On 08/06/17 18:23 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 07/06/17 12:04 +0200, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
On 06.06.2017 18:08, Emilien Macchi wrote:
Another benefit is that confd will generate a configuration file when
the application will start. So if etcd is down *after* the app
startup, it shouldn't
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Maili
. Therefore, we need to explicitly list the type of
binaries we build.
As long as the binaries produced don't introduce any kind of bias, I think I'm
good.
Thanks for sending this out,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ad-hoc conversations that need to happen, using
#openstack-dev might end up "locking" the channel until those conversations are
finished. Not explicitly but it'll happen. A dedicated channel would allow for
reducing the noise during these discussions.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
ors' dev/test systems? Production deployments?
All of them. Note that TripleO now builds its own "kolla images" (it uses the
kolla Dockerfiles and kolla-build) because the dependency of puppet. When I
said, TripleO uses kolla images was intended to answer Dims question on whether
these i
On 16/05/17 14:08 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
From a release perspective, as Doug mentioned, we've avoided releasing projects
in any kind of built form. This was also one of the concerns I raised when
working on the proposal to support other programming languages
nts people for building their own images and uploading them to
dockerhub. Having this as part of the OpenStack's pipeline is a problem.
Flavio
P.S: note this goes against my container(ish) interests but it's a
community-wide problem.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
table, I would move them to the gate so
we don't break it. Wdyt?
Couldn't agree more! Thanks to everyone involved...
/me bows and walks away
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack
e these images.
Nothing prevents people for building their own images and uploading them to
dockerhub. Having this as part of the OpenStack's pipeline is a problem.
Flavio
P.S: note this goes against my container(ish) interests but it's a
community-wide problem.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
s
, both are entirely optional.
Just as a bonus example, TripleO is currently using kolla images. They used to
be vanilla and they are not anymore but only because TripleO depends on puppet
being in the image, which has nothing to do with kolla.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signatu
forum at summit that the pika
driver will be marked as deprecated [1] for removal.
[dims} +1 from me.
+1
Also +1
+1
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development M
On 07/05/17 11:59 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2017-05-07 09:49:41 -0400:
On 05/05/17 08:45 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
>On 05/04/2017 01:10 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
>> Some of the current TC activities depend on the meeting to some extent
On 05/05/17 08:45 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 05/04/2017 01:10 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Some of the current TC activities depend on the meeting to some extent:
* We use the meeting to give the final ack on some the formal-vote reviews.
* Some folks (tc members and not) use the meeting agenda
the way we interact and work from an TC
perspective. The way it's done currently is *NOT* very friendly for folks that
are not in a US timezone and that are non-English speakers.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP
of OpenStack (regardless they happen
upstream or downstream) is the upgrade path, which is one of the problems Drew
raised.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing
uot; posted the day before...
Right Thierry, we all have to adjust the way we work somewhat.
As mentioned in the meeting, I've started a thread to discuss the topic about
dropping the meetings:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-May/116375.html
Thanks,
Flavio
-
and start more
discussions there.
Sending this out to kick off a broader discussion on these topics. Thoughts?
Opinions? Objections?
[0] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2017/tc.2017-05-02-20.01.log.html
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459848/
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
elopment Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Devel
likes very much!
+1
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
let's take actions.
+1
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.opensta
it
out in our early years/days).
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
ilman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
si
for OpenStack I believe you are also aiming for some
forms of consistency and interoperability.
Could you expand on why you think the lego analogy does not cover consistency
and interoperability?
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ewhere in OpenStack.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsub
://blog.flaper87.com/something-about-being-a-ptl.html
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
:).
Providing a set of combinations, maps/constallations is a good excersice. It
helps consumers to picture OpenStack and understand its capabilities better. In
the end, however, I'd prefer the users to create their own constellations/groups
based on what they need.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
, there are discussions, disagreements, etc. but we always
work towards a common goal. Oh, and we love eating and drinking :D
Flavio
[0]
https://speakerdeck.com/flaper87/keeping-up-with-the-pace-of-a-fast-growing-community-without-dying
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP
from the TC.
[0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115255.html
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
. For the
latter we've used a "round table" model a couple of times, which IMHO worked
well enough.
I'll write a more detailed email soon(ish),
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP
w we can there. Documenting this process, the OpenStack culture
and making sure the community is in a healthy state team/project wise. I think
this would make our existing interactions with other communities better and
it'll also help creating new ones.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
; seems to have been
scheduled twice. Is that expected or a mistake? In the schedule it's not
explicit whether it's a 2 parts topic or not.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
enstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing Lis
(m-l copy of my candidacy on https://review.openstack.org/453156 )
I'm announcing my candidacy for a position on the OpenStack Technical Committee.
For those of you who don't know me yet, I'm Flavio Percoco. I'm currently
employed by Red Hat and I've been in the Technical Committee for the last
] http://status.openstack.org//elastic-recheck/index.html#1630664
+1 on all of the above! I think we're even just hitting some issues with the
inconsistencies between triple.sh and oooq in the different containers gates.
I love this effort, thanks for working on it.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio
On 27/03/17 08:47 -0400, Dan Prince wrote:
On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 13:49 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 24/03/17 17:16 -0400, Dan Prince wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 16:20 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > So after looking at the backlog of patches
On 23/03/17 16:24 +0100, Martin André wrote:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Dan Prince <dpri...@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 13:35 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 22/03/17 13:32 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 21/03/17 23:15 -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > He
in Glance.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
On 22/03/17 10:47 +1300, Fei Long Wang wrote:
As far as I know, most of Zaqar team members won't be in Boston. But I
will be there, so pls help put Zaqar on the list if there is one
available. Thanks.
I will be there and I'll try to help, time permitting.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
the first phase of the containerized overcloud, which uses
docker daemon.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe
t; may be different than mine
Which is probably different than mine :)
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-de
paths again
in the future and I wish you the best of lucks in your new adventure.
Hugs,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
On 22/03/17 13:32 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 21/03/17 23:15 -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote:
Hey,
I've noticed that container jobs look pretty unstable lately; to me,
it sounds like a timeout:
http://logs.openstack.org/19/447319/2/check-tripleo/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-containers-oooq-nv
today.
Also, it would be great to have the container jobs in
http://tripleo.org/cistatus.html - what do you think?
As I mentioned here (and in my email yday) this is work in progress and the
containers squad is aware of it. Just not enough news today.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Desc
/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
is also working on a job for
upgrades. This job will specifically test the upgrade from baremetal deployments
to containerized deployments. The details of this job are still being worked
out, though.
On behalf of the tripleo containers squad,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: op
-containers-overcloud
Let us know if you need anything,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
know what other members (especially folks that have worked on App Catalog) think
about it.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
to v2, and second, you can re-enable this by setting
GLANCE_V1_ENABLED=True in the settings/localrc for your devstack
plugin.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/343129/
+1
FWIW, TripleO now also uses only Glance v2 and no registry!
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
On 02/03/17 10:57 +, Dougal Matthews wrote:
On 2 March 2017 at 10:40, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
Greetings,
Just wanted to give a heads up that we're tagging all the containers
related
bugs with the... guess what?... containers tag. If you find an issue wi
/tripleo/+bugs?field.tag=containers
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
n
Happy to meet, in fact I think it’ll be important for keeping things on track –
however weekly is too often. I think once a month at most is perfectly fine.
Yes, monthly prolly better than weekly in this cas (if we ever decide to have
these meetings).
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
#openstack-deployment and #openstack-deploy-tools
properly. If the OpenStack deployment project members wish to proceed, I
will commit to doing the legwork of setting up the bots/etc on the final
name we come up with even if it isn't one of the above two :)
This sounds like a good thin
there should be someone in the TripleO team that takes
this on.
Also, I want a Diplomatico... I'll let Gin Tonics to you ;)
Flavio
And folks, that's a logo, I think we'll all survive.
Peace.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 13/02/17 21:38 -0500, E
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
F
)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenSta
looking forward to this discussion and I'll hold any comments back
until it happens next week.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
On 13/02/17 08:19 -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
Hello,
I've been playing with a self-installing container for the containerized
TripleO
undercloud and I thought I'd share some of the progress we've made
On 13/02/17 11:46 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Hello,
I've been playing with a self-installing container for the containerized TripleO
undercloud and I thought I'd share some of the progress we've made so far.
This is definitely not at its final, ideal, state but I wanted to provide a
sneak
-a --filter label=managed_by=docker-cmd
[2] docker run --rm -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock -ti
flaper87/tripleo-undercloud-init-container
[3] https://github.com/flaper87/tripleo-undercloud-init-container
Enjoy,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On 10/02/17 15:24 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/02/17 09:57 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I was talking with Tony and he mentioned that he's recording a new demo for
kuryr and, well, it'd be great to also use the containerized version of TripleO
for the demo.
His plan
On 09/02/17 09:57 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I was talking with Tony and he mentioned that he's recording a new demo for
kuryr and, well, it'd be great to also use the containerized version of TripleO
for the demo.
His plan is to have this demo out by next week and that may be too
v-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailin
Kolla and openstack-helm joining.
Looking forward to hearing ideas and hacking with y'all,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
On 19/01/17 11:59 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
The Technical Committe recently approved a new reference document which
describes how new programming languages can be proposed for inclusion as
supported languages by OpenStack. The new reference document can be found
here[0].
I'd like
solved. So maybe we can work together on
it?
Absolutely, I saw you added a topic similar to this in the tripleo agenda. I
think it'd be awesome to sit and talk about this.
Flavio
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Flavio Percoco [fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi
umes. We can easily switch to v2 for this, I'll do it right away.
For those following along at home, this merged:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418987/
Patch to deprecate the resource type:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419043/
Thanks for the work here, folks!
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Fl
tack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Descriptio
and that it'll help innovating
OpenStack. I'm sure the process is not perfect and that we'll have to refine it
as we go so, let's get going.
Thanks everyone,
Flavio
[0] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/new-language-requirements.html
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP
entirely and not having to multi-task across a
gazillion of things is one of the things I'm definitely looking forward to.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development
-ansible-actions
http://www.dougalmatthews.com/2017/Jan/12/calling-ansible-from-mistral-workflows/
WoW, this is awesome! Great work Dougal.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s that
a new service is required to have a working OpenStack.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: o
his, I'll do it right away.
Thanks, Thomas!
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.o
On 09/01/17 17:35 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/01/17 15:02 +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 2016-12-12 09:22, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/12/16 13:32 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/12/16 17:20 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
Some docs jobs seem to be broken by the latest
On 10/01/17 08:59 +, Huangtianhua wrote:
-邮件原件-
发件人: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com]
发送时间: 2017年1月10日 15:34
收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
主题: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] glance v2 support?
On 10/01/17 12:35 +0530, Rabi Mishra wrote
On 09/01/17 19:39 +0200, Andrey Kurilin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 09/01/17 17:55 +0200, Andrey Kurilin wrote:
Hi, Flavio!
Does it possible to create badges per project release?
mmh, it's currently not possible.
Cou
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 10/01/17 12:35 +0530, Rabi Mishra wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 06/01/17 09:34 +0530, Rabi Mishra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:38 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com>
wrote:
Greetings Heat folks!
My question is sim
?
Flavio
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
Just a heads up!
There are still unmerged patches on this effort. If you have a couple of
spare
brain cycles, it'd be awesome to get the patches relative to the projects
you've
+2 votes on in.
I'll p
On 09/01/17 15:02 +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 2016-12-12 09:22, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/12/16 13:32 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/12/16 17:20 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
Some docs jobs seem to be broken by the latest (or not?) docutils
release. The
breakage seems
are not interested in having them. As I mentioned in previous emails,
you're free to update the patches to match your project needs.
Here's the link to see the remaining patches:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:project-badges
Thanks a lot,
Flavio
On 12/10/16 14:50 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote
(with room to improve) during
this time :-)
Just wanted to second what other folks have said in this thread. You've done an
amazing work over the past year. Thanks for the time spent as PTL.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
gi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.opensta
-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
rovided packages (which are
built from git tags). With that in mind, I don't think this should
block Glance being EOL'd.
I'm sorry for the delay in my reply. I took a little over a week of
time off myself.
Yeah, the above sounds reasonable to me, fwiw.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signatur
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
ely and stick to
IRC which has been proven to be a good (not perfect) welcoming tool for the
OpenStack community.
Flavio
[snip]
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Deve
.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ.
eved by just pinging me on
#openstack-dev
We can still list these meetings in a central repo. One downside that I see is
that the chance for overlaps is higher, which may be a problem for folks that
participate in several meetings.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description:
On 11/12/16 13:32 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/12/16 17:20 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
Some docs jobs seem to be broken by the latest (or not?) docutils release. The
breakage seems to be related to the latest addition of the bages patch. The docs
generation doesn't like
On 09/12/16 17:20 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
Some docs jobs seem to be broken by the latest (or not?) docutils release. The
breakage seems to be related to the latest addition of the bages patch. The docs
generation doesn't like to have remote images. It used to be a warning
. If your project doesn't do it, you can ignore this email.
That said, I'd recommend all projects to do it.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing
it by issuing this command:
$ curl -x PURGE $THE_GITHUB_IMAGE_URL
Hope this helps,
Flavio
Michael
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 25/11/16 13:46 +, Amrith Kumar wrote:
Flavio,
I see a number of patches[1] which have been landed on this p
hub.com/9e9e2e2ba4ecfdece7827082114f8258
-Original Message-
From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 7:07 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Ex
g that #6 doesn't do.
I'll try to come up with some proposals to have #6 communicate this, unless it
was left out on purpose.
Thank you all for working on this,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Descri
101 - 200 of 1094 matches
Mail list logo
