Re: [osol-discuss] syslog-ng?

2010-04-01 Thread dmpk2k
It would be nice if something was done about the current syslog. The last time I used it for centralized logging, things didn't quite turn out like I hoped. Solaris' syslog is limited, delicate, and only supports UDP. Also, I found a bug where the workaround was in an email from 1994 or 1996. O

Re: [osol-discuss] syslog-ng?

2010-03-31 Thread Casper . Dik
>casper@sun.com wrote: >> Clearly syslog-ng needs to be able to pick up such messages *and* create a >> door where it can say "yes, I'm still running". > >Wouldn't it be better to use SMF for that now instead of a custom door >solution for just that one service? Considering that we need to c

Re: [osol-discuss] syslog-ng?

2010-03-31 Thread Alan Coopersmith
casper@sun.com wrote: > Clearly syslog-ng needs to be able to pick up such messages *and* create a > door where it can say "yes, I'm still running". Wouldn't it be better to use SMF for that now instead of a custom door solution for just that one service? -- -Alan Coopersmith-

Re: [osol-discuss] syslog-ng?

2010-03-31 Thread Casper . Dik
>Saw someone in opensolaris-help having trouble building syslog-ng, >and it got me to wondering why that hasn't been integrated (perhaps >with any changes needed to support doors rather than a Unix domain >socket for local communication). > >AFAIK, the existing syslog has a lot less functionality.

[osol-discuss] syslog-ng?

2010-03-31 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
Saw someone in opensolaris-help having trouble building syslog-ng, and it got me to wondering why that hasn't been integrated (perhaps with any changes needed to support doors rather than a Unix domain socket for local communication). AFAIK, the existing syslog has a lot less functionality. Aside

Re: [osol-discuss] Syslog-ng?

2010-01-05 Thread Predrag Zecevic
I was able to compile and install it using http://pkgbuild.sourceforge.net/ a) Install SFE environment and build pkgtool and cd /path/to/build/of/packages/spec-files-extra.2009116 b) pkgtool build-only --svr4 --download --autodeps --interactive SFEeventlog.spec (build-only, because installation

Re: [osol-discuss] Syslog-ng?

2009-12-07 Thread Rob McMahon
On 07/12/2009 14:34, Eugene Vilensky wrote: Hi, Is syslog-ng available for OpenSolaris, through IPS or otherwise? If I were to build it, is there an "easy" metapackage for the build system, maybe analogous to Red Hat's rpmbuild+dependencies or Debian's "build-essential" metapackage? I'm ru

Re: [osol-discuss] Syslog-ng?

2009-12-07 Thread Casper . Dik
>> Solaris Syslog doesn't log using a door. >> >> Solaris logs on "/dev/conslog" but uses the door only >> to determine if the >> syslogd is running. >> >> Casper > >I always wondered at the sanity of using a door for this purpose. My biggest problem with the code is that syslogd_ok() is alwa

Re: [osol-discuss] Syslog-ng?

2009-12-07 Thread Gary Gendel
> > >On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Eugene Vilensky > = > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> Is syslog-ng available for OpenSolaris, through > IPS or otherwise? = > >=A0If > >> I were to build it, is there an "easy" metapackage > for the build > >> system, maybe analogous to Red Hat's > rpmbuild+dependencies

Re: [osol-discuss] Syslog-ng?

2009-12-07 Thread Casper . Dik
>On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Eugene Vilensky = > wrote: >> Hi, >> Is syslog-ng available for OpenSolaris, through IPS or otherwise? = >=A0If >> I were to build it, is there an "easy" metapackage for the build >> system, maybe analogous to Red Hat's rpmbuild+dependencies or Debia= >n's >> "buil

Re: [osol-discuss] Syslog-ng?

2009-12-07 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Eugene Vilensky wrote: > Hi, > Is syslog-ng available for OpenSolaris, through IPS or otherwise?  If > I were to build it, is there an "easy" metapackage for the build > system, maybe analogous to Red Hat's rpmbuild+dependencies or Debian's > "build-essential" metap

[osol-discuss] Syslog-ng?

2009-12-07 Thread Eugene Vilensky
Hi, Is syslog-ng available for OpenSolaris, through IPS or otherwise? If I were to build it, is there an "easy" metapackage for the build system, maybe analogous to Red Hat's rpmbuild+dependencies or Debian's "build-essential" metapackage? Thanks! -Eugene