
link and use these in-house libraries, and have the expectation that they will
Just Work(TM).
I may run the risk of sounding like a broken record, but, in the world of C++
Compilers, maintaining C++ ABI compatibility across 7 different compiler
releases is a rar
biconv which you downloaded from
Blastwave (and maybe also libintl), by adding this to EXTRA_LIBS in
PHP's Makefile:
-liconv -lintl
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.
QT/Jambi [http://trolltech.com/products/qt/jambi] on Solaris 10 built
with Sun Studio 11 and QT 4.3.0:
http://www.stefanteleman.org/qtjambi/jambisolaris.jpg
And some patches:
http://www.stefanteleman.org/qtjambi/
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Sp
ormally defined. i believe that
allowing an experiment is more valuable than disallowing it because of lack of
due process, missing paperwork or filling in the wrong form.
just my 0.02.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[
anyone else, that authority.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing li
On May 11, 2007 at 1:18 PM UNIX admin wrote:
> Dear Sir,
> if you need to use the `locate` command to find something, you have
> a MUCH bigger problem.
Dude,
This is, SO, like, AWESOME!!!!
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquis
)) would have
been called [21.3.3.13].
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thursday 22 March 2007 18:23, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > The dirfd( ) function may fail if:
> > [EINVAL] The dirp argument does not refer to a valid directory
> > stream.
>
> May is not "must" ;-)
It isn't "can't" or "shouldtn't
Where does the standard disagree ?
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Yes, is will SEGV; is that an issue?
Yes. It can return -1 and set EBADF. This would require that it is a
function, not a macro.
> getc(NULL) also blows up; what is your point?
My point is that it should not SEGV on NULL pointer. It should
return -1 and set EBADF.
--Stefan
--
St
On Thursday 22 March 2007 12:29, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Stefan Teleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 March 2007 10:21, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > But BTW: dirfd() would be just:
> > >
> > > #define dirfd(dp) (dp)->dd_fd
>
On Thursday 22 March 2007 10:21, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> But BTW: dirfd() would be just:
>
> #define dirfd(dp) (dp)->dd_fd
This works really well when (dp) is NULL.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inq
for module
porting and regression testing, is the possibility described above an acceptable
risk ?
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
, for example, svc:/network/http:apache2.2.
Yes, the svc manifest names will be preserved.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
he "f" files that the vendor - for example, Sun - delivers) and we're
not talking about overwriting the configuration files (the so-called
"e" files). Is that correct?
Correct. Existing configuration files will *not* be overwritten.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Micro
actual binaries [/{usr,opt}/apache2]:
/etc/apache2
/var/apache2
These additional two locations *must* exist.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ls in /usr/apache2.2, thereby preserving the existing /usr/apache2.
However, this alternate location would *not* alter the EOF/EOL timeout announced
for Apache 2.0.x.
What are the community's views on this ?
Thank you.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL
uot; refers to.
In this particular case "we" referes to yours truly. I was using the
Royal "We". :-)
Yes, maintaining security patches for PHP is an extremely high maintenance job.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 02:07, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> On Monday 19 March 2007 07:37 pm, Stefan Teleman wrote:
> > http://www.php-security.org/
>
> This is scary...I think I'll go get a cold shower...;-)
>
> I have to wonder, much of the online forum software is written i
ese tools. However, that must be tempered
> with the requirement of stability and security.
http://www.php-security.org/
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.
he
announcement on my blog (http://ianmurdock.com/2007/03/19/joining-sun/),
and it'll likely be making the rounds soon. Just wanted to
make sure you heard the news directly from me and to introduce myself.
Cool. Very cool.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Te
erface-taxonomy/
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
utions/solaris/index-all.html
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 12:04, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> what it if it a non code project ? Not all projects should be
> required to be code based.
Granted, but i'm assuming that 6 months from inception, a project
should show some signs of activity of some sort. :-)
--Stefan
t;y-logic-of-binary-sys-04.txt
Maybe we could enforce some kind of automatic self-destruct timer from
the date of project inception. For example, if a project doesn't
check in any code within 6 months of inception, it self-destructs.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'No
On 2/6/07, Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry - I've never used Opera and don't know what it does.
One thing it *doesn't* do is to bloat Xorg to 684MB in 24 hours.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE
ating
system might even become very successful, and might even "steal
momentum from OpenSolaris". And this was done exclusively under CDDL.
What does this have to do with the GPL ?
For the record: Yes, i am a card carrying member of the Free Software
Foundation
ry focus at first will be to remove libc_i18n.a, and
> that must be integrated without delay, but ultimately I'd like for
> closed bins to disappear completely.
+1.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inqui
with an opinion to voice it sooner rather than later.
+1 from me to dual license under GPLv3, with, or without, the CDDL
assembly exception.
the only material downside that i can think of is not to dual-license.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
rrentItem6M_nJQdDTextItem__ == QTextItem
QTextLayout::currentItem()
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/opt/qt-3.3.7-32/lib][01/19/2007 9:26:03][86]>>
c++filt says:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/19/2007 9:29:46][108]>> c++filt
__1cLQdDTextLayoutLcurrentItem6M_nJQdDTextItem__
__1cLQdDTextLayoutLcurrentItem
On Thursday 18 January 2007 19:02, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Martin Bochnig wrote: (MB)
>
> Stefan Teleman wrote: (ST)
>
> ST>>At most, you can say that the intersection between KDE e.V. and
> ST>>OpenSolaris is not the Null Set, since it contains at least one
> k
ou don't need to separate them, because you
can't mix them in the first place.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
re is a KDE 3.5.x series which has many
improvements over KDE 3.4.x. That IMHO would be worth having in
OpenSolaris (plus the starting point for the KDE 3.5.x work can be
KDE 3.4.x, while KDE4 is completely new).
Otherwise, no objections here.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 01:03, John Plocher wrote:
> Stefan Teleman wrote:
> > There is currently no place where "Things that align well with
> > the kernel and/or the core utilities, that demand or require
> > tight integration" can happen for KDE Solaris,
>
E on
OpenSolaris, not KDE on OpenVMS.
I am quite a bit surprised at the comparison between KDE and
OpenOffice, or Java, mostly because it is very unclear to me what
exactly is being compared here. I think it would be useful to
determine whether a comp
gt; once: YOU
At most, you can say that the intersection between KDE e.V. and
OpenSolaris is not the Null Set, since it contains at least one known
element. :-)
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.
OpenSolaris
OpenSolaris Project != OpenSolaris Community
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:56, John Sonnenschein wrote:
> Following the official proposal guidelines, I'd like to take this
> opportunity to propose that we collaborate with the KDE e.V. and
> kde-core-devel in order to integrate KDE as an OpenSolaris project
+1.
--Stefan
--
War(TM), i am questioning the "Blindly trying to follow
Linux" statement, given Mr. Torvalds' publicly expressed views on
GPLv3.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:24, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2084284,00.asp?kc=EWEWEMNL0115
>07EP28A
>
> ( Sun to License OpenSolaris Under GPLv3)
+1.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inq
thz.ch/linux/webcam.html
I found the information about the Linux pwc driver by searching for
'SuSE 10 Philips webcam' in Google. Finding this information is not an
obscure and tedious task.
I do not understand the purpose of these endless GPL-vs-CDDL
flamewars. Even less so when fact
nd only secondarily on the collective set of irrational instincts we
might be sharing with our primate acestors.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
quot;. it only succeeded at making
the t-rex "worse".
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
. You (and your customers) pay through
the nose later.
exaclty. so then back to my original question: why start off the Power
PC Solaris port with an already obsolete (and not open source) Korn
Shell ?
i have no personal emotional attachment to the Korn Shell, i use the T-Shell.
--Stefan
--
ese extensions, which compiles, links and
runs on Xorg x86/x64 does not compile or link (never mind run) on Xsun
SPARC, because the header files are missing.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
6/x64 will not compile and link on
Solaris 10 Xsun SPARC because Solaris 10 Xsun SPARC is a very
different beast than Solaris 10 Xorg x86/x64). I haven't heard of too
many people willingly running Xsun on x86/x64 for compatibility's sake
either -- compatibility in this particular case me
ugh to meet the companion CD projects requirements,
but still used by many people.
I am a bit confused about the necessity of creating a new OpenSolaris
project which states from the outset that it will be in conflict with
an existing OpenSolaris proj
at many available protocols when designing Skype
and none were good enough for us. We hope you agree!
if Sun can open source Solaris then whats the issue with these people ?
They don't want to open source it and they don't use SIP.
--Stef
cation.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
rk.
>From the information I have, the final decision must have been made recently.
Noone from OFD Niedersachsen has contacted KDE Solaris to at least ask
a generic question about whether or not KDE is supported on Solaris
X86.
--Stefan
--
On 5/29/06, Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 12:51 -0400, Stefan Teleman wrote:
> On 5/29/06, Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > But I'm asking how to make Sun C compiler do what I want?
>
> The compiler is doing
On 5/29/06, Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But I'm asking how to make Sun C compiler do what I want?
The compiler is doing what you want, within the limits of it being
explicitly allowed to ignore what you want. :-)
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAI
. Your software
subscribes to the Jack API, and Jack Audio takes care of the rest.
This translates into your software having cleaner, and more
maintainable code.
In OO-land, this is called encapsulation and polymorphism.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
d Rosegarden has builtin support for Jack audio.
stay tuned. :-)
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
engine.o"
More of crappy Linux software. Why can't they do some QA on their stuff?
There is no Solaris driver for Jack anyway. Yet. ;-)
And Jack is really not crappy at all. The design is actually quite
clean and elegant. it is based on operating system specific loadable
modules.
Hi.
Forwarded-From: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solaris&m=114583439110822&w=2
This patch installs kdiff3 for KDE 3.4.3.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi.
Forwarded-From: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solaris&m=114564061403078&w=2
This is a thread concurrency/deadlock fix for AmaroK 1.3.5.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
s he attacking his own distro ? :-)
SuSE usually gets very high marks for their desktop, they do a very nice job.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi.
Forwarded-From: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solaris&m=114513575122100&w=2
This is a very important patch set.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
hoice questionnaire, for your
convenience.
Please select only one answer to the following question:
Are you willing to support the Companion CD Project as proposed by
Keith Wesolowski:
0. Yes [ ]
1. No [ ]
Thank you.
Stefan Teleman
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ming Server
(
)
will form the basis for the Streaming Server project.
I would be very interested in working on this project.--Stefan-- Stefan Teleman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
s thread concurrency problems in amaroK 1.3.5.
These two patches are available for both IA32AMD32 and UltraSPARC-II.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
instead of raw ioctl(2)'s.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 2/15/06, Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 February 2006 07:14 pm, Stefan Teleman wrote:
> > Forwarded-From: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solaris&m=113997299912587&w=2
> >
> > This patch adds Xine playback support for Microsoft Windows *.
Forwarded-From: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solaris&m=113997299912587&w=2
This patch adds Xine playback support for Microsoft Windows *.avi and
*.wmv files.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
ope
marked private.
it is true that it's not very difficult to guess the functions and
their usage from the header files. but i thought, since many of us
already do this, why not do it openly ?
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
openso
UNSTUDIO10/IA32AMD32/PATCHES.BINARIES/
http://ftp.tiscali.nl/kde/stable/3.4.3/SOLARIS/SUNSTUDIO10/IA32AMD32/PATCHES.BINARIES/
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Forwarded-From: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solaris&m=113928171511102&w=2
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solaris&m=113877382526587&w=2
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the
KDE Security Advisory 20051207-1, and subsequent updates at:
http://www.kde.org/info/security/advisory-20051207-2.txt
I strongly recommend applying this patch at your earliest convenience.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris
On 1/16/06, Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 01:21 -0500, Stefan Teleman wrote:
> > The entire source code tree for the KDE 3.4.3 port is now available
> > for download from Sunfreeware and its mirrors:
> >
> > http://www.sunfreeware
the linking with non-GPL
code restrictions from GPL v2 have been removed.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
K3B will follow very soon.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sun cdrw.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
x27; and build KDE on their own. my participation in this
collective exercise is neither required, nor necessary.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> I would be very careful using any optimization that sets the -fns on
> Sun Studio, as I've seen significant differences in results when
> enabling this. For that matter, -ffast-math has a similar effect with
> gcc.
No such optimization is involved, because no such flags are passed.
This is pure
significantly
_slower_ code than other options (which require more work because they
need to be written out).
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
d EDG compilers in the mix, let's see what comes
out.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ode which compiles, won't work, because the code depends on
some packing and alignment peculiarities of GCC.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
, with SunStudio,
and let us know how the linking goes. :-)
2. Try building libmad, libxine or liba52dec (which are written in C)
with SunStudio, and let us know the results.
3. Hint: The C++ Standard (ISO/IEC 14882:2003) does not contain a
single instance of the following
and SunStudio do not get along at all. And sometimes not
in C either.
Happy New Year.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 12/28/05, Paul Gress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The XComposite is an Xorg library. Shouldn't this be Sun's
> responsibility to add. Are they going to have it in Xorg 6.9?
i really don't know. maybe AlanC could shed some light on this when he
gets back from vac
ompmgr requires XComposite. i have
built XComposite on
my own (from the Xorg sources), but it is extremely unstable and i
decided against releasing it, since it would have been of very little
use anyway.
the situation is identical on SPARC.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[
with the correct Companion CD RPATH
3. testing thoroughly 2(a) and 2(b).
As soon as we figure these out, we can have a more precise timeline.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Many Thank You's to Steve Christensen for making KDE 3.4.3 available
at Sun Freeware and its mirrors:
http://www.sunfreeware.com/
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi.
i upgraded K3B to version 0.12.10 (IA32 and SPARC):
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solaris&m=113547539525248&w=2
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
are packages have functioned with this
model for a very long time.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> I can easily sit here and ask where else can I find Scribus or FlightGear
> (not to get too far off topic) other than Blastwave?!?
Scribus for Solaris has been available at KDE since early 2004 and KDE 3.3.1
--Stefan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
On 12/22/05, Stefan Teleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A bit of news: i have been working with Steve Christensen , and i am
> very happy to let everyone know that KDE will be available on the
> Companion CD.
we would very much need, and welcome community input on the Companion
gt; will be launched on opensolaris.org sometime in Q1 '06.
Hi.
Sorry for replying at random -- first, thank you for the very kind words.
A bit of news: i have been working with Steve Christensen , and i am
very happy to let everyone know that KDE will be available on the
Companion CD.
--Stef
On 12/21/05, Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Teleman wrote:
>
> >On 12/21/05, Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes I remember that well and as you say, nothing has happened in the
> interim.
>
> So, how can we move forward? Any co
was
solaris.kde.org. (a.k.a. yours truly).
Blastwave chose to stay silent.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
d innovation. Openness,
honesty and fair play carry a responsibility on the part of those
involved in free software: one must be willing to take a back seat in
this show, because the show is not about particular distributions, or
individuals, but about freedom, innovation and creativity.
--Stefa
opinion. I can explain these reasons upon
request.
> If this were to happen, I think you KDE would become more popular.
KDE is doing quite well on its own merits, with, or without Blastwave.
Stefan Teleman
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
o
On 12/21/05, Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be possible to base your KDE build on Blastwave libraries?
No.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
not improve. KDE can be downloaded right now off the 'Net, in
its various shapes, forms and incarnations.
having a real, collaborative engineering effort at OpenSolaris does
not formally imply product support from Sun.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DS within Sun and KDE
outside Sun.
Having BOTH means giving users (actual and potential) a choice.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 12/19/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How many catholics will avoid to use the pill just because the pope
> recommends not to use it?
i don't use the pill and i am catholic. is that bad ?
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
eryone played by the
> rules and followed proper procurement directives, GNOME would have a
> decent chance of winning government desktops.
Are you actually trying to publicly suggest that GNOME/JDS has not
succeeded because of unfair competitive practices by KDE e.V. ????
Stefan Teleman
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
