At 01:01 23.04.99 +0200, you wrote:
Any comments / additions ?
The question is what to do about name conflicts with applications.
For example an application might also definite "bool".
Drop it ?
Since it is only defined on sun/sparc it seems to be a bad idea
to define it at all...
By
Goetz
When compiling OpenSSL (current) and defining SIXTY_FOUR_BIT, the
preprocessor define BN_ULLONG is undefined (see comment in file
include/bn.h line 119). That results in an error when compiling
crypto/bn/bn_div.c:
bn_div.c 215: [error]: CFE1020 Identifier "BN_ULLONG" not defined
etc.
Why is
Hi! I do realize that I'm concentrating on wrong matters (after all,
blowfish is never used by SSL applications), but I couldn't abstain from
commenting:-) First of I fail to understand why #define BF_PTR2 would
perform better than the last "generic" version. The one that performs
best on Alpha:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Ulf Möller wrote:
People get confused by the make links output. So I think Configure
should print out something reassuring after make links is done.
I also wonder if it wouldn't be enough to create the links only if
the include directory is empty.
I would also
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 02:21:12AM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
[...] Now whether /usr/local/include/openssl is a link or a
directory with copies of all the files doesn't really make a
difference, what counts is that the name-space makes sense.
Since there seems to be mostly agreement to the
You can't do that: it means the other dependencies aren't valid when the
Makefile is parsed. Unless I'm misunderstanding what you mean.
Uh, right.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
I'll commit the appropriate changes tonight unless somone vetoes very
quickly. In addition to the actual #includes, many Makefile.ssl's
need a tiny change, Makefile.org needs a couple of tiny changes; so
does mk1mf.pl (I verified building the changed library with
Und OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER
echo "`sysctl -n hw.model | sed
's,.*\(.\)86-class.*,i\186,'`-whatever-netbsd"; exit 0
Thanks!
The FreeBSD:*:*:*486* and NetBSD:*:*:*486* entries are bogus, right?
sysctl -n hw.model exists on FreeBSD as well, but it prints the string
"Pentium" there. Makes me wonder how it calls
Oops. I didn't mean to send that to the list (and it is wrong, too--in
order to check the version header you'd have to find it first.)
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
At 16:29 23.04.99 +0200, you wrote:
Since there seems to be mostly agreement to the change to
openssl/*.h (including a "Yes, please!!!" sent via private mail -
:),
I'll commit the appropriate changes tonight unless somone vetoes
very
quickly. In addition to
My recommendation is to build for the generic case, and document the
optimizations available for each platform, and why someone would want
to (or not want to) use them. Slow and working is always preferable to
a fast crash.
Let me explain why we need the CPU version:
OpenSSL contains
"Titchener, Tom" wrote:
Who wants to write a simple S/MIME tool, able to decrypt, verify, sign,
crypt any mail, so I can use it as a PINE filter? ;-)
You can use the pkcs#7 patch I sent last week to do
the sign/verify bit. Then you just need to fix it up
to encrpyt/decrypt and you'll be
While scanning the libary for remaining include filenames without
the openssl/ prefix, I noticed that crypto/cryptall.h doesn't make any
sense at all. Ever since 0.6.6b (possibly earlier) this header file
included a file "meth.h", which I could not find anywhere in neither
that nor the current
13 matches
Mail list logo
