[openssl.org #122] s_server "no shared cipher" error

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 08:46:49 2002]: > When I try to set up an SSL connection between two invocations of > the openssl command, I get a "no shared cipher" error. Since I can > set up SSL connections to web servers, I suspect that the problem is > with the openssl implementing the ser

[openssl.org #121] make test failure on mac os x

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 08:43:17 2002]: > output of make report follows. i removed the -O3 flag from > Makefile.ssl and make test still fails as follows. ... > ./rc4test > error calculating RC4 > output: 75 b7 19 80 82 e0 c5 ef 00 > expect: 75 b7 87 80 99 e0 c5 96 00 > error calculating

Re: [openssl.org #122] s_server "no shared cipher" error

On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:46:52AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote: > > When I try to set up an SSL connection between two invocations of > the openssl command, I get a "no shared cipher" error. Since I can > set up SSL connections to web servers, I suspect that the problem is > with the o

[openssl.org #120] fyi -- /dev/random for Solaris -- Free Symptoms and Resolutions Article 27606

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jun 26 19:28:22 2002]: > official word from Sun about /dev/random support in Solaris9, > Solaris8, > and prior support. -GA > > http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub- > cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsrdb/27606&zone_32=SUNWski > cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsrdb%2F2

[openssl.org #105] Problem build 0.9.7 SNAP with ./Configure debug

I solved this, not by changing bn_mul.c, since BN_DEBUG doesn't necessarely mean we don't want assembler. Instead, I changed the "debug" target i Configure to add -DOPENSSL_NO_ASM to the C flags. -- Richard Levitte __ OpenSS

[openssl.org #106] 0.9.7 Beta2 - install.com referencing non-existent rsaref directory.

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jun 18 16:48:39 2002]: > it complained that the rsaref directory did not exist. I changed > install.com > from this line: > > $ SDIRS := CRYPTO,SSL,RSAREF,APPS,VMS!,TEST,TOOLS > > to: > > $ SDIRS := CRYPTO,SSL,APPS,VMS!,RSAREF,TEST,TOOLS Applied and committed. >

[openssl.org #123] [PATCH] Build on Win32 with Borland C++Builder 5 and nasm

Hi, [I originally sent this patch direct to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - following a lack of response, I'm now resending it via rt. Please let me know if I should send it elsewhere or if there's some problem with the patch] The attached patch allows OpenSSL to build with Borland Builder and nasm on

[openssl.org #107] pb installing OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta2 on W2000

It sounds like something is corrupted on your machine. I can't tell you what it is, unfortunately. Take a look at util/mk1mf.pl and search for CRYPTOOBJ. If it's split in two in there (i.e. you have to search for CRYPTO to find it), I'd say something went quite wrong when you unpacked the

[openssl.org #111] Cross compilation assumption

How do you suggest we handle this? And BTW, speaking of hacking the Makefiles, you really only need to hack the topmost one. The value of AR will be propagated down. [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jun 21 09:37:30 2002]: > > This applies to openssl 0.9.6d (and all earlier versions) > > The build

[openssl.org #112] minor bug in M_PKCS12_cert_bag_type

Good catch! I've renamed the macro argument to 'bg', which is the same as other macros further down use. [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jun 21 09:54:34 2002]: > > #define M_PKCS12_cert_bag_type(bag) OBJ_obj2nid(bag->value.bag->type) > > if the variable passed in has the name "bag", this works, b

Re: [openssl.org #111] Cross compilation assumption

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ Hardwired 'ar' ] > How do you suggest we handle this? And BTW, speaking of hacking the > Makefiles, you really only need to hack the topmost one. The value > of AR will be propagated down. Yes, I

Re: [openssl.org #111] Cross compilation assumption

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ Hardwired 'ar' ] > How do you suggest we handle this? And BTW, speaking of hacking the > Makefiles, you really only need to hack the topmost one. The value > of AR will be propagated down. Yes, I d

[openssl.org #113] subjectAltName bugs (current CVS)

This is not a bug, it's a misunderstanding on your part. By default, request extensions aren't copied to the new certificate. However, in the [ca] section, you can have the setting 'copy_extensions' with one of the following values: none Doesn't copy anything (default) copy

[openssl.org #115] aix 5.1 openssl compiling problem and solution

It would be nice if you told us which configuration target you used. If you don't know, the following will give you the answer: grep '^CONFIGURE_ARGS=' Makefile [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Jun 23 16:44:16 2002]: > hi, > i try to compile openssl 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta2 under AIX 5.1 (ML > 510

[openssl.org #117] Solaris 9/gcc 3.1/64-bit linking requires additional flag

Change applied and commited. Thanks. [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Jun 24 16:30:46 2002]: > OpenSSL won't build a 64-bit shared library correctly unless "-m64" is > given to gcc when invoked as linker. For testing purposes I added > "-m64" manually to SHARED_LDFLAGS. Compiling and 'make test' went

[openssl.org #119] Bug Report/Change Request: pkcs7 cmd always returns 0 exit status

Change applied and committed. Thanks! [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jun 25 21:48:00 2002]: > Line 91 of apps/pkcs7.c contains > > int ret=0; > > Can this be changed to > > int ret=1; > > So that the pkcs7 command will return 1 on error and 0 > if successful? -- Richard Levitte __

[openssl.org #123] [PATCH] Build on Win32 with Borland C++Builder 5 and nasm

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 11:32:12 2002]: A few comments... > rand.h : Various files in the tree (crypto/des/rand_key.c, for > example) > include rand.h without including anything that would drag in windows.h > and > hence windef.h under Win32. This causes a problem with the prototype

[openssl.org #123] [PATCH] Build on Win32 with Borland C++Builder 5 and nasm

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 11:32:12 2002]: > x509.h : This is the change I'm genuinely unsure about. x509.h > includes > asn1.h, but both x509/x_all.c and x509v3/v3_bitst.c reference (via > macros) > struct ASN1_ITEM_st, which is defined not in asn1.h but in asn1t.h. > Since both files inc

Re: [openssl.org #123] [PATCH] Build on Win32 with Borland C++Builder 5 and nasm

On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > > [lack of prototypes for WPARAM/LPARAM/etc.] > > Hmm, wouldn't it be easier to have the following early in rand.h? > > #include > > #if defined(OPENSSL_SYS_WINDOWS) > #include > #endif It'd certainly be an option, but this would mean th

Re: [openssl.org #123] [PATCH] Build on Win32 with Borland C++Builder5 and nasm

On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 11:32:12 2002]: > > > x509.h : This is the change I'm genuinely unsure about. x509.h > > includes > > asn1.h, but both x509/x_all.c and x509v3/v3_bitst.c reference (via > > macros) > > struct ASN1_ITEM_st, w

Re: [openssl.org #107] pb installing OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta2 on W2000

Ok, I found the problem. I have Cygwin installed on this machine (W2000) and perl in Cygwin was in the path before the standard installation of Perl for Win32. now the installation work fine. Thanks Francois - Original Message - From: "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

Re: [openssl.org #123] [PATCH] Build on Win32 with Borland C++Builder 5 and nasm (fwd)

[resent so that RT picks up the patch] On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 11:32:12 2002]: > > > x509.h : This is the change I'm genuinely unsure about. x509.h > > includes > > asn1.h, but both x509/x_all.c and x509v3/v3_bitst.c reference (v

[openssl.org #22] [PATCH] to dev build 20020428 for Win64 on Itanium

John, I didn't notice this before, but VC-64.pl is missing from your patch. Could you please send it to us? I've set up my laptop (running W2K, which I assume will be OK) with the platform SDK you mentioned and will do a testrun as soon as I can. -- Richard Levitte _

Re: cvs commit: openssl e_os.h

On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 03:48:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Modified:.Tag: BRANCH_WIN64 e_os.h > Log: > With Win64, define ssize_t as size_t. This is a very odd thing to do, really, >since size_t is supposed to be unsigned while ssize_t is supposed to be signed. >Ho

[openssl.org #124] [PATCH] OS/2 shared build support

This patch adds the ability to build shared libraries (DLLs) for the OS/2 platform. It's a diff against the current 0.9.7-stable branch but should apply cleanly to HEAD too. Although I've touched a few bits of code that are used for the Win32 build in mkdef.pl I've verified that the output genera

[openssl.org #125] [Enhancement] --certdir option for cert/key directory

Hi! I very much would like to see an option in the config script to specify the directory for certificates/keys instead of just using openssldir. Reason: we always install packages in version dependent directories (e.g. /usr/local/openssl-0.9.6d) to be able to maintain several versions in paral

Re: cvs commit: openssl e_os.h

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:03:03 +0200, Bodo Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: moeller> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 03:48:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: moeller> moeller> > Modified:.Tag: BRANCH_WIN64 e_os.h moeller> > Log: moeller> > With Win64, d

Re: [openssl.org #124] [PATCH] OS/2 shared build support

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:10:55 +0200 (METDST), "" Brian Havard " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rt> The output for VMS does change a little but rt> looks quite broken anyway (EXETYPE WINDOWS?). VMS doesn't use .def files. Look at VMS/mkshared.com instead for VMS

Re: [openssl.org #124] [PATCH] OS/2 shared build support

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:10:55 +0200 (METDST), "" Brian Havard " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rt> The output for VMS does change a little but rt> looks quite broken anyway (EXETYPE WINDOWS?). VMS doesn't use .def files. Look at VMS/mkshared.com instead for VM

Re: [openssl.org #123] [PATCH] Build on Win32 with BorlandC++Builder 5 and nasm

In message on Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:15:32 +0200 (CEST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: jon> Attached, the patch to do this, as well as to make the appropriate change jon> in do_masm.bat. I would have done this originally, but since the commit jon> messag

[openssl.org #123] [PATCH] Build on Win32 with Borland C++Builder 5 and nasm

All changes have now been applied, so I'm setting this ticket to "resolved". Please download the next snapshot (tomorrow) and try it out. -- Richard Levitte __ OpenSSL Project http://www.opens

[openssl.org #111] Cross compilation assumption

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 15:49:46 2002]: > Yes, I did notice that after sending, so it's not that big a deal as I > first thought. I can see two solutions: > > - Add another field to Configure Yes, that could be a possibility. Another is to call make like this: make AR=foo Als

[openssl.org #107] pb installing OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta2 on W2000

Hmm, weird. Anyhow, since this isn't a problem with our code, I'm killing this ticket. [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 14:43:15 2002]: > Ok, I found the problem. > I have Cygwin installed on this machine (W2000) > and perl in Cygwin was in the path before the standard installation > of Perl

[openssl.org #92] Prototypes SSL_write() & SSL_read() problem in openssl/ssl.h for 64-bit applications

I'd like to know which platform this is on. -- Richard Levitte __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager

Re: [openssl.org #22] [PATCH] to dev build 20020428 for Win64 on Itanium

That's funny, it's in my image, and I just zipped the entire thing up. Here it is anyway. John >>> "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/27/02 07:22AM >>> John, I didn't notice this before, but VC-64.pl is missing from your patch. Could you please send it to us? I've set up my l

Re: [openssl.org #111] Cross compilation assumption

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 15:49:46 2002]: > > > Yes, I did notice that after sending, so it's not that big a deal > as I > > first thought. I can see two solutions: > > > > - Add another

Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/evp evp.h

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > levitte 27-Jun-2002 07:03:04 > > Modified:crypto/evp evp.h > Log: > A number of includes were removed from evp.h some time ago. The reason > was that they weren't really needed any more for EVP itself. However, > it seems like soma applications (I kn

[openssl.org #75] DJGPP (DOS) Patch for 0.9.7

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Jun 17 09:54:04 2002]: > The snapshot doesn't work under DJGPP, but I think that this patch > will fix it. There were several problems. In Configure, you tried to > use ENV{DJDIR}, but this puts in a DOS style path such as That was a mistake, I only changed one of the

Re: [openssl.org #123] [PATCH] Build on Win32 with Borland C++Builder 5 and nasm

On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > All changes have now been applied, so I'm setting this ticket to > "resolved". Please download the next snapshot (tomorrow) and try it > out. I have an rsynced copy of the CVS repository, so I synced and tried it today :-) You've missed

Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/evp evp.h

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Jun 2002 17:13:15 +0100, Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: ben> Can we wrap this kind of thing up in a back compatibility flag of some ben> kind (at least in 0.9.8) so we know we can remove them eventually? I've pondered starting to define some kind

[openssl.org #123] [PATCH] Build on Win32 with Borland C++Builder 5 and nasm

Oops, sorry. Applied, please try again. Also, do you have the possibility to check if it works properly with Builder 4? [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 18:44:26 2002]: > You've missed part of the patch to BC-32.pl - I've attached the > missing > patch. There's also still the issue with x_al

Re: [openssl.org #123] [PATCH] Build on Win32 with Borland C++Builder 5 and nasm

On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > Oops, sorry. Applied, please try again. Will do. In the meantime, I've found a problem with the alternate rand.h solution, namely that OPENSSL_SYS_WINDOWS doesn't appear to be defined, at least for me. I do, however, have OPENSSL_SYSNAME_W

Re: [openssl.org #92] Prototypes SSL_write() & SSL_read() problem in openssl/ssl.h for 64-bit applications

Richard, The platforms are Irix 6.5.15m with the MIPSpro 7.3.1.3m compiler suite & Solaris 8 with the Forte 6 update 2 with all patches applied. Darin Broady [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lexmark International, Inc. __ OpenSSL Project

[openssl.org #71] [Fwd: Bug#141360: libssl-dev: gcc warning: redundant declaration of ERR_load_PEM_strings()]

I changed pem2.h so it would check if pem.h has already been included. That should fix the problem, I believe. -- Richard Levitte __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing L

[openssl.org #123] [PATCH] Build on Win32 with Borland C++Builder 5 and nasm

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 19:05:20 2002]: > Will do. In the meantime, I've found a problem with the alternate > rand.h > solution, namely that OPENSSL_SYS_WINDOWS doesn't appear to be > defined, at > least for me. I do, however, have OPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN32. Entirely my fault. Including

[openssl.org #111] Cross compilation assumption

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 17:42:23 2002]: > It's RISC OS. The command is still 'ar', but it's in a different > path and is a wrapper to a different tool which generates RISC OS > library files - i.e, not Archive files. Having said that, my > argument > falls a bit flat, because you can

Re: [openssl.org #92] Prototypes SSL_write() & SSL_read() problemin openssl/ssl.h for 64-bit applications

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Jun 2002 13:08:18 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: dbroady> The platforms are Irix 6.5.15m with the MIPSpro 7.3.1.3m compiler suite & dbroady> Solaris 8 with the Forte 6 update 2 with all patches applied. Do you have the possibility to assign an account

Re: [openssl.org #111] Cross compilation assumption

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Still, it would be nice for consistency > > since all the other standard build tools are defined in the > Configure > > script, > > Hardly. Only cc and ranlib are specified in Configure... Well, t

Re: [openssl.org #123] [PATCH] Build on Win32 with Borland C++Builder 5 and nasm

On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > Entirely my fault. Including e_os2 instead of opensslconf.h helps :-). > > Thanks for the notification, I just applied the change. OK, other than the ASN1_ITEM_st problem (which I'll now look at), everything's now building fine with BCB5 a

makefile.org missing

Hi friends, I am getting this error when i use ./config command on my AIX(IBM version of unix) promt which is "makefile.org missing : No such file or directory" Please reply me ASAP if somebody knows about it. Ankit Shah __ Ope

[openssl.org #47] Re: [openssl.org #121] make test failure on mac os x

sorry about the duplicate, the install readme didn't indicate where i could check for open bugs. i've found it now :) perhaps the readme should be updated? thanks for your help. On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 09:40:20AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote: > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 08:43:17

[openssl.org #126] [PATCH] Allow mkdir to fail on Windows builds

Hi, The attached one-line patch changes the command 'mkdir' to '-mkdir' in mk1mf.pl (the file that builds the huge monolithic makefile for windows builds). Windows builds create three directories, inc32, tmp32 and out32 at the start of the build. The effect of this patch is that the build

Re: [openssl.org #111] Cross compilation assumption

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 15:49:46 2002]: > > > Yes, I did notice that after sending, so it's not that big a deal > as I > > first thought. I can see two solutions: > > > > - Add another f

[openssl.org #25] [patch] SSL.cert_store

Hi Doug (and anyone else following this ticket) [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue May 7 21:46:52 2002]: [snip] > i saw references to a STATUS file in the mail archives that ralf was > working on this, but doesn't seem to have happened yet. the simple > patch below implements the required functions to

Re: [openssl.org #86] Bug in RSA_check_key

Calling all algebraic coders ... [snip] > > I would suggest the following for checking RSA public keys: > > > > 1) that the public exponent e satisfies 3 <= e < n and that > >e is odd (PKCS#1) [this doesn't prevent low exponent > >attacks however] > > 2) that the modulus n is not a pro

[openssl.org #22] [PATCH] to dev build 20020428 for Win64 on Itanium

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 17:30:55 2002]: > That's funny, it's in my image, and I just zipped the entire thing up. And now I discovered that 64all.bat is missing as well. *sigh* -- Richard Levitte __ OpenSSL Project

Re: [openssl.org #22] [PATCH] to dev build 20020428 for Win64 onItanium

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:05:57 +0200 (METDST), "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rt> rt> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 17:30:55 2002]: rt> rt> > That's funny, it's in my image, and I just zipped the entire thing up. rt> rt> And now I discovered

Re: [openssl.org #22] [PATCH] to dev build 20020428 for Win64 on Itanium

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:05:57 +0200 (METDST), "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rt> rt> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 17:30:55 2002]: rt> rt> > That's funny, it's in my image, and I just zipped the entire thing up. rt> rt> And now I discovered

problem with make command

Hey Friend, I am getting this error when i use make command after ./config command. Please let me know if anybody knows what the problem is: $ make + rm -f libcrypto + rm -f libssl making all in crypto... gcc -I. -I../include -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -O3 -DAIX -DB_ENDIAN -c cryptlib.c

Re: [openssl.org #111] Cross compilation assumption

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Still, it would be nice for consistency > > since all the other standard build tools are defined in the > Configure > > script, > > Hardly. Only cc and ranlib are specified in Configure... Well, th

Re: [openssl.org #115] aix 5.1 openssl compiling problem and solution

Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > It would be nice if you told us which configuration target you used. > If you don't know, the following will give you the answer: > > grep '^CONFIGURE_ARGS=' Makefile > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Jun 23 16:44:16 2002]: > > > hi, > > i try to compile openssl 0

Re: [openssl.org #22] [PATCH] to dev build 20020428 for Win64 on Itanium

Here you go... >>> "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/27/02 02:05PM >>> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 17:30:55 2002]: > That's funny, it's in my image, and I just zipped the entire thing up. And now I discovered that 64all.bat is missing as well. *sigh* -- Richard Levitte b

Re: [openssl.org #111] Cross compilation assumption

- Original Message - From: "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: den 27 juni 2002 17:17 Subject: [openssl.org #111] Cross compilation assumption > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 15:49:46 2002]: > > > Yes, I did notice t