I'm using b134/32-bit OSOL
I tried to follow this procedure to upgrade to b142; everything seemed to go
through OK but at the end I got this:
PHASEACTIONS
Removal Phase 54/54
DOWNLOAD PKGS
Hernan Saltiel wrote:
> Thanks to Rich Lowe, I know what I did in the wrong way.
> Here is what needs to be done in order to have a working onnv_142
> OpenSolaris:
>
> a) Install OpenSolaris snv_134 (this is my case only).
>
> b) Create a directory where to put the untar'ed, unbzip2'ed binaries:
>
Hi!
After Brandon and some other mails, I perfomed some tests to check how to
deal with this upgrade to onnv_142.
Here is what happened:
Test scenario:
A machine running snv_133 receives onnv_142 bits.
After that, snv_134 is available, causing the user to upgrade to that bits.
- Check how to dea
So there is no direct way of updating this from 2009.06, you have to have b134
installed first?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Hernan Saltiel wrote:
> This will (maybe) reproduce the expected behaviour when ZFS and ZPOOL
> upgrades with new official bits.
It's also the point of using a boot environment, however upgrading the
zpool or zfs version will render the pool unreadable to the old
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Brandon High wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:57 AM, ken mays wrote:
> > You don't need snv_b134 anymore and you can update other areas as you see
> fit.
>
> I'd recommend not upgrading your zfs and zpool versions and keeping
> your b134 boot environment aroun
On 21/06/2010 07:15, Hernan Saltiel wrote:
Thanks to Rich Lowe, I know what I did in the wrong way.
Here is what needs to be done in order to have a working onnv_142
OpenSolaris:
a) Install OpenSolaris snv_134 (this is my case only).
b) Create a directory where to put the untar'ed, unbzip2'e
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:57 AM, ken mays wrote:
> You don't need snv_b134 anymore and you can update other areas as you see fit.
I'd recommend not upgrading your zfs and zpool versions and keeping
your b134 boot environment around to make sure you can update to the
next official OpenSolaris rele
date other areas as you see fit.
~ Ken Mays
--- On Mon, 6/21/10, Bruno Sousa wrote:
From: Bruno Sousa
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SNV_142 Test DVD & Blastwave's AMP stack
To: "Hernan Saltiel"
Cc: "Ken Mays" , opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Date: Mon
Hi,
thank you for the walkthrough. I've a couple of questions.
Can you give me a diskspace requirement summary? How much do the various stages
cost in terms of disk space? And can certain parts be placed on another pool?
My boot devices are very small, 18GB, so diskspace is a scarce resource.
E
Hi Hernan,my friend!
Thanks noticing!we're looking forward to seeing new official release and
development release from new 'Oracle'.
but we have a 'bit' heard new one.but since Oracle and Sun merger,we
haven't seen on their website.
I will try soon if I have a time and hope Oracle would conti
Hi Hernan,
Thanks for the tip!
P.S Any "noticeable" changes in snv_142 ?
On 21-6-2010 8:44, Hernan Saltiel wrote:
> Hi, Bruno!
> Yes, I booted again into snv_134, and then back into onnv_142.
> Take special care to the instructions about "image-update"!!!
> If you want to see this command list i
Hi, Bruno!
Yes, I booted again into snv_134, and then back into onnv_142.
Take special care to the instructions about "image-update"!!!
If you want to see this command list in Spanish, go to AOSUG web site -
HowTos section: http://www.aosug.com.ar/?q=node/40 .
Thanks to all!!!
Best regards,
HeCSa.
Hi,
Thanks to all that made this really nice howto.
BTW, after this procedure is it still possible to boot into snv_134
environment, i.e will the grub.conf be updated to have have snv_134 and
snv_142 boot entries?
Thanks,
Bruno
On 21-6-2010 8:15, Hernan Saltiel wrote:
> Thanks to Rich Lowe, I k
Thanks to Rich Lowe, I know what I did in the wrong way.
Here is what needs to be done in order to have a working onnv_142
OpenSolaris:
a) Install OpenSolaris snv_134 (this is my case only).
b) Create a directory where to put the untar'ed, unbzip2'ed binaries:
1) mkdir -p /export/repo
c) Unta
Hi, Ken!
I didn't BFU'ed since first OpenSolaris 2008.05 appeared.
Taking a look to the README you posted, it seems that if I want to upgrade
from snv_134 to 142 I need to:
a) Create a new Boot Environment and boot into it:
1) beadm create new134
2) beadm activate new134
3) poweroff and b
Basically, you can recreate the test DVD based on OSOL-DEV-134 and initial work
based on enhancements from:
1. Nexenta Core v3.0rc1 CD (initial work on that platform):
http://www.nexenta.org/projects/site/wiki/DownloadUnstable
http://www.genunix.org/dist/nexenta/nexenta-core-platform_3.0-b134-rc1
Working on packages for compatible OSOL 2010.DEV-based distros.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
IS it publicly available? Where can we get the DVD from?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello,
I've been working on an updated core test DVD release of an ' ON SNV_142
consolidation' based on the work of Blastwave.org Inc and a few partners.
Changes for BETA1 include:
* Currently based on ON b142+.
* IPS 134 support
Summary of New Features
---
* Ful
20 matches
Mail list logo
