Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Low Key Monday Evening Get Together

Just some local input.. That is a long way to go from downtown. There are plenty of outdoor venues with great beer a little closer. You might want to try a personal favorite [1], there are ton of other breweries around odell as well. Hard to go wrong there. Either way, enjoy your time in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Enrique Llorente Pastora as a core reviewer for TripleO

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 8:52 AM Sagi Shnaidman wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to propose Quique (@quiquell) as a core reviewer for TripleO. > Quique is actively involved in improvements and development of TripleO and > TripleO CI. He also helps in other projects including but not limited to >

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Ansible getting bumped up from 2.4 -> 2.6.6

Greetings, Please be aware of the following patch [1]. This updates ansible in queens, rocky, and stein. This was just pointed out to me, and I didn't see it coming so I thought I'd email the group. That is all, thanks [1] https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/14960 -- Wes Hayutin Associate

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] gate issues please do not approve/recheck

Thanks Alex! On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:27 AM Alex Schultz wrote: > Ok since the podman revert patche has been successfully merged and > we've landed most of the non-voting scenario patches, it should be OK > to restore/recheck. It would be a good idea to prioritized things to > land and if

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] shutting down 3rd party TripleO CI for measurements

Greetings, The TripleO-CI team would like to consider shutting down all the third party check jobs running against TripleO projects in order to measure results with and without load on the cloud for some amount of time. I suspect we would want to shut things down for roughly 24-48 hours. If

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] reducing our upstream CI footprint

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:21 AM Alex Schultz wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Based on previous emails around this[0][1], I have proposed a possible > reducing in our usage by switching the scenario001--011 jobs to > non-voting and removing them from the gate[2]. This will reduce the > likelihood of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci][upgrade] New jobs for tripleo Upgrade in the CI.

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 5:10 AM Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: > Hi, > > Testing and maintaining a green status for upgrade jobs within the 3h > time limit has proven to be a very difficult job to say the least. > Indeed > > The net result has been: we don't have anything even touching the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][puppet] clearing the gate and landing patches to help CI

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:29 AM Alex Schultz wrote: > And master is blocked again. We need > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607952/ > > Thanks, > -Alex > I just got infra to put that patch on the top of the queue. We also need https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607904/ reviewed ASAP Thanks >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 3:02 PM Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 9/28/2018 3:12 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > I was asked to write a followup to this as the long Zuul queues have > persisted through this week. Largely because the situation from last week > hasn't changed much. We were down the upgraded

Re: [openstack-dev] [E] [tripleo] quickstart for humans

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:08 PM Wesley Hayutin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:55 PM Gordon, Kent < > kent.gor...@verizonwireless.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Honza Pokorny [mailto:ho...@redhat.com]

Re: [openstack-dev] [E] [tripleo] quickstart for humans

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:55 PM Gordon, Kent wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Honza Pokorny [mailto:ho...@redhat.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 9:28 AM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > > > Subject: [E] [openstack-dev] [tripleo]

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] quickstart for humans

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 7:12 AM Steven Hardy wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Honza Pokorny wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Over the last few months, it seems that tripleo-quickstart has evolved > > into a CI tool. It's primarily used by computers, and not humans. > > tripleo-quickstart is

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][kolla-ansible][DevStack][Tempest][openstack-ansible] Collaborate towards creating a unified ansible tempest role in openstack-ansible project

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:43 PM Mohammed Naser wrote: > Hi Chandan, > > This is great, I added some more OSA-side comments, I'd love for us to > find sometime to sit down to discuss this at the PTG. > > Thanks, > Mohammed > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Jesse Pretorius > wrote: > >>On

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] The Weekly Owl - 29th Edition

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 2:40 PM Emilien Macchi wrote: > Welcome to the twenty-ninthest edition of a weekly update in TripleO world! > The goal is to provide a short reading (less than 5 minutes) to > learnwhat's new this week. > Any contributions and feedback are welcome. > Link to the previous

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI is blocked

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:13 PM Wesley Hayutin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:13 PM Alex Schultz wrote: > >> Please do not approve or recheck anything until further notice. We've >> got a few issues that have basically broken all the jobs. >> >> https://b

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI is blocked

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:13 PM Alex Schultz wrote: > Please do not approve or recheck anything until further notice. We've > got a few issues that have basically broken all the jobs. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1786764 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1787226 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:33 PM Alex Schultz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Doug Hellmann > wrote: > > Excerpts from Alex Schultz's message of 2018-08-09 14:31:34 -0600: > >> Ahoy folks, > >> > >> I think it's time we come up with some basic rules/patterns on where > >> code lands when

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] 3rd party ovb jobs are down

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 5:55 PM Wesley Hayutin wrote: > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:56 PM Wesley Hayutin > wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> There is currently an unplanned outtage atm for the tripleo 3rd party OVB >> based jobs. >> We will contact the list when

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] 3rd party ovb jobs are down

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:56 PM Wesley Hayutin wrote: > Greetings, > > There is currently an unplanned outtage atm for the tripleo 3rd party OVB > based jobs. > We will contact the list when there are more details. > > Thank you! > OK, I'm going to call an end to

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] 3rd party ovb jobs are down

Greetings, There is currently an unplanned outtage atm for the tripleo 3rd party OVB based jobs. We will contact the list when there are more details. Thank you! -- Wes Hayutin Associate MANAGER Red Hat w hayu...@redhat.comT: +1919 <+19197544114>4232509

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci][metrics] Stucked in the middle of work because of RDO CI

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 7:41 AM Sagi Shnaidman wrote: > Hi, Martin > > I see master OVB jobs are passing now [1], please recheck. > > [1] http://cistatus.tripleo.org/ > Things have improved and I see a lot of jobs passing however at the same time I see too many jobs failing due to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTL non-candidacy

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 9:24 AM Alex Schultz wrote: > Hey folks, > > So it's been great fun and we've accomplished much over the last two > cycles but I believe it is time for me to step back and let someone > else do the PTLing. I'm not going anywhere so I'll still be around to > focus on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Plan to switch the undercloud to be containerized by default

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 4:38 PM Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 7:57 PM Emilien Macchi, wrote: > >> with [tripleo] tag... >> >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 7:56 PM Emilien Macchi >> wrote: >> >>> This is an update on where things are regarding $topic, based on >>> feedback I've got

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] PTG Stein topics

Greetings, Starting to collect thoughts and comments here, https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleoci-ptg-stein Thanks -- Wes Hayutin Associate MANAGER Red Hat w hayu...@redhat.comT: +1919 <+19197544114>4232509 IRC: weshay View my

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] TripleO CI squad status 7/03/2018

Apologies, The dark theme in my browser changed the font color of the text. The email is available at http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-July/131984.html Thank you! On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 7:13 PM Wesley Hayutin wrote: > Greetings > > The TripleO squad has just

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] TripleO Tempest squad status 07/03/2018

Greetings, The TripleO Tempest squad has just completed Sprint 15 (6-15 - 7/03). The following is a summary of activities during this sprint. Epic: # Sprint 15 Epic ( Tempest Squad): Finish the refactoring of the core OpenStack services in python-tempestconf, refstack certification tests, and

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] TripleO CI squad status 7/03/2018

Greetings The TripleO squad has just completed Sprint 15 (6-15 - 7/03). The following is a summary of activities during this sprint. Epic: # Sprint 15 Epic (CI Squad): Begin migration of upstream jobs to native zuulv3. For a list of the completed and remaining items for the sprint please refer

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI is down stop workflowing

Check and gate jobs look clear. More details on a bit. Thanks Sent from my mobile On Tue, Jun 19, 2018, 07:33 Felix Enrique Llorente Pastora < ellor...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > >We have the following bugs with fixes that need to land to unblock > check/gate jobs: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo gate is blocked - please read

On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 10:21 AM Paul Belanger wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 12:47:10PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2018-06-15 23:15:01 -0700 (-0700), Emilien Macchi wrote: > > [...] > > > ## Dockerhub proxy issue > > > Infra using wrong image layer object storage proxy for Dockerhub:

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] zuul change gating repo name change

Greetings, Please be aware the yum repo created in tripleo ci jobs is going to change names to include the release [1]. This is done to ensure that only the appropriate patches are installed when patches from multiple branches are in play. This is especially important to upgrade jobs. If you

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:21 AM James Slagle wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote: > > On 12.6.2018 15:06, James Slagle wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Wesley Hayutin > >> wrote: > >>> > >&

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades

Greetings, I wanted to let everyone know that we have a keystone only deployment and upgrade job in check non-voting. I'm asking everyone in TripleO to be mindful of this job and to help make sure it continues to pass as we move it from non-voting check to check and eventually gating. Upgrade

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Status of Standalone installer (aka All-In-One)

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:31 AM Raoul Scarazzini wrote: > On 05/06/2018 02:26, Emilien Macchi wrote: > [...] > > I hope this update was useful, feel free to give feedback or ask any > > questions, > [...] > > I'm no prophet here, but I see a bright future for this approach. I can > imagine how

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Automating documentation the tripleo way?

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:22 AM Petr Kovar <pko...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2018 13:26:46 -0600 > Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 3:05 PM Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> > wrote: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Automating documentation the tripleo way?

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 3:05 PM Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Wesley Hayutin's message of 2018-05-16 12:51:25 -0600: > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:41 PM Doug Hellmann > wrote: > > > > > Excerpts from Petr Kovar's message of 2018-05-16

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Automating documentation the tripleo way?

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:41 PM Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Petr Kovar's message of 2018-05-16 17:39:14 +0200: > > Hi all, > > > > In the past few years, we've seen several efforts aimed at automating > > procedural documentation, mostly centered around the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ci][infra][tripleo] Multi-staged check pipelines for Zuul v3 proposal

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:42 AM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-05-15 17:31:07 +0200 (+0200), Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > [...] > > * upload into a swift container, with an automatic expiration set, the > > de-duplicated and compressed tarball created with something like: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ci][infra][tripleo] Multi-staged check pipelines for Zuul v3 proposal

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 3:16 PM Sagi Shnaidman wrote: > Hi, Bogdan > > I like the idea with undercloud job. Actually if undercloud fails, I'd > stop all other jobs, because it doens't make sense to run them. Seeing the > same failure in 10 jobs doesn't add too much. So maybe

Re: [openstack-dev] [ci][infra][tripleo] Multi-staged check pipelines for Zuul v3 proposal

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 1:29 PM James E. Blair wrote: > Jeremy Stanley writes: > > > On 2018-05-15 09:40:28 -0700 (-0700), James E. Blair wrote: > > [...] > >> We're also talking about making a new kind of job which can continue to > >> run after it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Zuul repo insertion in update/upgrade CI

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:36 AM Jiří Stránský wrote: > Hi, > > this is mainly for CI folks and whom-it-may-concern. > > Recently we came across the topic of how to enable/disable zuul repos at > various places in the CI jobs. For normal deploy jobs there's no need to >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 11:50 PM Tristan Cacqueray <tdeca...@redhat.com> wrote: > On May 14, 2018 2:44 am, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > [snip] > > I do think it would be helpful to say have a one week change window where > > folks are given the opportunity to pre

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:37 PM Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2018-05-14 09:57:17 -0600 (-0600), Wesley Hayutin wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:36 AM Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> > wrote: > [...] > > > Couldn't a significant

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:08 PM Clark Boylan <cboy...@sapwetik.org> wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018, at 8:57 AM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:36 AM Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> > wrote: > > > > > On 2018-05-14 07:07

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:36 AM Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2018-05-14 07:07:03 -0600 (-0600), Wesley Hayutin wrote: > [...] > > I think you may be conflating the notion that ubuntu or rhel/cent > > can be updated w/o any issues to ap

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 11:30 PM Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2018-05-13 20:44:25 -0600 (-0600), Wesley Hayutin wrote: > [...] > > I do think it would be helpful to say have a one week change > > window where folks are given the opportunity to preflig

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 11:25 AM Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2018-05-13 08:25:25 -0600 (-0600), Wesley Hayutin wrote: > [...] > > We need to in coordination with the infra team be able to pin / lock > > content for production check and gate jobs whi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 11:45 PM Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: >> >> 2. Shortly after #1 was resolved CentOS released 7.5 which comes directly >> into the

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:43 PM Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> wrote: > FYI.. https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1770298 > > I'm on #openstack-infra chatting w/ Ian atm. > Thanks > > Greetings, I wanted to update everyone on the status of the upstream tri

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

FYI.. https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1770298 I'm on #openstack-infra chatting w/ Ian atm. Thanks __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Migration to Storyboard

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:25 PM Alex Schultz wrote: > Hello tripleo folks, > > So we've been experimenting with migrating some squads over to > storyboard[0] but this seems to be causing more issues than perhaps > it's worth. Since the upstream community would like to

Re: [openstack-dev] Overriding project-templates in Zuul

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:23 PM Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 10:02 AM, James E. Blair > wrote: > [...] > > Okay, let's summarize: >> >> Proposal 1: All project-template and project-local job variants matching >> the item's branch must

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] The Weekly Owl - 17th Edition

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:44 PM Emilien Macchi wrote: > Note: this is the seventeeth edition of a weekly update of what happens in > TripleO. > The goal is to provide a short reading (less than 5 minutes) to learn > where we are and what we're doing. > Any contributions and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] roadmap on containers workflow

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 at 20:51 Emilien Macchi wrote: > Greetings, > > Steve Baker and I had a quick chat today about the work that is being done > around containers workflow in Rocky cycle. > > If you're not familiar with the topic, I suggest to first read the > blueprint to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] The Weekly Owl - 16th Edition

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 at 19:24 Emilien Macchi wrote: > Note: this is the sixteenth edition of a weekly update of what happens in > TripleO. > The goal is to provide a short reading (less than 5 minutes) to learn > where we are and what we're doing. > Any contributions and

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] use of tags in launchpad bugs

FYI... This is news to me so thanks to Emilien for pointing it out [1]. There are official tags for tripleo launchpad bugs. Personally, I like what I've seen recently with some extra tags as they could be helpful in finding the history of particular issues. So hypothetically would it be "wrong"

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 at 12:25 Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 4:37 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > > Much of the work on this is already there. We've been using this stuff >> for over a year to dev/test the containerization efforts for a long >> time

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 at 13:53 Dan Prince wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Javier Pena wrote: > > > >> Greeting folks, > >> > >> During the last PTG we spent time discussing some ideas around an > All-In-One > >> installer, using 100% of the TripleO

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 at 10:00 Javier Pena wrote: > > > Greeting folks, > > > > During the last PTG we spent time discussing some ideas around an > All-In-One > > installer, using 100% of the TripleO bits to deploy a single node > OpenStack > > very similar with what we have today

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 at 08:45 Paul Grist wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Emilien Macchi > wrote: > >> Greeting folks, >> >> During the last PTG we spent time discussing some ideas around an >> All-In-One installer, using 100% of the TripleO bits

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] FYI.. the full tempest execution removed from promotion criteria temporarily

Greetings, The upstream packages for master and queens have not been updated in TripleO in 22 days. We have come very close to a package promotion a number of times, but failed for several different reasons. In this latest issue the full tempest job featureset020 was discussed with both Alex

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][infra][dib] Gate "out of disk" errors and diskimage-builder 2.12.0

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Ian Wienand <iwien...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 03/21/2018 03:39 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: >> >>> We will prepare dib 2.12.1 with the fix.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][infra][dib] Gate "out of disk" errors and diskimage-builder 2.12.0

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > On 03/21/2018 03:39 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > >> We will prepare dib 2.12.1 with the fix. As usual there are >> complications, since the dib gate is broken due to unrelated triple-o >> issues [2]. In the mean time,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposal for quickstart devmode replacement

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > Hi, > > we recently changed our set of scripts to uniform the users workflow > with the CI workflow. > One of the results of this change was the reproducer script, that is now > the official way to spawn a live

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] looking for feedback on running triple-quickstart libvirt as root

Greetings, I've heard from a number of people in the TripleO community that they would prefer the default libvirt settings for quickstart be changed from user sessions to root system settings [1]. If you have any thoughts or opinions please share them in the launchpad bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [ openstack-dev ][ tripleo ] unplanned outtage in RDO-Cloud

ard = [irc, github, twitter] > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Greetings, > >&

Re: [openstack-dev] [ openstack-dev ][ tripleo ] unplanned outtage in RDO-Cloud

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > *The TripleO CI in RDO-Cloud has experienced an unplanned outage and is > down at this time. We will update this thread with more information > regarding when the CI will b

[openstack-dev] [ openstack-dev ][ tripleo ] unplanned outtage in RDO-Cloud

Greetings, *The TripleO CI in RDO-Cloud has experienced an unplanned outage and is down at this time. We will update this thread with more information regarding when the CI will be brought back online as it becomes available.* Thank you! Wes Hayutin

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI][QA] Validating HA on upstream

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 2/16/18 2:59 PM, Raoul Scarazzini wrote: > >> On 16/02/2018 10:24, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: >> [...] >> >>> +1 this looks like a perfect fit. Would it be possible to install that >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Unbranched repositories and testing

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Emilien Macchi > wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote: > >> On 5.10.2017 22:40, Alex Schultz wrote: > >>> > >>> Hey folks,

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] how to reproduce tripleo ci

Greetings, The TripleO-CI team has added a recreate / reproduce script to all the tripleo upstream ci jobs as an artifact [1-2] much like the devstack reproduce.sh script. If you find yourself in need of recreating a tripleo ci job please take a look at the instructions. At this time the

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario00[1-2]-multinode-oooq-container failing

Greetings, Jobs: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container The above jobs have been failing in check and gate over the past 24 hours. The fix is posted here [1] which reverts [2] Thanks [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] Many timeouts in zuul gates for TripleO

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:55 AM, Or Idgar wrote: > Hi, > Still having timeouts but now in tripleo-heat-templates experimental gates > (tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-fakeha-caserver and tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-ha- > tempest-oooq). > > see examples: >

Re: [openstack-dev] Many timeouts in zuul gates for TripleO

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 01/18/2018 09:45 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:34 AM, Or Idgar wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> we're encountering many timeouts for zuul gates in TripleO. >>> For example, see

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo-upgrade pike branch

Thanks Marius for sending this out and kicking off a conversation. On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Marius Cornea wrote: > Hi everyone and Happy New Year! > > As the migration of tripleo-upgrade repo to the openstack namespace is > now complete I think it's the time to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Ocata to Pike upgrade job is working as of today.

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: > Emilien Macchi writes: > > > Nice work Sofer! > > I have a few questions, see inline. > > > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:46 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] containers-multinode is broken, what's our plan

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Mistral broke us with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/506185/ and we > had a promotion yesterday so now our CI deploy Mistral with this > patch. > It breaks some Mistral actions, including the ones needed by >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [upgrade] CI status and Current effort.

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > [...] >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [upgrade] CI status and Current effort.

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: > Hi, > > We (Upgrade Squad) have eventually save some time for fixing/creating > the needed upgrade/update jobs. > > We have made an inventory of what currently exists there[1] and what is > missing in the same

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] containerized undercloud update

Greetings, Just wanted to share some progress with the containerized undercloud work. Ian pushed some of the patches along and we now have a successful undercloud install with containers. The initial undercloud install works [1] The idempotency check failed where we reinstall the undercloud [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

+1 woot On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:34 PM, John Trowbridge > wrote: > > I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has > > been a solid contributor to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Please do not approve or recheck anything not related to CI alert bugs

On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > Ok so here's the current status of things. I've gone through some of > the pending patches and sent them to the gate over the weekend since > the gate was empty (yay!). We've managed to land a bunch of patches. > That

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] log collection in upstream jobs

Greetings, Infra asked the tripleo team to cut down on the logs we're producing upstream. We are using a lot of space on their servers and also it's taking too long to collect the logs themselves. We need to compromise and be flexible here, so I'd like the tripleo-ci and tripleo core to take

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:30 AM, James Slagle > wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Emilien Macchi

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:07 PM, James Slagle wrote: > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > Yes. Thanks for reformulate with better words. > > Just to be clear, I want to transform the scenarios into single-node > > jobs that

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo]

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I'd like to propose we remove the upgrade jobs that are consistently > faili

[openstack-dev] [tripleo]

Greetings, I'd like to propose we remove the upgrade jobs that are consistently failing from the upstream infrastructure and instead focus our efforts in RDO Software Factory. The jobs listed in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/518405/ are consistently failing after being reviewed by myself and

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 11/6/17 1:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Dan Prince wrote: >> [...] >> >> -CI resources: better use of CI resources. At the PTG we received >>> feedback from

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > [...] > > > -CI resources: better use of CI resources. At the PTG we received > > feedback from the OpenStack infrastructure team that our

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] New hash for master promoted

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Adriano Petrich wrote: > Amazing! Thanks for the effort that took to get the promotion fixed! > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Jason E. Rist wrote: > >> On 11/03/2017 03:52 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] New hash for master promoted

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:52 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > Hi, > > since the failures in Tuesday's tests were caused by infra problems, we > believed a specific hash involved in the failures to remain the best > candidate for a promotion. > So we pinned it in our promotion

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers job needs attention

Greetings, We noticed the job legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers failing in the gate in the following patches [1], [2]. The job was voting in the review here [3]. ATM the job is non-voting in check and voting in the gate. This is a dangerous combination where the job can fail in

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] latest centos iptables rpm broke tripleo ci

Greetings, TripleO CI started to hit errors in any of the multinode node pool jobs last Friday afternoon. Please review the bug and patch to bring CI back online [1-2] More work needs to be done to discover exactly why the latest rpm breaks the vxlan network link between nodes. It's also a good

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] RFC, be more prescriptive in our log collection in CI

Greetings, The upstream log server is overloaded a bit, I think we can help their cause. Please review and add comments to this bug [1] Yesterday the following two related patches landed [2], [3] Thank you! [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1723182 [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] plans on testing minor updates?

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: > [...] > > OK.. I think the solution is to start migrating these jobs to RDO > Software > > Facto

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] plans on testing minor updates?

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Marios Andreou > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:50 AM, mathieu bultel > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> On 09/28/2017 05:05 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] CI design session at the PTG

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:42:45AM -0400, David Moreau Simard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > (cc whom I would at least like to attend) > > > > The PTG would be a great opportunity to talk about CI design/layout > > and how

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] add mistral to the auto-update package list for TripleO CI

Greetings, I'd like to propose that the mistral project be added to the list of projects where in CI the very latest built packages are added to each CI run [1]. This will help get patches that depend on mistral patches to more quickly be tested and merged. For example Honza's patch [2] depends

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] critical situation with CI / upgrade jobs

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > So far, we're having 3 critical issues, that we all need to address as > soon as we can. > > Problem #1: Upgrade jobs timeout from Newton to Ocata > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1702955 > Today I spent an

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Bogdan Dobrelya core on TripleO / Containers

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote: > On 21.7.2017 16:55, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Bogdan (bogdando on IRC) has been very active in Containerization of >> TripleO and his quality of review has increased over time. >> I would like to give him core

  1   2   >