,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
future point, it is hoped that will be sufficient instead.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Glenn Holmer wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 12:16 -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
Glenn Holmer wrote:
I've got several OpenSolaris machines that were installed with 2009.06.
I updated to snv_123 (which was my first dev build), and would now like
to update to snv_124. But when I start the Update
permissions
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Alexander wrote:
OpenSolaris
...
4) - No binary updates for stable systems
http://www.opensolaris.com/learn/subscriptions/
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sun is not denying you the fixes,
they're just not providing free binaries to everyone.
Updates are a form of support, and support costs.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the prices of that support are reasonable is up to you and
something you should provide feedback about to Sun directly through
customer service.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
that was not accounted for in the packages.
This seems related:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=11276
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
for
someone to tell me there is... though.
Just simple wildcards, such as '*' can be used.
The man page for pkg explains the search syntax and provides a few examples.
See:
$ man pkg
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
automatic partial matching when you're
attempting to install something.
Note that all of the packages are going to be renamed soon anyway, and
so all of the 'SUNW' prefixes are going away.
In the near future, you'll also be able to things like 'pkg install *irssi'.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
,
but for now, the built-in wildcard functionality should give you
sufficient capability in combination with the action filtering, etc.
that you can perform (see the man page for details).
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
what is there.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
solarg wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Gavin Maltby wrote:
Hi,
solarg wrote:
hello all,
i have a web app that do a huge use of perl modules.
After upgrading, my app is broken, and i notice:
r...@koha2:~# /usr/perl5/5.8.4/bin/cpan
IO object version 1.21 does not match bootstrap parameter 1.23
/pkg/lost+found/* and ignore the warnings.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Do you use a proxy?
If so, you need to export http_proxy=url before running the pkg
search command when *not* using the -l option (for local).
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
is a
difficult option at best.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Charles Monett wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Jensen Lee wrote:
At least they should be doing the right thing to open the source code of
every hardware component Sun no longer plan to support commercially, to
encourage their continued use
Brian Utterback wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
If those modules install under /usr/lib/*, yes. If you can have CPAN
install and deliver those modules under /usr/local/perl5 ... or
perhaps /opt/perl5/locl or some other directory that doesn't belong to
an existing package, then you should be ok
Brian Utterback wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Brian Utterback wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
If those modules install under /usr/lib/*, yes. If you can have
CPAN install and deliver those modules under /usr/local/perl5 ... or
perhaps /opt/perl5/locl or some other directory that doesn't belong
upgrade to the build 125 version of SUNWipkg if you're running
build 118.
Why are you specifying sunwi...@0.5.11-0.125?
You should be specifying:
sunwi...@0.5.11-0.118
...which would install the latest available version of SUNWipkg for
build 118.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
can upgrade all that stuff ?? Using live upgrade? if yes,
can you point me how to do it ? thanks,
The zfs format isn't ugpraded automatically.
You have to explicitly tell zfs to upgrade the format by executing:
zpool upgrade
See man zpool for more information.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
Shawn Walker wrote:
Benoit Heroux wrote:
Hi guys,
I needed a quick install of OpenSolaris and i found :
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+jeos/200906+Prototype#HDownloads
The footprint is splendid: around 275 megs, so it is little. But i
have a question.
Why the ZFS
issues with package downloads in specific builds, so it is
difficult to say whether your issue has already been resolved in a newer
build since you haven't mentioned which build you are using.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
that would break
those packages.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Viktor Cemasko wrote:
Greetings Erik,
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:08:05 +0100, Shawn Walker wrote:
Viktor Cemasko wrote:
...
--forceForce the (un)install of a package.
This was purposefully omitted. Your system couldn't be properly
upgraded if this was supported
Viktor Cemasko wrote:
Greetings Erik,
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:56:14 +0100, Shawn Walker
swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
...
In short, the way the OpenSolaris distribution is currently built
pretty much requires SUNWfirefox if you want to use the included GNOME.
I understand Your position
Viktor Cemasko wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:41:21 +0100, Shawn Walker
swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
As I already said, -r does what you said for --upward. Look at the
output of 'uninstall -nrv'.
I am sure You already mistook only because of my bad explanation.
~%= pfexec pkg uninstall
Viktor Cemasko wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:39:22 +0100, Shawn Walker
swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
It is upward through the dependencies of the package you named.
SUNWfirefox is not a dependency of SUNWgnome-help-viewer and is
therefore not listed.
Bingo. We come closer to what I want
is the way of the future and should not be
stifled.
LIke I said I has not been fun I came to Solaris to get away from Linux not to
become a halfwitted linux clone.
Thankfully, no one is working on a half-witted Linux clone, so you may
relax now.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
Chad Welsh wrote:
I guess this is not enough information? Chad Welsh wrote:
I guess there is a limit to how much you can update at one time when using
Opensloaris 1002 b127 or any other Opensloaris version?
No.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris
available.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Rich Reynolds wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Rich Reynolds wrote:
hi all -
Im having momentary(i hope) brain death. can i and if so how do i,
roll-back an application upgraded via packagemanager??
because it was simply an application upgrade no new BE was created...
Rollback functionality
that of the software (especially
when its has been modified compared to upstream). But, I do agree that
there should be an easier way to expose the upstream version to users.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
, or
update the already installed version.
It was last updated on June 17, 2009 at 10:54:13 PM CST.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Keith wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
keithk wrote:
Hi:
I am getting some compilation error which I think one of the patches
listed on
http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/patches/ss12u1_patches.jsp
for Sun Studio 12 update 1 would fix the problem. I downloaded the
patches, but could
be compared directly as our functionality set is very different.
We've done lots of performance work recently and more is coming.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Vikash Tulsiyan wrote:
Do we have a pkginfo -q equivalent in IPS. I want to just check if a package
is installed without all the details
Check the return code of pkg info name; if it's 0, the package is
installed, otherwise it isn't installed.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
Leonidas Savvides wrote:
when NEW OpenSolaris 2009.12 will get out and also when free CD available ?
You mean what is currently known as 2010.xx? :)
There are no more release builds scheduled for 2009.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss
packages properly. To do so otherwise is madness from a dependency
resolution standpoint.
With that said, it is planned that publication tools are enhanced so
that you can easily copy a package and strip its dependencies if you
want to customise it and install your own version.
Cheers,
--
Shawn
Shawn Walker wrote:
Greetings,
I recently updated from OpenSolaris 200x build 127 to build 128a.
Much to my dismay, I've discovered that input from my USB mouse has
become sporadically delayed. Moving the mouse back and forth is
frequently interrupted as the system seems to start ignoring
for just SUNWipkg. I'd have to see the lines you
elided to say exactly what happened.
It would also be helpful to see the output of:
pkg info entire ips-incorporation
...and the output of pkg publisher.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss
Brian Ruthven - Solaris Network Sustaining - Sun UK wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Brian Ruthven - Solaris Network Sustaining - Sun UK wrote:
I was trying to image-update to b129, and I wasn't going to be put
off by the request to upgrade the pkg command:
$ pfexec pkg image-update -nv
something so broken in the
first place.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
system mechanism available to do so.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
UNIX admin wrote:
For instance, what is the equivalent of pkgmk(1) for IPS?
See man pkgsend.1
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
Publication documentation is somewhat incomplete as the system is still
under heavy design and development as has been repeatedly stated.
And no tools to build packages.
That isn't true. There are many tools that are available with IPS to
create and publish packages.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
are:
pkgdepend(1)
pkgdiff(1) -- build 130+
pkgmogrify(1)
pkgrecv(1)
pkgsend(1)
Please note that pkgsend will allow you to import an existing SVR4
package (minus class action scripts), directory, or tarball as the basis
for a new package. The man page explains all of this.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
Peter Tribble wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Vikash Tulsiyan wrote:
Do we have a pkginfo -q equivalent in IPS. I want to just check if a
package is installed without all the details
Check the return code of pkg info name; if it's 0
.
Class action and other scripts are completely ignored.
The purpose of the SVR4 import support is to import payload content and
basic package information.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
needed
to test variations of it.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
And there is also such a thing as premature optimisation. A solution
that scales well to 600 million records may not be appropriate for a
much smaller number.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
been a discussion of how to simplify delivery
of these scripts to ease transition.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
John Martin wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Anyone? I've tried b129 and it has the same symptoms/issue.
If it still happens with b129 then it should rule out the ZFS
issue fixed under bug 6881015.
This appears to have been due to a duplicate instance of metacity
starting and exiting several
.
Significant portion of softwares in use at large software installations
for high-traffic providers such as Google are written in Python.
It is important to keep in mind that algorithms generally matter more
than choice of programming language.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
Peter Tribble wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
And sorry, but you're complaining about .64 seconds? Seriously?
Absolutely. Do that multiple times across hundreds of servers and it
becomes considerable. The conclusion is that you;ll avoid
Peter Tribble wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Andre Lue wrote:
Shawn,
Can you say if there are any future plans to include a switch to override
installing the dependencies of a package.
No, there are no plans for that. If a package
thoroughly thought through, you just don't agree with
the conclusions :)
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
of an operation with sub-second execution
times.
Executing a single command and retrieving its output seems a lot more
efficient to me than executing the same command multiple times.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
of course if you're willing to work on
performance-sensitive areas.
Otherwise, our development team is better spent on other issues.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
earned the right to do so.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
suitable algorithms are employed. The significant advantages in ease of
development, time required for development, and the long-term
maintenance and support of a project make it clear that it is beneficial
to employ a high-level language where appropriate.
--
Shawn Walker
and the traffic stats that can be viewed from pkg.opensolaris.org.
Its obvious you too care about the product, as you spend a great deal of
time talking about it :)
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
currently support OpenSolaris? And when I write ISVs, I mean
companies like: CheckPoint, Oracle, Adobe, Veritas, ...
If you're going to play a numbers game, then everyone should just use
Windows, right? Windows has the largest ISV support of any platform :)
--
Shawn Walker
language.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
script the entire build process. Ask on sw-porters-discuss if
you need assistance.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the responsibility themselves.
We don't claim scripting is forbidden, just scripting during packaging
execution context :)
You can script all you want with SMF.
Other frameworks, hooks, or options may present themselves in the future
as the project progresses.
--
Shawn Walker
.
You also have the option of setting up a completely local copy of the
package repository for major releases (such as 2009.06) using the
repository ISO images that are provided.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
updatemanager to be able to prepare for the update as well.
So even if you didn't have a proxy in place, you should eventually be
able to do something like:
pfexec pkg image-update --download-only
...and then later:
pfexec pkg image-update
...completely offline.
--
Shawn Walker
Halton Huo wrote:
I can not access http://wiki.genunix.org for several days, anybody know
what happens?
Yes, it is currently offline and the administrator will be working on it
as soon as possible.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
problems -- even if the solution is not
optimized to fit into my comfort zone. We just haven't seen the whole picture
yet. -c
Thanks. It is my firm hope that nobody will miss PCA after using pkg(5).
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
a legacy action that allows
them to declare themselves as providing specific SVR4 dependencies.
This allows most SVR4 packages to install without issue since they
believe their dependencies are already installed.
See man pkg.5 for more information.
--
Shawn Walker
* massive performance improvements for system upgrade scenarios
* only downloads differences between package versions when updating
installed packages
* eliminates the need for patches :)
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
.
Is this the case?
No.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
off if it happens.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
philo neo wrote:
hi,
i can to update my system since X11, the windows update manager doesn't work.
can you tell me the bash command for udate all and grub.
To perform an update all from the command line:
pfexec pkg image-update
--
Shawn Walker
poked Glynn
Foster about this.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
) for the Serial#. Just pick an identifier you'll remember such
as 'DESKTOP1' or 'LAPTOP1', etc.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Full (origin) mirroring is not yet available for /dev. In part
because it contains 64GB+ data and growing and for many other reasons.
However, you can easily setup a mirror for the 2009.06 release using
these instructions:
http://blogs.sun.com/observatory/entry/local_repository_mirror
is not used to perform the install.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
-130_trytryagain
# pkg -R /mnt/osol-130_trytryagain image-update
Add the '-f' parameter to the above:
pkg -R /mnt/osol-130_trytryagain image-update -f
...and try again.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
arise are in the subsystems that have changed.
I should also note that many users are able to run b130 without issue,
or with relatively minor workarounds. I'm one of them; it worked first
boot.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
files without running a
depot server, that's still work in progress.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Jan 3, 2010, at 6:53 AM, andrew wrote:
On 01/ 1/10 10:36 AM, andrew wrote:
Sorry - my mistake. Still looking for ability to
install from local files though. ;-)
You can do that now as long as you're willing to run
a depot server
(which is a very light-weight easy to start/run
On Jan 2, 2010, at 1:03 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010, Jürgen Keil wrote:
[OpenSolaris Indiana: GNU?]
Well, it does have both the gnu utilities (/usr/gnu/bin)
and the solaris counterparts, and in the default setup
the /usr/gnu/bin directory is ahead of /usr/bin in $PATH.
On Jan 4, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Volker A. Brandt wrote:
Happy new year every1!
130 is the final SXCE release planned though, as previously announced.
Which is too bad, really. Maybe the infrastructure to build SXCE
can be kept in
works. ;-)
It's not as simple as that; I assure you.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
case, single file retrieval is certainly faster,
but how much faster has not yet been established.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
) the same core OS packages
that SXCE releases featured. Comstar functionality should be identical.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
development - pkg -
api-python.
Include the entire message you originally posted.
In the meantime, you may try disabling the dev publisher first, and then
removing it:
pfexec pkg set-publisher -d dev
pfexec pkg unset-publisher dev
--
Shawn Walker
into the
repository at some point soon I would guess.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
, there is sufficient data for analysis.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
-1710/
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
-archive in such a way that it include most of the
files necessary for mounting /etc from separate pool? Have someone tried such
configurations?
It is not advisable.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
a route.
I just want to know the protocols and ports used for control pkg!
As others mentioned, pkg just uses http. You may also set the
http_proxy and https_proxy environment variables to a proxy of your
choosing if so desired.
--
Shawn Walker
not enough here for me to debug. I can only
guess that there is a routing issue of some sort between your system and
pkg.opensolaris.org.
What happens if you attempt to open the http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev
address in your web browser?
--
Shawn Walker
On 01/26/10 12:22 PM, B wrote:
no proxy configuration
Do you have a firewall or are you on a corporate network?
What happens if you:
pfexec pkg set-publisher --no-refresh -O http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev
opensolaris.org
pfexec pkg refresh --full opensolaris.org
?
--
Shawn Walker
--no-refresh -O http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev
opensolaris.org
pfexec pkg refresh --full opensolaris.org
I should note that some firewalls have problems with the catalog refresh
mechanism used in build 111b. A different mechanism is used in build 128+.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
, or that there is a networking bug in the version of
VirtualBox you are using.
Have you tried upgrading the version of virtualbox you are using?
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
, and can only suggest you
try an alternate network configuration.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
1101 - 1200 of 1390 matches
Mail list logo
