Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] Meeting tomorrow

cc'ed sig list. Kind reminder for the meeting about 2 and half hours away, we will do a review of the denver ptg summary [0] and then go over the forum sessions which we want to propose [1] This is an EU/APAC friendly meeting so please do join us if you are in the region :)

Re: [openstack-dev] [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] Meeting tomorrow

cc'ed sig list. Kind reminder for the meeting about 2 and half hours away, we will do a review of the denver ptg summary [0] and then go over the forum sessions which we want to propose [1] This is an EU/APAC friendly meeting so please do join us if you are in the region :)

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] tempest and grenade conversion to python 3.6

On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 02:28:29 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > Excerpts from Clark Boylan's message of 2018-09-18 09:53:45 -0700: > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018, at 9:46 AM, Nate Johnston wrote: > > > Hello python 3.6 champions, > > > > > > I have looked around a little, and I don't see

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] tempest and grenade conversion to python 3.6

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 09:52:50PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 9/18/2018 12:28 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > What's probably missing is a version of the grenade job that allows us > > to control that USE_PYTHON3 variable before and after the upgrade. > > > > I see a few different grenade

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] tempest and grenade conversion to python 3.6

On 9/18/2018 9:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 9/18/2018 12:28 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: What's probably missing is a version of the grenade job that allows us to control that USE_PYTHON3 variable before and after the upgrade. I see a few different grenade jobs (neutron-grenade,

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] tempest and grenade conversion to python 3.6

On 9/18/2018 12:28 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: What's probably missing is a version of the grenade job that allows us to control that USE_PYTHON3 variable before and after the upgrade. I see a few different grenade jobs (neutron-grenade, neutron-grenade-multinode,

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Optimize the query of the octavia database

Hi All, I have created a patch that resolves this regression: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/603242/ Please take a look. Locally it showed dramatic improvements. List load balancers went from two and half minutes down to seconds when I had a thousand Act/Stdby LBs. The patch may need some

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Control Plane Server Upgrade Sprint Planning

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:09 AM Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello everyone, > > We still have a few Trusty servers hanging around. We should work to > upgrade them either to Xenial (using puppet deployment) or Bionic (using > ansible and containers?). We've made good progress in the past using a >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Forum Session Brainstorming

This is a friendly reminder for anyone wishing to see Ops-focused sessions in Berlin to get your submissions in soon. We have a couple things there that came out of the PTG, but that's it so far. See below for details. Cheers, Erik On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 5:07 PM Erik McCormick wrote: > Hello

Re: [openstack-dev] Ops Forum Session Brainstorming

This is a friendly reminder for anyone wishing to see Ops-focused sessions in Berlin to get your submissions in soon. We have a couple things there that came out of the PTG, but that's it so far. See below for details. Cheers, Erik On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 5:07 PM Erik McCormick wrote: > Hello

[openstack-dev] [All][TC] Stein TC Polling is open!

Hello! The poll for the TC Election is now open and will remain open until Sep 27, 2018 23:45 UTC. We are selecting 6 TC members, please rank all candidates in your order of preference. For more information on condorcet voting and how it works, you can read more here[0]. You are eligible to

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][senlin] Action Required. Idea to propose for a forum for autoscaling features integration

Thanks for creating the etherpad. I have added a question on the common library in the etherpad. I think we can iterate on the basic proposal before the forum in Berlin so that we can get input from developers who won't be able to attend in person. On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:46 AM Rico Lin

Re: [Openstack] [Openstack-Ansible] Unable to install Openstack Queens using Ansible

You have 12GB on controller node where mysql going to run. I would say you need to tweak some setting in /etc/openstack_deploy/user_variables.yml file default setting is grab as much resource you can so i would say play with those setting and limit mem use something like this.. and there are more

Re: [openstack-dev] [User-committee][tc] Joint UC/TC Meeting

[Redirecting this from the openstack-tc list to the -dev list.] Excerpts from Melvin Hillsman's message of 2018-09-18 17:43:57 -0500: > Hey everyone, > > UC is proposing a joint UC/TC meeting at the end of the month say starting > after Berlin to work more closely together. The last Monday of

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Forum Topic Submission Period

Hey Matt, Matt Riedemann wrote: Just a process question. Good question. I submitted a presentation for the normal marketing blitz part of the summit which wasn't accepted (I'm still dealing with this emotionally, btw...) If there's anything I can do... but when I look at the CFP link

Re: [openstack-dev] Forum Topic Submission Period

Hey Matt, Matt Riedemann wrote: Just a process question. Good question. I submitted a presentation for the normal marketing blitz part of the summit which wasn't accepted (I'm still dealing with this emotionally, btw...) If there's anything I can do... but when I look at the CFP link

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Berlin Forum Proposals

Team, I have created an etherpad for our Forum Topic Planning: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-berlin-forum-proposals Please add your ideas to the etherpad.  Thank you! Jay __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] Forum Topic Submission Period

On 9/17/2018 11:13 AM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: Hello Everyone! The Forum Topic Submission session started September 12 and will run through September 26th.  Now is the time to wrangle the topics you gathered during your Brainstorming Phase and start pushing forum topics through. Don't rely

Re: [Openstack-operators] [tripleo]Pacemaker in split controller mode

Hello, I have a follow up question. According to the TripleO docs for RHOPS 13/Queens, "you cannot scale up or scale down a custom role that contains OS::TripleO::Services::Pacemaker or OS::TripleO::Services::PacemakerRemote services." Does that only apply to the role itself or all the

[openstack-dev] [ptg][cinder] Stein PTG Summary Page Ready ...

Team, I have put together the following page with a summary of all our discussions at the PTG: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderSteinPTGSummary Please review the contents and let me know if anything needs to be changed. Jay

Re: [Openstack] Can any user add or delete OpenStack Swift middleware?

Dear Kota, On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:43 PM Kota TSUYUZAKI wrote: > > Hi Quio, > > > I know Storlets can provide user-defined computation functionalities, > > but I guess some capabilities can only be achieved using middleware. > > For example, a user may want such a feature: upon each PUT

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Control Plane Server Upgrade Sprint Planning

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 04:09:03PM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > October 15-19 may be our best week for this. Does that week work? Post school-holidays here so SGTM :) > Let me know if you are working on upgrading any servers/services and > I will do what I can to help review changes and make

[openstack-dev] Fwd: Denver Ops Meetup post-mortem

-- Forwarded message - From: Chris Morgan Date: Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:13 PM Subject: Denver Ops Meetup post-mortem To: OpenStack Operators Hello All, Last week we had a successful Ops Meetup embedded in the OpenStack Project Team Gathering in Denver. Despite generally

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Are we ready to put stable/ocata into extended maintenance mode?

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > The release page says Ocata is planned to go into extended maintenance mode > on Aug 27 [1]. There really isn't much to this except it means we don't do > releases for Ocata anymore [2]. There is a caveat that project teams that do > not

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs] Are we ready to put stable/ocata into extended maintenance mode?

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 02:27:03PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > The release page says Ocata is planned to go into extended maintenance mode > on Aug 27 [1]. There really isn't much to this except it means we don't do > releases for Ocata anymore [2]. There is a caveat that project teams that do

Re: [openstack-dev] Are we ready to put stable/ocata into extended maintenance mode?

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > The release page says Ocata is planned to go into extended maintenance mode > on Aug 27 [1]. There really isn't much to this except it means we don't do > releases for Ocata anymore [2]. There is a caveat that project teams that do > not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] Are we ready to put stable/ocata into extended maintenance mode?

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 02:27:03PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > The release page says Ocata is planned to go into extended maintenance mode > on Aug 27 [1]. There really isn't much to this except it means we don't do > releases for Ocata anymore [2]. There is a caveat that project teams that do

[Openstack-operators] Are we ready to put stable/ocata into extended maintenance mode?

The release page says Ocata is planned to go into extended maintenance mode on Aug 27 [1]. There really isn't much to this except it means we don't do releases for Ocata anymore [2]. There is a caveat that project teams that do not wish to maintain stable/ocata after this point can immediately

[openstack-dev] Are we ready to put stable/ocata into extended maintenance mode?

The release page says Ocata is planned to go into extended maintenance mode on Aug 27 [1]. There really isn't much to this except it means we don't do releases for Ocata anymore [2]. There is a caveat that project teams that do not wish to maintain stable/ocata after this point can immediately

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Edge Squad meeting

Hi, Thanks to those who responded on the etherpad poll for a meeting time for the TripleO Edge squad: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-August/134069.html We've selected 1400UTC on Thursdays in #tripleo. I've started a rough agenda in the etherpad:

Re: [Openstack] URGENT: packet loss on openstack instance

Liping, Last 2 days i am running test with hping3 and found following behavior, if you noticed my result UDP doing very bad if i increase number of queue, do you know why ? UDP: If i set "ethtool -L eth0 combined 1" then UDP pps rate is 100kpps if i set "ethtool -L eth0 combined 8" then UDP

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][senlin] Action Required. Idea to propose for a forum for autoscaling features integration

cool Duc, and it's nicely started: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/autoscaling-integration-and-feedback I also submit the etherpad, will add you as moderator once it's selected (don't know why, but can't add any more now from the web). Please add whatever you like to that etherpad, I will try to

[Openstack] [trove] publish_exists_event fails with "This is not a recognized Fernet token"

Hi, Trove on Pike is running into a known bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1700586 which seems to have been fixed in trove v9.0.0. Is Trove from Queens backward compatible with Pike? I am thinking whether I can install Trove from Queens repo on another server and make it work with the

[Openstack-operators] Denver Ops Meetup post-mortem

Hello All, Last week we had a successful Ops Meetup embedded in the OpenStack Project Team Gathering in Denver. Despite generally being a useful gathering, there were definitely lessons learned and things to work on, so I thought it would be useful to share a post-mortem. I encourage everyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [tc][uc]Community Wide Long Term Goals

Excerpts from Lance Bragstad's message of 2018-09-18 12:27:06 -0500: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:17 PM Doug Hellmann > wrote: > > > Excerpts from Lance Bragstad's message of 2018-09-18 11:56:22 -0500: > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:17 AM Doug Hellmann > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Excerpts from

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] [placement]

On 17-09-18 08:48:01, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:29 AM Lee Yarwood wrote: > > > FWIW I've also started work on the RDO packaging front [1] and would be > > happy to help with this puppet extraction. > > > > Good to know, thanks. > Once we have the repo in place, here is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] tempest and grenade conversion to python 3.6

Excerpts from Clark Boylan's message of 2018-09-18 09:53:45 -0700: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018, at 9:46 AM, Nate Johnston wrote: > > Hello python 3.6 champions, > > > > I have looked around a little, and I don't see a method for me to > > specifically select the version of python that the tempest and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [tc][uc]Community Wide Long Term Goals

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:17 PM Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Lance Bragstad's message of 2018-09-18 11:56:22 -0500: > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:17 AM Doug Hellmann > > wrote: > > > > > Excerpts from Zhipeng Huang's message of 2018-09-14 18:51:40 -0600: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] When can/should we change additionalProperties=False in GET /servers(/detail)?

On 9/17/2018 9:41 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:33:30 +0900 Alex Xu wrote > That only means after 599276 we only have servers API and os-instance-action API stopped accepting the undefined query parameter. > What I'm thinking about is checking all the APIs,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [tc][uc]Community Wide Long Term Goals

Excerpts from Lance Bragstad's message of 2018-09-18 11:56:22 -0500: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:17 AM Doug Hellmann > wrote: > > > Excerpts from Zhipeng Huang's message of 2018-09-14 18:51:40 -0600: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Based upon the discussion we had at the TC session in the afternoon, I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [tc][uc]Community Wide Long Term Goals

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:57 PM Lance Bragstad wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:17 AM Doug Hellmann wrote: >> >> Excerpts from Zhipeng Huang's message of 2018-09-14 18:51:40 -0600: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Based upon the discussion we had at the TC session in the afternoon, I'm >> > starting

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [tc][uc]Community Wide Long Term Goals

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:17 AM Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Zhipeng Huang's message of 2018-09-14 18:51:40 -0600: > > Hi, > > > > Based upon the discussion we had at the TC session in the afternoon, I'm > > starting to draft a patch to add long term goal mechanism into > governance. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] tempest and grenade conversion to python 3.6

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018, at 9:46 AM, Nate Johnston wrote: > Hello python 3.6 champions, > > I have looked around a little, and I don't see a method for me to > specifically select the version of python that the tempest and grenade > jobs for my project (neutron) are using. I assume one of four

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][senlin] Action Required. Idea to propose for a forum for autoscaling features integration

Hi Rico, I'm the Senlin PTL and would be happy to have a forum discussion in Berlin about the future of autoscaling. Can you go ahead and start an etherpad to capture the proposed agenda and discussion items? Also, feel free to submit the forum submission so that we can get it on the schedule.

[openstack-dev] [python3] tempest and grenade conversion to python 3.6

Hello python 3.6 champions, I have looked around a little, and I don't see a method for me to specifically select the version of python that the tempest and grenade jobs for my project (neutron) are using. I assume one of four things is at play here: A. These projects already shifted to python

Re: [openstack-dev] GUI for Swift object storage

Hate to nitpick, but Cyberduck is licensed GPLv3 -- you can browse the source (and confirm the license) at https://trac.cyberduck.io/browser/trunk and https://trac.cyberduck.io/ indicates the source is available via git or

[openstack-dev] [oslo][tacker][daisycloud-core][meteos] Removal of rpc_backend config opt from oslo.messaging

Thanks to work done by Steve Kowalik we're ready to remove the old rpc_backend transport configuration option that has been deprecated since mid 2016. This removal involves changes to the oslo.messaging.ConfFixture as well. Steve has provided patches to those projects affected by these changes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 16:00, Thierry Carrez a écrit : > Sylvain Bauza wrote: > > > > > > Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 14:41, Jeremy Stanley > > a écrit : > > > > On 2018-09-18 11:26:57 +0900 (+0900), Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > [...] > > > I can understand that

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc]Question for candidates about global reachout

On 09/14/2018 09:52 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > This is a joint question from mnaser and me :) > > For the candidates who are running for tc seats, please reply to this > email to indicate if you are open to use certain social media app in > certain region (like Wechat in China Even if I do use

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc]Question for candidates about global reachout

Excerpts from Zhipeng Huang's message of 2018-09-14 13:52:50 -0600: > This is a joint question from mnaser and me :) > > For the candidates who are running for tc seats, please reply to this email > to indicate if you are open to use certain social media app in certain > region (like Wechat in

[openstack-dev] [goals][python3] week 6 update

This is the 6th week of the "Run under Python 3 by default" goal (https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/stein/python3-first.html). == What we learned last week == I spoke with a few teams at the PTG to clarify the process and the "definition of done" for the goal. If you have similar

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc]Question for candidates about global reachout

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 5:34 AM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2018-09-18 10:23:33 +0800 (+0800), Zhipeng Huang wrote: > [...] > > Jeremy, what I'm saying here, and also addressed in comments with > > the related resolution patch, is that personality reasons are the > > ones that we have to respect

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [tc][uc]Community Wide Long Term Goals

Excerpts from Zhipeng Huang's message of 2018-09-14 18:51:40 -0600: > Hi, > > Based upon the discussion we had at the TC session in the afternoon, I'm > starting to draft a patch to add long term goal mechanism into governance. > It is by no means a complete solution at the moment (still have not

Re: [Openstack] [nova][cinder] Migrate instances between regions or between clusters?

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Peter Penchev wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 03:07:45PM +0200, Attila Fazekas wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Peter Penchev < > openstack-...@storpool.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:32:37AM +0200, Attila Fazekas wrote: > > >

[openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 18-38

HTML: https://anticdent.org/tc-report-18-38.html Rather than writing a TC Report this week, I've written a report on the [OpenStack Stein PTG](https://anticdent.org/openstack-stein-ptg.html). -- Chris Dent ٩◔̯◔۶ https://anticdent.org/ freenode: cdent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 7:40 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > I have yet to hear anyone provide first-hand confirmation that > access to Freenode's IRC servers is explicitly blocked by the > mainland Chinese government. There has been a lot of speculation [...] Data point: I have a couple of reports

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

On 9/18/2018 7:40 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2018-09-18 11:26:57 +0900 (+0900), Ghanshyam Mann wrote: [...] I can understand that IRC cannot be used in China which is very painful and mostly it is used weChat. [...] I have yet to hear anyone provide first-hand confirmation that access to

Re: [Openstack] [nova][cinder] Migrate instances between regions or between clusters?

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 03:07:45PM +0200, Attila Fazekas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Peter Penchev > wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:32:37AM +0200, Attila Fazekas wrote: > > [format recovered; top-posting after an inline reply looks confusing] > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] notes from stein ptg meetings of the technical committee

On 17/09/18 5:07 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: Also, for the record, I actually wasn't referring to Adjutant specifically when I referred in my original post to "only tangentially related to cloud computing". I was referring to my recollection of fairly recent history. I remember the seemingly endless

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [blazar][goal][python3] starting zuul migration for blazar

Please process this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/596250/ Thanks. On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 5:06 PM Nguyễn Trí Hải wrote: > The Zuul project settings for the blazar repositories > has begun. Please do not approve any changes to > openstack-infra/project-config/zuul.d/projects.yaml for > the

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 14:41, Jeremy Stanley > a écrit : On 2018-09-18 11:26:57 +0900 (+0900), Ghanshyam Mann wrote: [...] > I can understand that IRC cannot be used in China which is very > painful and mostly it is used

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

On 2018-09-18 14:52:28 +0200 (+0200), Sylvain Bauza wrote: [...] > Why are we discussing about WeChat now? Is that because a large > set of our contributors *can't* access IRC or because they > *prefer* any other? Until we get confirmation either way, I'm going to work under the assumption that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 14:41, Jeremy Stanley > a écrit : On 2018-09-18 11:26:57 +0900 (+0900), Ghanshyam Mann wrote: [...] > I can understand that IRC cannot be used in China which is very > painful and mostly it is used

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

On 2018-09-18 14:52:28 +0200 (+0200), Sylvain Bauza wrote: [...] > Why are we discussing about WeChat now? Is that because a large > set of our contributors *can't* access IRC or because they > *prefer* any other? Until we get confirmation either way, I'm going to work under the assumption that

Re: [openstack-dev] GUI for Swift object storage

I don't know about a good open source cross-platform GUI client, but the SwiftStack one is slick and doesn't seem to be behind a paywall (yet?) https://www.swiftstack.com/downloads There's probably some proprietary integration that won't make sense - but it should work with any Swift end-point.

Re: [Openstack] [nova][cinder] Migrate instances between regions or between clusters?

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Attila Fazekas wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Peter Penchev > wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:32:37AM +0200, Attila Fazekas wrote: >> [format recovered; top-posting after an inline reply looks confusing] >> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:43

Re: [Openstack] [Openstack-Ansible] Unable to install Openstack Queens using Ansible

Hi, 4GB of memory is not enough for a deployment unfortunately. You’ll have to bump it up. Thanks Mohammed Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 18, 2018, at 7:04 AM, Budai Laszlo wrote: > > Hi, > > run dmesg on your deployment host. It should print which process has been > evicted by the OOM

[Openstack-operators] OpenStack Ops Meetups team meeting in ~40 minutes

Calendar link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/calendars/ops-meetup-team.ics Join us on #openstack-operators to discuss last weeks embedded ops meetup at the Denver PTG, the upcoming Forum at the Summit in Berlin this November and possible meetups in 2019. Chris -- Chris Morgan

Re: [Openstack] [nova][cinder] Migrate instances between regions or between clusters?

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Peter Penchev wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:32:37AM +0200, Attila Fazekas wrote: > [format recovered; top-posting after an inline reply looks confusing] > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:43 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > > > > On 09/17/2018 09:39 AM, Peter Penchev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 14:41, Jeremy Stanley a écrit : > On 2018-09-18 11:26:57 +0900 (+0900), Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > [...] > > I can understand that IRC cannot be used in China which is very > > painful and mostly it is used weChat. > [...] > > I have yet to hear anyone provide first-hand

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

On 2018-09-18 11:26:57 +0900 (+0900), Ghanshyam Mann wrote: [...] > I can understand that IRC cannot be used in China which is very > painful and mostly it is used weChat. [...] I have yet to hear anyone provide first-hand confirmation that access to Freenode's IRC servers is explicitly blocked

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Post-lunch presentations schedule

Stephen, could you please share your presentation slides? Thanks Witek > -Original Message- > From: Thierry Carrez > Sent: Freitag, 24. August 2018 11:21 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List d...@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Post-lunch presentations

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

On 2018-09-18 11:26:57 +0900 (+0900), Ghanshyam Mann wrote: [...] > I can understand that IRC cannot be used in China which is very > painful and mostly it is used weChat. [...] I have yet to hear anyone provide first-hand confirmation that access to Freenode's IRC servers is explicitly blocked

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc]Question for candidates about global reachout

On 2018-09-18 10:23:33 +0800 (+0800), Zhipeng Huang wrote: [...] > Jeremy, what I'm saying here, and also addressed in comments with > the related resolution patch, is that personality reasons are the > ones that we have to respect and no form of governance change > could help solve the problem.

Re: [Openstack] [nova][cinder] Migrate instances between regions or between clusters?

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:32:37AM +0200, Attila Fazekas wrote: [format recovered; top-posting after an inline reply looks confusing] > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:43 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > > On 09/17/2018 09:39 AM, Peter Penchev wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> So here's a possibly stupid

Re: [openstack-dev] Bumping eventlet to 0.24.1

On 9/6/18 8:52 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: On 18-08-23 09:50:13, Matthew Thode wrote: This is your warning, if you have concerns please comment in https://review.openstack.org/589382 . cross tests pass, so that's a good sign... atm this is only for stein. I pushed the big red button. Ironic

[openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg] Meeting tomorrow

Hi everyone, Don't forget that we have a meeting tomorrow at 0700 UTC at IRC channel #openstack-publiccloud. See you all there! Cheers, Tobias -- Tobias Rydberg Senior Developer Twitter & IRC: tobberydberg www.citynetwork.eu | www.citycloud.com INNOVATION THROUGH OPEN IT INFRASTRUCTURE

Re: [Openstack] [Openstack-Ansible] Unable to install Openstack Queens using Ansible

Hi, run dmesg on your deployment host. It should print which process has been evicted by the OOM killer. We had similar issues with our deployment host. We had to increase its memory to 9G to have openstack-ansiblle working properly. You should also monitor the memory usage of your processes

[Openstack] [Openstack-Ansible] Unable to install Openstack Queens using Ansible

Hi Team, I am installing Open Stack Queens using the Openstack Ansible and facing some issues *System Configuration* *Controller/Deployment Host* RAM - 12 GB Hard disk - 100 GB Linux - Ubuntu 16.04 Kernel Version - 4.4.0-135-generic *Compute* RAM - 4 GB Hard disk - 100 GB Linux -

[openstack-dev] [kayobe] Stein forum topics

Hi, Brainstorming for the Stein forum in Berlin has started, please add your proposal topics before 26th September to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kayobe-stein-forum. Forum topics are proposed using the same CFP method as Summit presentations:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] notes from stein ptg meetings of the technical committee

Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2018-09-17 17:07:43 -0400: On 09/17/2018 04:50 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] I don't remember the history quite the way Jay does, either. I remember us trying to base the decision more about what the team was doing than how the code

Re: [Openstack] [nova][cinder] Migrate instances between regions or between clusters?

Create a volume transfer VM/machine in each region. attache the volume -> dd -> compress -> internet ->decompress -> new volume, attache(/boot with) to the volume to the final machine. In case you have frequent transfers you may keep up the machines for the next one.. In case the storage is

[Openstack] [kolla] Stein forum topics proposal

Hi, Berlin forum brainstorming has started, please add your proposal topics before 26th september https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-forum-stein Forum topics are proposed the same method as Summit presentations https://www.openstack.org/summit/berlin-2018/call-for-presentations Regards

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Stein forum topics proposal

Hi, Berlin forum brainstorming has started, please add your proposal topics before 26th september https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-forum-stein Forum topics are proposed the same method as Summit presentations https://www.openstack.org/summit/berlin-2018/call-for-presentations Regards

[openstack-dev] [charms] retiring the ceph charm

Hi All We deprecated and stopped releasing the ceph charm a few cycles back in preference to the split ceph-osd/ceph-mon charms; consider this official notification of retirement! Cheers James __ OpenStack Development

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] starting zuul migration for masakari team repositories

It's ready to process: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/592992/ On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 9:20 PM Nguyễn Trí Hải wrote: > The Zuul project settings for the masakari repositories > has begun. Please do not approve any changes to > openstack-infra/project-config/zuul.d/projects.yaml for > the