SSL_THREADS
kevin.greaney> $
kevin.greaney>
kevin.greaney> And the output with the fix in place:
kevin.greaney>
kevin.greaney> $ run test_time
kevin.greaney> The current local time (localtime) is: Sun Jul 18 04:05:19 2004
kevin.greaney> .
kevin.greaney> The current UTC t
rings.h when building under Windows.
(I'd like to say a word or two to Bill or his C library developers,
they're the reason for part of the greyness in my beard...)
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richa
iances in
the number of significant bits?
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automate
You're welcome, and thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Ticket resolved.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jul 1 14:42:46 2004]:
> Perfect!
> Thanks a lot.
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Open
+size" of such a key, either use functions like RSA_size(), DH_size()
+and DSA_size(), or use BN_num_bytes() and multiply with 8 (although
+there's no real guarantee that will match the "key size", just a lot
+more prob
led with gcc 3.3.1
>
> I have attached a test case (actually more or less a fragment of an
> application of mine) which shows the 2044 bit case. Also, the output
of
> 'make report' is attached.
>
> Please e-mail me directly in case of any questions or comments, since
Thanks for the confirmation and the kind words. That resolves this
ticket.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jun 29 21:22:28 2004]:
> Richard Levitte via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Paul, I finally decided to apply the changes, both to the
> > 0.9.7-stable and 0.9
t matter, but as
you noticed, the input is a multiple of block size anyway... If that
changes, we're definitely bound to notice :-).
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL
t matter, but as
you noticed, the input is a multiple of block size anyway... If that
changes, we're definitely bound to notice :-).
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL
vious. In this case I was compiling with the wrong C
libraries.
> I feel stupid and to make myself feel better I sent you a small
donation.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Marcus Carey
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT"
difference is that I eliminated my changes to
comment-out the
> unconditional execution of openssl.pm in apps/Makefile.ssl because (a)
> Richard Levitte objected and (b) the affected command line starts with
a
> hyphen, so the fact that it fails when cross-compiling should be
ignored by
&
t_p);
return(1);
}
+
+#endif
+#endif
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53
an remove the whole OpenSSL manual directory.
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
Solaris build
of
> 0.9.7d (compiled using cc).
> Chris Brook
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Levitte via
> RT
> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 8:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:14:36 -0600, The Doctor <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
doctor> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:40:45PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
doctor> > Try the following:
doctor> >
doctor> > make clean;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jun 11 17:02:20 2004]:
> On June 11, 2004 10:34 am, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> > rt> I see. The problem seems more about the model used by AEP
though.
> > rt> Ie. we could use CRYPTO_thread_id() instead of getpid() (b
little detail '0.9.4'... We
don't support that. Please upgrade to something we support, like the
latest 0.9.6 at the very least. 0.9.7d would be even better if you can.
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
o me that the creation of the
libraries failed miserably. Could you please submit a full build log
(do 'make clean' followed by 'make', please)?
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL
ecked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.701 / Virus Database: 458 - Release Date: 6/7/2004
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.701 / Virus Database: 4
t worked like a charm (I checked with gdb that I really
did get a value back, and that it contained sensible data).
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EM
t worked like a charm (I checked with gdb that I really
did get a value back, and that it contained sensible data).
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EM
@@ -1399,6 +1399,7 @@
EVP_DecryptInit_ex(&ctx,evp_cipher,NULL,key16,iv);
else
EVP_EncryptInit_ex(&ctx,evp_cipher,NULL,key16,iv);
+ EVP_CIPHER
code 1
doctor>
doctor> Stop.
doctor> *** Error code 1
doctor>
doctor> Stop.
doctor> *** Error code 1
doctor>
doctor> Stop.
doctor> *** Error code 1
doctor>
doctor> Stop.
doctor> doctor.nl2k.ab.ca//usr/source/openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-200406
oint of your patch, ctx->buf_len will *always* be zero.
I think the real problem lies in apps/speed.c, which should set the
EVP_CIPH_NO_PADDING flag for the decrypt tests (at the very least). The
speed difference will be v
Fix applied, and will be visible in tomorrow's snapshot. Thanks for the
contribution.
Ticket resolved.
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openss
main one). My stand on this issue hasn't
> changed since we discussed it last.
If ERR_remove_state() doesn't work as it should (as said above), then
it's a bug in ERR_remove_state() and should be treated that way, and
therefore result in a fix of ERR_r
Patch replaced. Ticket resolved.
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List
n one). My stand on this issue hasn't
changed since we discussed it last.
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
> # SCO/Caldera targets.
> #
>
>
>
> I don't know if this relly is a bug or if it's particularly related to
> uClibc.
>
> Hope it is helpful anyway.
>
> regards
> erich buri
>
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:18:37 +0400, Maxim Patlasov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
maxim> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:24:19 +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
maxim>
maxim> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:34:55
nge.
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\ SWEDEN \
Procurator
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:43:48 -0400, Kevin Stefanik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
kstef> On Wednesday 16 June 2004 12:46 pm, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
kstef> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 16 Jun 2004
kstef> > 12:30
OK, thanks for the explanation. I just committed a fix, which resolves
this ticket.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Jun 21 19:36:19 2004]:
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
>
> >
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 21 Jun
> 2004 08
> rt> as it was done in fips/dsa/Makefile.
>
> OK, but I'll do it another way, so we don't have to think about
> uncommenting later on, if EXHEADER would change.
>
> -
> Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
> See h
it was done in fips/dsa/Makefile.
OK, but I'll do it another way, so we don't have to think about
uncommenting later on, if EXHEADER would change.
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ T
it was done in fips/dsa/Makefile.
OK, but I'll do it another way, so we don't have to think about
uncommenting later on, if EXHEADER would change.
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ T
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 16 Jun 2004 19:27:27 -0400, Geoff Thorpe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
geoff> On June 16, 2004 12:46 pm, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
geoff> > kstef> I think we can make do with a less involved fix, actually, by
geoff> &g
k on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\ SWEDEN \
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the ENGINE_get_static_state() code into
0.9.7.
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jun 15 13:11:40 2004]:
> Ah, now I see what you're talking about. Yup, looks a typo to me as
> well. Correcting it right now.
Committed, and that resolves the ticket.
Thanks for your report and patience.
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAI
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:49:26 +0200 (METDST), "Stefan
Farfeleder via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt>
rt> On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:05:32AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
wrote:
rt> >
rt> > In message <[
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:49:26 +0200 (METDST), "Stefan
Farfeleder via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt>
rt> On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:05:32AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
wrote:
rt> >
rt> > In message <[
member of the array
rt> nids.
Why?
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\
member of the array
rt> nids.
Why?
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\
eproduced in the child, which means a whole lot of locks may be
left locked in the child with noone to unlock them, if other threads
in the parent were doing something protected by a lock of some
sort). But that's a different issue... ]
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free so
ed in the child, which means a whole lot of locks may be
left locked in the child with noone to unlock them, if other threads
in the parent were doing something protected by a lock of some
sort). But that's a different issue... ]
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free so
Wish granted. *KICK*
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\ SWEDEN
08008359106412&w=2
rt> for the updated patch. This is a letter I originally sent to
rt> openssl-dev on March 23, 2004, and which has some follow-ups from
rt> Richard Levitte and myself.
rt>
rt> I neglected to send in this newer patch to the request tracker;
rt> please let me kno
9106412&w=2
rt> for the updated patch. This is a letter I originally sent to
rt> openssl-dev on March 23, 2004, and which has some follow-ups from
rt> Richard Levitte and myself.
rt>
rt> I neglected to send in this newer patch to the request tracker;
rt> please let me kno
s on VMS...
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\ SWEDEN \
Procurator Odio
lt, and that just expresses what software package it
comes from, nothing more (i.e. those are OpenSSL-specific files,
rather than SSL-specific).
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnl
Fundraising for OpenSSL development
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revision $Id: OpenSSL-funding.html,v 1.4 2004/05/24 11:09:14 levitte
Exp $
Hello OpenSSL users and
:
> Yup, you're right. I thought the modulus had to be a power of 2 but I
just
> realized the error of my ways. Sorry for bothering you. Thanks. /Luis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, Ma
h a large enough n).
Unless you can find some more compelling evidence, I think I'll
kill this ticket tomorrow...
-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL P
What 16-bit platforms are out there? But in
appro> > appro> either case...
appro> >
appro> > Hmm, DJGPP?
appro>
appro> DJGPP is 32-bit environment where printf("%d\n",sizeof(size_t)); prints
appro> 4. A.
Ah, OK...
-
Please consider sponsoring my wor
returned by
strlen() or required by malloc() on the platform at hand), but other
than that, just don't bother.
I don't have the standards document, but I thought size_t was defined
as part of C89. Am I incorrect in my beliefs?
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
stuff for example. In a cipher case there is a
appro> *remote* possibility that someone would like to take full
appro> advantage of size_t. But in BN or PKI case on the other it
appro> would/should be considered as a DoS attack. A.
There's gonna be quite a lot of new casts with that ap
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 16 May 2004 20:17:07 +0200, "Dr. Stephen
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> On Sun, May 16, 2004, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
steve>
steve> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 16 May 2004 19:12:22
g my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\ SWEDEN \
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTEC
m the
geoff> NO_DEPRECATED build.
Thanks.
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
rking directory with that going
on...
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\
ntioning libssl is a mistake, or as my dear ex would
express it, a brain-fart. Let's just leave it at that, shall me? :-)
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTE
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 14 May 2004 07:29:51 -0400, "Marquess, Steve Mr
JMLFDC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Steve.Marquess> Richard Levitte wrote:
Steve.Marquess>
Steve.Marquess> >jaltman> One concern with your answer is that it
Steve.Marquess&
"shared", regardless of
the arguments given by the person building/script. Would that be
regarded as a viable solution?
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\ SWEDEN \
Procurat
arquess> NIST.
I'm going to work on the FIPS stuff for Windows, and hopefully for
VMS, tomorrow. I'm fairly confident that will be enough.
Thanks for the reminder.
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
like that all files get through the compiler as much as
possible, to make sure nothing is forgotten...
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S
=0x80aafc0,
> > > #in=0x80ab708,
> > > cipher=0x4016f0a0, flags=0) at pk7_smime.c:366
> > > #3 0x08084872 in smime_main (argc=8, argv=0xba18) at
> smime.c:483
> > > #4 0x08054c67 in do_cmd (prog=0x80aaf58, argc=8, argv=0xba18)
> > > at o
R). The
latter involves a few scripts as well.
As far as your run-time data goes, you can place them wherever you want,
just tweak your configuration file accordingly...
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
; bofh:/sw/src/openssl-0.9.7d: diff -u Makefile.org~ Makefile.org
> --- Makefile.org~ Fri Mar 12 22:33:04 2004
> +++ Makefile.orgWed May 5 19:44:49 2004
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@
> MAKEFILE= Makefile.ssl
> MAKE= make -f Makefile.ssl
>
> -MANDIR=$(OPENSSLDIR)/m
if
> more than 20480 bytes of argv/env information is found).
> Thus, exec() now supports up to 2048000 bytes of argv/env
> information.
>
> However: this patch has long been superseeded by PHKL_16750 (and other
> later versions of this patch)...
>
if those in the team that really know the SSL parts
could give an accurate response...
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECT
The question is: What's the purpose of /etc/ssl/lib when the
> > libraries are installed in another directory ?
>
> Very good question. I can't figure it out, but hopefully will either
> figure it out, or remove that line.
--
Richard Levitte
[
d that it compiles properly. Please test
tomorrow's 0.9.7 snapshot (ftp://ftp.openssl.org/snapshot/openssl-0.9.
7-stable-SNAP-20040507.tar.gz).
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project
> ! len = strlen(p)+len-(e-from)+1; /* keep len up
> with the current string length even across
> multiple replacements */
> ! BUF_MEM_grow_clean(buf, len);
> !
> while (*p)
>
=
> os = win2k, compiler = vc++ 6.0
>
> callingi2d_RSAPrivateKey_fp(FILE* , RSA* ) with valid argument
> causes access violation in vc++.
>
>
>
>
>
> Subir Chakraborty
>
>
> ---------
> D
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:37:45 -0400, Geoff Thorpe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
geoff> On April 21, 2004 04:49 am, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
geoff> > I'm a little hesitant to do this, however, as it has a strong
geoff> > smell of quic
s 80% of
the time...).
Comments?
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Apr 21 08:27:23 2004]:
This bug is already fixed by having free_index() check for NULL.
Thank you. I'm resolving this ticket.
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Pr
Paul.Green> embedded spaces.
That's a manual page building bug that has been fixed. You can check
for yourself in a recent 0.9.7 snapshot (you find those in
ftp://ftp.openssl.org/snapshot).
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://
, I can understand. Otherwise, I'd prefer if the
gnu-shared target got used, so we don't get an even larger bag of
shared library targets, looking almost the same...
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Ric
n/as -o asm/pa-risc2W.o asm/pa-risc2W.s
>
>
> (HP-UX, hpux64-parisc2-cc)
>
> thanks
>
> Martin
>
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.op
.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\ SWEDEN \
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of t
.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\ SWEDEN \
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:51:13 +0200 (CEST), Richard
Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
levitte> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:23:29 +0200 (METDST),
"Simon Josefsson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTE
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:51:13 +0200 (CEST), Richard
Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
levitte> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:23:29 +0200 (METDST),
"Simon Josefsson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTE
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:23:29 +0200 (METDST), "Simon
Josefsson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt>
rt> "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
rt>
rt> > I'm honestly very unsure about thi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:23:29 +0200 (METDST), "Simon
Josefsson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt>
rt> "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
rt>
rt> > I'm honestly very unsure about this on
RT and attachments, I tell ya... This mail is generated externally,
so it does contain the intended attachment...
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:44:21 +0200 (METDST), "Richard
Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt>
rt> I'm guess
sl/kssl.h:158: error: parse error before '*' token
> ../include/openssl/kssl.h:166: error: parse error before '*' token
> In file included from ssl_locl.h:129,
> from s2_meth.c:59:
> ../include/openssl/ssl.h:909: e
t; > - goto end;
> > + if (!reqfile && !noselfsign && !X509_verify_cert(&xsc))
> > + goto end;
> >
> > if (!X509_check_private_key(xca,pkey))
> > {
> > @@ -1132,6 +1137,7 @@
> > if (ok)
> > {
&
Steven Reddie has now confirmed, on openssl-dev, that this issue is
resolved.
Thanks, Steve. Ticket resolved.
[levitte - Tue Mar 30 23:14:37 2004]:
> I would very much like to know if my fix worked, so I can close this
> ticket.
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PRO
anks.
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\ SWEDEN \
Pr
; Interix does not ship with OpenSSL.
> A binary version of OpenSSL for Interix can be installed
> as a package from http://www.interopsystems.com/tools/warehouse.htm
>
> Let me know if there are any questions.
>
> thanks
> Rodney
>
--
+ 0x9C
> openssl.exe!do_cmd(lhash_st * prog=0x00a44a00, int argc=13,
> char * * argv=0x003a4454) Line 381 + 0xe C
> openssl.exe!main(int Argc=13, char * * Argv=0x003a4454) Line
> 300 + 0x14C
> openssl.exe!mainCRTStartup() Line 398 + 0x11 C
>
#x27;ve verified that redefining rename by
> copying
> > line 140 of apps.h and inserting it after line 353 of apps.c fixes
all
> of
> > the problems with serial and index files that I was experiencing:
> >
> > apps.c:352 #undef rename
> > apps.c:353
due to reusing an already opened page.
>
> I've checked with the following snapshot:
> openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20040326.tar.gz
> and it now seems to be adequately named
> as 'Modes_of_DES.7'
>
> Thank You!
>
> Best Regards,
> Rolf S
are at least "short name",
"name" and "printable lable". I'm pretty sure I could come up with
some more.
Now, if we want to make it less confusing, the question is how do we
solve it...
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://w
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\ SWEDEN \
Procurator Odiosus Ex I
d pasting
> > > it into the SSLOBJ dependency section. That seemed to solve the
> > > problem.
> > >
> > > I'll be happy to download the latest version of OpenSSL and
> > try
OK, I'm resolving this ticket.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Mar 22 12:04:28 2004]:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Richard Levitte via RT schrieb:
> > Care to tell us exactly what's wrong with it? There are more files
> > where the name part spans several lines, for example des
1001 - 1100 of 3412 matches
Mail list logo
