Hey,
Stephen Hahn wrote:
> Core Contributors, the only voting member class, are proposed by each
> Community Group. As such, Community Groups like Marketing are
> permitted (and expected) to have different criteria
Sorry to be devil's advocate here, but is that really such a good thing? Wh
Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Ghee Teo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-12 13:16]:
Simon Phipps wrote:
I'd suggest that, as we have a member-based system emerging right now,
maybe we should have a list as Roy suggests that's writable only by
Core Contributors (readable by all). Time for an "openso
* Ghee Teo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-12 13:16]:
> Simon Phipps wrote:
> >I'd suggest that, as we have a member-based system emerging right now,
> >maybe we should have a list as Roy suggests that's writable only by
> >Core Contributors (readable by all). Time for an "opensolaris-core"
> >list
Simon Phipps wrote:
I'd suggest that, as we have a member-based system emerging right now,
maybe we should have a list as Roy suggests that's writable only by
Core Contributors (readable by all). Time for an "opensolaris-core"
list perhaps, a place for substantive discussion of issues facing th
Bill Rushmore wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Feb 11, 2007, at 13:28, Bill Rushmore wrote:
I totally agree Giacomo. As much as I have tried, I just can't
interested in the licensing discussions. As someone who wants to use
the fruits of OpenSolaris for my own use and to make a living writing
On Feb 12, 2007, at 05:58, Bill Rushmore wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Feb 11, 2007, at 13:28, Bill Rushmore wrote:
I totally agree Giacomo. As much as I have tried, I just can't
interested in the licensing discussions. As someone who wants to
use the fruits of OpenSolaris for my own u
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Feb 11, 2007, at 13:28, Bill Rushmore wrote:
I totally agree Giacomo. As much as I have tried, I just can't
interested in the licensing discussions. As someone who wants to use
the fruits of OpenSolaris for my own use and to make a living writing
software for the pla
On Feb 11, 2007, at 13:28, Bill Rushmore wrote:
I totally agree Giacomo. As much as I have tried, I just can't
interested in the licensing discussions. As someone who wants to
use the fruits of OpenSolaris for my own use and to make a living
writing software for the platform the differen
De Togni Giacomo wrote:
[i]The discussion should be held
in the widest possible forum, which to me looks like
opensolaris-discuss[/i]
Good for widest possible forum but if generic (like opensolaris-discuss) it
could be problematic.The licenses issues are not generic but specific
issues.So,a sp
