[openstack-dev] [glance][ptl] Canceled: Glance meeting Thu 6th and 13th of Sept

Hi all, PTG is approaching fast and I'm pretty much offline this week for holidays so will cancel the two next meetings. We will get together over Wed to Fri in the PTG and have next Glance weekly meeting the week after. Safe travels everyone and I'm looking forward to see as many of ye as

[openstack-dev] [requirements][ffe] glance_store 0.26.1 (to be released)

Hi all, We found a critical bug on glance_store release 0.26.0 (the final release for Rocky) preventing us to consume the multihash work for Glance Rocky release. We would like to include https://review.openstack.org/#/c/587098 containing the missing wrappers for the feature to work. And have

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE for multi-backend

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:35 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote: > I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for Multiple backend support > (multi-store) > feature [0]. The only remaining work is a versioning patch to flag this > feature as > experimental and should be completed early next week. > > [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE for multihash

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for the glance-side work for > the Secure Hash Algorithm Support (multihash) feature [0]. The work > is underway and should be completed early next week. > > cheers, > brian > > [0] >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Edge-computing] [edge][glance][mixmatch]: Wiki of the possible architectures for image synchronisation

Hi, Answering inline. Best, Erno "jokke" Kuvaja On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) wrote: > Hi, > > > > I did some work ont he figures and realised, that I have some questions > related to the alternative options: > > > > Multiple backends option: > > What

[openstack-dev] [Glace] Cores review open changes in glance-specs, please

Hi all, This week is the deadline week for Glance specs for Rocky! I'd like to get ack (in form of review in gerrit) for open specs [0] and I will start Workflow -+1 them as appropriate during the week. Thu meeting will be last call and anything hanging after that will be considered again for S

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Vancouver Summit Glance Dinner planning

Hi all, time to see if we could get the glance folks together for dinner and perhaps some refreshing beverages. If you are interested, please do contribute to the plans here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/yvr-glance-dinner - jokke

[openstack-dev] [Glance] No team meeting during the summit week

As majority of the team is in Vancouver for the summit we will cancel next weeks meeting (24th of May). Glance team will have next meeting in IRC Thu 31st. Thanks, Erno "jokke" Kuvaja __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

[openstack-dev] [glance] Priorities for WC 16th of April

Hi all, Now when client release is out and milestone 1 is approaching quickly I'd like to draw your attention to few things in Glance development. 1) reviews of outstanding specs 2) work towards removal of the Images API v1 3) Pending delete rollback ability Lets get the reviews to specs so we

[openstack-dev] [glance] Priorities for WC 26th of March

Hi all, Time for the priority update: The python-glanceclient release was postponed til this week due to some bugs Brian found and is in process of fixing. Lets review these and see what we need for the release, so we can get it out this week. The R-1 Milestone is approaching quickly so I would

[openstack-dev] [glance] Priorities for WC 12th of March

Hi all, Queens is released, we had good and productive PTG so lets get the ball rolling and start working through our Rocky priorities. This week I'd like the focus to be, as discussed in our weekly meeting at Thu, on python-glanceclient for 'web-download' import method and any specs that still

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Changes to Glance core team

Hi all, At the start of the cycle is good time to have a look of the Glance reviewers and based on the discussions amongs the group during and before the PTG I'd like to propose following changes: 1) Adding Sean McGinnis to Glance core. The current active core team has been very positive about

[openstack-dev] [Glance][PTL] Nomination for Glance PTL for Rocky cycle

Hi all, After lengthy discussions and careful thinking I have thrown my name into the hat for Glance PTL. You can find my thoughts from the candidacy patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539196/ I'd like to take the opportunity to thank most recently Brian but also our other former PTLs from

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Community Goals for Rocky

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Here's an update so we can hopefully, as a community, take a decision > in the next days or so. > > > * Migration to StoryBoard > > Champion: Kendall Nelson > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/513875/ > Some projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Clarifying testing recommendation for interop programs

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Colleen Murphy wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We have governance review under debate[1] that we need the community's help > on. > The debate is over what recommendation the TC should make to the Interop team > on where the tests it uses for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to longer development cycles

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Over the past year, it has become pretty obvious to me that our > self-imposed rhythm no longer matches our natural pace. It feels like we > are always running elections, feature freeze is always just

[openstack-dev] [Glance] No Team Meeting Today 23rd of Nov

Hi all, Due to the Thanks giving in US and as no agenda items were added by the deadline yesterday we will not have glance meeting today. Will recoup next week 30th of Nov. Thanks, Jokke __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for candidates: How do you think we can make our community more inclusive?

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Greetings, > > Some of you, TC candidates, expressed concerns about diversity and > inclusiveness > (or inclusivity, depending on your taste) in your candidacy. I believe this > is a > broad, and some times ill-used,

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

? Just remember the connection between Glance and the client (that being user, nova, cinder...) is > > Le 28 sept. 2017 6:30 PM, "Erno Kuvaja" <ekuv...@redhat.com> a écrit : >> >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Arnaud MORIN <arnaud.mo...@gmail.com> >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

ray of very fast disks. Do you have any data you can share that would show us getting the performance boost worth of the overhead cost? Just remember the connection between Glance and the client (that being user, nova, cinder...) is single stream anyways. - jokke > > Le 28 sept. 2017 6:30 P

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Arnaud MORIN wrote: > Hey all, > So I finally tested your pull requests, it does not work. > 1 - For uploads, swiftclient is not using threads when source is given by > glance: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][glance] What should be the response for invalid 'Accpet' header?

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Sean McGinnis wrote: > >> Thanks Chris, I wasn't aware of that. What's your opinion - change >> it to be more strict, or leave it as is? > > > Ideally we'd have true content negotiation and support

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote: > On 07/13/2017 08:42 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 07/11/2017 06:47 AM, Flavio Pe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 07/11/2017 06:47 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: >> >> On 11/07/17 14:20 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Monty Taylor >>> wrote: >>> On 07/10/2017 04:31 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Stepping down from core

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 20/06/17 09:31 +1200, feilong wrote: >> >> Hi there, >> >> I've been a Glance core since 2013 and been involved in the Glance >> community even longer, so I care deeply about Glance. My situation right now >> is such

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Abhishek Kekane for glance core

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I'm nominating Abhishek Kekane (abhishekk on IRC) to be a Glance core > for the Pike cycle. Abhishek has been around the Glance community for > a long time and is familiar with the architecture and design

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][glance] Glance needs help, it's getting critical

Just quick comment here on my day off. I will get proper reply to the chain itself tomorrow when I'm back. While I cannot argue with all Mike's points below, I personally cannot stand behind his proposals here and just want to indicate that this is view of one member, not the Glance community by

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/glance failed

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:31:42PM -0500, Ian Cordasco wrote: > >> I believe you asked in another thread (that I cannot locate) if it was >> acceptable to the Glance team to not have an 11.0.3 tarball on >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] question for OpenStack User Survey

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > Glancers, > > We have the opportunity to submit one question for the upcoming User > Survey, which launches on or before February 1. We'd receive responses > in advance of the February PTG, so this would be a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][rdo][kolla] Recommending the RDO tag for the mailing list

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Folks, > > > > I am in favor of using a new tag called [rdo] such that RDO (or its > transitive dependencies) can be discussed and filtered by email clients as > it relates to development topics that affect the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Propose Steve Lewis for Glance core

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I'd like to propose Steve Lewis (stevelle on IRC) for Glance core. Take > a look at any of his reviews, and you can see that he's thorough and > comprehensive in his reviewing. He's knowledgeable about Python,

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [stable] New stable releases (Was: [release] Release countdown for week R-14, 14-18 Nov, Ocata-1 milestone)

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Doug Hellmann > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Date: November 10, 2016 at 13:13:02

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [stable] Bug backports

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Andrey Pavlov wrote: > Hi, > > I want to backport this bug - > https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1616556 > but review for master is stuck since August - > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357827/ > My stand on backporting this as I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Cores using -2 votes

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > Hi all, > > A few weeks ago, there was a controversy in which a patch had been > -2'd until other concerns were resolved and then the core who used > their -2 powers disappeared and could not lift it after those

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Gerrit is blocking the workflow with -2 for reason

Hi all, As it seems by the "Improving help text for *" string of patches like [0][1] that the Glance core group is willing to get around -2s by abandoning, reproposing and merging just because not all of us are around in US office hours, I'd like to propose that we would just remove the -2 right

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for Manila CephFS Native backend integration

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Erno Kuvaja <ekuv...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:32:16AM +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvaja <ek

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for Manila CephFS Native backend integration

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:32:16AM +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvaja <ekuv...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I'm still worki

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for Manila CephFS Native backend integration

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvaja <ekuv...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm still working on getting all pieces together for the Manila CephFS > driver integration and realizing that we have about a week of busy > gating left 'till FF and the changes are not r

Re: [openstack-dev] [searchlight] [glance] Will glance community image sharing make it into Newton?

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Tripp, Travis S wrote: > Hello Glance team, > > > > We’re looking into implementing the Glance Community Image sharing support > within Searchlight for Newton, but it looks like several patches are > outstanding. Can you let us know how

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][UI] Port number for frontend app

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Honza Pokorny wrote: > Hello folks, > > We've been using port 3000 for the GUI during development and testing. > Now that we're working on packaging and shipping our code, we're > wondering if port 3000 is still the best choice. > > Would 3000

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Memory shortage in HA jobs, please increase it

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Hugh Brock wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: >> On 19 August 2016 at 00:07, Sagi Shnaidman wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> we have a problem again with not enough memory in HA jobs,

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for Manila CephFS Native backend integration

Hi all, I'm still working on getting all pieces together for the Manila CephFS driver integration and realizing that we have about a week of busy gating left 'till FF and the changes are not reviewed yet, I'd like to ask community consider the feature for Feature Freeze Exception. I'm confident

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][cinder] tag:follows-standard-deprecation should be removed

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: >> >> >> >> As follow up on the mailing list discussion [0], gerrit activity >> >> [1][2] and cinder 3rd party CI policy [3] I'd like to initiate >> >> discussion how Cinder follows, or rather does not follow, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][cinder] tag:follows-standard-deprecation should be removed

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Erno Kuvaja's message of 2016-08-11 12:26:59 +0100: >> Hi all, >> >> As follow up on the mailing list discussion [0], gerrit activity >> [1][2] and cinder 3rd party CI policy [3] I'd like to initiate >>

[openstack-dev] [tc][cinder] tag:follows-standard-deprecation should be removed

Hi all, As follow up on the mailing list discussion [0], gerrit activity [1][2] and cinder 3rd party CI policy [3] I'd like to initiate discussion how Cinder follows, or rather does not follow, the standard deprecation policy [4] as the project has been tagged on the assert page [5]. I'm not

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 08/09/2016 08:33 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: John Dickinson >> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

projects have gotten since the big tent > was established, that might be an accurate conclusion, but really bad for > users/operators of OpenStack. > > I really would like glance/glare to reconsider this stance. OpenStack > continuously budding off projects is not a good pattern. &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Tim Bell <tim.b...@cern.ch> wrote: > >> On 04 Aug 2016, at 19:34, Erno Kuvaja <ekuv...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com> wrote: >>> Excerpts from Tim Bell's messa

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2016-08-04 15:55:48 +: >> >> On 04 Aug 2016, at 17:27, Mikhail Fedosin >> > wrote: >> > >> > Hi all, >> > > > after 6 months of Glare

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] persistently single-vendor projects

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > On 1 August 2016 at 18:14, Adrian Otto wrote: >> >> I am struggling to understand why we would want to remove projects from >> our big tent at all, as long as they are being actively

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] persistently single-vendor projects

Kevin, What do you mean by "Other OpenStack projects don't take it into account because its not a big tent thing"? I think there is pretty decent adoption of Ceph across the projects where it would make sense. Also I doubt none of them would be against 3rd party Ceph gates to those project if the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Alexander Tivelkov wrote: > I am the one who started the initiative 2.5 years ago, and was always > advocating the "let's stay in Glance" approach during numerous discussions > on "where should it belong" for all these years. > Now I believe

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] Globally disabling hw_qemu_guest_agent support

Hi Daniel, You might want to have look on the Glance Property Protections [0]. I'd assume that would do it for you? [0] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/glance/property-protections.html Best, Erno On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Daniel Russell wrote: > Hi, > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] snapshots are broken by default with newton and glance v2

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Thanks Matt. I've scheduled for a release of the client this week. > > On 7/16/16 4:09 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> This is more of a heads up than anything. >> >> Our internal CI is running Tempest with images that

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] glance backend: replace swift by file in CI

TL;DR Makes absolutely sense to run file backend on single node undercloud at CI. Few more comments inline. On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote: >> There's probably some

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [defcore] [interop] Proposal for a virtual sync dedicated to Import Refactor May 26th

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 20/05/16 18:00 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> >> I want to propose having a dedicated virtual sync next week Thursday May >> 26th at 1500UTC for one hour on the Import Refactor work [1] ongoing in

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo_config] Improving Config Option Help Texts

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:58 PM, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> wrote: > On 24 May 2016 at 19:03, Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Erno Kuvaja <ekuv...@redhat.com> > > Reply: OpenStack Developmen

[openstack-dev] [all][oslo_config] Improving Config Option Help Texts

Hi all, Based on the not yet merged spec of categorized config options [0] some project seems to have started improving the config option help texts. This is great but I noticed scary trend on clutter to be added on these sections. Now looking individual changes it does not look that bad at all

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:28 AM, Gregory Haynes wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2016, at 05:24 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Gregory Haynes > wrote: > > On Fri, May 20, 2016, at 07:48 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > John

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [defcore] [interop] Proposal for a virtual sync dedicated to Import Refactor May 26th

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > +1 > On May 22, 2016 11:50 PM, "Kairat Kushaev" wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Best regards, >> Kairat Kushaev >> >> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Nikhil Komawar >> wrote: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: [Heat][Glance] Can't migrate to glance v2 completely

Hi Huangtianhua, Bit more general pointers here and I respond to your exact cases inline. OpenStack community has made really clear that we must not expose backend configuration details of the services to users and we must not rely users knowing any of those details to operate in the cloud. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Cross project and all other liaisons

If there is changes needed and you haven't been editing the wiki pages before, let us know. Infra does not accept new accounts at the moment due to huge amount of spamming, so if you haven't registered before, you can't do it now. - Erno On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Nikhil Komawar

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] [glance] On operating a high throughput or otherwise team

I'm not sure why I'm spending one of these very rare sunny Sunday afternoons on this but perhaps it's just important enough. Thanks Nikhil and Chris for such a verbal start for the discussion. I will at least try to keep my part shorter. I will quote both of your e-mails by name from which one it

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] glance-registry deprecation: Request for feedback

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 05/11/2016 11:51 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> The Glance team is evaluating the needs and usefulness of the Glance >> Registry >> service and this email is a request for feedback from the overall >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [cross-project] [all] Quotas -- service vs. library

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Hello everyone, > > tl;dr; > I'm writing to request some feedback on whether the cross project Quotas > work should move ahead as a service or a library or going to a far > extent I'd ask should this even be in a

[openstack-dev] [glance] Stable and Release Liaison

Hi all, Due to some changes where my focus is needed, I will not have time to keep driving Glance's stable maintenance nor continue my efforts in Glance release management. I hope/believe that this shift of focus is temporary in nature and that I will still have time to participate on reviews,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Ideas needed for v2 registry testing

stack using keystone differently than how v1 api + v1 registry stack uses it? Thanks On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Erno Kuvaja kuv...@hp.com mailto:kuv...@hp.com wrote: Hi all, I have been trying to enable functional testing for Glance API v2 using data_api

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Ideas needed for v2 registry testing

Hi all, I have been trying to enable functional testing for Glance API v2 using data_api = glance.db.registry.api without great success. The current functionality of the v2 api+reg relies on the fact that keystone is used and our current tests does not facilitate that expectation. I do

Re: [openstack-dev] Help in re-running openstack

Hi Shiva, You can get into the screen after you have made the changes stop the process you have changed (ctrl-c on the correct tab) and restart it (arrow up will give you the last command ran which will be the one that has started the process by devstack). - Erno On 03/04/14 11:47, shiva m