Along those lines, here's a more direct link that discusses what Zulu is:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=44918
And, the PSARC case:
Zones Features For Zulu
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2006/387/
Mike
Alan Hargreaves wrote:
It does make y
Roland Mainz wrote:
James Carlson wrote:
[snip]
What exactly are you looking for here? The project name (it's "Zulu,"
if that helps)?
You now got my full attention... :-)
... is this for the "ZULU" framebuffer (= XVR-4000) ? If "yes" I would
be VERY interested about the details...
No, diffe
James Carlson wrote:
I don't agree that the original response was quite that vague, but in
fact the answer itself is awfully short: someone just made a simple
mistake. It wasn't a complicated problem, so there really aren't any
details to hold back, or to explain. Just "oops."
I think the onl
Richard Lowe writes:
> > What exactly are you looking for here? The project name (it's "Zulu,"
> > if that helps)?
> >
>
> Yes, that does help, but only because it's then possible to infer
> exactly what is being talked about.
>
> Just a black box 'something went wrong, somewhere' really tells
James Carlson wrote:
> Glynn Foster writes:
>>> What exactly are you looking for here? The project name (it's "Zulu,"
>>> if that helps)?
>> Because it makes people [non-Sun, non-ON, whatever] feel like they're part of
>> something rather than the monkeys they currently feel because there's a
>>
>
>
> James Carlson wrote:
>> Roland Mainz writes:
>>> Karyn Ritter wrote:
Build 51 is being respun, so the build won't be available on
opensolaris.org by Friday (Nov. 3) as normally planned. The SX program
manager believes this will be available by Nov. 6 or 7.
>>> What exactly wen
It does make you wonder how curious some folks *actually* are. Obviously
not sufficiently so to do something simple like a google search with the
following terms:
site:www.opensolaris.org zulu
alan.
Glynn Foster wrote:
James Carlson wrote:
Glynn Foster writes:
delivered project we
Roland Mainz writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
> [snip]
> > What exactly are you looking for here? The project name (it's "Zulu,"
> > if that helps)?
>
> You now got my full attention... :-)
> ... is this for the "ZULU" framebuffer (= XVR-4000) ? If "yes" I would
> be VERY interested about the detai
Glynn Foster writes:
> > What exactly are you looking for here? The project name (it's "Zulu,"
> > if that helps)?
>
> Because it makes people [non-Sun, non-ON, whatever] feel like they're part of
> something rather than the monkeys they currently feel because there's a
> blindfold around them at
James Carlson wrote:
Glynn Foster writes:
delivered project were accidentally sent to the consolidation, and
overwrote the correct packages already there. It results in upgrade
failures.
Hrm, from one vague message to another. Any chance of being just a little bit
more open in sake of creating
James Carlson wrote:
[snip]
> What exactly are you looking for here? The project name (it's "Zulu,"
> if that helps)?
You now got my full attention... :-)
... is this for the "ZULU" framebuffer (= XVR-4000) ? If "yes" I would
be VERY interested about the details...
Bye,
Roland
--
__ .
James Carlson wrote:
> Glynn Foster writes:
>>> delivered project were accidentally sent to the consolidation, and
>>> overwrote the correct packages already there. It results in upgrade
>>> failures.
>> Hrm, from one vague message to another. Any chance of being just a little bit
>> more open i
Glynn Foster writes:
> > delivered project were accidentally sent to the consolidation, and
> > overwrote the correct packages already there. It results in upgrade
> > failures.
>
> Hrm, from one vague message to another. Any chance of being just a little bit
> more open in sake of creating a bet
James Carlson wrote:
> Roland Mainz writes:
>> Karyn Ritter wrote:
>>> Build 51 is being respun, so the build won't be available on
>>> opensolaris.org by Friday (Nov. 3) as normally planned. The SX program
>>> manager believes this will be available by Nov. 6 or 7.
>> What exactly went wrong ? D
> "Roland" == Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Build 51 is being respun, so the build won't be available on
>> opensolaris.org by Friday (Nov. 3) as normally planned. The SX
>> program manager believes this will be available by Nov. 6 or 7.
Roland> What exactly went wrong ? Does th
Roland Mainz writes:
> Karyn Ritter wrote:
> >
> > Build 51 is being respun, so the build won't be available on
> > opensolaris.org by Friday (Nov. 3) as normally planned. The SX program
> > manager believes this will be available by Nov. 6 or 7.
>
> What exactly went wrong ? Does the OS/Net sour
Karyn Ritter wrote:
>
> Build 51 is being respun, so the build won't be available on
> opensolaris.org by Friday (Nov. 3) as normally planned. The SX program
> manager believes this will be available by Nov. 6 or 7.
What exactly went wrong ? Does the OS/Net source tarball need to be
updated ?
--
Build 51 is being respun, so the build won't be available on
opensolaris.org by Friday (Nov. 3) as normally planned. The SX program
manager believes this will be available by Nov. 6 or 7.
Apologies for the inconvenience.
Thanks,
Karyn
___
opensolar
18 matches
Mail list logo
