Re: [openstack-dev] [Senlin]Nominating Ruijie Yuan for Senlin core reviewer

+1 to this. Very happy to work with him. - Qiming On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 02:27:50PM +0800, Yanyan Hu wrote: > Hi Senlin core team, > > I'd like to nominate Ruijie Yuan(IRC name 'ruijie') for Senlin core > reviewer. > > Ruijie started to work on Senlin since the beginning of Newton cycle and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Senlin]Nominating Ruijie Yuan for Senlin corereviewer

+1, Welcome Ruijie Yuan -- Original -- From: "Yanyan Hu"; Date: Fri, Nov 11, 2016 02:27 PM To: "openstack-dev"; Subject: [openstack-dev] [Senlin]Nominating Ruijie Yuan for Senlin corereviewer Hi

[openstack-dev] [Senlin]Nominating Ruijie Yuan for Senlin core reviewer

Hi Senlin core team, I'd like to nominate Ruijie Yuan(IRC name 'ruijie') for Senlin core reviewer. Ruijie started to work on Senlin since the beginning of Newton cycle and he has made significant contribution to Senlin project in last three months including the batch policy support, versioned

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] End of week wrap-up

Hi folks, We had our kickoff Keystone/Horizon cross-project meeting[1] which was super productive, and we've settled on Thursday 2000UTC as the meeting time going forward. We'll meet in #openstack-meeting-cp - details here[2]. The range of topics was broad, both on the Horizon and Keystone side.

[openstack-dev] [nova] Spec review sprint on Monday 11/14

As discussed in the nova meeting today [1] we're going to have a spec review sprint on Monday 11/14 (next week). A few things to keep in mind: 1. Spec approval freeze is next Thursday 11/17. We'll get in what we can and may have some exceptions for priority specs after that if they are close,

[openstack-dev] [daisycloud-core] Agenda for IRC meeting 0800UTC Nov. 11 2016

Please feel free to add what you need to discuss. 1) Roll Call 2) OPNFV: Escalator Support 3) OPNFV: CI Progress 4) Core Code Abstraction 5) Newton B.R., Zhijiang __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Transition to Ubuntu Xenial in the gate

Hi Neutrinos, Some of you may be aware of our CI jobs have been transitioning to Xenial. There are a few jobs still left and taking into account mail [1] we need to accelerate the process a bit, especially for those jobs that affect our gate queue or are voting. Ajo put together [2], I also

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][neutron-lbaas][octavia] Not be able to ping loadbalancer ip

Hi Wanjing, Yes, active/standby is available in Mitaka. You must enable it via the octavia.conf file. As for benchmarking, there has been some work done in this space (see the octavia meeting logs last month), but it varies greatly depending on how your cloud is configured and/or the hardware

[openstack-dev] [charms] Default KeystoneV3 Creds

Concerning the Juju Keystone charm, and api v3, can someone shed some light on how to find the default admin creds needed to access the keystone api, or what the novarc file might look like? I'm setting the 'admin-password' config of the keystone charm to "openstack", and am using this ->

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] dhclient spawned by dhcp-all-interfaces doesn't exit when os-net-config runs

- Original Message - > From: "Dan Sneddon" > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 4:28:55 PM > Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] dhclient spawned by dhcp-all-interfaces > doesn't exit when os-net-config runs > > I just opened

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][requirements] Odd cases in requirements?

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:08:04PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: > On 10 Nov 2016 9:29 PM, "Tony Breeds" wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:48:16PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: > > > > > We generate multiline constraints whenever versions are different > > > between

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][neutron-lbaas][octavia] Not be able to ping loadbalancer ip

Thanks, Michael. Now I have brought up this octavia. I have a question: Is HA supported on octavia, or is it yet to come? I am using stable/mitaka and I only see one amphorae vm launched per loadbalancer. And did anybody benchmark this octtavia against vender box? Regards! Wanjing On

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][requirements] Odd cases in requirements?

On 10 Nov 2016 9:29 PM, "Tony Breeds" wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:48:16PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: > > > We generate multiline constraints whenever versions are different > > between python 2 and 3 for the same package. That was happening when I > > wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] proposing Michele Baldessari part of core team

+1 On 11/04/2016 12:40 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: MIchele Baldessari (bandini on IRC) has consistently demonstrated high levels of contributions in TripleO projects, specifically in High Availability area where's he's for us a guru (I still don't understand how pacemaker works, but hopefully he

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [keystone][tripleo][ansible][puppet][all] changing default token format

I've added my blog to the OpenStack blog feed and I've published a post about switching/upgrading to Fernet [0]. I'm not sure when it will propagate to the OpenStack blog, but I published it yesterday. Hopefully this helps! [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Isolated Network Testing

On 10/12/2016 05:58 PM, Dan Sneddon wrote: I recently evaluated our needs for testing coverage for TripleO isolated networking. I wanted to post my thoughts on the matter for discussion, which will hopefully lead to a shared understanding of what improvements we need to make. I think we can

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Follow up on BCN review cadence discussions

On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Matt Riedemann wrote: What's really baffling to me is when I'm in the hallway with you and Matt Booth and others talking about this stuff face to face in person, and explaining my side of the issue, and I'm listening to yours, we seem to all be nodding our heads and

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Deprecation warnings

Hey Neutrinos & Co. Lately, there were couple patches merged which removed deprecated functions from neutron code [1][2][3][4][5]. It seems that at least [1] caused [6]. If you see any problems, errors, disruptions, it could be caused by one of these. Please verify if all places with deprecation

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Global changes to CI jobs using neutron

On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Matt Riedemann wrote: Heads up, we are a GO for neutron by default in Ocata jobs: This. Is. Awesome. Nice work by everyone involved. -- Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/ freenode: cdent tw:

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Weekly Policy Meeting

Thanks for taking the initiative Lance! It'll be great to hear some ideas that are capable of making policy more fine grained, and keeping things backwards compatible. On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > Hi folks, > > After hearing the recaps from the

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Weekly Policy Meeting

Hi folks, After hearing the recaps from the summit, it sounds like policy was a hot topic (per usual). This is also reinforced by the fact every release we have specifications proposed to re-do policy in some way. It's no doubt policy in OpenStack needs work. Let's dedicate an hour a week to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Follow up on BCN review cadence discussions

On 11/10/2016 6:15 AM, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Chris Friesen wrote: That said, I don't know that there's an easy solution to this in nova due to the fact that it's a distributed system with a central shared data store. Enhancing a sched filter might require new data, which means

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] change in plan for releases repo data model updates

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2016-11-08 12:28:28 -0500: > At the summit we said we would move the data that tells us the type > and release model for each deliverable out of the governance > repository and into the releases repository where it is easier to > change over time, but that

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Global changes to CI jobs using neutron

On 11/2/2016 2:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: nova-network was deprecated in newton. Nova is working on moving the CI jobs that run against it to use Neutron only in Ocata. I'm tracking that work here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/removing-nova-network In an effort to make this more of a

[openstack-dev] [all][ptg] how are cross-project sessions scheduled?

I've been fielding questions about the upcoming PTG, but one has come up that I don't know how to answer. How will cross-project sessions at the PTG be scheduled? >From looking at the "Event Layout" section on https://www.openstack.org/ptg, it seems to imply that each team in the left column

[openstack-dev] [glance] [stable] New stable releases (Was: [release] Release countdown for week R-14, 14-18 Nov, Ocata-1 milestone)

-Original Message- From: Doug Hellmann Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: November 10, 2016 at 13:13:02 To: openstack-dev Subject:  [openstack-dev]

[openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-14, 14-18 Nov, Ocata-1 milestone

Focus - Teams should be focusing on wrapping up incomplete work left over from the end of the Newton cycle, finalizing and announcing plans from the summit, and completing specs and blueprints. The first milestone deadline is Thursday 17 Nov. General Notes - Keep in mind that

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

Excerpts from Pete Zaitcev's message of 2016-11-10 11:00:27 -0700: > On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:14:32 + (GMT) > Chris Dent wrote: > > > The conversations about additional languages in this community have > > been one our most alarmingly regressive and patronizing. They

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

Pete, Please see below: On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:14:32 + (GMT) > Chris Dent wrote: > >> The conversations about additional languages in this community have >> been one our most alarmingly

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

Ed Leafe wrote: On Nov 9, 2016, at 5:14 AM, Chris Dent wrote: Something that feels like it gets under-emphasised in this conversation is that change is coming whatever we do. As a community we can either move quickly and stay ahead of the change and see it as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:14:32 + (GMT) Chris Dent wrote: > The conversations about additional languages in this community have > been one our most alarmingly regressive and patronizing. They seem > to be bred out of fear rather than hope and out of lack of faith in >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2016-11-10 15:54:39 +: > On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2016-11-09 11:14:32 +: > >> Let's just get on with making stuff and work out the problems (and of > >> course there will be many, there always

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

On Nov 9, 2016, at 5:14 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > Something that feels like it gets under-emphasised in this conversation > is that change is coming whatever we do. As a community we can either > move quickly and stay ahead of the change and see it as a productive >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

On 10/11/16 15:54 +, Chris Dent wrote: On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2016-11-09 11:14:32 +: Let's just get on with making stuff and work out the problems (and of course there will be many, there always are) as they happen. That's what we

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:53:51 -0800 Joshua Harlow wrote: > Standards though exist for a reason (and ini files are pretty common > across languages and such); though of course oslo.config has some very > tight integration with openstack, the underlying ini concept it >

Re: [openstack-dev] [MassivelyDistributed] bi-weekly meeting - Timeslot - 15 UTC Wednesday (odd week)

Thanks Thierry @all: Massively distributed IRC meetings every Wednesday (odd week) at 15:00 UTC The first official meeting will be on Wednesday November, the 23rd. The agenda is available at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/massively_distributed_ircmeetings_2016 ++ ad_rien_ - Mail

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Is it time to reconsider how we configure OVS bridges in the overcloud?

On 11/10/2016 07:22 AM, Brent Eagles wrote: > Hi all, > > > A recent critical issue that has come up that has compelled me to > propose reconsidering our default and OVS based network configuration > examples : > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1640812 - Network connectivity > lost

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] possible backports for stable/newton

Hi Alan, On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: > > Since our cherry picks don't seem to be considered equivalents by git > > (probably because of modified commit messages) > > I'd like to understand why is that, do you have an example? > It should work when

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] How tied is kolla to matching 1:1 releases of openstack?

Paul Bourke wrote: Hi Joshua, Thanks for sharing your workflow, interesting to see. To answer your question, there is a 1:1 relationship between Kolla and OpenStack releases. As Kevin outlined, you may get lucky, currently in Oracle we deploy OpenStack Mitaka with Kolla Newton and for the most

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [lbaas] [octavia] Ocata LBaaS retrospective and next steps recap

Octavia is using own DB and LBaaS v2 has his own. Because of that like Michael said we’re working on aligning this DBs and we’re planning to provide migration mechanism. Cheers, Lubosz Kosnik Cloud Software Engineer OSIC On Nov 10, 2016, at 1:13 AM, Gary Kotton

[openstack-dev] [RefStack] No RefStack Special Meeting Today ( 19 UTC, Nov 10, 2016 )

Hi everyone, Due to team members' schedule conflict, the special meeting previously scheduled at 19 UTC today (Nov 10, 2016) has been canceled. I will follow-up with the new time later. Sorry for the late notice! Catherine

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [lbaas] [octavia] Ocata LBaaS retrospective and next steps recap

Hi Gary, The LBaaS DB table contents will be moved into the Octavia database as part of the migration process/tool. Michael On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Will the same DB be maintained or will the LBaaS DB be moved to that of > Octavia. I am really

[openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

Greetings OpenStack community, Just me (cdent) and edleafe today. We burned through the agenda, quickly merging the frozen guidelines that were ready to merge. See below. If you think they are not complete please considering submitting a patch or bug [4] to get them cleaned up. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] When should a project be under Ironic's governance?

Second try -Original Message- From: Kanevsky, Arkady Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:08 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [ironic] When should a project be under Ironic's governance?

[openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Biweekly Meeting 2016.11.10 minutes

Hi Team, Thanks for attending today's meeting and again sorry for not be able to host it on yesterday. Since we don't have a meetbot now associated with a fix channel, I recorded the irc chat in a doc file and you could find it in the attachment. Key Takeaways: 1. Nomad project will be renamed

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2016-11-09 11:14:32 +: Let's just get on with making stuff and work out the problems (and of course there will be many, there always are) as they happen. That's what we do. Apologies for the stretched analogy.

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] spec proposal freeze

-Original Message- From: Brian Rosmaita Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: November 9, 2016 at 16:10:05 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2016-11-09 11:14:32 +: > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Ash wrote: > > > I couldn't agree more. I don't like change for the sake of change (in any > > aspect of my life). So in my mind this would have to be a way to better > > bind us. > > Here, have some tortured

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

> On Nov 10, 2016, at 7:24 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Chris Dent > wrote: > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Ash wrote: > > I couldn't agree more. I don't like change for the sake of

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Is it time to reconsider how we configure OVS bridges in the overcloud?

Hi all, A recent critical issue that has come up that has compelled me to propose reconsidering our default and OVS based network configuration examples : https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1640812 - Network connectivity lost on node reboot I've been thinking about it for awhile, but you

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Weekly meeting Nov 10 is canceled

Nothing is on the agenda [0] this week, so I'm calling to cancel the meeting. If you have anything to discuss. Please come chat in #fuel or add it to the agenda to discuss next week. [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda --- WBR, Alexey Shtokolov OpenStack Fuel PTL

[openstack-dev] [nova] vendordata plugin for freeIPA host enrollment

Wanted to let you know I'm working on a nova metadata vendordata plugin that will help automate instance enrollment into a freeIPA server. This will do a number of things for a user: - provide centralized user identity, sudo and host-based access control for the instances - provide the instance

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][tripleo] Fuel and TripleO Cross-Project Integration

Hi, > 3. Consider integration of Fuel provisioning, network configuration and disk partitioning with Ironic and TripleO As a part of this, I'd like to propose "l23network" puppet module [0] separation from fuel-library. This would allow anyone to reuse it for software-defined network

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for O-1

Hello Glancers, O-1 is around the corner (i.e., next week). The priority for Glance is Community Images. Please review the following patches: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369110/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/387660/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391968/ Also, don't forget about the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Ash wrote: > > I couldn't agree more. I don't like change for the sake of change (in any >> aspect of my life). So in my mind this would have to be a way to better >> bind us. >> > > Here, have some

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] How do you haproxy?

-Original Message- From: Jean-Philippe Evrard Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: November 10, 2016 at 06:40:00 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Debugging slow Xenial gate

On 11/02/2016 08:51 AM, Major Hayden wrote: > At this point, I'm still trying to test some additional theories. Does anyone > have any other ideas? Here's an update for today. There are a few bugs open now: OpenStack-Ansible bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1637494

Re: [openstack-dev] Mirantis Fuel 9.1 slave node UEFI mode

Hi, you should use openstack or openstack-operators mailing list or ask.openstack.org [1] indicates that UEFI support in Fuel is not yet there. But I think your HW/BIOS/RAID vendor should allow configuration of RAID for Legacy mode as well. BR, Konstantin [1]

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] How do you haproxy?

Hello, In openstack-ansible, we are using haproxy (and keepalived) as load balancer mechanism. We’ve been recommending to use hardware load balancers for a while, but I think it’s time to improve haproxy configuration flexibility and testing. I’m gathering requirements of what you’d like to

[openstack-dev] Mirantis Fuel 9.1 slave node UEFI mode

Hi Team, I am trying PXE boot in UEFI mode for slave node. But it is not working. PXE boot works if i changed to legacy bios mode.. unfortunately RAID is not supported in legacy bios mode. Can you please confirm if it is supported or not ?. if not what is the alternate method, i can try. --

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Follow up on BCN review cadence discussions

On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Chris Friesen wrote: That said, I don't know that there's an easy solution to this in nova due to the fact that it's a distributed system with a central shared data store. Enhancing a sched filter might require new data, which means modifying the DB model and the DB

[openstack-dev] [OSSN-0066] (Errata) MongoDB guest instance allows any user to connect

MongoDB guest instance allows any user to connect --- ### Summary ### When creating a new MongoDB single instance or cluster the default setting in MongoDB `security.authorization` was set as disabled. This resulted in no need to provide user credentials to connect to the mongo instance and

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] [openstack deployment] Adding deployment guides to docs.o.o

> -Original Message- > > We're talking here about deployment guides for official OpenStack projects - > and thus OpenStack-Ansible - that are part of their repositories, > Ah, I just realized that after my email was sent :) Sorry for the noise. > Andreas Br, György

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] [openstack deployment] Adding deployment guides to docs.o.o

On 11/10/2016 05:32 AM, Gyorgy Szombathelyi wrote: Hi everyone, Hi Alexandra, If any of the deployment projects are interested in getting involved, let us know and we can work together to make this transition :) We have an ansible-based deployment project for Ubuntu. This is used

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Barcelona summit "neutron-agent retrospective" recap

It's cool to store tunnel termination endpoint information in the port model. Will this information support updating so external devices or controllers can inject the tunnel termination endpoints via the API? This is very useful to support VxLAN type external network, which there are already some

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] [openstack deployment] Adding deployment guides to docs.o.o

> > Hi everyone, > Hi Alexandra, > > > > If any of the deployment projects are interested in getting involved, let us > know and we can work together to make this transition :) > We have an ansible-based deployment project for Ubuntu. This is used successfully in production at our company,

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] How tied is kolla to matching 1:1 releases of openstack?

Hi Joshua, Thanks for sharing your workflow, interesting to see. To answer your question, there is a 1:1 relationship between Kolla and OpenStack releases. As Kevin outlined, you may get lucky, currently in Oracle we deploy OpenStack Mitaka with Kolla Newton and for the most part it works

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][requirements] Odd cases in requirements?

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:48:16PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: > We generate multiline constraints whenever versions are different > between python 2 and 3 for the same package. That was happening when I > wrote the tool in the first place - it was one of the reasons I wrote > edit-constraints,

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Zhang Guoqing as core for cloudkitty

+1 Le 2016-11-04 19:13, Christophe Sauthier a écrit : Hello developer mailing list folks, I'd like to propose that we add Zhang Guoqing (zhangguoqing) as an OpenStack cloudkitty core reviewer. He has been a member of our community for many months, contributing very seriously in cloudkitty and

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Maxime Cottret as core for cloudkitty

+1 Le 2016-11-04 19:19, Christophe Sauthier a écrit : Hello developer mailing list folks, I'd like to propose that we add Maxime Cottret (aolwas) as an OpenStack cloudkitty core reviewer. He has been a member of our community for a few months. Working mainly on the stabilisation/bug fixing of