Re: [openstack-dev] [omni] Has the Platform9's hybrid multicloud project been abandoned?

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 6:13 AM Blake Covarrubias wrote: > > Hi Andrea, > > Omni has not been abandoned by Platform9. We're still developing Omni > internally, and are working to open source additional code as well as improve > docs so that others may more easily test & contribute. It sounds

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Enrique Llorente Pastora as a core reviewer for TripleO

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 3:54 PM Sagi Shnaidman wrote: > > Hi, > I'd like to propose Quique (@quiquell) as a core reviewer for TripleO. Quique > is actively involved in improvements and development of TripleO and TripleO > CI. He also helps in other projects including but not limited to >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Bob Fournier as core reviewer

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 1:24 PM Juan Antonio Osorio Robles wrote: > > Hello! > > > I would like to propose Bob Fournier (bfournie) as a core reviewer in > TripleO. His patches and reviews have spanned quite a wide range in our > project, his reviews show great insight and quality and I think he

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Removing global bootstrap_nodeid?

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 2:06 PM Jiří Stránský wrote: > > Hi Steve, Thanks for the reply - summary of our follow-up discussion on IRC below: > On 25/09/2018 10:51, Steven Hardy wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After some discussions with bandini at the PTG, I've been ta

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Removing global bootstrap_nodeid?

Hi all, After some discussions with bandini at the PTG, I've been taking a look at this bug and how to solve it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1792613 (Also more information in downstream bz1626140) The problem is that we always run container bootstrap tasks (as well as a bunch of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Automating role generation

On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote: > On 4.9.2018 08:13, Janki Chhatbar wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I am looking to automate role file generation in TripleO. The idea is >> basically for an operator to create a simple yaml file (operator.yaml, >> say) >> listing services that are

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] quickstart for humans

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Honza Pokorny wrote: > Hello! > > Over the last few months, it seems that tripleo-quickstart has evolved > into a CI tool. It's primarily used by computers, and not humans. > tripleo-quickstart is a helpful set of ansible playbooks, and a > collection of feature

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] podman: varlink interface for nice API calls

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:48 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 08/15/2018 04:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:31 PM Emilien Macchi > > wrote: >> >> More seriously here: there is an ongoing effort to converge the >> tools around

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Mistral workflow cannot establish connection

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Samuel Monderer wrote: > > Hi Remo, > > Attached are templates I used for the deployment. They are based on a > deployment we did with OSP11. > I made the changes for it to work with OSP13. > > I do think it's the roles_data.yaml file that is causing the error

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Alan Bishop tripleo core on storage bits

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Alan Bishop has been highly involved in the Storage backends integration in > TripleO and Puppet modules, always here to update with new features, fix > (nasty and untestable third-party backends) bugs and manage all the > backports for

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] config-download/ansible next steps

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 06/13/2018 03:17 PM, James Slagle wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:49 AM, Dmitry Tantsur >> wrote: >>> >>> Slightly hijacking the thread to provide a status update on one of the >>> items >>> :) >> >> >> Thanks for jumping in. >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][heat][jinja] resources.RedisVirtualIP: Property error: resources.VipPort.properties.network: Error validating value 'internal_api': Unable to find network with name or id

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Mark Hamzy wrote: > I am trying to delete the Storage, StorageMgmt, Tenant, and Management > networks and trying to deploy using TripleO. > > The following patch > https://hamzy.fedorapeople.org/0001-RedisVipPort-error-internal_api.patchapplied > on top of

Re: [openstack-dev] DeployArtifacts considered...complicated?

On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 3:06 AM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > I've been working on a series of patches to enable support for > keystone federation in tripleo. I've been making good use of the > DeployArtifacts support for testing puppet modules...until today. > > I have some patches that teach

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleO] quickstart with containers deployment failed

On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Moshe Levi wrote: > Hi, > > > > We are trying to add container support ovs hw offload. > > We were able to do the deployment a few weeks ago, but now we getting an > errors . > > Jan 14 07:14:32 localhost os-collect-config: "2018-01-14

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Some historic digging

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: > Hello, > > While trying to add some unit tests for some resources in the > puppet-tripleo repository, I stumbled on a not-so-nice case: the > tripleo::firewall::service_rules definition. > > In there, a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Wesley Hayutin core on TripleO CI

+1! On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Team, > > Wes has been consistently and heavily involved in TripleO CI work. > He has a very well understanding on how tripleo-quickstart and > tripleo-quickstart-extras work, his number and quality of reviews are >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

+1 On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Attila Darazs wrote: > On 11/29/2017 08:34 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: >> >> I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has >> been a solid contributor to tripleo-quickstart and extras almost since the >> beginning.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates on the TripleO on Kubernetes work

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 4:56 PM, James Slagle wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: >> Integration with TripleO Heat Templates >> === >> >> This work is on-going and you should eventually see

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing John Fulton core on TripleO

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose John Fulton core on TripleO. >> >> I think John did an awesome work during the Pike cycle around the >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Next steps for pre-deployment workflows (e.g derive parameters)

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:55 PM, James Slagle <james.sla...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:16 AM, James Slagle <james.sla...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nominate akrivoka for tripleo-validations core

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Honza Pokorny wrote: > Hello people, > > I would like to nominate Ana Krivokapić (akrivoka) for the core team for > tripleo-validations. She has really stepped up her game on that project > in terms of helpful reviews, and great patches. > > With

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Next steps for pre-deployment workflows (e.g derive parameters)

Hi all, Today I had a productive hallway discussion with jtomasek and stevebaker re $subject, so I wanted to elaborate here for the benefit of those folks not present. Hopefully we can get feedback on the ideas and see if it makes sense to continue and work on some patches: The problem under

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] roles_data.yaml equivalent in containers

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Abhishek Kane wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In THT I have an environment file and corresponding puppet service for > Veritas HyperScale. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [stable] [tripleo] [kolla] [ansible] [puppet] Proposing changes in stable policy for installers

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Emilien, > > I generally thought the stable policy seemed reasonable enough for lifecycle > management tools. I’m not sure what specific problems you had in TripleO > although I did read your review. Kolla was

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][quickstart][rdo] shipping python-virtualbmc in Newton to allow undercloud upgrades from Newton to Queens

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Lee Yarwood wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm currently working to get the tripleo-spec for fast-forward upgrades > out of WIP and merged ahead of the Queens M-1 milestone next week. One > of the documented pre-requisite steps for fast-forward

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] plans on testing minor updates?

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Marios Andreou wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:50 AM, mathieu bultel wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> On 09/28/2017 05:05 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> > I was reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487496/ and >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] CLI extensions for the undercloud

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Ricardo Noriega De Soto wrote: > Hello guys, > > After integrating BGPVPN and L2GW Neutron drivers in TripleO, I've realized > I always have to jump to the overcloud controller (and copy-pasting the > overcloudrc file) in order to use the CLI

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] pingtest vs tempest

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Justin Kilpatrick wrote: > Maybe I'm getting a little off topic with this question, but why was > Tempest removed last time? > > I'm not well versed in the history of this discussion, but from what I > understand Tempest in the gate has > been

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Forming our plans around Ansible

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote: > What i'd like to dig more is how Ansible and Heat can live together. And > what features do Heat offer that are not covered by Ansible as well? Is > there still the need to have Heat as the main engine, or could that

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Forming our plans around Ansible

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 6:50 PM, James Slagle wrote: > I proposed a session for the PTG > (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ptg-queens) about forming a > common plan and vision around Ansible in TripleO. > > I think it's important however that we kick this

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] proposing Alex Schultz tripleo-core in all projects

+1 On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Alex has demonstrated high technical and community skills in TripleO - > where he's already core on THT, instack-undercloud, and puppet-tripleo > - but also very involved in other repos. > I propose that we extend his

Re: [openstack-dev] How to test private patches on overcloud ?

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Dnyaneshwar Pawar wrote: > Hi, > > while testing my patches i am getting errors with command 'openstack deploy > --templates' any idea what is wrong here? > > http://paste.openstack.org/show/614074/ This shows rabbit is failing to

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Deprecate/Remove deferred_auth_method=password config option

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Kaz Shinohara wrote: > Hi, > >> No, I think we still need this, because it is disabled by default - >> this option allows you to enable defeating token expiry via trusts, > My understanding for the current implementation is.. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo]: overcloud deploy --templates fails.

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Dnyaneshwar Pawar wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am getting following error. Do I need to specify anything else in the > command? > > This command was working fine before commit > 3e6147dee4497bbb607e6377bd588e32f62be2b7 . There is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Pt. 2 of Passing along some field feedback

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > A few weeks later than I had planned, but here's the other half of the field > feedback I mentioned in my previous email: > > * They very emphatically want in-place upgrades to work when moving from > non-containerized to

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][mistral][deployment] how to add deployment roles

Hi Dan, On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Dan Trainor wrote: > Hi - > > I'm looking for the glue that populates the overcloud role list. > > I can get a list of roles via 'openstack overcloud role list', however I'm > looking to create new roles to incorporate in to this

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Deprecate/Remove deferred_auth_method=password config option

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Kaz Shinohara wrote: > Hi Rabi, > > > I still takes `deferred _auth_method=password` behalf of trusts because we > don't enable trusts in the Keystone side due to some internal reason. > The issues what you pointed are correct(e.g.

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Making stack outputs static

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 06/09/2017 03:10 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: >> >> History lesson: a long, long time ago we made a very big mistake. We >> treated stack outputs as things that would be resolved dynamically when >> you requested them,

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][tripleo][heat] Projects holding back requirements updates

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 03:15:13PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > Tagging with tripleo and heat teams for the os-*-config projects. I'm not > sure which owns them now, but it sounds like we need a new release. I think they're still owned by the TripleO team, but we missed them in the pike-1 release,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Onboarding rooms postmortem, what did you do, what worked, lessons learned

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:22:07AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > This is a thread for anyone that participated in the onboarding rooms, > on either the presenter or audience side. Because we all went into this > creating things from whole cloth, I'm sure there are lots of lessons > learned. > > If

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Issue while applying customs configuration to overcloud.

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 04:33:33AM +, Dnyaneshwar Pawar wrote: > Hi TripleO team, > > I am trying to apply custom configuration to an existing overcloud. (using > openstack overcloud deploy command) > Though there is no error, the configuration is in not applied to overcloud. > Am I missing

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Validations before upgrades and updates

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 02:45:08PM +0300, Marios Andreou wrote: >Hi folks, after some discussion locally with colleagues about improving >the upgrades experience, one of the items that came up was pre-upgrade and >update validations. I took an AI to look at the current status of >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Heat template example repository

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:46:28PM +0200, Lance Haig wrote: > Hi Steve, > > I am happy to assist in any way to be honest. > > The backwards compatibility is not always correct as I have seen when > developing our library of templates on Liberty and then trying to deploy it > on Mitaka for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Heat template example repository

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:21:30AM -0400, Lance Haig wrote: >Good to know that there is interest. Thanks for starting this effort - I agree it would be great to see the example templates we provide improved and over time become better references for heat features (as well as being more well

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Project On-Boarding Info Collection

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:57:38PM +, Kendall Nelson wrote: >Hello! > >If you are running a project onboarding session and have etherpads/slides/ >etc you are using to educate new contributors  please send them to me! I >am collecting all the resources you are sharing into a

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][heat][murano][daisycloud] Removing Heat support from Tempest

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:56:56PM -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:51:13AM +, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:33 PM Matthew Treinish > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:49:14AM +0530, Rabi Mishra wrote: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][ironic][tripleo] ironic resources in heat

e first time there was some >opposition from ironic community (although I personally find it reasonable >to have those) but AFAIU this is no longer the case. >I would gladly revive old Steven Hardy patches [0] (have them starred on >Gerrit since then :) ) and make it happen if

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Heat] Conditionally passing properties in Heat

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 02:51:28PM -0700, Dan Sneddon wrote: > On 04/13/2017 12:01 AM, Rabi Mishra wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Dan Sneddon > > wrote: > > > > On 04/12/2017 01:22 PM, Thomas Herve wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] pingtest vs tempest

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:48:32PM -0400, Justin Kilpatrick wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > Tempest isn't really either of those things. According to another message > > in this thread it takes around 15 minutes to run just the smoke tests.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] blog post about being PTL in OpenStack

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:22:50PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Exceptionally, I'll self-promote a blog post that I wrote about my > personal experience of being PTL in OpenStack. > > http://my1.fr/blog/my-journey-as-an-openstack-ptl/ Thanks for writing this up Emilien - it aligns pretty well

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Florian Fuchs for tripleo-validations core

On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:53:04AM +0200, Martin André wrote: > Hellooo, > > I'd like to propose we extend Florian Fuchs +2 powers to the > tripleo-validations project. Florian is already core on tripleo-ui > (well, tripleo technically so this means there is no changes to make > to gerrit

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Roadmap for Container CI work

On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 04:01:48PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > After our weekly meeting of today, I found useful to share and discuss > our roadmap for Container CI jobs in TripleO. > They are ordered by priority from the highest to lowest: > > 1. Swap ovb-nonha job with ovb-containers, enable

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][heat] Nominate huangtianhua for heat-stable-maint

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 04:45:38PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > We are feeling the pinch on stable-branch reviewers in Heat, so now that I > understand the process a bit better, let's try this again. > > I'd like to nominate Huang Tianhua to join the heat-stable-maint team. > Tianhua is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] container jobs are unstable

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:07:24PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:56:59AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] spec-lite process for tripleo

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:09:43PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Bringing an old topic on the table. > > We might have noticed: > > 1. Some tripleo-specs take huge amount of time before getting merged > (or even reviewed). We have been asking folks to review them every > week but unfortunately

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Status of monitoring tools

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 04:34:09PM +0530, Sanjay Upadhyay wrote: >Hi Folks, >I recently started work with a requirement to integrate a security tool >with monitoring framework for alerting and logging. I fail to  find >relevant docs in this direction. After looking around for more

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] How to Preview the Overcloud Stack?

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 01:43:39PM -0700, Dan Sneddon wrote: > I've been trying to figure out a workflow for previewing the results of > importing custom templates in an overcloud deployment (without actually > deploying). For instance, I am overriding some parameters using custom > templates, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [dib][heat] dib-utils/dib-run-parts/dib v2 concern

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:30:48AM -0500, Gregory Haynes wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, at 05:18 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:22:37PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > While looking through the dib v2 changes after the feature branch was > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [dib][heat] dib-utils/dib-run-parts/dib v2 concern

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:22:37PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > While looking through the dib v2 changes after the feature branch was merged > to master, I noticed this commit[1], which bring dib-run-parts back into dib > itself. Unfortunately I missed the original proposal to do this, but I have >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][heat] Heat memory usage in the TripleO gate: Ocata edition

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:21:54PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > > Following up on the previous thread: > > > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109748.html > > > > Here is the latest data,

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][release][deployment] Packaging problems due to branch/release ordering

Hi all, I wanted to raise visibility of a problem we're experiencing in TripleO CI, which I think will potentially affect other projects that consume trunk builds from the RDO repositories (and potentially other distros too I guess) The problem is that we tag our final ocata releases after

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Heat] Selectively disabling deployment resources

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:34:50PM -0500, James Slagle wrote: > I've been working on this spec for TripleO: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/431745/ > > which allows users to selectively disable Heat deployment resources > for a given server (or server in the case of a *DeloymentGroup >

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:06:34AM +, Brandon B. Jozsa wrote: >+1 for the monthly meetings and a long standing, cross-team, collaborative >etherpad. Yes the etherpad is a good idea, thanks! I guess we'll want one per-release, so I created one for Pike here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:25:46AM -0700, Steven Dake wrote: >comments inline. >On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona, > we'v

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel][openstack-ansible] Next steps for cross project collaboration

Adding openstack-ansible to the subject tags (apologies, sdake pointed out I got that wrong in the initial mail, here's the top of this thread): http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-February/112960.html On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 04:02:54PM +, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi

[openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

Hi all, Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona, we've had some productive cross-project discussions amongst the various deployment teams. It's clear that we share many common problems, such as patterns for major version upgrades (even if the workflow isn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][heat] Heat stable-maint additions

>That's slowing down getting backports merged, amongst other things. > >I'd like to request that we update the membership to be the same as >https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/152,members > >Rabi Mishra > Rico Lin >S

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for composable upgrades

Hi all, There's been some discussion on IRC about this, but I wanted to formally request a FFE for the remaining composable upgrades work and provide a status update: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/overcloud-upgrades-per-service We've made pretty good progress on this, and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo-heat-templates, vendor plugins and the new hiera hook

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 02:59:42PM +0200, Marios Andreou wrote: > Hi, as part of the composable upgrades workflow shaping up for Newton to > Ocata, we need to install the new hiera hook that was first added with > [1] and disable the old hook and data as part of the upgrade > initialization [2].

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Honza Pokorny core on tripleo-ui

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 08:52:51AM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: > I have been discussed with TripleO UI core reviewers and it's pretty > clear Honza's work has been valuable so we can propose him part of > Tripleo UI core team. > His quality of code and reviews make him a good candidate and it

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Sergey (Sagi) Shnaidman for core on tripleo-ci

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 07:03:56PM +0200, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: > Sagi (sshnaidm on IRC) has done significant work in TripleO CI (both > on the current CI solution and in getting tripleo-quickstart jobs for > it); So I would like to propose him as part of the TripleO CI core team. > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Update TripleO core members

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:03:28PM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Greeting folks, > > I would like to propose some changes in our core members: > > - Remove Jay Dobies who has not been active in TripleO for a while > (thanks Jay for your hard work!). > - Add Flavio Percoco core on tripleo-common

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Upstream backwards compatibility job for Newton oooq

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:34 AM, mathieu bultel wrote: > > Hi Adriano > > > > On 01/17/2017 03:05 PM, Adriano Petrich wrote: > > > > So I want to make a backwards compatibility job upstream so from last scrum >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Upstream backwards compatibility job for Newton oooq

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:48:27PM +, Adriano Petrich wrote: >Mathieu, >    That sounds exactly what we need. Do we run tempest or something on >those to validate it? It doesn't currently run tempest, only some basic sanity tests (crud operations where we create some resources

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Fixing Swift rings when upscaling/replacing nodes in TripleO deployments

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 02:56:15PM +, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: > I have concern to rely on undercloud for overcloud swift. > Undercloud is not HA (yet) so it may not be operational when disk failed or > swift overcloud node is added/deleted. I think the proposal is only for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Adding a LateServices ResourceChain

On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 03:20:37PM -0500, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 02:21:00PM +0000, Steven Hardy wrote: > > I commented on the bug, I'm not sure about this as it seems to overlap with > > our service_config_settings interface, which IIRC landed slightly

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ci] TripleO-Quickstart Transition to TripleO-CI Update and Invite:

Hi Harry, On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 04:04:51PM -0500, Harry Rybacki wrote: > Greetings All, > > Folks have been diligently working on the blueprint[1] to prepare > TripleO-Quickstart (OOOQ)[2] and TripleO-Quickstart-Extras[3] for > their transition into TripleO-CI. Presently, our aim is to begin

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Adding a LateServices ResourceChain

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:02:12PM -0500, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > I've been working along with a few others on some "opstools" > composable services for TripleO: that is, services that provide > things like centralized logging, performance monitoring, or > availability/health monitoring. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Network Configuration in TripleO UI

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:46:05PM -0600, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 12/08/2016 08:05 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've been investigating how to implement TripleO network configuration > > in TripleO UI. Based on my findings I'd like to propose a solution. > > > > tl;dr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][TripleO] How to run mistral workflows via templates

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:03:10PM +0100, Thomas Herve wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > > hi, > > > > we're trying to address in TripleO a couple of use cases for which we'd like > > to trigger a Mistral workflow from a Heat template. > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Re-defining network templates/isolation

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Tim Rozet wrote: > Hello, > I wanted to get thoughts about re-thinking how users configure and create new > networks with OOO. The current way to configure network settings for a > deployment requires creating nic + network environment templates, and >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Requesting files from the overcloud from the undercloud

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 01:54:34PM -0700, Alex Schultz wrote: > Hey folks, > > So I'm in the process of evaluating options for implementing the > capture-environment-status-and-logs[0] blueprint. At the moment my > current plan is to implement a mistral workflow to execute the > sosreport to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][heat][mistral][magnum] Manage Ironic resource in Orchestration.

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:18:59PM +0800, Rico Lin wrote: >Think about bare metal (ironic) deployment, we can do directly ironic >call, or use nova to deploy. >Right now I have a spec about implemented Ironic resources [1] in Heat. >Including Chassis, Port and some state setting

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] On allowing null as a parameter default

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:27:50PM -0500, Zane Bitter wrote: > Any parameter in a Heat template that has a default other than None is > considered optional, so the user is not required to pass a value. Otherwise, > however, the parameter is required and creating the stack will fail pretty >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Alex Schultz core on puppet-tripleo

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 05:26:31PM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Team, > > Alex Schultz (mwhahaha on IRC) has been active on TripleO since a few > months now. While he's very active in different areas of TripleO, his > reviews and contributions on puppet-tripleo have been very useful. > Alex is

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Julie Pichon for tripleo core

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 05:01:49PM +, Dougal Matthews wrote: >Hi all, > >I would like to propose we add Julie (jpich) to the TripleO core team for >python-tripleoclient and tripleo-common. This nomination is based >partially on review stats[1] and also my experience with her

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] proposing Michele Baldessari part of core team

On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 01:40:43PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > MIchele Baldessari (bandini on IRC) has consistently demonstrated high > levels of contributions in TripleO projects, specifically in High > Availability area where's he's for us a guru (I still don't understand > how pacemaker

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Ocata specs

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 05:46:48PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 01/11/16 15:13, James Slagle wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > TripleO (like some other projects in OpenStack) have not always done > > > good job in merging

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Your draft logo & a sneak peek

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:09:54PM +0200, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez wrote: > Here you have my 2 cents, > > I think the proposed draft does not fit with what we currently have/want. > > I'm 100% sure that can be improved but here it goes. Thanks to everyone for the feedback (both on and off list),

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Your draft logo & a sneak peek

Hi team, I recently received a draft version of our project logo, using the mascot we selected together. A final version (and some cool swag) will be ready for us before the Project Team Gathering in February. Before they make our logo final, they want to be sure we're happy with our mascot. We

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG space request

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:28:00AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Emilien Macchi wrote: > > I would like to request for some space dedicated to TripleO project > > for the first OpenStack PTG. > > > > https://www.openstack.org/ptg/ > > > > The event will happen in February 2017 during the next

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Roles count and flavors inside Heat environment file

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:23:08PM +0200, Marius Cornea wrote: > Hello everyone, > > In Newton we've deprecated the *-scale and *-flavor deploy command > arguments in favor of using Heat environment files. In the context of > testing the composable roles where the custom roles' node count and >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] TripleO Core nominations

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:20:07AM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi all, > > As we work to finish the last remaining tasks for Newton, it's a good time > to look back over the cycle, and recognize the excellent work done by > several new contributors. > > We've seen a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] Temporary increase for the OVB undercloud instance memory

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 04:36:30PM +0200, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > Hi, > > As reported on this bug > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1626483 > > HA gate and periodic jobs for master and sometimes newton started to > fail for errors related to memory shortage. Memory on undercloud >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] let's talk (development) environment deployment tooling and workflows

Hi Alex, Firstly, thanks for this detailed feedback - it's very helpful to have someone with a fresh perspective look at the day-1 experience for TripleO, and while some of what follows are "know issues", it's great to get some perspective on them, as well as ideas re how we might improve things.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] *ExtraConfig, backwards compatibility & deprecation

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 06:32:07PM +0200, Giulio Fidente wrote: > On 09/14/2016 05:59 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > > On 09/14/2016 02:31 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > > Related to this is the future of all of the per-role customization > > > interfaces. I'm thinking th

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] TripleO Core nominations

Hi all, As we work to finish the last remaining tasks for Newton, it's a good time to look back over the cycle, and recognize the excellent work done by several new contributors. We've seen a different contributor pattern develop recently, where many folks are subsystem experts and mostly focus

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] *ExtraConfig, backwards compatibility & deprecation

Hi all, I wanted to draw attention to this patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367295/ As part of the custom-roles work, I had to break backwards compatibility for the OS::TripleO::AllNodesExtraConfig resource. I'm not happy about that, but I couldn't find any way to avoid it if we want to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Overriding internal_api network name

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:21:43PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi folks! > > I'm looking into support for multiple overclouds with shared control plane. > I'm porting a downstream guide: https://review.openstack.org/368840. > > However, this no longer works, probably because "internal_api"

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] RC1 status & request for reviews

Hi all, We had a bunch of CI issues this week, so there's still a lot to land before we cut RC1 next week. https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/newton-rc1 Please help by prioritizing·reviews to help burn down that list (especially the features), and please update the status of your FFE

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >