On 4/12/06, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So why not have /export/zfs_0/
/export/zfs_0/jumpstart
/export/zfs_0/jumpstart/s10
/export/zfs_0/jumpstart/s10/SXCRb35
all as separate ZFS filesystems, they are cheap after all :-)
It is
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:41:21PM +0200, Holger Berger wrote:
It is still a bug which should be fixed. The requirement that only the
base of a ZFS file system can be shared is a serious limitation which
will hamper or even prevent deployment of ZFS at large sites.
I haven't quite grokked
Dennis Clarke wrote:
What the heck is that /export/zfs_0 is already shared. ??
No its not.
So I setup the share manually in /etc/dfs/dfstab thus :
# vi /etc/dfs/dfstab
/etc/dfs/dfstab 1 lines, 97 characters
share -F nfs -o ro=isis,root=isis -d jumpstart
/export/zfs_0/jumpstart/s10/SXCRb35
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 14:01, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I like to perform little experiments. Its my nature.
...
So I wondered to myself .. just how small a footprint can SXCR have?
I know that Eric Bootilier did some interesting work with the reduced core
install cluster and I was thinking of
