I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 10/17/06, maoyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/projects/#portal
"The process for requesting a new project requires that a community
member write a proposal to
On 10/17/06, maoyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network.
I suggest that you wait until the ksh93 integration project is done
with it's work. The project suffers from excessive bureaucracy
overhead and
Josh Hurst writes:
> On 10/17/06, maoyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
> >
> > 4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network.
> I suggest that you wait until the ksh93 integration project is done
> with it's work. The project suffers from ex
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 18:50 -0700, maoyi wrote:
> I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
>
> 4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network.
In addition to the input you've received regarding putting forward a
project proposal here, we'd love to have your participation in the
Ne
On 10/18/06, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josh Hurst writes:
> On 10/17/06, maoyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
> >
> > 4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network.
> I suggest that you wait until the ksh93 integration proje
Josh Hurst writes:
> > Please take it elsewhere.
> Fine. Which list would you suggest? CAB?
That's fine by me. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the original
poster's "4over6" project, and you're doing both him and Open Solaris
community a grave disservice by saying that he should wait until k
On 10/18/06, Josh Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/18/06, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Hurst writes:
> > On 10/17/06, maoyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
> > >
> > > 4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network
Josh Hurst wrote:
I've added the CAB discussion list to the CC: for comments. IMO the
problem should be discussed before any new projects are started. We
need a new, streamlined process which makes sure that projects are no
longer trashed with excessive bureaucracy
The "excessive bureaucracy" o
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Josh Hurst wrote:
> On 10/18/06, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Josh Hurst writes:
> > > On 10/17/06, maoyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
> > > >
> > > > 4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network.
>On 10/18/06, Josh Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 10/18/06, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Josh Hurst writes:
>> > > On 10/17/06, maoyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > > I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
>> > > >
>> > > > 4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go th
On 10/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 10/18/06, Josh Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 10/18/06, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Josh Hurst writes:
>> > > On 10/17/06, maoyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > > I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
>> > > >
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ... ]
There are sparcs flying and sometimes disagreement; but in the end
There's this picture in my mind now of CAB members grabbing whatever piece
of Sun workstation hardware in reach and hurling it at each other...
:)
the projects general
Frank Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know this popped up because of my last bundle of PCFS bugfixes (which
> actually unintentionally made PCFS behave like Windows does ... and that
> immediately caused a flurry of bug reports how much breakage this causes
> because there are expectatio
>Is there any other Open Source project which has similar bureaucracy
>requirements? The integration of ksh93 is an item which the average
>Linux distribution does in days or weeks while OpenSolaris.org needs 8
>months to present another list of bureaucracy items which still need
>to be finished.
>I know this popped up because of my last bundle of PCFS bugfixes (which
>actually unintentionally made PCFS behave like Windows does ... and that
>immediately caused a flurry of bug reports how much breakage this causes
>because there are expectations towards PCFS beyond the capabilities of th
16 matches
Mail list logo