Hi all,
It has caught my attention the following subthread in latest groklaw article
("A Protective Order in Novell & a Tiny Delay in IBM"), from a post
titled "GPL 2 or 3 an interesting dilemma" on the OT thread.
http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20060803232955625&title=GPL+2+o
El Domingo, 6 de Agosto de 2006 17:12, Thomas Hertweck escribió:
> Andreas Hanke wrote:
> > Miguel Angel Alvarez schrieb:
> >> So, is Novell really violating the GPL with SuSE 10.1?
> >
> > Could you please elaborate a bit more? Which sources of which package
> &g
El Lunes, 7 de Agosto de 2006 01:33, Eberhard Moenkeberg escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> > Miguel Angel Alvarez wrote:
> >> Stephan said that there is a mention to source code on the bottom side
> >> of the box, but what text is there
El Lunes, 7 de Agosto de 2006 10:13, Andreas Jaeger escribió:
> The media kit (the box with the CDs in it which is inside the SUSE
> Linux 10.1 box) contains the following sentence "The source code for
> SUSE Linux 10.1 is available at:
> www.novell.com/products/suselinux/source_code.html"
>
> This
El Martes, 8 de Agosto de 2006 23:12, Jerry Westrick escribió:
> But the so called Journalist, who claimed SUSE was in violation of the GPL
> before he even got his facts right was either irresponsible, or most
> probably malicious.
Which journalist are you refering to?
This thread started about a
How can I know what has triggered a rebuild in the build service repositories?
I know that a rebuild can be triggered by a changed dependency, or by hand.
But, since the packages change frecuently (thinking mainly kde) I'm
interested in knowing which changes or what has caused the rebuild or vers
El Viernes, 25 de Agosto de 2006 21:38, Stephan Binner escribió:
> On Friday 25 August 2006 17:54, Miguel Angel Alvarez wrote:
> > But, since the packages change frecuently (thinking mainly kde) I'm
> > interested in knowing which changes or what has caused the rebuild o
Hi,
I'm trying to build a uml kernel in suse10, but either I'm doing something
wrong or it is broken. Any hint?
kernel is current 2.6.13-15.11
make menuconfig ARCH=um
make linux ARCH=um
CHK /usr/src/linux-2.6.13-15.11/include/linux/version.h
CHK arch/um/user-offsets.h
make[1]: `arch/
El Martes, 5 de Septiembre de 2006 09:55, Stoyan Tzalev escribió:
> Sorry, it seems you can't use nxclient ver.2 with the SuSE 10.1 included NX
> libraries (ver. 1.5).
> http://www.nomachine.com/tr/view.php?id=TR07D01421
> I've had the same problem, and had to use nomachine's free edition of NX
> s
El Lunes, 18 de Septiembre de 2006 14:37, Kenneth Aar, Grafikern.no escribió:
> Hi
>
> Anyone else experiencing that the latest firefox(1.5.0.7-0.1) runs at
> 98-100% after a couple of minutes. Reverting back to the older version
> (1.5.0.6-1.3) fixes the problem...
Me, but it started with 1.5.0.6
Hi all,
Just a quick question for the SUSE people
I have noticed that openoffice 2.0.4 is out for suse 10.1, but not for suse
10.0 There will be no more openoffice updates for suse 10.0?
--
Don't see the world through a window, be open{source}minded, and be free :-)
-
=8-O
I'm terrified!
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/nov06/11-02MSNovellPR.mspx
--
Don't see the world through a window, be open{source}minded, and be free :-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
El Viernes, 3 de Noviembre de 2006 18:11, Kevin Donnelly escribió:
> On Friday 03 November 2006 14:26, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > > Yes, though it's unclear from the press release whether the patent
> > > ceasefire is in perpetuity, or merely for the duration of the Novell
> > > agreement (up to 201
El Viernes, 3 de Noviembre de 2006 19:35, Anders Johansson escribió:
> On Friday 03 November 2006 18:11, Kevin Donnelly wrote:
> > In particular, is Novell suggesting that there is some truth to the
> > suggestion that parts of Linux infringe patents,
>
> No, Novell's position is that there are no
El Sábado, 4 de Noviembre de 2006 09:53, Andreas Hanke escribió:
> Tony Pott schrieb:
> > To all the people at SuSE,
> > I know this isn't your fault, and I'm sorry I have to stop using your
> > excellent work. I'm sad to have to change to another distro, I've been a
> > fanboy since SuSE 8.0, but
El Sábado, 4 de Noviembre de 2006 13:17, Andreas Hanke escribió:
> Miguel Angel Alvarez schrieb:
> > [...]
>
> All this stuff resembles a similarly *censored* "1+1=2"-style discussion
> we had recently, and it's similarly useful: We're just stuffing the
>
El Sábado, 4 de Noviembre de 2006 14:01, Pascal Bleser escribió:
> It's a PR and sales move by Novell. There are certainly still a lot of
Unfortunately I think it's a bad PR move like EV1-SCO was. It may seems
good for your customers but ...
>
> It has absolutely nothing to do with MS playing
El Sábado, 4 de Noviembre de 2006 18:38, John Meyer escribió:
> Has anybody else noticed Firefox 2.0 locking up and crashing at various
> times?
For me FF1.5 crashes much more often
(Disclaimer: I'm using FF2 mozilla official build by now)
--
Don't see the world through a window, be open{source}mi
18 matches
Mail list logo
