Roland Mainz wrote:
As I said... if dtksh cannot be fixed using an upgrade it should be
removed ASAP.
dtksh is actually one of the parts of CDE identified during the
currently ongoing CDE EOF process as forming part of the public/stable
API/ABI of CDE, since we know third party scripts have
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Roland Mainz wrote:
Hi!
General note: The email below contains some of the old history of dtksh
in Solaris and some background why the ksh93-integration project was
created. I would prefer to take this as a page in a history book and
_not_ as opportunity to come up
Would Sun
adopt that version? I have no clue.
As I said... if dtksh cannot be fixed using an upgrade it should be
removed ASAP.
I'd be interested to play with this, I think this kind of thing can be a
really neat and powerful tool, i've used xdialog in the past, which did
an ok job, i'm
On 2/16/07, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Girts Zeltins wrote:
Sorry, but I am talking again about CDE.
I want to know if founded CDE errors will be reported to bug database, will
they be fixed? Is there any chance to see them fixed?
If they are serious bugs, then they may be
Josh Hurst wrote:
On 2/16/07, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Girts Zeltins wrote:
Sorry, but I am talking again about CDE.
I want to know if founded CDE errors will be reported to bug
database, will they be fixed? Is there any chance to see them fixed?
If they are serious bugs,
On 2/23/07, Ghee Teo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:
On 2/16/07, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Girts Zeltins wrote:
Sorry, but I am talking again about CDE.
I want to know if founded CDE errors will be reported to bug
database, will they be fixed? Is there any
Josh Hurst wrote:
On 2/23/07, Ghee Teo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:
On 2/16/07, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Girts Zeltins wrote:
Sorry, but I am talking again about CDE.
I want to know if founded CDE errors will be reported to bug
database, will they be fixed?
Josh Hurst wrote:
WIll Sun FIX dtksh? Both experts in this field - David Korn and Roland
Mainz have complained about dtksh being utterly broken because Sun
used an unofficial alpha code as ksh basis.
It depends on how you define broken. Trying to be precise, several
potential definitions of
Josh Hurst wrote:
WIll Sun FIX dtksh?
If customers escalate bugs, yes. I know it annoys Roland, but
there aren't actually a whole lot of dtksh users out there reporting
bugs on it.
Both experts in this field - David Korn and Roland
Mainz have complained about dtksh being utterly broken
Hi!
General note: The email below contains some of the old history of dtksh
in Solaris and some background why the ksh93-integration project was
created. I would prefer to take this as a page in a history book and
_not_ as opportunity to come up with the old flamewars about dtksh,
support
Girts Zeltins writes:
Sorry, but I am talking again about CDE.
I want to know if founded CDE errors will be reported to bug database, will
they be fixed? Is there any chance to see them fixed?
CDE is still a supported part of the system.
At second I plan soon to write letter to OpenGroup
Girts Zeltins wrote:
Sorry, but I am talking again about CDE.
I want to know if founded CDE errors will be reported to bug database, will
they be fixed? Is there any chance to see them fixed?
If they are serious bugs, then they may be fixed. Low priority (P4 P5)
bugs aren't being worked on
Hello,
Sorry, but I am talking again about CDE.
I want to know if founded CDE errors will be reported to bug database, will
they be fixed? Is there any chance to see them fixed?
At second I plan soon to write letter to OpenGroup and talk about faster CDE
open sourcing.
Best Regards,
Girts
13 matches
Mail list logo
