Re: valgrind and openssl

2008-05-15 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
* do what you want. But thats a compile time option. I would prefer not to have to compile my own version of OpenSSL just to be able to valgrind my program which links against openssl. Erik -- - Erik de Castro Lopo

Re: valgrind and openssl

2008-05-15 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
de Castro Lopo - We reject kings, presidents, and voting. We believe in rough consensus and running code. -- Dave Clark (IETF 1992) __ OpenSSL Project

Re: valgrind and openssl

2008-05-15 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
-- - Erik de Castro Lopo - The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits

Re: valgrind and openssl

2008-05-15 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
unpredicatable or are you only guessing? Can a bad guy force it to be predicatable? How much entropy is actually there? Has anyone actually measured it? Erik -- - Erik de Castro Lopo

Re: valgrind and openssl

2008-05-15 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
. In the practice of engineering, we should try to avoid 'hoping' about anything. Erik -- - Erik de Castro Lopo - Every method you use to prevent or find bugs leaves a residue

Re: valgrind and openssl

2008-05-15 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
-- - Erik de Castro Lopo - The Earth is around 70% water. Fish rule the seas. Humans are over 90% water. It's only a matter of time

[openssl.org #1513] Bug : SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file fails due to earlier errors

2007-03-22 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo via RT
... */ -- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo +---+ Men who use terrorism as a means to power, rule by terror once they are in power. -- Helen Macinnes

Bug : SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file fails due to earlier errors

2007-03-20 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
... */ -- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo +---+ Men who use terrorism as a means to power, rule by terror once they are in power. -- Helen Macinnes

Re: Bug : SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file fails due to earlier errors

2007-03-20 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
-- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo +---+ If only Muslims were clever politically, they could take over the United States and replace its constitutional govt. with a caliphate. -- Siraj Wahaj, American convert to Islam http

[openssl.org #1508] bug report : Possible issue in AES asm code?

2007-03-18 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo via RT
-- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo +---+ Code is more often read than written and thus making it readable is more important than making it writable. -- Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk

bug report : Possible issue in AES asm code?

2007-03-16 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
-- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo +---+ Code is more often read than written and thus making it readable is more important than making it writable. -- Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk

[patch] Valgrind complaining about unitialized data

2007-03-01 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
(); - memset (buf, 0, num); if (meth meth-bytes) return meth-bytes(buf,num); return(-1); -- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo +---+ Even Napoleon had his Watergate

Re: [patch] Valgrind complaining about unitialized data

2007-03-01 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: So, my question is, is there any reason why Daniel Brahneborg's patch from 2003 wasn't applied? For reference, the patch (against 0.9.8c) is below. Sorry, the patch was the wrong direction. The correct patch below. Erik diff -r -u openssl-0.9.8c/crypto/rand

Re: [patch] Valgrind complaining about unitialized data

2007-03-01 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
the -DPURIFY was supposed to affect is already being disabled. Secondly, if that code is really as un-necessary as it seems to be, why is it still in there? Erik -- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo

Re: Emails not getting through?

2006-09-18 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On 9/18/06, Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Sorry for being such a PITA about this. Testing from a newly set up Gmail account. Over night there have been a number of emails to ths list as I can see here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-devr=1b=200609w=2

Re: Emails not getting through?

2006-09-18 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On 9/19/06, Dr. Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It will be a few days before I can check properly (on dead slow dialup at present) but your gmail and openssl-dev:[EMAIL PROTECTED] are in the openssl-dev subscription list. Thanks Stephen. I can wait until you have time to look at it.

Re: Emails not getting through?

2006-09-17 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
-- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo +---+ Visual SourceSafe? It would be safer to print out all your code, run it through a shredder, and set it on fire. http://www.wadhome.org/svn_vs_vss.txt

Re: Emails not getting through?

2006-09-17 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
PROTECTED] Address already subscribed to openssl-dev so it seems that my work email address is in some weird quantum state between subscribed and not-subscribed :-). Cheers, Erik -- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo

Re: Emails not getting through?

2006-09-17 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
PROTECTED] to majordomo at openssl domain name. Erik -- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo +---+ I'm not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions

Re: Emails not getting through?

2006-09-17 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Hi all, Sorry for being such a PITA about this. Testing from a newly set up Gmail account. Erik __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

Emails not getting through?

2006-09-15 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
-- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo +---+ Safety versus Expressiveness is a false dichotomy -- you can have both. Compare ObjectiveCaml with CeePlusPlus: OCaml obtains expressiveness without compromising safety, while C++ obtains

Re: Emails not getting through?

2006-09-15 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Darryl Miles wrote: Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Anybody have any idea why this is happening? Can this be fixed somehow? Both times I have replied to your emails my Mail User Agent (Mozilla SeaMonkey) did not offer to put your email address into the address box, it only but the single

Re: SSL_library_init and freeing memory allocations

2006-09-14 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Sorry, I missed this response from Darryl Miles (probably work spam filter being overly agressive) but found in in the archive: Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Unfortunately, it seems that openssl allocates memory inside the call to SSL_library_init() that seems to never get deallocated

SSL_library_init and freeing memory allocations

2006-09-11 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
people be interested in a patch that adds an SSL_library_release() function that releases all memory and returns the SSL library to the state it was in before SSL_library_init() was called? Cheers, Erik -- === erik de castro lopo senior design engineer bCODE level 2, 2a glen