Hartmut,
when I read your comment I thought you're using same library as I...
If I enter a key for a infrastructure network and nm is traying to
connect to the ad-hoc network, doesn't it try to authenticate with the
key for infrastructure network against the ad-hoc one? Isn't this
behaviour a
Gryffus wrote:
Yes , it was accident. One of my clients had set AP mode instead of
client on its wifi router... :-)
I know that WEP is unsafe. Broke into a WEP protected networks take
less than 15mins. I use MAC authentication...
And WPA is also unbreakable :-)
Mac authentication doesn't bu
On Friday 24 August 2007 11:05, Gryffus wrote:
> Yes , it was accident. One of my clients had set AP mode instead of
> client on its wifi router... :-)
>
> I know that WEP is unsafe. Broke into a WEP protected networks take
> less than 15mins. I use MAC authentication...
Much modern MAC hardware h
: "Randall R Schulz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: [opensuse] Network Manager
On Friday 24 August 2007 10:01, Gryffus wrote:
Hi,
You are absolutely right with this... I administer a free WiFi
community AP and last month somebody creat
On Friday 24 August 2007 10:01, Gryffus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You are absolutely right with this... I administer a free WiFi
> community AP and last month somebody created a network wit exactly
> same ESSID and WEP key as me.
Could that possibly be an accident? Or was it some kind of intrusion /
data
Gfs
- Original Message -
From: "Hartmut Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: [opensuse] Network Manager
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Freitag, 24. August 2007, Kai Ponte wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 August 2007 15:54, Johannes Nohl wrote:
> > > > The adhoc network with enabled SSID interferes with the
> > > You're saying, for example, you have a SSID (hidden) of Net1 and a
> > > SSID (open) of Net1 in the same room?
> >
> >
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 15:54, Johannes Nohl wrote:
> > > The adhoc network with enabled SSID interferes with the infrastructure
> > > network with hidden SSID. I use "Connect to other" and, if there's no
> > > adhoc network with same SSID around, it connects to the hidden SSID.
> > > Like it s
> > The adhoc network with enabled SSID interferes with the infrastructure
> > network with hidden SSID. I use "Connect to other" and, if there's no
> > adhoc network with same SSID around, it connects to the hidden SSID.
> > Like it should do.
> > But if there's a network with same SSID Networkman
> Deliberate mixing of ad-hoc and infrastructure based networking on the
> same SSID is probably not good practice. People configuring machines as
> ad-hoc with the same SSID and passphrase is something the network
> managers can do little about, and I would regard this as a potential
> security we
Quoting "Dennis J. Tuchler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
My eth1 setup includes a passphrase and ESSID for my current wireless
router. I expect to take my laptop "on the road" and use it in various
places which provide WiFi. If the identifying name of the network is
not apparent, how do I set it up?
On 07/28/2007 12:20 AM, Dennis J. Tuchler wrote:
> My eth1 setup includes a passphrase and ESSID for my current wireless
> router. I expect to take my laptop "on the road" and use it in
> various places which provide WiFi. If the identifying name of the
> network is not apparent, how do I set it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis J. Tuchler wrote:
> I noted what was said about hidden SSID problems using SuSE and
> Knetwork manager:
>
> Kai Ponte wrote:
>> On Thu, July 26, 2007 2:27 pm, Johannes Nohl wrote:
I don't know for those of you in Gnome-land, but in KDE wi
I noted what was said about hidden SSID problems using SuSE and
Knetwork manager:
Kai Ponte wrote:
On Thu, July 26, 2007 2:27 pm, Johannes Nohl wrote:
I don't know for those of you in Gnome-land, but in KDE with
KNetworkmanager (the KDE front end to networkmanager) you right
click
the icon in
On Thu, July 26, 2007 2:27 pm, Johannes Nohl wrote:
>> I don't know for those of you in Gnome-land, but in KDE with
>> KNetworkmanager (the KDE front end to networkmanager) you right
>> click
>> the icon in the system tray, and you'll be presented with a list of
>> available wifi networks.
>
> I'm
I don't know for those of you in Gnome-land, but in KDE with
KNetworkmanager (the KDE front end to networkmanager) you right click
the icon in the system tray, and you'll be presented with a list of
available wifi networks.
I'm using exactly knetworkmanager even under gnome or xfce.
If you wan
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 08:49, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
...
nm ist the GNOME frontend,
If that's true, it's a poorly chosen name, since Unix systems have had
an "nm" command as part of the object code tools for eons (that nm
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 09:11, Johannes Nohl wrote:
> > > The problem is that (at least using knetworkmanager) you can't choose
> > > between infratructure only and adhoc connections.
> > > The point is the hotspot I'm using (it's inside a library with many
> > > students) is hiding its SSID. And
On Wed, July 25, 2007 9:37 am, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> "Johannes Nohl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> > The problem is that (at least using knetworkmanager) you can't
>>> choose
>>> > between infratructure only and adhoc connections.
>>> > The point is the hotspot I'm using (it's inside a librar
"Johannes Nohl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > The problem is that (at least using knetworkmanager) you can't choose
>> > between infratructure only and adhoc connections.
>> > The point is the hotspot I'm using (it's inside a library with many
>> > students) is hiding its SSID. And windows make
> The problem is that (at least using knetworkmanager) you can't choose
> between infratructure only and adhoc connections.
> The point is the hotspot I'm using (it's inside a library with many
> students) is hiding its SSID. And windows make it to easy to start an
If it just hides the ESSID, jus
Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 25 July 2007 08:49, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> nm ist the GNOME frontend,
>
> If that's true, it's a poorly chosen name, since Unix systems have had
> an "nm" command as part of the object code tools for eons (that nm
> lists ob
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 08:49, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> ...
>
> nm ist the GNOME frontend,
If that's true, it's a poorly chosen name, since Unix systems have had
an "nm" command as part of the object code tools for eons (that nm
lists object and executable file tables of contents).
> Andreas
"Johannes Nohl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is Networkmanager (this thing instead of ifup) suse specific?
No, it's not - it is used by Ubuntu as well.
> knetworkmanager is just a frontend, right?
Correct.
>
> The problem is that (at least using knetworkmanager) you can't choose
> between inf
Is Networkmanager (this thing instead of ifup) suse specific?
knetworkmanager is just a frontend, right?
The problem is that (at least using knetworkmanager) you can't choose
between infratructure only and adhoc connections.
The point is the hotspot I'm using (it's inside a library with many
stud
On Friday 16 February 2007 12:59, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> Using SLED10, there is a nice-looking option in the network manager, a
> left click on the icon in the panel, and there is a "VPN Connections"
> option, you can configure vpn definitions, and then launch those that
> have been configured. If
Using SLED10, there is a nice-looking option in the network manager, a
left click on the icon in the panel, and there is a "VPN Connections"
option, you can configure vpn definitions, and then launch those that
have been configured. If you choose to configure, there is a nice
little wizard, and th
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 10:59 -0600, Dennis J. Tuchler wrote:
> Anders Johansson wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 January 2007 21:12, Dennis J. Tuchler wrote:
> >>
Not butting in...well a little. I could never get this thinkpad (r40)
to work wireless in suse9.3. Yast in 10.2 found it, set it up, I added
ki
On Monday 08 January 2007 08:45, David Mayr wrote:
> > [...] Ot, how do I disable KnetworkManager and just use
> > ifup and ifdown?
>
> AFAIK, it should be sufficient to start the YaST LAN module and
> answer the first question "use Network Manager or traditional method with
> ifup/ifdown" appropri
> [...] Ot, how do I disable KnetworkManager and just use
> ifup and ifdown?
AFAIK, it should be sufficient to start the YaST LAN module and
answer the first question "use Network Manager or traditional method with
ifup/ifdown" appropriate.
--
David Mayr, http://davey.de
openSUSE LINUX, htt
Anders Johansson wrote:
On Sunday 07 January 2007 21:12, Dennis J. Tuchler wrote:
My wireless "card" (really an Intel Centron wireless feature) was read
and installed when I installed my 10.2, SO I tried to connect with a
wireless router. Firefox reported that it couldn't connect. So, as su,
Dennis J. Tuchler wrote:
> My wireless "card" (really an Intel Centron wireless feature) was read
> and installed when I installed my 10.2, SO I tried to connect with a
> wireless router. Firefox reported that it couldn't connect. So, as
> su, I entered ifup eth1, to which I received this reply:
On Sunday 07 January 2007 15:27, Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Sunday 07 January 2007 21:12, Dennis J. Tuchler wrote:
> > My wireless "card" (really an Intel Centron wireless feature) was read
> > and installed when I installed my 10.2, SO I tried to connect with a
> > wireless router. Firefox rep
On Sunday 07 January 2007 21:12, Dennis J. Tuchler wrote:
> My wireless "card" (really an Intel Centron wireless feature) was read
> and installed when I installed my 10.2, SO I tried to connect with a
> wireless router. Firefox reported that it couldn't connect. So, as su,
> I entered ifup eth1
My wireless "card" (really an Intel Centron wireless feature) was read
and installed when I installed my 10.2, SO I tried to connect with a
wireless router. Firefox reported that it couldn't connect. So, as su,
I entered ifup eth1, to which I received this reply:
Network interface is manage
On 7/28/06, Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are some fixes in the 10.1 codebase which were done for SLED 10,
which we likely could release for 10.1 however.
That would be greatly appreciated. Despite the problems I had
initially, NetworkManager crashing when coming out of suspe
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 07:24:29AM +0100, James Ogley wrote:
> > reference url? what is OS 10.1? SL 10.1?
>
> http://rlove.org/log/2006071301.html and he actually says it'll appear
> in "openSUSE" soon.
>
> It did
> [http://lists.opensuse.org/archive/opensuse-commit/2006-Jul/0275.html].
> FACTORY
> reference url? what is OS 10.1? SL 10.1?
http://rlove.org/log/2006071301.html and he actually says it'll appear
in "openSUSE" soon.
It did
[http://lists.opensuse.org/archive/opensuse-commit/2006-Jul/0275.html].
FACTORY now uses 0.6.4.
--
James Ogley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://usr-local-bin.org
P
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 03:24:09PM -0400, Alexander Antoniades wrote:
> Robert Love's blog indicated that the updated Network Manager would
> reach OS 10.1 soon. Does anyone have an idea when this will be?
reference url? what is OS 10.1? SL 10.1?
> Also, is there a Bugzilla for the additional KDE
Robert Love's blog indicated that the updated Network Manager would
reach OS 10.1 soon. Does anyone have an idea when this will be?
Also, is there a Bugzilla for the additional KDE repository?
Thanks,
Sander
-
To unsubscribe,
Hello,
Peter Czanik írta:
> Hello,
> Can NetworkManager manage two ethernet interfaces? In my experiences it
> can only one, namely eth0. Do I see something wrong? I couldn't find a
> related bugreport...
>
OK, it's not eth0. For some reason NetworkManager always try to use only
the 10/100 inte
Hello,
Can NetworkManager manage two ethernet interfaces? In my experiences it
can only one, namely eth0. Do I see something wrong? I couldn't find a
related bugreport...
My other problem is automatic interface renaming. It's related to the
previous problem. I want to use the gigabit interface from
42 matches
Mail list logo
