The problem has been fixed. Please grab version 0.9.6g. This
ticket is now resolved.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Aug 10 00:44:57 2002]:
>
> We have a question on the patched code:
>
> http://www.openssl.org/news/patch_20020730_0_9_6d.txt
>
> RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/crypto/asn1/asn1_
According to your log, that's 0.9.6e you're talking about. In
0.9.6f and 0.9.6g, The function OpenSSLDie() doesn't exist at all.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Aug 9 22:09:42 2002]:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a problem with building OpenSSL version 096g on Windows
> 2000. The linker is throwing an un
We have a question on the patched code:
http://www.openssl.org/news/patch_20020730_0_9_6d.txt
RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/crypto/asn1/asn1_lib.c,v
retrieving revision 1.19.2.1
diff -u -r1.19.2.1 asn1_lib.c
--- crypto/asn1/asn1_lib.c 2001/03/30 13:42:32 1.19.2.1
+++ crypto/asn1/as
I was hoping for VisualC. It's for an embedded application and that is my toolset.
Any idea if anyone has used VC or how hard it would be?
On Friday 09 August 2002 2:54 pm, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 9 Aug 2002 11:22:41
> -0700, Brad Figg <[EMA
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 9 Aug
2002 15:36:22 -0400, "Glenn Horton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Glenn.Horton> I was able to build OpenSSL for 64 bit AIX. I was able
Glenn.Horton> to make most of the requisite modifications to Configure
Glenn.Horton> but was unable to find out how to
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 9 Aug 2002 18:46:24
+0200 (METDST), "" download (Jim Prewett) " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> I'm sorry to bother you again, but check this out:
rt>
rt> http://www.redhat.com/swr/i686/openssl-0.9.6b-18.i686_dp.html
rt>
rt> Which says:
rt>
rt> P
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 9 Aug 2002 18:46:24
+0200 (METDST), "" download (Jim Prewett) " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> I'm sorry to bother you again, but check this out:
rt>
rt> http://www.redhat.com/swr/i686/openssl-0.9.6b-18.i686_dp.html
rt>
rt> Which says:
rt>
rt> Pr
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 9 Aug 2002 11:22:41 -0700, Brad
Figg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
brad>
brad> Has anyone done a port of OpenSSL to 16 bit MSDOS?
0.9.7 beta3 should be buildable with djgpp...
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 09 Aug 2002 10:06:41 -0400, Rich
Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rsalz>
rsalz> > The checksums were calculated using the following commands:
rsalz> >
rsalz> > openssl md5 < openssl-0.9.6f.tar.gz
rsalz> > openssl md5 < openssl-engine-0.9.6f.tar.gz
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 9 Aug 2002 06:42:07 -0700,
Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
ca+ssl-dev> Just a very minor nit (since the announcement contains all the
ca+ssl-dev> necessary data to verify the distribution): the signature is not
ca+ssl-dev> accessible for mere mortal
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:01:09PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 12:35:40AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >
> >
> > OpenSSL version 0.9.6f released
> > ===
>
> Why is the util/cygwi
I was able to build OpenSSL for 64 bit AIX. I was able to make most of
the requisite modifications to Configure but was unable to find out how to pass the
-X64 flag to ar. The workaround is to set the OBJECT_MODE environment variable to 64.
If anyone on the OpenSSL team is intere
Hi,
I'm having a problem with building OpenSSL version 096g on Windows
2000. The linker is throwing an unresolved external error. The build log
file is attached. The Configure line is:
perl Configure no-asm no-idea no-cast VC-WIN32
Any help would be greatly appreciated,
Bruce LeMaster
Sof
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 12:35:40AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
>
> OpenSSL version 0.9.6f released
> ===
Why is the util/cygwin.sh file not in the distribution anymore?
I don't find a word of that mentioned i
I'm sorry to bother you again, but check this out:
http://www.redhat.com/swr/i686/openssl-0.9.6b-18.i686_dp.html
Which says:
Provides
The following virtual packages are provided in this package.
openssl libcrypto.so.2
libssl.so.2 openssl
Thanks again,
Jim
-
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:06:41AM -0400, Rich Salz wrote:
>
> > The checksums were calculated using the following commands:
> >
> >openssl md5 < openssl-0.9.6f.tar.gz
> >openssl md5 < openssl-engine-0.9.6f.tar.gz
>
> Is there another md5/hash program that's readily available?
> Cf: Tho
Has anyone done a port of OpenSSL to 16 bit MSDOS?
--
Brad Figg - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 503.601.0235 ext. 105
TriplePoint, Inc. - http://www.tpi.com
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Developm
Hello,
What is the variable sid_ctx in the SSL session structure used for?
I am trying to backport the recent security fixes to SSLeay-0.9.0b and need
to understand the significance of a change in ssl_sess.c that involves
sid_ctx_length.
Ajay
___
Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> If we document that *num must always be zero on first use (not sure
> how I can assert() that), is there any bug that needs fixing?
Yes, the sample code I included in a previous post demonstrates the bug
despite num being zero on first use.
Matt
Ok, I'll buy it if thats what y'all think.
Do you have an explanation for this? Does the generated rpm not provide
those? Am i looking to the wrong package to provide me libssl.so.2 and
libcrypto.so.2? I have several rpms from redhat that say they require
these and openssl is the only ssl I'
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:12:52AM -0400, tc lewis wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Rich Salz wrote:
> > > The checksums were calculated using the following commands:
> > >
> > > openssl md5 < openssl-0.9.6f.tar.gz
> > > openssl md5 < openssl-engine-0.9.6f.tar.gz
> >
> > Is there another
John Allen's md5-in-perl?
http://www.cypherspace.org/adam/rsa/md5.html
#!/usr/bin/perl -iH9T4C`>_-JXF8NMS^$#)4=@<,$18%"0X4!`L0%P8*#Q4``04``04#!P``
@A=unpack N4C24,unpack u,$^I;@K=map{int abs 2**32*sin$_}1..64;sub L{($x=pop)
<<($n=pop)|2**$n-1&$x>>32-$n}sub M{($x=pop)-($m=1+~0)*int$x/$m}do{$l+=$r
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Rich Salz wrote:
>
> > The checksums were calculated using the following commands:
> >
> > openssl md5 < openssl-0.9.6f.tar.gz
> > openssl md5 < openssl-engine-0.9.6f.tar.gz
>
> Is there another md5/hash program that's readily available?
> Cf: Thompson's reflections
Hello,
I'll send my patch for util/pod2mantest to install OpenSSL 0.9.6f
correctly in a certain environment --- the environment which have
several versions of perl and pod2man in the path.
Problem: pod2mantest may returns "pod2man" which cause error in Makefile
Environment:
O
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Rich Salz wrote:
> > The checksums were calculated using the following commands:
> >
> > openssl md5 < openssl-0.9.6f.tar.gz
> > openssl md5 < openssl-engine-0.9.6f.tar.gz
>
> Is there another md5/hash program that's readily available?
> Cf: Thompson's reflections on
> The checksums were calculated using the following commands:
>
> openssl md5 < openssl-0.9.6f.tar.gz
> openssl md5 < openssl-engine-0.9.6f.tar.gz
Is there another md5/hash program that's readily available?
Cf: Thompson's reflections on trusting trust.
__
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
>
> OpenSSL version 0.9.6g released
> o openssl-0.9.6g.tar.gz [normal]
> MD5 checksum: 515ed54165a55df83f4eb4e4e9078d3f
Just a very minor nit (since the announcement contains all t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
OpenSSL version 0.9.6g released
===
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of version
0.9.6g of our open source toolkit for SSL/
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 09 Aug 2002 12:32:46 +0200, Jan
Tschirschwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Jan.Tschirschwitz> Additional Information:
Jan.Tschirschwitz>
Jan.Tschirschwitz> I can reproduce the error by including this short
Jan.Tschirschwitz> code into any place of the engine
Additional Information:
I can reproduce the error by including this short code into any place of the engine
init function:
{ RSA *rsa = NULL;
rsa = RSA_new();
RSA_free(rsa);
}
When I include this code in another engine function that is load
Hi,
I need to install an SSL certificate on Microsoft Internet Information
Service. It's possible?
Thanks.
Angelo D'Errico
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
This problem is fixed in 0.9.6f. (You might prefer to wait for 0.9.6g,
which will be out very soon.)
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL
Compiling ssleay32.dll library (on a w2k machine with msvc6 SP5, masm 6.14
and ActivePerl 5.6.1 build 633) give unresolved _OpenSSLDie symbol.
I added a line
OpenSSLDie @2600
to libeay32.def and all work (I don't know your export enumeration method,
so I used a big
Title: problem when linking opensll
forks,
I just encounter the link problem, is it the
opensll bug or other problem ? I just
compile it under mswin2000, vc++ 6.0. and type following
command: " nmake -f
ms/ntdll.mak
thanks you all. jeryy
message.zip
Description: Binary data
Title: problem when linking opensll
hi forks,
I just encounter the link problem, is it the opensll bug or other problem ?
I just compile it under mswin2000, vc++ 6.0.
and type following command:
" nmake -f ms/ntdll.mak
thanks you all.
jeryy
[levitte - Fri Aug 9 09:42:58 2002]:
> > 4. The "Makefile" contains another error which prevents the
> >correct installation of shared libraries.
> >
> >At the end of the "install:" section, the following line
> >
> > $(MAKE) -f $$here/Makefile link-shared ); \
> >
> >should
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 9 Aug 2002 09:59:42
+0200 (METDST), "" download (Jim Prewett) " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> I built an rpm from the .spec file in the distribution as noone has yet to
rt> release an rpm for 0.9.6e (to my knowledge). When I try to install the
rt
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 9 Aug 2002 09:59:42
+0200 (METDST), "" download (Jim Prewett) " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> I built an rpm from the .spec file in the distribution as noone has yet to
rt> release an rpm for 0.9.6e (to my knowledge). When I try to install the
rt>
Patch applied.
Please send unified or context diffs in the future.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager
On Windows, the OpenSSL speed test crashes when used with the CryptoSwift
engine (running the test with CryptoSwift IK 3.2 and a CryptoSwift 200
card). The attached patch to cswift.h fixes this problem.
<>
Lynn Gazis
Rainbow Technologies
__
Hi,
I'm doing the big upgrade along with everyone else right now :)
I'm working with redhat 7.1 on i386.
I built an rpm from the .spec file in the distribution as noone has yet to
release an rpm for 0.9.6e (to my knowledge). When I try to install the
rpms (all of the openssl binary rpms and a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
OpenSSL version 0.9.6f released
===
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of version
0.9.6f of our open source toolkit for SSL/
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Aug 9 07:56:08 2002]:
> The configuration and installation process of the new OpenSSL
0.9.6f
> package is broken in several places. Same problems on Linux and
> Solaris. The package cannot be installed properly.
OK, I thought the snapshots had been tested. My bad. I
43 matches
Mail list logo
