Hi All:
While taking a look at RFC5272 and other things, I got to playing with the CMS
functions in 1.0.0, and I had a couple of questions. Given the attached C
program:
1: Why is not the SID value filled in - it looks like it SHOULD be with a SKID
value.
2: How would I go about signing this
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, Patrick Patterson wrote:
2: How would I go about signing this structure - I already have the data I
need in eContent, so I don't think that it would be THAT interesting to dump
it out into a BIO just to use a higher level function? I understand the
utility of using
I need an advice on usind EVP_SignFinal function with two private key
objects stored on two different tokens. I can use two PKCS11 engine
instances to access these objects in low-level functions. But
EVP_SignFinal implementation uses EVP_PKEY_CTX_new(pkey, NULL) call
internally to create
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, Valery Blazhnov wrote:
I need an advice on usind EVP_SignFinal function with two private key
objects stored on two different tokens. I can use two PKCS11 engine
instances to access these objects in low-level functions. But EVP_SignFinal
implementation uses
Hi Steve:
On 2010-11-15, at 11:43 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, Patrick Patterson wrote:
If you call CMS_dataInit() with a NULL BIO it should make use of any content
already in the CMS structure. It does create a read only BIO internally for
that purpose.
Ok -
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, Patrick Patterson wrote:
Hi Steve:
On 2010-11-15, at 11:43 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, Patrick Patterson wrote:
If you call CMS_dataInit() with a NULL BIO it should make use of any content
already in the CMS structure. It does create a
Hi Steve:
On 2010-11-15, at 11:43 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, Patrick Patterson wrote:
If you call CMS_dataInit() with a NULL BIO it should make use of any content
already in the CMS structure. It does create a read only BIO internally for
that purpose.
Ok -
Hi Steve:
On 2010-11-15, at 1:29 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, Patrick Patterson wrote:
1: Why SID isn't getting set.
Not sure haven't had a chance to check in more detail yet.
It appears rather strange, because as I step through it, it LOOKS like the
Bug Report
OpenSSL 1.0.0 encodes the DN attribute rfc822Mailbox, also known as
mail, MAIL, or 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.3, as a DirectoryString
(specifically, a TeletexString/T61String) when it contains characters
such as the @ symbol.
However, the RFCs on the topic (1274, 4524) are
15.11.2010 19:55, Dr. Stephen Henson пишет:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, Valery Blazhnov wrote:
I need an advice on usind EVP_SignFinal function with two private key
objects stored on two different tokens. I can use two PKCS11 engine
instances to access these objects in low-level functions. But
10 matches
Mail list logo
