Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

Feel free to add your name to the wiki :) On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > ++, I also want to join this party :) > > 2018-01-09 8:40 GMT+08:00 Zhipeng Huang : > >> Agree 100% to avoid regular meeting and it is better to have bi-weekly

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

++, I also want to join this party :) 2018-01-09 8:40 GMT+08:00 Zhipeng Huang : > Agree 100% to avoid regular meeting and it is better to have bi-weekly > email report. Meeting should be arranged event based, and I think given the > status of OpenStack community's work on

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

application filed at https://review.openstack.org/534342 and wiki created at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Res_Mgmt_SIG . On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > i think I could do it, but I gotta rely on you guys to attend the Resource > Management WG

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

i think I could do it, but I gotta rely on you guys to attend the Resource Management WG meeting since its time is really bad for us in APAC timezone :P On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Jay Pipes wrote: > > I think having a

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Jay Pipes wrote: I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

Zhipeng Huang wrote: > [...] > With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in > OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community > increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a > Resource Management SIG as a contact point for

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

Hi Eric, Glad to count you in :) On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Eric Fried wrote: > > I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if > > we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events > > in the resource tracking world would

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

Agree 100% to avoid regular meeting and it is better to have bi-weekly email report. Meeting should be arranged event based, and I think given the status of OpenStack community's work on resource provider, mostly what we need to do is attend k8s meetings (sig-scheduler, wg-resource-management,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if > we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events > in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular > meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: Hi all, With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a Resource Management SIG as a

[openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

Hi all, With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community to