-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Darryl Gregorash wrote:
> On 2006-12-21 16:31, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>> There appears to be a tcptraceroute package in the Guru's RPM repository
>> for 10.0 but not for 10.2. At least not at this moment.
>
> I'm still running in the Dark Ages, I onl
On 2006-12-21 16:31, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> There appears to be a tcptraceroute package in the Guru's RPM repository
> for 10.0 but not for 10.2. At least not at this moment.
I'm still running in the Dark Ages, I only checked 9.3 :-)
All the builds are from August, and there is only one src.rp
Darryl,
On Thursday 21 December 2006 13:51, Darryl Gregorash wrote:
> ...
>
> > Find it at:
> > http://michael.toren.net/code/tcptraceroute/
The latest source (1.5beta7) builds on 10.2 and 10.0, if you install all
the required development packages.
> Also available on Pascal Bleser's repositor
On 2006-12-21 04:44, John Andersen wrote:
>
> Also the tcptraceroute package can help: (slaged this off a google search)
>
> Find it at:
> http://michael.toren.net/code/tcptraceroute/
>
Also available on Pascal Bleser's repository,
ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/suser-guru/rpm//
>
>
On 12/21/06, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This page has some info that might help:
http://tracetcp.sourceforge.net/usage_proxy.html
but it might require you install that package.
Also the tcptraceroute package can help: (slaged this off a google search)
Find it at:
http://michael.
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 22:32, Mark Goldstein wrote:
> On 12/21/06, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 December 2006 22:09, Mark Goldstein wrote:
> > > Well, of course there was my provider ...
> >
> > Since your results differ from most with the same kernel, have yo
On 12/21/06, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 22:09, Mark Goldstein wrote:
> Well, of course there was my provider ...
Since your results differ from most with the same kernel, have you tested to
see if you are behind a transparent proxy at your provider?
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 22:09, Mark Goldstein wrote:
> Well, of course there was my provider ...
Since your results differ from most with the same kernel, have you tested to
see if you are behind a transparent proxy at your provider?
--
_
John Andersen
On 12/20/06, Joe Morris (NTM) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kenneth Schneider wrote:
> If the proxy were running on anything but 10.2 w/ 2.6.18 kernel it would
> probably work.
So it does seem to be a definite kernel bug. weird.
Once again, my configuration at home is: Pentium III box with openS
On 20 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Incorrect. Felix Miata has compiled one which works, with a lot of
> stuff stripped out:
>
>> On 2006/12/20 09:01 (GMT+-0500) Nick Zentena apparently typed:
>>
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 09:02, Felix Miata wrote:
>>>
>> Have you read the bug?
On Thursday 21 December 2006 00:42, Darryl Gregorash wrote:
> On 2006-12-20 16:21, Charles philip Chan wrote:
> > On 20 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> So it does seem to be a definite kernel bug. weird.
> >
> > They don't work with kernel 2.6.19 either.
> >
> > Charles
>
> Incorrect. Feli
On 2006-12-20 16:21, Charles philip Chan wrote:
> On 20 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> So it does seem to be a definite kernel bug. weird.
>>
>
> They don't work with kernel 2.6.19 either.
>
> Charles
>
>
Incorrect. Felix Miata has compiled one which works, with a lot of stuf
On 20 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So it does seem to be a definite kernel bug. weird.
They don't work with kernel 2.6.19 either.
Charles
--
Linux is obsolete
(Andrew Tanenbaum)
pgpimHgiW29Pv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Kenneth Schneider wrote:
> If the proxy were running on anything but 10.2 w/ 2.6.18 kernel it would
> probably work.
So it does seem to be a definite kernel bug. weird.
--
Joe Morris
Registered Linux user 231871 running openSUSE 10.2 x86_64
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On 2006-12-20 08:06, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2006/12/20 06:59 (GMT-0500) Nick Zentena apparently typed:
>
>
>
>> Okay neither are working for me after upgrading the kernal.
>>
>
> Upgrading to which kernel? I tried on 3 different boxes with about 8
> different operating systems. The o
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 08:51, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 07:43, Kai Ponte wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > Funny - I couldn't reach it this morning. I can now.
> >
> > I then checked:
> >
> > Owner: Marymount University 2807 North Glebe Rd
> > Arlington VA US
* Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-20-06 11:53]:
> Where did you get that information? It's not part of the "whois"
> output.
Don't know where *he* got it but,
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://www.marymount.edu
--
Patrick ShanahanRegistered
On 2006/12/20 09:01 (GMT+-0500) Nick Zentena apparently typed:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 09:02, Felix Miata wrote:
>> Have you read the bug? Etch's and Fedora's 2.6.18 kernels also fail.
>> OTOH, the vanilla 2.6.19 kernel worked for me yesterday, and still works
>> today.
> How did you con
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 07:43, Kai Ponte wrote:
> ...
>
> Funny - I couldn't reach it this morning. I can now.
>
> I then checked:
>
> Owner: Marymount University 2807 North Glebe Rd
> Arlington VA US 22207
> IP Address: 198.100.0.3
> Operating System: Solaris 8
> Web Server: Apa
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 05:15, Michael Nelson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:53:13PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have 10.1
> > with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have read
> > the thread and, as I
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 21:52 +0800, Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
> Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> > just to be sure, as there was some confusion:
> > Are you trying www.marymount.edu ? THAT is the one in question. Or
> > www.keh.com Please retest and repost.
> >
> Sorry to confuse the issue, it was an
On 2006/12/20 06:59 (GMT-0500) Nick Zentena apparently typed:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 06:44, Mark Goldstein wrote:
>> Guys, please re-check. Somebody mistyped it as marymount.com. This one
>> is working.
>> It was marymount.edu that still fails (on ALL my boxes, including Win XP).
>
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 09:02, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> Have you read the bug? Etch's and Fedora's 2.6.18 kernels also fail.
> OTOH, the vanilla 2.6.19 kernel worked for me yesterday, and still works
> today.
How did you configure it? I downloaded it and did an make oldconfig. It
st
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 08:57, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
>
> ANYBODY knows something about that server? What is it running? What OS?
> What Kernel? What apache? Special modules and FW?
>
I checked netcraft yesterday. One is running Apache the other some
Microsoft
product.
On 2006/12/20 05:15 (GMT-0800) Michael Nelson apparently typed:
> I am running 10.1 with a self-compiled "Linux seahunt 2.6.18" kernel, and it
> raises the Marymount site just fine. If it's a 2.6.18 problem, it's related
> to something in the SUSE version of 2.6.18, because kernel.org's 2.6.18
>
>>> Reply on 20-12-2006 15:55:04 <<<
> I am not sure what that means exactly, but it still doesn't work
here,
> even with a proxy. So at work it must have been because the server
is
> still running 9.3.
>
Joe,
if I understood you right, you installed squid on a 10.2 box? Then I'm
not surprise
Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> just to be sure, as there was some confusion:
> Are you trying www.marymount.edu ? THAT is the one in question. Or
> www.keh.com Please retest and repost.
>
Sorry to confuse the issue, it was an honest typo. I was typing it from
memory at the end of a long day (th
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 02:19:34PM +0100, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> > I am running 10.1 with a self-compiled "Linux seahunt 2.6.18"
> kernel,
> > and it
> > raises the Marymount site just fine. If it's a 2.6.18 problem, it's
> > related
> > to something in the SUSE version of 2.6.18, because
>>> Reply on 20-12-2006 15:18:44 <<<
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:53:13PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> > me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have
> 10.1
> > with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have
read
> > the thread and, as I recall, noone
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:53:13PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have 10.1
> with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have read
> the thread and, as I recall, noone with 2.6.18+ could access, but
> several with 2.6.1
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 12:44, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> >>> Dominique Leuenberger 20-12-2006 13:41:11 >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Reply on 20-12-2006 13:40:19 <<<
> >
> > I can get to Mary Mount too, where I previously could not! Seems
> > the site is fixed???
> >
> > Comfirmed: www.keh.com i
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 12:44, Mark Goldstein wrote:
> On 12/20/06, Leendert Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 December 2006 12:29, Nick Zentena wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 20 December 2006 01:45, Mark Goldstein wrote:
> > > > On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 06:44, Mark Goldstein wrote:
> Guys, please re-check. Somebody mistyped it as marymount.com. This one
> is working.
> It was marymount.edu that still fails (on ALL my boxes, including Win XP).
Okay neither are working for me after upgrading the kernal.
>>> Dominique Leuenberger 20-12-2006 13:41:11 >>>
>>> Reply on 20-12-2006 13:40:19 <<<
> I can get to Mary Mount too, where I previously could not! Seems the
> site is fixed???
>
> Comfirmed: www.keh.com is still broken.
>
That must be while it was offline for a few hours now. The admin pro
On 12/20/06, Leendert Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 12:29, Nick Zentena wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 01:45, Mark Goldstein wrote:
> > On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem.
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 12:29, Nick Zentena wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 01:45, Mark Goldstein wrote:
> > On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I
> > > have 10.1 with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and canno
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 01:45, Mark Goldstein wrote:
> On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have 10.1
> > with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have read
> > the thread and, as I recall,
Hartmut Meyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 07:45, Mark Goldstein wrote:
>
>> Patrick, that's not correct. As I wrote I had no problem accessing
>> these sites and I have 2.6.18.2-34-default kernel on 2 machines.
>>
>
> Only guessing: you're accessing http through a proxy, right?
>
On 12/20/06, Dominique Leuenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
May I ask if you have these two boxes behind a proxy?
I tracked it as far down as the 2.6.17+ kernels could not reach that
site, except when being proxied. I discussed with different other people
yesterday evening.. none of them, havi
On 12/20/06, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark: did you post your particulars (processor, nics, etc) to the bugzilla
report as a point of reference to the developers?
Will do
--
Mark Goldstein
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
Mark,
>>> Reply on 20-12-2006 9:55:47 <<<
> On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have
> 10.1
> > with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have
read
> > the thread and, as I recall, noone with
Hi,
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 07:45, Mark Goldstein wrote:
> On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have 10.1
> > with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have read
> > the thread and, as I rec
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 21:45, Mark Goldstein wrote:
> On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have 10.1
> > with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have read
> > the thread and, as I recall, no
On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have 10.1
with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have read
the thread and, as I recall, noone with 2.6.18+ could access, but
several with 2.6.16 could.
Patr
On 2006-12-19 19:45, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2006/12/19 19:18 (GMT-0600) Darryl Gregorash apparently typed:
>
Not "apparently" ;-)
>> BTW, Felix, you created the bug as normal severity. Shouldn't it be a
>> tad higher than that? I don't think it's quite a blocker, but it's
>> certainly major, IM
On 2006-12-19 19:53, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-19-06 20:48]:
>
>> Comments are not prerequisite to voting, but if most who replied in
>> thread also vote they'll probably get a better handle on how
>> widespread the problem is among 10.2 users.
>>
>>
>
* Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-19-06 20:48]:
>
> Comments are not prerequisite to voting, but if most who replied in
> thread also vote they'll probably get a better handle on how
> widespread the problem is among 10.2 users.
>
me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I
On 2006/12/19 19:18 (GMT-0600) Darryl Gregorash apparently typed:
> On 2006-12-19 18:58, Felix Miata wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229848
> And vote for the bug too.
> Anyone without an account should create one, add comments where
> appropriate, and then vote for it :-)
On 2006-12-19 18:58, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2006/12/19 17:48 (GMT-0600) Darryl Gregorash apparently typed:
>
>
>> Felix was the first one to suggest it, so maybe he should do it :-)
>>
>
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229848
>
> Those who have bugzilla accounts should feel f
Those who have bugzilla accounts should feel free to add any useful
information I may have left out.
Thank Felix--you beat me to it.
Chip
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2006/12/19 17:48 (GMT-0600) Darryl Gregorash apparently typed:
> Felix was the first one to suggest it, so maybe he should do it :-)
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229848
Those who have bugzilla accounts should feel free to add any useful
information I may have left out.
--
"Let
51 matches
Mail list logo
