Re: [osol-discuss] Will KDE4 .spec files be merged / contributed to SFE as well?

2008-01-24 Thread Glynn Foster
Hey, Alan DuBoff wrote: > Not directly related, but what is Indiana's plans for sparc? > > I notice that most communities are not focused on or working on sparc, > and as such, much of it doesn't have support. > > I know that we do plans to have a working KDE for sparc, but Xorg, as an > example

Re: [osol-discuss] Will KDE4 .spec files be merged / contributed to SFE as well?

2008-01-24 Thread Glynn Foster
Hey, Alan DuBoff wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Glynn Foster wrote: > >> While GNOME may end up being the default desktop, absolutely no reason >> why KDE packages should be a single pkg install away. Choice is good - >> even for derivative distributions where KDE is that default desktop. > > Oh,

Re: [osol-discuss] Will KDE4 .spec files be merged / contributed to SFE as well?

2008-01-24 Thread Alan DuBoff
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Glynn Foster wrote: > While GNOME may end up being the default desktop, absolutely no reason > why KDE packages should be a single pkg install away. Choice is good - > even for derivative distributions where KDE is that default desktop. Glynn, Not directly related, but wha

Re: [osol-discuss] Will KDE4 .spec files be merged / contributed to SFE as well?

2008-01-24 Thread Alan DuBoff
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Glynn Foster wrote: > While GNOME may end up being the default desktop, absolutely no reason > why KDE packages should be a single pkg install away. Choice is good - > even for derivative distributions where KDE is that default desktop. Oh, I agree with you 100%, but just s

Re: [osol-discuss] Will KDE4 .spec files be merged / contributed to SFE as well?

2008-01-24 Thread Glynn Foster
Alan DuBoff wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Glynn Foster wrote: > >> I agree it would be *awesome* to see - but anything that makes it >> easier to get KDE for Indiana or any of the other distributions gets >> my vote. > > That seems to be a surprise, not long ago I remember hearing that > Indian

Re: [osol-discuss] Will KDE4 .spec files be merged / contributed to SFE as well?

2008-01-24 Thread Alan DuBoff
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Glynn Foster wrote: > I agree it would be *awesome* to see - but anything that makes it easier > to get KDE for Indiana or any of the other distributions gets my vote. That seems to be a surprise, not long ago I remember hearing that Indiana would include no part of KDE wha

Re: [osol-discuss] Will KDE4 .spec files be merged / contributed to SFE as well?

2008-01-24 Thread Glynn Foster
Brian Cameron wrote: > Manish: > >> A lot of .spec files have been written for the KDE4/Solaris project. >> A lot more are on the way I guess, thanks to the amazing work of a lot >> of people on this list (We all know who they are) >> >> Would these spec files be contributed to SFE as well? >

Re: [osol-discuss] Will KDE4 .spec files be merged / contributed to SFE as well?

2008-01-24 Thread Brian Cameron
Manish: > A lot of .spec files have been written for the KDE4/Solaris project. > A lot more are on the way I guess, thanks to the amazing work of a lot > of people on this list (We all know who they are) > > Would these spec files be contributed to SFE as well? That makes sense to me. However

[osol-discuss] Will KDE4 .spec files be merged / contributed to SFE as well?

2008-01-24 Thread Manish Chakravarty
Hi , A lot of .spec files have been written for the KDE4/Solaris project. A lot more are on the way I guess, thanks to the amazing work of a lot of people on this list (We all know who they are) Would these spec files be contributed to SFE as well? As I understand both the repositories stand t