e/vagrant/+bug/1964025
Cheers,
--
Simon Chopin
Foundations Team Ubuntu MOTU
simon.cho...@canonical.comscho...@ubuntu.com
encryption algorithms.
Do we have an API for converting the encrypted private key file to an
unencrypted private key file in PKCS#8 format?
Regards
Simon
am looking for the APIs used to get the OIDs associated with Digital
Signature and Key Encipherment from the certificate.
Reagrds
Simon
.
p12 = d2i_PKCS12_fp(fp, NULL);
PKCS12_parse(p12, passwd, &pkey, &cert, &ca))
Regards
Simon
where I can start looking (for the dns
resolution).
Thank you for your time.
Regards
Simon
x27;, 'openssl-ptest', '', d)}
openssl-dbg openssl openssl-doc openssl-dev openssl-static openssl-locale
openssl-bin which triggered exception AttributeError: 'module' object has
no attribute 'contains'
ERROR: Command execution failed: Exited with 1
Regards
Simon
s64r2*
| make[1]: *** [crypto/aes/aes-mips.o] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/sbaby/workspace/WQAR/tmp/work/mips-mv-linux/openssl-1.1.0h-r0/openssl-1.1.0h'
| make: *** [all] Error 2
| + die 'oe_runmake failed'
| + oefatal 'oe_runmake failed'
Regards
Simon
Okay.
Thanks Matt, I didn't see that one in x509_vfy.c, I must look harder.
I will modify our own copy of OpenSSL1.1.1c to provide the missing functions
and open a PR on the master.
Simon Edwards
On 25/09/2019 12:31, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 25/09/2019 12:22, Simon Edwards wrote:
>
t different keys. The second (or later) of these may be the signer of the
certificate being verified. The OpenSSL version would stop when it encountered
the first certificate with an incorrect key. If OpenSSL now supports this
situation we could remove the need to set our own callback.
Si
That's odd. I've been waiting for a post that I sent on Friday to appear.
Nothing so far.
The list seems to be far more active now than on Friday.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Salz, Rich via openssl-users <
openssl-users@openssl.org> wrote:
>
>- I have posted my question into the forum.
-Enhance-SSL-load-client-CA-file-td52977.html
Am I missing something fundamental here?
Is the Server side verification supposed to work for multiple signature
types when they are identifying the same CARoot entities?
If so, I suggest that the sig' type not being checked alongside the
SubjectN
accept newer certificates unless it can validate them fully?
Simon
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
> Use a publicly-trusted certification authority, such as Let's Encrypt.
> The problem is from the remote side (it's sending the alert that it
> does not rec
I am getting a certificate expired error on the above URL.
Simon
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 4:55 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/11/17 05:39, Simon Matthews wrote:
>>
>> I have generated a new certificate for my CentOS 6/postfix server, and
>> it seems to work with most clients, but when I try to send email using
>&g
q -in smtp.matthews-family.org.uk.csr -CA
MatthewsCA2017.pem -CAkey MatthewsCA2017.key -CAcreateserial -out
smtp.matthews-family.org.uk.crt -days 3000 -sha256
Any ideas on what might be wrong?
Simon
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
The BIO_write sends back the number of bytes of the client hello.
But that doesn't work, because when the handshake is re executed I still
get a WANT_READ in response, instead of a WANT_WRITE (to send the server
HELLO).
What I am missing ?
Best regards,
Simon
openssl-dev mailing list from Attila Gulyas who had been working on
implementing this functionality and was looking to submit their work. I
however have not been able to find any reference to this work in gitweb,
so am assuming this was never done. Is my assumption here correct?
Thanks,
Simon
openssl-dev mailing list from Attila Gulyas who had been working on
implementing this functionality and was looking to submit their work. I
however have not been able to find any reference to this work in gitweb,
so am assuming this was never done. Is my assumption here correct?
Thanks,
Simon
Thanks Mat - that info really helps. I validated your input and queried the
private key file - which indeed pointed to handles on the HSM. For further
validation - i tried to sign using the sautil output key file on another box
w/o hsm and it failed.
- Simon Charles -
> From: argem
# sautil -l "my-rsa-private-label" g 2048
# openssl req -engine LunaCA3 -new -nodes -key "my-rsa-private-label"
-keyform ENGINE -out tmpkey.req -days 30
Which works but when using openssl ca routine - it is not able to find / load
the keys
- Simon Charl
here. Any help would be much
appreciated.
Thanks.
- Simon Charles -
> Subject: Re: Openssl default_ca values while using HSM - LunaCA3
> From: ppatter...@carillon.ca
> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:54:11 -0500
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org; charlessi...@hotmail.com
>
> Hello
/usr/local/openssl/ssl/bin/openssl version
OpenSSL 1.0.0e 6 Sep 2011
- Simon Charles -
> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:53:40 +0100
> From: st...@openssl.org
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: Openssl default_ca values while using HSM - LunaCA3
>
> On Thu, D
6D06C:PEM routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line:pem_lib.c:696:
* Looks like it is trying to read the key from disk on not from the HSM.
Thanks.
- Simon Charles -
> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:48:09 +0100
> From: st...@openssl.org
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re:
All ,
What would the default_ca section look like while using LunaCA3 HSM for
storing CA private key. Openssl looks for certificate and private_key on disk -
how do i make openssl ca routine aware of private keys on the HSM ( LunaCA3 )
Thanks.
- Simon Charles -
. Openssl looks for certificate
and private_key on disk - how do i make openssl ca routine aware of
private keys on the HSM ( LunaCA3 )
Thanks.
- Simon Charles -
story if yo're cross
compiling, which you're not.
Good luck.
Simon
>
liam A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 1/18/2012 9:57 AM, Brooke, Simon wrote:
> > Sadly, removing -fomit-frame-pointer does not work.
>
> Isn't that the default behavior for -O3?
>
On GCC - yes.
OP is using the ancestor of what is now known as GCC.
The answer was in another pers
had been removed from the Makefiles, and indeed it had.
But many thanks for the suggestion!
Cheers
Simon
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of Michael S. Zick
Sent: 18 January 2012 14:05
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
box (i386,
kernel 2.0.36)
On 1/18/2012 12:00 PM, Brooke, Simon wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have a box running Debian 2.1 still in production, and for complicated
> reasons we can't replace it immediately. I'm trying to compile OpenSSH for
> it, and to do that I need to compi
0386, version 1,
statically linked, stripped
Output from make (after doing config) is as follows:
$ make
making all in crypto...
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/simon/openssl-1.0.0f/crypto'
gcc -I. -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN
-DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DL_ENDIAN -DTER
st.c:125: error: expected ':' or ')' before ';' token
md4_dgst.c:126: error: expected ':' or ')' before ';' token
md4_dgst.c:127: error: expected ':' or ')' before ';' token
md4_dgst.c:128: error:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:59:36AM +0100, OpenSSL wrote:
>
>The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of
>version 0.9.8m-beta1 of our open source toolkit for SSL/TLS. This new
>OpenSSL version is a security and bug fix beta release which implements
>draft-ietf-tls
Hi Damian,
Thank you for your help but I still have one concern if I use a self generated
certification that the user must confirm each time he wants to access the site.
do you have a solution for this?
sorry to bother you,
warm regards,
Simon
> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:01
hi,
I am a new user of openssl, I have html software that users must put user name
and password to get access but it is in plain text how can I use opennssl to
circumvent this odd without using an international ca.
Thank you,
Simon Charbel, CISM, CISA
Microsoft brings you a new
that the key length may be internally truncated
since I cannot seem to find much documentation regarding this.
Thanks,
Simon
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List
dynamic CRTS, rather than a
static link version. So how can I modify the VC flag using the OpenSSL
Configuration options?
Regards,
Simon Edwards
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
Micro Focus Limited is registered in England and Wales. Registered number:
01504593
Re
You can not use the "shared" option for the fips module (1.1.1)
You are only supposed to use the "fips" option, which will build a
single fips canister object file. This object file can then be used to
link into your openssl build (eg. 0.9.7m).
For openssl itself, you _should_ be able to use
he API
against, even if everything's stubbed out. :P)
I do have to ask, though: is this one going to compile properly on
Intel-based Macs? 1.1 and 1.1.1 didn't.
-Kyle H
On Nov 29, 2007 5:22 PM, Brendan Simon < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Where
Where can I find information about OpenSSL FIPS Object Module v1.2 ???
Where can this be downloaded from? CVS only? Or are there tarballs
somewhere?
Where does FIPS related development/discussion take place? Just the
users mailing list?
Is there a spot on the website dedicated to FIPS relate
rary
trivially behaves as the traditional openssl (with all
functionalities). The former is called FIPS-validated App and latter
is FIPS-capable App.
On Nov 29, 2007 4:22 PM, Brendan Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi,
I require FIPS functional
Hi,
I require FIPS functionality in OpenSSL but I do NOT have a requirement
to run in FIPS mode.
What I would like is to build OpenSSL and have ALL functions available
to me so I can choose which ones I want to use. At the moment there are
some functions that are only available if the -fips
I want to use the RSA_X931_generate_key() function as part of a dynamic
library, but it seems to only be available when using fips mode and
presumably the fipscanister. The codes is surrounded by "#ifdef
OPENSSL_FIPS".
I'm happy to use the fipscansister, but it seems that both
openssl-fips-1
David Schwartz wrote:
I'm happy to use the fipscansister, but it seems that both
openssl-fips-1.1.1 and openssl-0.9.7m both fail building if configured
using "./config fips shared".
Why are you trying to build the FIPS canister with anything other than
"./config fips"?
Without the "sh
I want to use the RSA_X931_generate_key() function as part of a dynamic
library, but it seems to only be available when using fips mode and
presumably the fipscanister. The codes is surrounded by "#ifdef
OPENSSL_FIPS".
I'm happy to use the fipscansister, but it seems that both
openssl-fips-1.1.1
I can't even build openssl-fips.1.1.1 if the "shared" option is
specified. I had to remove it as you (Bill) did for the openssl-0.9.7m.
My build host is an oldish Debian (Woody) PowerPC box.
$ uname -a
Linux larabee 2.4.25-powerpc #1 mer avr 14 15:38:38 CEST 2004 ppc unknown
Why does "shared
Hi, Folks,
I have a long lived SSL connection which I'd like
to create a new symmetric key every hour. Can someone
shed some example or tips how to do it?
Thanks ahead
*
http://RateMyBossCafe.com
Leverage the Wisdom of Crowds
c:83:50:ad:
98:c1:70:89
Simon McMahon
Software Engineer
Australia Development Laboratory
IBM
+61 7 5552 4002
Kyle Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25/10/2007 06:24 PM
Please respond to
openssl-users@openssl.org
To
Simon McMahon/Australia/Contr/[EMAIL
e extensions without looking at them.
It probably should update the "Authority Key Identifier" if it is present
in the extensions.
Simon McMahon
Simon McMahon/Australia/Contr/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25/10/2007 02:48 PM
Please respond to
openssl-users@openssl.or
39:c9:0c:2d:38:4b:2e:ae:21:f7:b7:3a:a0:82:03:
c3:fd
Simon McMahon
"Kyle Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
25/10/2007 01:09 PM
To
openssl-users@openssl.org, Simon McMahon/Australia/Contr/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: refresh validity dates on a certificate
be in openssl.
Any reason why it's not in the 'openssl' command line tool?
If I patch the openssl tool to add this will it get integrated into the
main code base? I.e. would anyone else use this to refresh end-user certs?
Simon McMahon
"David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PRO
atter.
The thing I would like to use is "openssl x509" and specify the old cert
and get a new cert from it with all the extensions preserved.
Thanks,
Simon McMahon
Simon McMahon/Australia/Contr/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
24/10/2007 03:27 PM
Please respond to
o
it?
Regards,
Simon McMahon
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ts using a single thread, but it
does get tricky as everything revolves around detecting activity and
responding quickly before returning to detection mode again. Its
impossible to do it reliably using blocking-mode calls.
Regards,
Simon Edwards
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi Gary,
Sorry the quick fix didn't work.
Amit is right, you've a different dependency issue from the one that I
found. So dependencywalker should throw it up.
Regards,
Simon Edwards
Communications Software Development
Micro Focus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
its not on the system path and will
initially give you the same load error. So go hunt for it on your system
drive, and stick a copy of it somewhere on the path.
Regards,
Simon Edwards
Communications Software Development
Micro Focus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mai
Hi,
I want to use the openssl library on a mobile device. Due to the limited memory
space I want to strip down the openssl api in that way, that I can still offer
proper SSL/TLS functionality to connect to a https webserver yet use as less
memory as possible.
Any advices/ recommendations?
--
?
Regards
Simon
--
"Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Ma
27;s suggestion.
Regards,
Simon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson
Sent: 26 March 2007 12:30
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Process getting locked on Win32
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007, Rocky S wrote:
> On 3/
Hi, folks,
Does anyone know how can the encryption key used to
secure SSL communication be changed/rotated over a
long-lived (hours to days) SSL connection to prevent
sniffers from deciphering the key by analyzing a
arge amount of traffic?
Thanks for comments
Paul
___
e request (with
nonce) from my end is now DER encoded.
Regards,
Simon McMahon
Simon McMahon/Australia/Contr/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/10/2007 12:56 PM
Please respond to
openssl-users@openssl.org
To
openssl-users@openssl.org
cc
Subject
OCSP response nonce extension e
The error I get is a bad signature.
The entire ocsp response is attached.
Simon McMahon
eeoknonce_x.orsp
Description: Binary data
siest for me.
The "-text" argument lets you see every ocsp request and response on the
responder's console window. This is worth setting so you can see if the
cert is being sent with the response and if nonce is being sent etc.
The -ignore_err is needed to make the responder kee
eight and works so it is worth the effort! You can certainly learn a
lot about OCSP responder from using this one.
Regards,
Simon McMahon
"Sowjanya Malika" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12/06/2006 10:21 PM
To
Simon McMahon/Australia/Contr/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
ocsp responder c
_certs) includes
an empty sequence for 'certs' which the responder must be looking for.
I'm still not sure how or if the responder is validating the request in
the -no_certs case. I used a cert that the responder could not have known
and it still responded 'good'. I.e. no
#x27; is not present.
Regards,
Simon McMahon.
Simon McMahon/Australia/Contr/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/13/2006 11:28 AM
Please respond to
openssl-users@openssl.org
To
openssl-users@openssl.org
cc
Subject
ocsp signed requests - bug ?
Hi,
Not sure if this belongs on
tificate
OPTIONAL}
Which shows the certs are optional too.
Regards,
Simon McMahon.
gskreq.der
Description: Binary data
responder will just verify it automatically if the request is
signed but can I set it up to reject unsigned requests?
Regards,
Simon McMahon
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing
to use OpenSSL correctly for this.
Cheers,
Simon McMahon
"Dr. Stephen Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/07/2006 10:10 PM
Please respond to
openssl-users@openssl.org
To
openssl-users@openssl.org
cc
Subject
Re: ocsp-nocheck
On Tue, Nov 0
Found it: extendedKeyUsage = OCSP Signing, OCSP No Check
does the trick.
The RFC doesn't exactly make this clear that 'nocheck' is a part of
ExtendedKeyUsage but I guess that is not OpenSSL's problem.
Thanks.
__
OpenSSL Pr
sions to certs but couldn't get it to work.
Regards,
Simon McMahon
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
u use -CA (a
server argument) then it also fails and this is pretty confusing.
Note: A sample of how to make a OCSP responder cert with OCSPSigning in
the extended key usage would be nice too. When I work this bit out I can
send in a sample for that if that helps.
Simon Mc
e. That should be done shortly, within the next 2 weeks. I'll post
it here or a link to it when done.
Simon
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List
ible for example to generate a huge file.txt or
file.html, then I could work with that no problem (or a pdf too).
Thanks,
Simon
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing L
e a newbie yells: "I wanna RTFM!!"
Well, in my case it's not read but rather print, so i can read at my
convenience!
Thanks a lot in advance,
Simon
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.op
bear in mind that the software user
has control over the smartcard but not over the software owner's public key.
So, is this safe? Any comments? Thanks in advance :-)
Kind regards,
Simon de Hartog
__
OpenSSL Proj
desirable. So I just want to use public/private keys, no
certificates for this.
Steve.
Kind regards,
Simon de Hartog
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List
this in Python (sorry, wasn't my choice :-( ), so I
can't use the RSA_public_decrypt() subroutine which, judging from
internet comments, *can* actually decrypt data with an RSA public key...
Any comments are welcome. Thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
Does anyone know how to get a daily digest version of this mailing
list. Mailman supports digests but I am not familiar with Majordomo. I
tried the support page of the website but could not find any relevant info.
Thanks,
Brendan.
_
+YWdT4cDohuSqEeu+x5R
-END CERTIFICATE-
--- satish danduvarma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>Thats great. Thanks for your quick response.
> What is tgv.pem file. how can we get that file.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Varma
>
> On 8/24/05, Paul Simon <[EMA
Maybe your URL is wrong. I just tried this:
openssl ocsp -issuer VeriSignClientECA.pem -url
http://ocsp.verisign.com -cert eca_usr_cert.pem
-VAfile tgv.pem -no_nonce -text
and it works fine as follows:
D:\prjs\ocsp\newEcaCA>openssl ocsp -issuer
VeriSignClientECA.pem -url http://ocs
p.verisign.co
that will
intereoperate with other openssl crypto functionality.
Hopefully someone can answer my questions or point me in the right
direction.
Cheers,
Brendan Simon.
__
OpenSSL Project http
that a correct interpretation?
3) If I am wrong and it is allowed to use openssl in kernel modules,
then how does one stop system header files interfering with kernel/linux
header files ??? eg. files, etc.
Cheers,
Brendan Simon.
(Please CC me as well as the
mance if you have to service
a continual stream of new client connections that prevent the select() from
blocking at all, but that is unlikely in the real world.
Regards,
Simon
- --
Simon Edwards
-Original Message-
From: Cesc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 July 2005 09:
engines
or doing anything fancy, so these are probably not a comprehensive list of
resource releasing functions.
Regards,
Simon
- --
Simon Edwards
-Original Message-
From: Amar Desai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 July 2005 16:59
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Investiga
nding this poor treatment of private keys!
Simon McMahon
Work: (07) 31311420
Mobile: (043) 2294180
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/05/05 12:50am >>>
> Darn, I thought I explained the problem: openssl "req" seems to require
> private key of the cert requestor, which
the same output in all cases.
Obviously I just fixed my problem by using method 1 instead of 2 but if
behaviour 2 is not necessary then maybe it should be dropped so as not to be a
trap for the unwary.
Note: Platform Windows XP, openssl-0.9.7g.
Cheers,
Simon.
Simon McMahon
Work: (07) 31
Got it built under windows and is working fine now.
Thanks very much!
Simon.
Simon McMahon
Work: (07) 31311420
Mobile: (043) 2294180
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/20/05 08:58am >>>
Hi Steve,
Thanks very much for the reply!
I am a bit new to OpenSSL and the release procedur
Hi Steve,
Thanks very much for the reply!
I am a bit new to OpenSSL and the release procedure. I did not build OpenSSL
from source, I just downloaded the windows binary.
Is it easy to upgrade to the snapshot? Is there an FAQ or instructions for this
for Windows?
Cheers,
Simon.
Simon
mime -out temp_dv.smime -recip
fac_enc1.pem -passin pass:Pass-123
C:\>openssl smime -verify -CAfile testHICca.pem -in temp_dv.smime -certfile
fac_sign2.pem -out result.hl7
Error reading S/MIME message
3252:error:2107A088:PKCS7 routines:SMIME_read_PKCS7:no multipart body
failure:.\c
, command line interface required.
Thanks,
Simon McMahon.
Simon McMahon
Work: (07) 31311420
Mobile: (043) 2294180
***
This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the
sole use o
ssl/x509.h:67,
from /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/ssl.h:122,
from SSLeay.xs:76:
/usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/des.h:193: parse error before `&'
make: *** [SSLeay.o] Error 1
sqhome1:/va
ideas ?
I'm using openssl1.16d, but the same error occurs with openssl1.16c .
Cheers
Simon Clewer
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ents is welcomed!!
Thanks in advance.
Simon
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Please respect Reply-To)
"Eric A. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on 6/8/2002 8:54 PM Simon Josefsson said the following:
>
>> Despite the FUD presented by certain individuals that doesn't want
>> keys/certs in DNS, people have already tarted doi
Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> > "Franck" == Franck Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Franck> I was wondering if the best system to build a global PKI wouldn't be the
>> Franck> DNS system already in place?
>>
>> Fra
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for a beginner) and I don’t know what doing now…
I just make the first certificate with IIS and after, I’m freeze!
Thanks for your help!
- Simon Sheehy
your help in
this matter..
Regards
Simon De Friend
0044 7951578 570
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com
Does anyone out there have a sample config for openSSL on VxWorks ?
I've looked in the mailing archive and could'nt find any.
Thanks
-Original Message-----
From: Simon, Mathew (Mathew)
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Building o
or NT first ?
I tried to manually compile the files in Vxworks and most of them
did except for about 20 of them which gave compilation errors.
This was done without configuring openssl for NT.
Does anyone have any experience compiling openssl for VxWorks ?
I would appreciate any help.
Thanks,
Mathew
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo