[openstack-dev] OpenDev, the future of OpenStack Infra

Hello everyone, Sorry for another cross post so soon. In the land before time we had Stackforge. Stackforge gave non-OpenStack projects a place to live with their own clearly defined "not OpenStack" namespacing. As the wheel of time spun we realized that many Stackforge projects were becoming

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018, at 4:47 AM, Mohammed Naser wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:37 PM Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > Corey Bryant writes: > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM Corey Bryant > > > wrote: > > > > > > I'd like to start moving forward with enabling py37 unit tests for a > > > su

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][qa] Migrating devstack jobs to Bionic (Ubuntu LTS 18.04)

On Tue, Nov 6, 2018, at 2:02 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > Thanks Jens. > > As most of the base jobs are in QA repo, QA team will coordinate this > migration based on either of the approach mentioned below. > > Another point to note - This migration will only target the zuulv3 jobs > not the leg

[openstack-dev] Community Infrastructure Berlin Summit Onboarding Session

Hello everyone, My apologies for cross posting but wanted to make sure the various developer groups saw this. Rather than use the Infrastructure Onboarding session in Berlin [0] for infrastructure sysadmin/developer onboarding, I thought we could use the time for user onboarding. We've got qui

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Zuul Queue backlogs and resource usage

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, at 1:01 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 10/30/18 1:25 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, at 10:42 AM, Alex Schultz wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:36 AM Ben Nemec wrote: > >>> > >>> Tagging with tripl

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Zuul Queue backlogs and resource usage

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, at 10:42 AM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:36 AM Ben Nemec wrote: > > > > Tagging with tripleo since my suggestion below is specific to that project. > > > > On 10/30/18 11:03 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > > Hello everyon

[openstack-dev] Zuul Queue backlogs and resource usage

Hello everyone, A little while back I sent email explaining how the gate queues work and how fixing bugs helps us test and merge more code. All of this still is still true and we should keep pushing to improve our testing to avoid gate resets. Last week we migrated Zuul and Nodepool to a new Zo

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for a process to keep up with Python releases

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, at 7:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 10/19/18 5:17 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: snip > > Integration Tests > > - > > > > Integration tests do test, amongst other things, integration with > > non-openstack-supplied things in the distro, so it's important that we

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for a process to keep up with Python releases

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, at 8:17 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > There hasn't been a Python 2 release in 8 years, and during that time > we've gotten used to the idea that that's the way things go. However, > with the switch to Python 3 looming (we will drop support for Python 2 > in the U release[1]), hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] Having more that one queue for gate pipeline at tripleo

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, at 7:17 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 10/11/18 8:53 AM, Felix Enrique Llorente Pastora wrote: > > So for example, I don't see why changes at tripleo-quickstart can be > > reset if tripleo-ui fails, this is the kind of thing that maybe can be > > optimize. > > Because if t

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, at 11:35 AM, Greg Hill wrote: > > I'm not sure how using pull requests instead of Gerrit changesets would > > help "core reviewers being pulled on to other projects"? > > > > The 2 +2 requirement works for larger projects with a lot of contributors. > When you have only 3 reg

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] [infra] remove driverfixes/ocata branch [was: Re: [cinder][infra] Remove driverfixes/ocata branch]

On Fri, Oct 5, 2018, at 12:44 PM, Tom Barron wrote: > Clark, would you be so kind, at your conveniencew, as to remove the > manila driverfixes/ocata branch? > > There are no open changes on the branch and `git log > origin/driverfixes/ocata ^origin/stable/ocata --no-merges --oneline` > reveals

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, at 12:16 AM, Abhishek Kekane wrote: > Hi, > Could you please point out some of the glance functional tests which are > failing and causing this resets? > I will like to put some efforts towards fixing those. http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/data/integrated_gate.html

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, at 12:11 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello everyone, > > You may have noticed there is a large Zuul job backlog and changes are > not getting CI reports as quickly as you might expect. There are several > factors interacting with each other to make this the

[openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

Hello everyone, You may have noticed there is a large Zuul job backlog and changes are not getting CI reports as quickly as you might expect. There are several factors interacting with each other to make this the case. The short version is that one of our clouds is performing upgrades and has b

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] tempest and grenade conversion to python 3.6

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018, at 9:46 AM, Nate Johnston wrote: > Hello python 3.6 champions, > > I have looked around a little, and I don't see a method for me to > specifically select the version of python that the tempest and grenade > jobs for my project (neutron) are using. I assume one of four thing

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][infra] Remove driverfixes/ocata branch

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018, at 8:53 AM, Jay S Bryant wrote: > > > On 9/17/2018 10:46 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > >>> Plan > >>> > >>> We would now like to have the driverfixes/ocata branch deleted so there > >>> is no > >>> confusion about where backports should go and we don't accidentally get >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][infra] Remove driverfixes/ocata branch

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018, at 8:00 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Hello Cinder and Infra teams. Cinder needs some help from infra or some > pointers on how to proceed. > > tl;dr - The openstack/cinder repo had a driverfixes/ocata branch created for > fixes that no longer met the more restrictive phase II s

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][python3] mixed versions?

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, at 10:23 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > The process of operators upgrading Python versions across their fleet came > up this morning. It's fairly obvious that operators will want to do this in > a rolling fashion. > > Has anyone considered doing this in CI? For example, running

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] CI job running functional against a mysql DB

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018, at 1:50 AM, Matthew Booth wrote: > I was reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/504885/ . The change > looks good to me and I believe the test included exercises the root > cause of the problem. However, I'd like to be certain that the test > has been executed against MySQ

[openstack-dev] [all] Gerrit project renaming Friday August 3 at 16:00UTC

Hello everyone, The infra team will be renaming a couple of projects in Gerrit on Friday starting at 16:00UTC. This requires us to restart Gerrit on review.openstack.org. The total noticeable downtime should be no more than about 10 minutes. If you would like to follow along, the current proce

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova] Running NFV tests in CI

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, at 10:21 AM, Artom Lifshitz wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Artom Lifshitz wrote: > >> Hey all, > >> > >> tl;dr Humbly requesting a handful of nodes to run NFV tests

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova] Running NFV tests in CI

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Artom Lifshitz wrote: > Hey all, > > tl;dr Humbly requesting a handful of nodes to run NFV tests in CI > > Intel has their NFV tests tempest plugin [1] and manages a third party > CI for Nova. Two of the cores on that project (Stephen Finucane and > Sean Mooney)

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack lagging behind 2 major python versions: we need a Python 3.7 gate

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018, at 1:38 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi everyone! > > It's yet another of these emails where I'm going to complain out of > frustration because of OpenStack having bugs when running with the > newest stuff... Sorry in advance ! :) > > tl;dr: It's urgent, we need Python 3.7 uw

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][infra] Maintaining constraints for several python versions

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018, at 9:34 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi Folks, > We have a pit of a problem in openstack/requirements and I'd liek to > chat about it. > > Currently when we generate constraints we create a venv for each > (system) python supplied on the command line, install all of > global-

[openstack-dev] [all][ci][infra] Small network interface MTUs on test nodes

Hello everyone, We now have more than one cloud provider giving us test node resources where we can expect network interfaces to have MTUs less that 1500. This is a side effect of running Neutron with overlay networking in the cloud providing the test resources. Considering we've largely made t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][cyborg][release] Pre-release of openstack/cyborg failed

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, at 4:59 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On 06/12/2018 06:01 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > > Hi Doug, > > > > Thanks for raising this, we will check it out > > > > Clark was sharped eyed enough to point out that setuptools does not > accept regexes for > data files. So it would appea

Re: [openstack-dev] [TC] Stein Goal Selection

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018, at 1:53 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 06/04/2018 08:59 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > > I hope we'll have Ubuntu 18.04 LTS on our gates for this activity soon. > > It becomes > > important not only for developers but for operators and vendors too. > > By the time the project w

[openstack-dev] [all] Zuul updating Ansible in use to Ansible 2.5

Zuul will be updating the version of Ansible it uses to run jobs from version 2.3 to 2.5 tomorrow, June 7, 2018. The Infra team will followup shortly after and get that update deployed. Other users have apparently checked that this works in general and we have tests that exercise some basic int

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] A culture change (nitpicking)

On Wed, May 30, 2018, at 8:13 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 30/05/18 00:52, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: > >> Another issue is that if the original author needs to rev the patch > >> again for any reason, they then need to figure out how to check out the > >> modified patch. This requires a fairly sophi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Mon, May 14, 2018, at 10:11 AM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:08 PM Clark Boylan wrote: > > > On Mon, May 14, 2018, at 8:57 AM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:36 AM Jeremy Stanley > > wrote: > > > > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Mon, May 14, 2018, at 8:57 AM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:36 AM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > On 2018-05-14 07:07:03 -0600 (-0600), Wesley Hayutin wrote: > > [...] snip > > > > This _doesn't_ sound to me like a problem with how we've designed > > our infrastructure, unl

Re: [openstack-dev] Does the openstack ci vms start each time clear up enough?

On Fri, May 4, 2018, at 2:37 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:13:41PM +0800, linghucongsong wrote: > > > > Hi all! > > > > Recently we meet a strange problem in our ci. look this link: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/532097/ > > > > we can pass the ci in the first ti

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Help with test run

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018, at 2:22 AM, András Kövi wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone please help me with why this build ended with TIMED_OUT? > http://logs.openstack.org/85/527085/8/check/mistral-tox-unit-mysql/3ffae9f/ Reading the job log the job setup only took a few minutes. Then the unittests start an

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] final stages of python 3 transition

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, at 7:27 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 04:54:46PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > It's time to talk about the next steps in our migration from python > > 2 to python 3. > > > > [...] > > > > 2. Change (or duplicate) all functional test jobs to run under >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] final stages of python 3 transition

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 3:25 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2018-04-25 21:40:37 +: > > On 2018-04-25 16:54:46 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: > > [...] > > > Still, we need to press on to the next phase of the migration, which > > > I have been calling

[openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job definitions and the branches attribute

Hello everyone, Nova recently discovered that if you use the job.branches attribute in job definitions the results may not be as expected, particularly if you are porting jobs from openstack-zuul-jobs into your project repos. The problem is the openstack-zuul-jobs project is "branchless", it on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Deployers] Optional, platform specific, dependancies in requirements.txt

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, at 5:45 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I also seem to remember that [extras] was less than user-friendly for > some reason, but maybe that was just because of how our CI jobs are > setup? Or I'm just making that up. I know it's pretty simple to install > the stuff from extras

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Deployers] Optional, platform specific, dependancies in requirements.txt

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, at 3:09 PM, Michael Still wrote: > Hi, > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523387 proposes adding a z/VM specific > dependancy to nova's requirements.txt. When I objected the counter argument > is that we have examples of windows specific dependancies (os-win) and > powervm

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra][openstack-zuul-jobs]Questions about playbook copy module

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, at 2:32 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2018-04-06 11:20, Xinni Ge wrote: > > Sorry, forgot to reply to the mail list. > > > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Xinni Ge > > wrote: > > > > Hi, Andreas. > > > > Thanks for reply. This is th

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements] uncapping eventlet

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, at 9:34 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 18-04-06 09:02:29, Jens Harbott wrote: > > 2018-04-05 19:26 GMT+00:00 Matthew Thode : > > > On 18-04-05 20:11:04, Graham Hayes wrote: > > >> On 05/04/18 16:47, Matthew Thode wrote: > > >> > eventlet-0.22.1 has been out for a while now, we s

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][requirements] Pip 10 is on the way

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > The other major issue we've run into is that nova file injection (which > is tested by tempest) seems to require either libguestfs or nbd. > libguestfs bindings for python aren't available on pypi and instead we >

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][requirements] Pip 10 is on the way

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, at 9:13 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, at 8:06 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > > On 18-03-31 15:00:27, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > According to a notice[1] posted to the pypa-announce and > > > distutils-sig mailing lists, pip 10.0.0.b

[openstack-dev] [all] A quick note on recent IRC trolling/vandalism

Hello everyone, During the recent holiday weekend some of our channels experienced some IRC trolling/vandalism. In particular the meetbot was used to start meetings titled 'maintenance' which updated the channel topic to 'maintenance'. The individual or bot doing this then used this as the pret

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][requirements] Pip 10 is on the way

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, at 8:06 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 18-03-31 15:00:27, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > According to a notice[1] posted to the pypa-announce and > > distutils-sig mailing lists, pip 10.0.0.b1 is on PyPI now and 10.0.0 > > is expected to be released in two weeks (over the April 14/15

Re: [openstack-dev] [tap-as-a-service] publish on pypi

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, at 7:59 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > hi, > > i'm thinking about publishing the latest release of tap-as-a-service on pypi. > background: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555788/ > iirc, the naming (tap-as-a-service vs neutron-taas) was one of concerns > when we talked about

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] Where did the ARA logs go?

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, at 8:13 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-03-28 09:26:49 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: > [...] > > I believe the ARA logs are only captured on failing jobs. > > Correct. This was a stop-gap some months ago when we noticed we were > overrunning our inode capacity on th

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [infra] Post PTG performance testing needs

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018, at 1:28 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > Hey all, > > Last week during the PTG the keystone team sat down with a few of the > infra folks to discuss performance testing. The major hurdle here has > always been having dedicated hosts to use for performance testing, > regardless of t

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Please delete branch "notif" of project tatu

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018, at 1:59 AM, Pino de Candia wrote: > Hi OpenStack-Infra Team, > > Please delete branch "notif" of openstack/tatu. > > The project was recently created/imported from my private repo and only the > master branch is needed for the community project. Done. Just for historical pu

[openstack-dev] [all][infra] PTG Infra Helproom Info and Signup

Hello everyone, Last PTG the infra helproom seemed to work out for projects that knew about it. The biggest problem seemed to be that other projects either just weren't aware that there is/was an Infra helproom or didn't know when an appropriate time to show up would be. We are going to try a c

[openstack-dev] [All] Gerrit User Study

Google is scheduling 60 minute Gerrit user research sessions to help shape the future of Gerrit. If you are interested in providing feedback to Gerrit as users this is a good opportunity to do so. More info can be found at this google group thread https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/repo-di

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] requirements-tox-validate-projects FAILURE

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018, at 1:54 PM, Kwan, Louie wrote: > Would like to add the following module to openstack.masakari project > > https://github.com/pytransitions/transitions > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534990/ > > requirements-tox-validate-projects failed: > > http://logs.openstack.org/

Re: [openstack-dev] [storyboard] need help figuring out how to use auth with storyboard client

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > The storyboard client docs mention an "access token" [1] as something > a client needs in order to create stories and make other sorts of > changes. They don't explain what that token is or how to get one, > though. > > Where do I get a to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] How to use libxml2 with tox

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018, at 1:52 PM, Kwan, Louie wrote: > Would like to use libxml2 and having issues for tox. > > What needs to be included in the requirements.txt file etc. > > Any tip is much appreciated. You likely need to make sure that libxml2 header packages are installed so that the python

[openstack-dev] [All][Infra] Meltdown Patching

Hello everyone, As a general heads up Ubuntu has published new kernels which enable kernel page table isolation to address the meltdown vulnerability that made the news last week. The infra team is currently working through patching our Ubuntu servers to pick up these fixes. Unfortunately patch

Re: [openstack-dev] zuulv3 log structure and format grumblings

On Fri, Jan 5, 2018, at 10:26 AM, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, 7:14 pm melanie witt, wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 08:46:38 -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > The main issue is for newer jobs like tempest-full, the logs are under > > > controller/logs/ and we lose the log analyz

Re: [openstack-dev] zuulv3 log structure and format grumblings

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018, at 6:46 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I've talked to a few people on the infra team about this but I'm not > sure what is temporary and transitional and what is permanent and needs > to be fixed, and how to fix it. > > The main issue is for newer jobs like tempest-full, the lo

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] Git submodules support

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Gaetan wrote: > Hello > > I recently submitted the following pull request in order to allow using git > submodules with PBR modules: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/524421/ > > To give a little bit of context, in my team, all our python modules are > followin

[openstack-dev] The Infra Team is back to normal "office hours"

Hello everyone, Just wanted to quickly let everyone know that with the majority of Zuul v3 transition firefighting, Summit Travel, and the big US Thanksgiving Holiday Weekend behind us the Infra team is resuming its normal "office hours". That means you shouldn't feel like it is a bad time to ping

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][release][trove][infra] Pre-release of openstack/trove failed

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Clark Boylan's message of 2017-11-14 09:04:07 -0800: > > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, at 09:01 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Excerpts from zuul's message of 2017-11-14 16:24:33 +: > > > > Build failed. > > > > > > > > - r

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][release][trove][infra] Pre-release of openstack/trove failed

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, at 09:01 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from zuul's message of 2017-11-14 16:24:33 +: > > Build failed. > > > > - release-openstack-python-without-pypi > > http://logs.openstack.org/17/175bd53e7b18a9dc4d42e60fe9225a5748eded34/pre-release/release-openstack-python-w

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][zuul][infra][trove] Tag of openstack/trove-dashboard failed

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, at 08:09 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from zuul's message of 2017-11-14 16:01:20 +: > > Unable to freeze job graph: Unable to modify final job > publish-openstack-releasenotes branches: None source: > > openstack-infra/project-config/zuul.d/jobs.yaml@master#26> at

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Distutils][pbr] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 07:23 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > It sounds like the PyPI/PyPA folks are planning some major changes to > > pip internals, soon. > > > > I know pbr uses setuptools, and I don't think

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Distutils][pbr] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 07:23 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > It sounds like the PyPI/PyPA folks are planning some major changes to > > pip internals, soon. > > > > I know pbr uses setuptools, and I don&

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Distutils][pbr] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 07:23 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > It sounds like the PyPI/PyPA folks are planning some major changes to > pip internals, soon. > > I know pbr uses setuptools, and I don't think it uses pip, but if > someone has time to verify that it would be helpful. > > We'll also want t

Re: [openstack-dev] Do you hate the new gerrit thing where the cursor jumps all over?

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Jeremy Freudberg wrote: > I don't wanna turn this into a complaint session about new Gerrit. But > three little notes since the upgrade: > > - I can't push the "e" key to go into editing mode anymore > - Cherry-picks change the gerrit topic (that's probably a fea

Re: [openstack-dev] [doc] [glance] backport patch doesn't seem to be applied to doc site

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017, at 04:30 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi > > I tried to install glance manually according to docs site[1] for Pike > release, and current doc site doesn't show how to create glance > database. > The bug has been already fixed and the backport patch[2] also has been > merged i

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul v3 Status - and Rollback Information

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017, at 10:00 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 10/3/2017 11:40 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > Our nodepool quota will be allocated 80% to Zuul v2, and 20% to ZUul > > v3.  This will slow v2 down slightly, but allow us to continue to > > exercise v3 enough to find problems. > > > > Zuu

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Zull retry limit

On Sun, Oct 1, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Is this an example of the solution that you are proposing - > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508775/. I also read that we should > create a .zuul.yaml file. Not sure what the correct thing to do is. > Please advise. > Thanks > Gary >

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Zull retry limit

On Sat, Sep 30, 2017, at 11:23 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > It seems like all patches are hitting this issue – “RETRY_LIMIT in 5m > 35s”. Any idea? Is this specific to vmware-nsx or all projects? > Did we miss doing an update for zuulv3? > This is specific to certain jobs. You can see general li

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] pypi publishing

On Sat, Sep 30, 2017, at 10:28 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Any idea why latest packages are not being published to pypi. > Examples are: > vmware-nsxlib 10.0.2 (latest stable/ocata) > vmware-nsxlib 11.0.1 (latest stable/pike) > vmware-nsxlib 11.1.0 (latest queens) > Did we miss a configuration t

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] Zuul v3 migration update

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017, at 03:24 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hey everybody, > > We're there. It's ready. > > We've worked through all of the migration script issues and are happy > with the results. The cutover trigger is primed and ready to go. > > But as it's 21:51 UTC / 16:52 US Central it's a s

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][mogan] Need help for replacing the current master

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017, at 05:57 PM, Zhenguo Niu wrote: > Thanks Clark Boylan, > > We have frozen the Mogan repo since this mail sent out, and there's no > need > to update the replacement master. So please help out when you got time. I mentioned this to dims on IRC today, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][mogan] Need help for replacing the current master

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017, at 02:18 AM, Zhenguo Niu wrote: > It's very appreciated if you shed some light on what the next steps would > be to move this along. We should schedule a period of time to freeze the Mogan repo, update the replacement master (if necessary) then we can either force push that o

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] pike time growth in August

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017, at 01:18 PM, Attila Fazekas wrote: > The main offenders reported by devstack does not seams to explain the > growth visible on OpenstackHealth [1] . > The logs also stated to disappear which does not makes easy to figure > out. > > > Which code/infra changes can be related ?

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Why do we apt-get install NEW files/debs/general at job time ?

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017, at 08:58 AM, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > Another, more revolutionary (for good or ill) alternative would be to > move gates to run Kolla instead of DevStack. We're working towards > registry of images, and we support most of openstack services now. If > we enable mixed install

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade TODAY 15:00 UTC - 23:59 UTC

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 04:58 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 06:43 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > Just a friendly reminder that the upgrade will happen TODAY, Monday > > 18th, starting at 15:00 UTC. The infra team expects that it takes 8 > > hours, so unti

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade TODAY 15:00 UTC - 23:59 UTC

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 06:43 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Just a friendly reminder that the upgrade will happen TODAY, Monday > 18th, starting at 15:00 UTC. The infra team expects that it takes 8 > hours, so until 2359 UTC. This work was functionally completed at 23:43 UTC. We are now running Ger

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 03:57 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello, > > The Infra team is planning to upgrade review.openstack.org from Gerrit > 2.11 to Gerrit 2.13 on September 18, 2017. This downtime will begin at > 1500UTC and is expected to take many hours as we have to perform an &

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] CI design session at the PTG

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017, at 07:19 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:42:45AM -0400, David Moreau Simard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > (cc whom I would at least like to attend) > > > > The PTG would be a great opportunity to talk about CI design/layout > > and how we see things moving f

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 03:57 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello, > > The Infra team is planning to upgrade review.openstack.org from Gerrit > 2.11 to Gerrit 2.13 on September 18, 2017. This downtime will begin at > 1500UTC and is expected to take many hours as we have to perform an &

Re: [openstack-dev] [distributions][devstack][requirements] Upper constraints broken in stable/ocata on CentOS 7/RHEL 7

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017, at 05:58 PM, Arun SAG wrote: > Hi, > > RHEL/CentOS 7 released new libvirt packages (upgraded from 2.x to 3.x) > which broke bootstrapping devstack on stable/ocata branch. I have a > review > up here to fix this in upper-requirements.txt > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/4910

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 01:44 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > > On 08/02/2017 12:28 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 07:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > >> Now that Stephen Finucane is ba

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][tc] IMPORTANT upcoming change to technical elections

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017, at 10:01 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi > > My name is on the nonmembers list and I guess that could be because of > "Current Member Level: Speaker", not "Current Member Level: Foundation > Member". > Can I know how to change this member level? > > Thanks > Ken'ichi Ohmichi

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017, at 02:37 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: > On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 12:26 -0700, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > > By the way stevedore is really providing very bad plugin experience > > and should not be used definitely.  > > Perhaps entrypointer[1]? ;) > > [1] https://pypi.python.org/pyp

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017, at 09:11 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > On 03.08.2017 00:57, Clark Boylan wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The Infra team is planning to upgrade review.openstack.org from Gerrit > > 2.11 to Gerrit 2.13 on September 18, 2017. > > [...] > > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017, at 03:04 AM, Andrey Kurilin wrote: > hi Clark, > > Do you have any plans to update to 2.14 release which has a new polymer > based user interface? > We decided to not try and go straight to 2.14 because it requires newer java and introduces the notedb which is a fairly large

[openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade

Hello, The Infra team is planning to upgrade review.openstack.org from Gerrit 2.11 to Gerrit 2.13 on September 18, 2017. This downtime will begin at 1500UTC and is expected to take many hours as we have to perform an offline update of Gerrit's secondary indexes. The outage should be complete by 23

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 08/02/2017 12:28 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 07:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> Now that Stephen Finucane is back from enjoying his youth and > >> gallivanting all over Europe, and we t

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 07:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Now that Stephen Finucane is back from enjoying his youth and > gallivanting all over Europe, and we talked about a few things in IRC > this morning on the docs migration for Nova, I wanted to dump my > concerns here for broader consumpti

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][python3][congress] locally successful devstack setup fails in check-job

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017, at 12:47 PM, Eric K wrote: > Hi all, looking for some hints/tips. Thanks so much in advance. > > My local python3 devstack setup [2] succeeds, but in check-job a > similarly > configured devstack setup [1] fails for not installing congress client. > > ./stack.sh:1439:check_l

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][all][ptl] Contributor Portal and Better New Contributor On-boarding

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Mike, > > I was recently helping one Intern to join OpenStack community and make > some > contribution. > > And I found that current workflow is extremely complex and I think not > all > people that want to contribute can pass it.. > > C

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Moving away from "big tent" terminology

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017, at 08:48 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 06/19/2017 05:42 PM, Chris Hoge wrote: > > > > > >> On Jun 15, 2017, at 5:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >> > >> Sean Dague wrote: > >>> [...] > >>> I think those are all fine. The other term that popped into my head was > >>> "Friend

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] Do we care about pypy for clients (broken by cryptography)

On Wed, May 31, 2017, at 07:39 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 09:47:37AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-05-31 07:34:03 -0500: > > > On 05/31/2017 06:39 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 06:37:02AM -0500, Sean M

Re: [openstack-dev] Documenting config drive - what do you want to see?

On Wed, May 24, 2017, at 07:39 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Rocky tipped me off to a request to document config drive which came up > at the Boston Forum, and I tracked that down to Clark's wishlist > etherpad [1] (L195) which states: > > "Document the config drive. The only way I have been abl

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][heat] - making Neutron more friendly for orchestration

On Fri, May 19, 2017, at 02:03 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: > I split this conversation off of the "Is the pendulum swinging on PaaS > layers?" thread [1] to discuss some improvements we can make to Neutron > to > make orchestration easier. > > There are some pain points that heat has when working with

Re: [openstack-dev] Is the pendulum swinging on PaaS layers?

On Fri, May 19, 2017, at 05:59 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > On 19 May 2017 at 12:24, Sean Dague wrote: > > > I do get the concerns of extra logic in Nova, but the decision to break > > up the working compute with network and storage problem space across 3 > > services and APIs doesn't mean we shoul

Re: [openstack-dev] Development workflow for bunch of patches

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017, at 01:11 AM, Sławek Kapłoński wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question about how to deal with bunch of patches which depends > one on another. > I did patch to neutron (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449831/ > ) which is not merged yet

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Can we stop global requirements update?

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017, at 05:54 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hoy, > > So Gnocchi gate is all broken (agan) because it depends on "pbr" and > some new release of oslo.* depends on pbr!=2.1.0. > > Neither Gnocchi nor Oslo cares about whatever bug there is in pbr 2.1.0 > that got in banished by req

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] is it ok to create extra users with sudo permissions during devstack run

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017, at 08:31 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > Hi infra team, > > on order to test a piece of functionality I am developing, during the > devstack plugin run I need to create an extra user with password-less > sudo > permissions. As I am not sure of intricacies of our infra setup

  1   2   3   4   >