Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett escribió:
> Today, we are further than that. This dream has grown like a monster. Today
> openSUSE has a name in the organization chart and the project is so big,
> noisy and cool.
..and Im still getting surprised of it 's growth everyday...
Things like the build servic
On 10/9/07, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 October 2007 13:56:33 Stefan Hundhammer wrote:
> > So far, I'd say the community got its fair share. openSUSE as a community
> > project would not exist if it hadn't been for Novell management to allocate
> > the funds fo
Stefan Hundhammer wrote:
> ...
> Folks, please get just a little bit more informed before you start bashing
> Novell. The old SuSE people don't do it, and there are reasons for that.
>
Wow, I already considered Novell heroic enough in the SCO affair that I
stuck with them even through what I co
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 13:56:33 Stefan Hundhammer wrote:
> So far, I'd say the community got its fair share. openSUSE as a community
> project would not exist if it hadn't been for Novell management to allocate
> the funds for constantly ongoing (!) involvement.
That is so true.
When I joined
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 10:49, Stefan Hundhammer wrote:
[...]
> Folks, please get just a little bit more informed before you start bashing
> Novell. The old SuSE people don't do it, and there are reasons for that.
>
>
> OK, that was a little more than 2 Cents. Let's make this one whole Euro.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Tuesday 2007-10-09 at 11:49 +0200, Stefan Hundhammer wrote:
Having been through all that, having owned employee shares (and lost a lot of
money with them), having seen "investors" buying out the previous owners of
the old SuSE (including the e
On Oct 9 2007 19:00, Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
>On 10/09/2007 05:49 PM, Stefan Hundhammer wrote:
>>
>> Folks, please get just a little bit more informed before you start bashing
>> Novell. The old SuSE people don't do it, and there are reasons for that.
>>
>>
>> OK, that was a little more than 2 C
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 13:44, darko g wrote:
> On 10/9/07, Stefan Hundhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We've been through times. Times where we had to produce an insane amount
> > of small products of questionable value for the customer each quarter --
> > just to avoid getting broke again
On 10/9/07, Stefan Hundhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've been through times. Times where we had to produce an insane amount of
> small products of questionable value for the customer each quarter -- just to
> avoid getting broke again. Those times are over. Thanks to being owned by a
> comp
On 10/9/07, Stefan Hundhammer wrote:
> And then something began that we remaining SuSE people wouldn't have believed:
> Not only did they realize the value of a well-known brand name "SuSE", they
> even did everything to absorb every tiny little bit of Linux know-how. Big
> and mighty 5000 people
qft
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 19:00 +0800, Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
> On 10/09/2007 05:49 PM, Stefan Hundhammer wrote:
> >
> > Folks, please get just a little bit more informed before you start bashing
> > Novell. The old SuSE people don't do it, and there are reasons for that.
> >
> >
> > OK, that w
On 10/09/2007 05:49 PM, Stefan Hundhammer wrote:
>
> Folks, please get just a little bit more informed before you start bashing
> Novell. The old SuSE people don't do it, and there are reasons for that.
>
>
> OK, that was a little more than 2 Cents. Let's make this one whole Euro. ;-)
>
Well s
On Monday 08 October 2007 18:26, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >We could get away doing that kind of thing back in the days when we were
> > that small German company SuSE. But now that SUSE is owned 100% by
> > Novell, that just won't work any more.
>
> Why is why takeovers of this magnitude are evil >>
13 matches
Mail list logo
