We won't change our openssl.spec, so I'm going to resolve this
ticket.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Aug 10 00:01:22 2002]:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 9
Aug
2002 18:46:24 +0200 (METDST), download (Jim Prewett) via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I'm sorry to bother you again, but
Fair enough. I didn't realize the political badness that redhat had
introduced here. I thought they were shipping openssl... not making
everything difficult...
Thanks so much for your time,
jim
---
Hi,
I'm doing the big upgrade along with everyone else right now :)
I'm working with redhat 7.1 on i386.
I built an rpm from the .spec file in the distribution as noone has yet to
release an rpm for 0.9.6e (to my knowledge). When I try to install the
rpms (all of the openssl binary rpms and
Ok, I'll buy it if thats what y'all think.
Do you have an explanation for this? Does the generated rpm not provide
those? Am i looking to the wrong package to provide me libssl.so.2 and
libcrypto.so.2? I have several rpms from redhat that say they require
these and openssl is the only ssl
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 9 Aug 2002 18:46:24
+0200 (METDST), download (Jim Prewett) via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I'm sorry to bother you again, but check this out:
rt
rt http://www.redhat.com/swr/i686/openssl-0.9.6b-18.i686_dp.html
rt
rt Which says:
rt
rt Provides
rt The
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 9 Aug 2002 18:46:24
+0200 (METDST), download (Jim Prewett) via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I'm sorry to bother you again, but check this out:
rt
rt http://www.redhat.com/swr/i686/openssl-0.9.6b-18.i686_dp.html
rt
rt Which says:
rt
rt Provides
rt The
