Joshua Harlow wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 03/10/16 23:25 +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016, Clay Gerrard wrote:
I just re-read your announcement - and I couldn't be happier you're
running
:D
a) Glad to hear it.
b) It's a shame these email threads didn't start last week. I
s
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 03/10/16 23:25 +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016, Clay Gerrard wrote:
I just re-read your announcement - and I couldn't be happier you're
running
:D
a) Glad to hear it.
b) It's a shame these email threads didn't start last week. I
suspect many of the peopl
On 03/10/16 23:25 +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016, Clay Gerrard wrote:
I just re-read your announcement - and I couldn't be happier you're running
:D
a) Glad to hear it.
b) It's a shame these email threads didn't start last week. I
suspect many of the people reading have already
e: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 4:46 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] TC candidacy
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Steven Dake (stdake)
mailto:std...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Emilen,
You say "the previous *PTL* of an Op
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
> On 10/3/2016 10:03 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm actually proposing to run TripleO multinode job in Nova experimental
>> jobs:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/381322/
>> It's non-voting and run at demand, so we're not breaking an
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
> On 10/3/2016 10:03 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm actually proposing to run TripleO multinode job in Nova experimental
>> jobs:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/381322/
>> It's non-voting and run at demand, so we're not breaking an
On 10/3/2016 10:03 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
I'm actually proposing to run TripleO multinode job in Nova experimental jobs:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/381322/
It's non-voting and run at demand, so we're not breaking anything.
tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode is a CI job that takes ~40-
ber 3, 2016 8:03 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] TC candidacy
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
__
From: Emilien Macchi
Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 8:03 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] TC candidacy
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote:
>&
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Clay Gerrard
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:34 PM, John Griffith
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I think what's more important and critical is the future and where
>> OpenStack is going over the course of the next few years.
>>
>
> I think this is a really important
On 2016-10-03 12:23:47 -0700 (-0700), Clay Gerrard wrote:
> This was a riveting soapbox missive - and I agree with what you said -
> particularly about the focus on breaking down the barriers to building out
> and supporting the OpenStack contributor base.
Thanks! Rather than talk about myself or
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> - Make sure it works outside Devstack.
>>>
>>> There is a huge gap between what is tested by Devstack gate and w
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016, Clay Gerrard wrote:
I just re-read your announcement - and I couldn't be happier you're running
:D
a) Glad to hear it.
b) It's a shame these email threads didn't start last week. I
suspect many of the people reading have already voted. I think the
conversations are still v
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>>
>> - Make sure it works outside Devstack.
>>
>> There is a huge gap between what is tested by Devstack gate and what
>> operators
>> deploy on the field. This gap tends to stret
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote:
> Do you think this is an important topic for OpenStack right now? I'd be
> really interested to hear any *new* insights from the previous PTL of *one*
> of OpenStack's installation automation projects? What could or should be
> done to reduce
This was a riveting soapbox missive - and I agree with what you said -
particularly about the focus on breaking down the barriers to building out
and supporting the OpenStack contributor base.
But I don't have a good sense for how you want to apply that focus in
action on the TC? I went back and
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
> - Make sure it works outside Devstack.
>
> There is a huge gap between what is tested by Devstack gate and what
> operators
> deploy on the field. This gap tends to stretch the feedback loop between
> developers and operators. As a comm
I just re-read your announcement - and I couldn't be happier you're running
:D
I was so surprised at the fallout from your suggestion that the TC should
actively engage in more broadcasting of important topics [1] to bring in
more voices from the community early!? Links to IRC logs and Gerrit com
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:34 PM, John Griffith
wrote:
>
>
> I think what's more important and critical is the future and where
> OpenStack is going over the course of the next few years.
>
I think this is a really important topic right now! Do you see any
dangerous road blocks coming up!?
>
>
I would like to announce my candidacy for election to the OpenStack
Technical Committee.
By way of introduction, I[1] have been working primarily on Trove
since just before Icehouse. I was the PTL of the project for the
Newton cycle, and was recently elected to a second term as the
PTL for the O
From: Monty Taylor
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 09/29/2016 07:29 PM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] TC candidacy
On 09/29/2016 06:14 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> https://review.openstack.org/379850
>
> Let's make OpenStack great again.
>
> If you don'
I would like to serve the community on the Technical Committee again.
For those of you who don't know me:
* I've served on the TC since it was the PPB.
* I founded and am past-PTL of OpenStack Infra.
* I also serve on the OpenStack Board of Directors as an Individual
Member, which is a position
Hey Everyone,
Some of you may know me, I've been around the OpenStack community for a
while (longer than some, shorter than others). I'm not an "uber hipster",
or a "super cool bro-grammer", or even a "mega hacker" trying to write the
most clever code possible to impress everyone.
I am however s
I believe this is the voice we really need in the TC.
THANK YOU.
- Qiming
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:47:12PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> I guess I'll send a copy of mine to the ML too, since all the cool
> kids seem to be doing it...
>
> Most of you probably know me as "that short dude in the
On 29 Sep 2016, at 16:00, gordon chung wrote:
>
> On 29/09/16 04:35 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
>>
>> I am concerned that there is a current focus on preserving the status
>> quo. There's focus on policies and rules instead of use cases; there's
>> focus on conformity instead of innovation; there'
I guess I'll send a copy of mine to the ML too, since all the cool
kids seem to be doing it...
Most of you probably know me as "that short dude in the Hawaiian
shirt and long hair." I'll answer to "Jeremy," "fungi" or even just
"hey you." I'm starting my third cycle as PTL of the Infrastructure
te
I am standing as a candidate for a seat on the OpenStack Technical
Committee.
I have worked with OpenStack since the Diablo days and have done it full
time since joining the OpenStack Infrastructure team during the Folsom
cycle. During this time I have been an OpenStack developer, operator,
and us
On 09/29/2016 06:14 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> https://review.openstack.org/379850
>
> Let's make OpenStack great again.
>
> If you don't know me, I'm very good. The code and designs I make
> are tremendous, and I intend to contribute to the TC bigly. The other
> candidates are sad, and they want O
https://review.openstack.org/379850
Let's make OpenStack great again.
If you don't know me, I'm very good. The code and designs I make
are tremendous, and I intend to contribute to the TC bigly. The other
candidates are sad, and they want OpenStack to be a third world project,
no good.
OpenStack
On 29/09/16 04:35 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
>
> I am concerned that there is a current focus on preserving the status
> quo. There's focus on policies and rules instead of use cases; there's
> focus on conformity instead of innovation; there's focus on forced
> prioritization instead of inclusivi
Howdy folks,
I'd like to submit myself as a candidate for the OpenStack TC,
The reasons why are varied (and longer than I can list here) but it
really comes to my desire to see OpenStack succeed and prosper and
exist (in whatever shape and form) going forward in a way that is
sustainable for the
I am throwing my hat into the ring for the TC election.
I've been a part of OpenStack since it started. I've seen it grow from
a few dozen people into the very large community we have today. During
the past 6 years, I've seen controversial topics come and go and the
community grow and adapt. I've
I’d like to also toss my name into the ring. I’m announcing my candidacy
for a
position on the OpenStack Technical Committee.
-- About me
I have served as the Keystone PTL for the Mitaka and Newton cycles, and will
again serve as the PTL for the Ocata cycle. I’ve also contributed heavily to
python
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, Flavio Percoco wrote:
I'm not saying it wouldn't be useful at all. What I'm saying is that
the format, and more importantly, the content will have to be studied.
I'll likely start working on this and I could use your help whether or
not you'll win the election
:)
Yeah, tha
On 28/09/16 20:59 +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
+1 to release notes or something of that like. i was asked to give an
update on the TC internally and it seems the only information out there
is to read through backlog of meeting logs or track the items that
On 28/09/2016 4:27 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> As was pointed out elsewhere in the thread, the TC has been trying
> to do something along these lines at
> http://www.openstack.org/blog/category/technical-committee-updates/
> but even with a dedicated communication subteam (see the May 13,
> 2015
On 28/09/2016 3:59 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
>
>> And the git tree, with a changelog, is here:
>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/
>
> I assume, but I'd prefer if he confirm, that the point gordc was
> trying to make was that there's mo
On 2016-09-28 20:59:09 +0100 (+0100), Chris Dent wrote:
> Part of the point I was trying to make in the message to which gordc was
> responding is that whereas a git tree can allow someone to dig through
> and acquire details, a thing that is more like release notes[1] is far
> more human oriented
> On Sep 28, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
>
+1 to release notes or something of that like. i was asked to give an
update on the TC internally and it seems the only information out there
is to read through backlog of meeting l
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
+1 to release notes or something of that like. i was asked to give an
update on the TC internally and it seems the only information out there
is to read through backlog of meeting logs or track the items that do
get raised to ML. even then, it's hard t
>> +1 to release notes or something of that like. i was asked to give an
>> update on the TC internally and it seems the only information out there
>> is to read through backlog of meeting logs or track the items that do
>> get raised to ML. even then, it's hard to define what deliverables were
>>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 2:49 PM, gordon chung wrote:
>
>
> On 28/09/2016 12:41 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
> >
> > * Information is not always clear nor clearly available, despite
> > valiant efforts to maintain a transparent environment for the
> > discussion of policy and process. There is more t
On 28/09/2016 12:41 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
>
> * Information is not always clear nor clearly available, despite
> valiant efforts to maintain a transparent environment for the
> discussion of policy and process. There is more that can be done
> to improve engagement and communication. Maybe
Despite its name, the Technical Committee has become the part of the
OpenStack contributor community that enshrines, defines, and -- in some
rare cases -- enforces what it means to be "OpenStack". Meanwhile,
the community has seen a great deal of growth and change.
Some of these changes have led
Hello! I am announcing my candidacy for a position on the OpenStack Technical
Committee.
For those who do not know me, I have been involved with OpenStack since the
very beginning, working for Rackspace as a core member of the Nova team. An
internal job change took me away from active development
I'd like to throw in my hat to serve the community as a TC member.
My name is Jim Rollenhagen, but I'm better known in the community as jroll.
I've worked in many environments, from 20-person startup to massive
corporations. For the past three years, I've been working on OpenStack at
Rackspace. I
This is my candidacy for a position on the OpenStack Technical
Committee.
https://review.openstack.org/378054
For those who don't know me, it has been 4 years that I have been
consistently working on OpenStack to make deployments production-ready:
- Puppet OpenStack core contributor, and ex-PTL
I'd like to throw my hat into the ring for the TC. I've been involved
in OpenStack since 2012. We may have interacted when working on Nova,
Devstack, Grenade, debugging the gate, or other areas of the broader
OpenStack project.
Upgrades are one of the things I'm passionate about in
OpenStack. The
+1
BR, Eli(Li Yong)Qiao
From: David Lyle [mailto:dkly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:57 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] TC Candidacy
I'm announcing my candidacy for the Technical Committee elections.
I have been contributing to OpenStack
> On Apr 24, 2015, at 6:17 AM, Luke Gorrie wrote:
>
> Question regarding your candidacy:
>
> If I recall correctly you have spoken in favor of face to face discussions at
> mid-cycle meetings as a practical way to set priorities and move things
> forward. What are your current thoughts on the
Hi Edgar,
To make it clear, this candidacy can not be confirmed as it was received
after the deadline (April 23, 05:59 UTC).
Regards,
Tristan
On 04/24/2015 02:55 AM, Edgar Magana wrote:
> OpenStack Members,
>
> I would like to announce my candidacy to serve for first time on the
> Technical Co
On 23 April 2015 at 01:17, Maru Newby wrote:
> My name is Maru Newby, and I am announcing my candidacy for the
> Technical Committee (TC) election.
>
Cool!
** Growing our contributors
>
Question regarding your candidacy:
If I recall correctly you have spoken in favor of face to face discussio
OpenStack Members,
I would like to announce my candidacy to serve for first time on the Technical
Committee.
Objective:
I want to be part of the Technical Committee (TC) because I have all the
passion in the world for OpenStack and I want to keep dedicating my energy and
love to the most revo
confirmed
On 04/23/2015 12:56 AM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
> I would like to announce my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee
>
> Many of you many not know me, because I am not a very active contributor.
>
> First a bit about myself. I am a Platform Architect working for Cisco in
>
confirmed
On 04/23/2015 12:26 AM, David Medberry wrote:
> Announcing my candidacy for the TC.
>
> I would bring an operator's perspective (ie, operator, user, super-user and
> dev) to the Technical Committee.
>
> I've been involved in OpenStack for four years. I gave talks at San Diego,
> Atlant
confirmed
On 04/22/2015 09:52 PM, Mark McClain wrote:
> All-
>
> I'd like to announce my candidacy to continue serving on the Technical
> Committee.
>
>
> Platform
> —
> OpenStack is a growing community comprised of many parts and we we must view
> ourselves as one unit. As a TC member, I
confirmed
On 04/22/2015 09:32 PM, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I'd like to announce my own candidacy for the OpenStack Technical
> Committee. My TL/DR platform is: "Represent Front-End Engineering". It's
> what I do, it's what I love, it's what I've been doing for the last 15
> ye
I would like to announce my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee
Many of you many not know me, because I am not a very active contributor.
First a bit about myself. I am a Platform Architect working for Cisco in
Israel and have been involved with OpenStack for the past two years. I
Announcing my candidacy for the TC.
I would bring an operator's perspective (ie, operator, user, super-user and
dev) to the Technical Committee.
I've been involved in OpenStack for four years. I gave talks at San Diego,
Atlanta, Paris, and soon Vancouver as a contributor, community organizer,
and
All-
I'd like to announce my candidacy to continue serving on the Technical
Committee.
Platform
—
OpenStack is a growing community comprised of many parts and we we must view
ourselves as one unit. As a TC member, I will continue to place the interests
of the larger community over those o
Hi everyone!
I'd like to announce my own candidacy for the OpenStack Technical
Committee. My TL/DR platform is: "Represent Front-End Engineering". It's
what I do, it's what I love, it's what I've been doing for the last 15
years, and it's what I want to keep doing for years to come.
Would you lik
confirmed
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:56 PM, David Lyle wrote:
> I'm announcing my candidacy for the Technical Committee elections.
>
> I have been contributing to OpenStack since Grizzly primarily in Horizon. I
> have also had the privilege to serve as Horizon PTL since Icehouse.
>
> Why I'm runn
I'm announcing my candidacy for the Technical Committee elections.
I have been contributing to OpenStack since Grizzly primarily in Horizon. I
have also had the privilege to serve as Horizon PTL since Icehouse.
Why I'm running:
I believe there should be broader representation on the TC. We are g
confirmed
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Maru Newby wrote:
> My name is Maru Newby, and I am announcing my candidacy for the
> Technical Committee (TC) election.
>
> tl;dr;
>
> I'm a relative unknown outside of Neutron, but I've been helping to drive
> high-level change in that project. I woul
confirmed
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd like to announce my candidacy for the TC elections.
>
> Here is a list of the main directions I would like to concentrate on as a TC
> member:
>
> * Continue to grow the OpenStack long-term vision and inclusive
Hi folks,
I’d like to announce my candidacy for the TC elections.
Here is a list of the main directions I would like to concentrate on as a
TC member:
* Continue to grow the OpenStack long-term vision and inclusive approach
that comes with "The Big Tent". We should not just be more inclusive, bu
My name is Maru Newby, and I am announcing my candidacy for the
Technical Committee (TC) election.
tl;dr;
I'm a relative unknown outside of Neutron, but I've been helping to drive
high-level change in that project. I would welcome the opportunity to bring my
energy and dedication to OpenStack-wid
confirmed
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Armando M. wrote:
> I would like to announce my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee.
>
> I will try to be brief and to the point: I have been involved in OpenStack
> since the early days of the Austin release; I have worked on (perhaps) the
I would like to announce my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee.
I will try to be brief and to the point: I have been involved in OpenStack
since the early days of the Austin release; I have worked on (perhaps) the
two most prolific projects in OpenStack (Nova, and Neutron) and a few
o
confirmed
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> Hello Stackists,
> I'd like to announce my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee.
>
> I'm running because I don't think that the diversity of perspectives amongst
> TC members reflects the diversity of our community. We'r
Hello Stackists,
I'd like to announce my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee.
I'm running because I don't think that the diversity of perspectives
amongst TC members reflects the diversity of our community. We're
fortunate to have a few people whose brilliance often transcends the
confirmed
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> Greetings Stackers!
>
> I'm announcing my candidacy for the Technical Comitee Elections.
>
> Those of you who have been around OpenStack for a while know me, as I was one
> of the original developers involved since the inception of Op
confirmed
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> Hello OpenStack world! My name is Dean Troyer and I am running for the
> OpenStack Technical Committee.
>
> I have been part of the OpenStack community for a long time and heavily
> involved in three projects: I was an early contrib
confirmed
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> Please consider my candidacy for membership on the technical committee.
>
> My name is Anita Kuno. I consider my home project to be Infra but I tend
> to move around wherever I feel the need is greatest.
>
> I have worked on OpenStac
Please consider my candidacy for membership on the technical committee.
My name is Anita Kuno. I consider my home project to be Infra but I tend
to move around wherever I feel the need is greatest.
I have worked on OpenStack since mid-grizzly starting as an intern with
the GNOME Outreach Program
Hello OpenStack world! My name is Dean Troyer and I am running for the
OpenStack Technical Committee.
I have been part of the OpenStack community for a long time and heavily
involved in three projects: I was an early contributor to DevStack and
served as its PTL during its short tenure as a stand-
Greetings Stackers!
I'm announcing my candidacy for the Technical Comitee Elections.
Those of you who have been around OpenStack for a while know me, as I was one
of the original developers involved since the inception of OpenStack back in
2010, when I worked for Rackspace's Cloud Server team.
confirmed
On 04/22/2015 05:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Hey fellow developers,
>
> I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Technical Committee election
> that's happening.
>
>
> TL;DR: Vote for me to bring back the fun and raise the bar! :)
>
>
> As you might know, I've been a member of th
confirmed
On 04/22/2015 03:52 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to announce my candidacy for re-election to the TC.
>
> About Me
>
>
> I am the PTL for the OpenStack Infrastructure Program, which I have
> been helping to build for nearly four years. I have also served on
>
Hey fellow developers,
I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Technical Committee election
that's happening.
TL;DR: Vote for me to bring back the fun and raise the bar! :)
As you might know, I've been a member of the OpenStack community for
several years now, and I actually already seated a
Hi,
I'd like to announce my candidacy for re-election to the TC.
About Me
I am the PTL for the OpenStack Infrastructure Program, which I have
been helping to build for nearly four years. I have also served on
the TC since the Icehouse cycle.
I am responsible for a significant portion
confirmed
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> Hello everybody, I'm announcing my candidacy for the TC.
>
> I loved Jay's list of reasons [not ]to vote for him - and I'd like you
> to apply those to me too :).
> [http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-April/0
Hello everybody, I'm announcing my candidacy for the TC.
I loved Jay's list of reasons [not ]to vote for him - and I'd like you
to apply those to me too :).
[http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-April/062234.html]
I think OpenStack is facing several key challenges at the moment
confirmed
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Hey Stackers,
>
> I'd like to continue serving on the Technical Committee, and I'm asking for
> your votes in the upcoming elections.
>
> Here's my ask of you, dear voter:
>
> #1.
>
> Please do NOT vote for me just because you may rec
Hey Stackers,
I'd like to continue serving on the Technical Committee, and I'm asking
for your votes in the upcoming elections.
Here's my ask of you, dear voter:
#1.
Please do NOT vote for me just because you may recognize my name being
around the OpenStack community for a long time. Being
confirmed
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
> I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Technical Committee elections.
>
>
> This last (Kilo) cycle I have been the PTL for Heat, but will not be for
> Liberty.
>
> Because of this, if I get elected to the TC, I can dedicate a s
I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Technical Committee elections.
This last (Kilo) cycle I have been the PTL for Heat, but will not be for
Liberty.
Because of this, if I get elected to the TC, I can dedicate a significant
amount of time to TC duties.
I have an interest in projects that e
confirmed
On 04/21/2015 04:47 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm announcing my candidacy for the Technical Comitee Elections.
>
> I wish I could say I've served as a TC member before but I haven't.
> However, there's always a first time for everything, isn't there? I'd
> like for Lib
Greetings,
I'm announcing my candidacy for the Technical Comitee Elections.
I wish I could say I've served as a TC member before but I haven't.
However, there's always a first time for everything, isn't there? I'd
like for Liberty to be that chance for me to be honored with a seat in
OpenStack's
confirmed
On 04/20/2015 05:56 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I'm announcing my candidacy for the Technical Committee elections.
>
> I have been serving as the chair of the Technical Committee since its
> inception, but I think we are at a critical point in the evolution of
> the rol
Hello list,
I'm announcing my candidacy for the Technical Committee elections.
I have been serving as the chair of the Technical Committee since its
inception, but I think we are at a critical point in the evolution of
the role of the Technical Committee, and if you allow it, I'd like to be
aroun
confirmed
On 10/10/2014 01:52 AM, David Lyle wrote:
> I would like to announce my candidacy for the Technical Committee.
>
> I have been working on OpenStack since the beginning of the Grizzly cycle.
> I started working on OpenStack as part of HP's Public Cloud effort. I spent
> two years working
confirmed
On 10/10/2014 01:22 AM, John Griffith wrote:
> I'd like to announce my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee
> Fall 2014 elections.
>
> I've been contributing to OpenStack for almost three years now (this months
> my anniversary) and up until this election cycle have served as
I would like to announce my candidacy for the Technical Committee.
I have been working on OpenStack since the beginning of the Grizzly cycle.
I started working on OpenStack as part of HP's Public Cloud effort. I spent
two years working to make Horizon work in that scale of environment and
making H
I'd like to announce my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee
Fall 2014 elections.
I've been contributing to OpenStack for almost three years now (this months
my anniversary) and up until this election cycle have served as PTL for the
Cinder Project. Over the years I've had the opportun
confirmed
On 09/10/14 09:07 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to run for a seat on the Technical Committee, to help
> serve the whole OpenStack community during this time of change.
>
> I am employed by Rackspace, working on their public cloud. I am
> currently focus mostly on Nova.
Hi,
I would like to run for a seat on the Technical Committee, to help
serve the whole OpenStack community during this time of change.
I am employed by Rackspace, working on their public cloud. I am
currently focus mostly on Nova. I am nova-core, and currently nova's
blueprint czar. I am johnthet
On 10/08/2014 05:29 PM, Adam Lawson wrote:
> It seems I left out a response. Sorry for the follow-on but here's what was
> missing.
>
> *Topic: Technical Committee Mission*
> *How do you feel the technical committee is doing in meeting the technical
> committee mission?*
>
> *"The Technical Commi
It seems I left out a response. Sorry for the follow-on but here's what was
missing.
*Topic: Technical Committee Mission*
*How do you feel the technical committee is doing in meeting the technical
committee mission?*
*"The Technical Committee ("TC") is tasked with providing the technical
leadersh
confirmed
On 07/10/14 10:06 PM, Adam Lawson wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I'll be perfectly straight and dedicate paragraph #1 to address the
> painfully obvious. A number of you are probably reading this after seeing
> 'TC Candidacy', looked at my name and wondered 'who is this guy?' In short,
>
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo