__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -cr openssl-0.9.8-beta4.clean/apps/s_socket.c
openssl-0.9.8-beta4/apps/s_socket.c
*** openssl-0.9.8-beta4.clean/apps/s_socket.c Tue Apr 26 17:43:52 2005
--- openssl-0.9.8-beta4/apps/s_socket.c Thu Jun 09 20:02:39 2005
***
*** 87,94
#ifndef OPENSSL_NO_SOCK
static
This is marked fixed, but checking the website again today shows it still has
the old patch from 0.9.7d. Is there something else that needs to happen? Thanks.
Verdon
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/5/2005 5:48:03 PM >>>
Added the 0.9.7g diff. Thanks!
Ticket resolved.
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PR
This is marked fixed, but checking the website again today shows it still has the old patch from 0.9.7d. Is there something else that needs to happen? Thanks.
Verdon>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/5/2005 5:48:03 PM >>>
Added the 0.9.7g diff. Thanks!Ticket resolved.-- Richard Levitte[EMAIL PROTECTED]__
diff -cr openssl-0.9.8-beta3/Configure openssl-0.9.8-beta3.nw/Configure
*** openssl-0.9.8-beta3/Configure Wed May 18 02:17:26 2005
--- openssl-0.9.8-beta3.nw/Configure Thu Jun 2 11:05:34 2005
***
*** 484,493
# NetWare from David Ward ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - requires MetroWerks
In updating the NetWare patch for 0.9.8, I also noticed that my latest 0.9.7g NetWare patch has not been added to the "Contributions" page. Is it possible to have that happen as well?
Thanks for everything.
Verdon
It looks like a couple of extra files hitched a ride in the latest 0.9.7e tarball. Unless I am mistaken, the root level directory has a "Makefile" and "Makefile.bak" that shouldn't be there since "Makefile" is created automatically from "Makefile.org".
I did not realize that ERR_remove_state() worked that way. In looking at the code, it appears that it does indeed delete the table making ERR_free_state_table() unnecessary in properly coded applications.
Thanks.
Verdon>>> "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/28/2004 5:47:58 AM >>>
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FXSAVE and FXRSTOR instructions during context switches) then the OSFXSR bit won't be set. When the OSFXSR bit is not set, the SSE2 instructions aren't available; if you try to execute one, you will get an invalid opcode exception - even if you are running on the latest CPUs that support S
he installation software install the appropriate version; or 2) have
the code be dynamic and detect the CPU type when it runs and adjust
itself as necessary.
[/Embedded Response]
I hope that answers the questions.
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider
I had already made the change you suggest even before reading your
email. It works great with the latest Metrowerks compiler.
Unfortunately, further testing with older versions of the compiler (the
only one available when the code was first ported to NetWare) produced
undefined symbols for "__rol".
Here's the assembly output for the two funtions. BTW, _MSC_VER was not
defined so I changed it to __NETWARE__ which was defined (to my
surprise):
foo:
: 55 push ebp
0001: 89E5 mov ebp,esp
0003: 6A02 push 0x2
0005: F
has been set up for use with OpenSSL in general.
I hope this answers the question.
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions
http://www.novell.com
>>> Andy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/12/2004 4:49:47 PM >&
upport these changes in future
versions of OpenSSL including building and testing them in each
release
(and pre-release) of OpenSSL.
Thank you so VERY much for your consideration of this work!
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solution
called inappropriately.
What are people's thoughts on the matter?
Should OpenSSL formalize a mechanism for cleaning up global library
resources? Or is it sufficient to let the OS do that work?
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solu
called inappropriately.
What are people's thoughts on the matter?
Should OpenSSL formalize a mechanism for cleaning up global library
resources? Or is it sufficient to let the OS do that work?
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solu
VERY much for your consideration of this work!
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions
http://www.novell.com
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/28/2003 5:39:44 AM >>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Nov 27 09:23:09 2003]:
&g
The test suite runs
correctly on both platforms with the patch applied.
Thank you for your consideration of this work.
Note: This is a repeat of a request made in June. The patch file has
been updated, however, to address a couple of minor issues.
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTEC
uot;Contributions" page in the
same manner as the 0.9.6 NetWare patch.
Thank you for your consideration of this work.
Note: This is a repeat of a request made in June. The patch file has
been updated, however, to address a couple of minor issues discovered
when migrating to OpenSSL 0.9.
x475'
SSLEAY32.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
SSL_COMP_get_compression_method
out32dll.dbg\ssleay32.lib : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved
externals
LINK : fatal error LNK1141: failure during build of exports file
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'link' : return code '0x47
Thanks for the information.
Verdon
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions
http://www.novell.com
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/26/03 7:08 PM >>>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003, Verdon Walker wrote:
> I noticed a s
n id's are not always checked when resuming
sessions. For a server implementation, they are only checked if mutual
authentication is turned on.
The code should really either check the session id anytime it is being
reused or ignore it always if it is not set. I'm not sure which is
better,
like "./config -DFIPS" to get it to build
the FIPS cryptography module?
2) It doesn't appear that optimized assembly code is part of the FIPS
module. Is that correct?
3) Once I have the FIPS crypto built, how do I use OpenSSL so that all
SSL crypto work is done using that FIPS c
really settled. Then suddenly a note that the code has been moved to its
own branch and now this message saying it's almost too late to have any
input. What happened to the discussion about the ongoing work?
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provid
I hate to be a pest, but has anything changed on this?
Verdon
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/7/2003 11:07:00 PM >>>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 07 Jul 2003 13:10:39 -0600, "Verdon Walker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
VWalker> Has anyone had a chance
Has anyone had a chance to look at this patch yet? Is it on anyone's "to
do" list if not?
Thanks for any feedback.
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions
http://www.novell.com
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTE
turn code '0x475'
As near as I can tell even though these functions exist in the public
header files, none of them are defined in the actual code. The easiest
way to work around this problem is to remove the references to the
functions in util\libeay.num. This results in a number of war
during build of exports file
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'link' : return code '0x475'
so I finally quit. (I did have Windows static libraries at this point which pass the
test suite.) The Windows build obviously isn't quite ready for prime time. :-)
BTW, I also see the warning:
Warn
pile because it does not find the include file
"openssl/store.h" which is referenced by "engine.h"
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions
http://www.novell.com
___
No action was ever taken on this request. Is there something more I need
to do?
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions
http://www.novell.com
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/14/2003 5:23:20 PM >>>
This patch adds
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/19/2003 5:54:04 PM >>>
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:53:32 -0700, Verdon Walker wrote:
>First, thank you for your responses. I appreciate the feedback, but
>I don't think I understand the points you are making in your last
>email.
>Perha
First, thank you for your responses. I appreciate the feedback, but I
don't think I understand the points you are making in your last email.
Perhaps, I did not explain myself well enough, but the idea of allowing
long operations to be cancelled is hardly rare. Suppose for example, you
want to searc
ing the "cancel".
Verdon
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/18/2003 7:10:23 PM >>>
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 11:26:46 -0700, Verdon Walker wrote:
>I know from looking in the archives that this question has been
>asked
>before, but I am wondering if anything has been done in th
they are using the same SSL structure. In particular, the "rwstate" flag
can get trashed and confuse one thread or the other about what is
happening. I know that OpenSSL does not support this in the 0.9.6
branch, but was anything done to address it in 0.9.7 or is anything
planned in 0.9.
ntroducing
another check of "(s != NULL)" in the "else if" statement. The code for
SSL_get_ciphers() should do the same.
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
_
This does not seem to have shown up in the contributions area. Are we
still waiting for an update or did something go wrong?
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
>>> "Richard Levitte v
task we will not be
offended. :-)
Note: Since this submission is from the USA, we have CC'd the appropriate US
government office as outlined in the Readme.
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novel
Would it be possible to have this patch added to the OpenSSL
Contributions area until we are able to get it merged into the 9.7
development branch? Thanks.
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
What is the status of the 0.9.6h defect release?
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
__
OpenSSL Project
avoid this naming conflict, but also to make these two
function names more consistent with the other functions defined in
pkcs12.h?
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
s for your feedback and for correcting my misunderstanding.
Verdon
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/09/02 12:15PM >>>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 08 May
2002 17:31:41 -0600, "Verdon Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
VWalker> This patch fixes the routine BI
he
very least the static buffer can be very minimal in size.
Can this change be made? Do I need to submit a patch to do it? Or am I
missing something?
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading pr
What is the status of support in OpenSSL for 64 bit architectures?
We are compiling our code for an Itanium box and are wondering how much
change may be required to get OpenSSL running as well.
Thanks for your feedback.
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading
oks like a hack to me. Is there a specific reason it is
needed?
Thanks for any help.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com
Is there an official postal address for the OpenSSL group? We are filing
some paperwork related to our use of OpenSSL and it requires an address. What
would a person list?
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com
Can Tina please be dropped from the developer list until January 8th to
eliminate this reoccuring email? Some with group rights, please help!
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
onse. The big question is: if we submit a patch to
OpenSSL to add NetWare support, will it be accepted? Is anyone else interested
in this work?
Thanks for your interest.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com
>&
to release that
work for general consumption.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/02/01 01:40PM >>>Hi,I want to
compile openssl for Novell NetWare. Was this done before?
Did you modify the configuration scripts to set up the single library or
did you just edit the makefiles directly? That is the issue I am looking into
now. (If you have anything you want to share, we'd love to see it.)
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
le
.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com
ble to all
platforms.
Any questions, comments or concerns, please contact me.
Thanks.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com
hmacdigest.patch.20010503
r concerns, please contact me.
Thanks.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com
o that you can specify the difference between being really
done and just ready for a value but still planning to do some more
processing.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/2
making (EVP implementation of digests,
ciphers, etc.) in that context and hope that it can be of benefit to all of
us.
Cheers.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/26/01 05:30PM >
r has
someone already done this work?
Thanks again.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/26/01 04:48PM >>>>
Verdon Walker wrote:> > > I appreciate your feedback.
want at this time.
Am I incorrect in any of my assumptions or conclusions? Are
there other considerations I have missed that would make the Engine more
palatable for what we are doing?
You time and consideration of these questions is greatly
appreciated.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL
ria should I use
when determining what patches to submit? We are making a number of changes to
OpenSSL in order to replace the standard crypto lib, but I only want to submit
changes that are generally useful to whole OpenSSL community. Any guidelines
would be appreciated. Thanks.
Verdon Walke
bmitted. I previously
submitted a small Patch for HMAC processing and never saw anything. Am I doing
something wrong or do I need to do something differently? Thanks for your help
on these matters.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Ne
the 2 finished messages,
but I believe we need a third in case a CertificateVerify is sent. Do we need
more than 3?
Thanks, as always, for your insight and help.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com
lease contact me.
Thanks.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com
diff.out
On the client side, I run (from the out32dll
directory)
openssl s_client -cipher
EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA
and it doesn't handshake.
What certificate file should I be using for this cipher
designation? Does this work for everyone
else?
Thanks again for your help.
Verdon Walker(801) 8
that this is a completely clean build of 0.9.6a.
(I just downloaded it and built it yesterday.)
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/12/01 11:12AM >>>> > I wrote a lit
n SSLCONNECTION CLOSEDACCEPT
Any help diagnosing the problem would be greatly
appreciated. Thanks.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the
leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com
The key is to update the ms\do_ms.bat file. I'm not
sure that Configure does much on the Win32 platform. If you edit the do_ms.bat
and pass no-rc4 no-rc5 no-idea into the perl scripts mk1mf.pl and mkdef.pl, you
should see a difference.
Good luck.
Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[
67 matches
Mail list logo
