On Wednesday 20 December 2006 22:32, Mark Goldstein wrote:
On 12/21/06, John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 22:09, Mark Goldstein wrote:
Well, of course there was my provider ...
Since your results differ from most with the same kernel, have you tested
On 12/21/06, John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This page has some info that might help:
http://tracetcp.sourceforge.net/usage_proxy.html
but it might require you install that package.
Also the tcptraceroute package can help: (slaged this off a google search)
Find it at:
On 2006-12-21 04:44, John Andersen wrote:
snip
Also the tcptraceroute package can help: (slaged this off a google search)
Find it at:
http://michael.toren.net/code/tcptraceroute/
Also available on Pascal Bleser's repository,
ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/suser-guru/rpm/version/
Darryl,
On Thursday 21 December 2006 13:51, Darryl Gregorash wrote:
...
Find it at:
http://michael.toren.net/code/tcptraceroute/
The latest source (1.5beta7) builds on 10.2 and 10.0, if you install all
the required development packages.
Also available on Pascal Bleser's repository,
On 2006-12-21 16:31, Randall R Schulz wrote:
There appears to be a tcptraceroute package in the Guru's RPM repository
for 10.0 but not for 10.2. At least not at this moment.
I'm still running in the Dark Ages, I only checked 9.3 :-)
All the builds are from August, and there is only one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Darryl Gregorash wrote:
On 2006-12-21 16:31, Randall R Schulz wrote:
There appears to be a tcptraceroute package in the Guru's RPM repository
for 10.0 but not for 10.2. At least not at this moment.
I'm still running in the Dark Ages, I only
On 12/20/06, John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark: did you post your particulars (processor, nics, etc) to the bugzilla
report as a point of reference to the developers?
Will do
--
Mark Goldstein
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 12/20/06, Dominique Leuenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May I ask if you have these two boxes behind a proxy?
I tracked it as far down as the 2.6.17+ kernels could not reach that
site, except when being proxied. I discussed with different other people
yesterday evening.. none of them,
Hartmut Meyer wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 07:45, Mark Goldstein wrote:
Patrick, that's not correct. As I wrote I had no problem accessing
these sites and I have 2.6.18.2-34-default kernel on 2 machines.
Only guessing: you're accessing http through a proxy, right?
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 01:45, Mark Goldstein wrote:
On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have 10.1
with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have read
the thread and, as I recall, noone
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 12:29, Nick Zentena wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 01:45, Mark Goldstein wrote:
On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I
have 10.1 with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access
On 12/20/06, Leendert Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 12:29, Nick Zentena wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 01:45, Mark Goldstein wrote:
On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I
Dominique Leuenberger 20-12-2006 13:41:11
Reply on 20-12-2006 13:40:19
I can get to Mary Mount too, where I previously could not! Seems the
site is fixed???
Comfirmed: www.keh.com is still broken.
That must be while it was offline for a few hours now. The admin probably did
some
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 06:44, Mark Goldstein wrote:
Guys, please re-check. Somebody mistyped it as marymount.com. This one
is working.
It was marymount.edu that still fails (on ALL my boxes, including Win XP).
Okay neither are working for me after upgrading the kernal.
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 12:44, Mark Goldstein wrote:
On 12/20/06, Leendert Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 12:29, Nick Zentena wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 01:45, Mark Goldstein wrote:
On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 12:44, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
Dominique Leuenberger 20-12-2006 13:41:11
Reply on 20-12-2006 13:40:19
I can get to Mary Mount too, where I previously could not! Seems
the site is fixed???
Comfirmed: www.keh.com is still broken.
That must be
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:53:13PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have 10.1
with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have read
the thread and, as I recall, noone with 2.6.18+ could access, but
several with 2.6.16
Reply on 20-12-2006 15:18:44
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:53:13PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have
10.1
with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have
read
the thread and, as I recall, noone with 2.6.18+
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 02:19:34PM +0100, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
I am running 10.1 with a self-compiled Linux seahunt 2.6.18
kernel,
and it
raises the Marymount site just fine. If it's a 2.6.18 problem, it's
related
to something in the SUSE version of 2.6.18, because
Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
just to be sure, as there was some confusion:
Are you trying www.marymount.edu ? THAT is the one in question. Or
www.keh.com Please retest and repost.
Sorry to confuse the issue, it was an honest typo. I was typing it from
memory at the end of a long day (that
Reply on 20-12-2006 15:55:04
I am not sure what that means exactly, but it still doesn't work
here,
even with a proxy. So at work it must have been because the server
is
still running 9.3.
Joe,
if I understood you right, you installed squid on a 10.2 box? Then I'm
not surprised that
On 2006/12/20 05:15 (GMT-0800) Michael Nelson apparently typed:
I am running 10.1 with a self-compiled Linux seahunt 2.6.18 kernel, and it
raises the Marymount site just fine. If it's a 2.6.18 problem, it's related
to something in the SUSE version of 2.6.18, because kernel.org's 2.6.18
works
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 08:57, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
ANYBODY knows something about that server? What is it running? What OS?
What Kernel? What apache? Special modules and FW?
I checked netcraft yesterday. One is running Apache the other some
Microsoft
product.
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 09:02, Felix Miata wrote:
Have you read the bug? Etch's and Fedora's 2.6.18 kernels also fail.
OTOH, the vanilla 2.6.19 kernel worked for me yesterday, and still works
today.
How did you configure it? I downloaded it and did an make oldconfig. It
still
On 2006/12/20 06:59 (GMT-0500) Nick Zentena apparently typed:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 06:44, Mark Goldstein wrote:
Guys, please re-check. Somebody mistyped it as marymount.com. This one
is working.
It was marymount.edu that still fails (on ALL my boxes, including Win XP).
Okay
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 05:15, Michael Nelson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:53:13PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have 10.1
with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have read
the thread and, as I
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 07:43, Kai Ponte wrote:
...
Funny - I couldn't reach it this morning. I can now.
I then checked:
Owner: Marymount University 2807 North Glebe Rd
Arlington VA US 22207
IP Address: 198.100.0.3
Operating System: Solaris 8
Web Server: Apache/1.3.14
On 2006/12/20 09:01 (GMT+-0500) Nick Zentena apparently typed:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 09:02, Felix Miata wrote:
Have you read the bug? Etch's and Fedora's 2.6.18 kernels also fail.
OTOH, the vanilla 2.6.19 kernel worked for me yesterday, and still works
today.
How did you configure
* Randall R Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-20-06 11:53]:
Where did you get that information? It's not part of the whois
output.
Don't know where *he* got it but,
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://www.marymount.edu
--
Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 08:51, Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 07:43, Kai Ponte wrote:
...
Funny - I couldn't reach it this morning. I can now.
I then checked:
Owner: Marymount University 2807 North Glebe Rd
Arlington VA US 22207
IP
On 2006-12-20 08:06, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2006/12/20 06:59 (GMT-0500) Nick Zentena apparently typed:
Okay neither are working for me after upgrading the kernal.
Upgrading to which kernel? I tried on 3 different boxes with about 8
different operating systems. The only
Kenneth Schneider wrote:
If the proxy were running on anything but 10.2 w/ 2.6.18 kernel it would
probably work.
So it does seem to be a definite kernel bug. weird.
--
Joe Morris
Registered Linux user 231871 running openSUSE 10.2 x86_64
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On 2006-12-20 16:21, Charles philip Chan wrote:
On 20 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it does seem to be a definite kernel bug. weird.
They don't work with kernel 2.6.19 either.
Charles
Incorrect. Felix Miata has compiled one which works, with a lot of stuff
stripped
On Thursday 21 December 2006 00:42, Darryl Gregorash wrote:
On 2006-12-20 16:21, Charles philip Chan wrote:
On 20 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it does seem to be a definite kernel bug. weird.
They don't work with kernel 2.6.19 either.
Charles
Incorrect. Felix Miata has
On 20 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incorrect. Felix Miata has compiled one which works, with a lot of
stuff stripped out:
On 2006/12/20 09:01 (GMT+-0500) Nick Zentena apparently typed:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 09:02, Felix Miata wrote:
Have you read the bug? Etch's and Fedora's
On 12/20/06, Joe Morris (NTM) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kenneth Schneider wrote:
If the proxy were running on anything but 10.2 w/ 2.6.18 kernel it would
probably work.
So it does seem to be a definite kernel bug. weird.
Once again, my configuration at home is: Pentium III box with openSuSE
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 22:09, Mark Goldstein wrote:
Well, of course there was my provider ...
Since your results differ from most with the same kernel, have you tested to
see if you are behind a transparent proxy at your provider?
--
_
John Andersen
On 12/21/06, John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 22:09, Mark Goldstein wrote:
Well, of course there was my provider ...
Since your results differ from most with the same kernel, have you tested to
see if you are behind a transparent proxy at your provider?
On 2006/12/19 17:48 (GMT-0600) Darryl Gregorash apparently typed:
Felix was the first one to suggest it, so maybe he should do it :-)
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229848
Those who have bugzilla accounts should feel free to add any useful
information I may have left out.
--
Let
Those who have bugzilla accounts should feel free to add any useful
information I may have left out.
Thank Felix--you beat me to it.
Chip
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2006-12-19 18:58, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2006/12/19 17:48 (GMT-0600) Darryl Gregorash apparently typed:
Felix was the first one to suggest it, so maybe he should do it :-)
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229848
Those who have bugzilla accounts should feel free to add
On 2006/12/19 19:18 (GMT-0600) Darryl Gregorash apparently typed:
On 2006-12-19 18:58, Felix Miata wrote:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229848
And vote for the bug too.
Anyone without an account should create one, add comments where
appropriate, and then vote for it :-)
* Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-19-06 20:48]:
Comments are not prerequisite to voting, but if most who replied in
thread also vote they'll probably get a better handle on how
widespread the problem is among 10.2 users.
me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have
On 2006-12-19 19:53, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-19-06 20:48]:
Comments are not prerequisite to voting, but if most who replied in
thread also vote they'll probably get a better handle on how
widespread the problem is among 10.2 users.
me thinks it
On 2006-12-19 19:45, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2006/12/19 19:18 (GMT-0600) Darryl Gregorash apparently typed:
Not apparently ;-)
BTW, Felix, you created the bug as normal severity. Shouldn't it be a
tad higher than that? I don't think it's quite a blocker, but it's
certainly major, IMO.
On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have 10.1
with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have read
the thread and, as I recall, noone with 2.6.18+ could access, but
several with 2.6.16 could.
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 21:45, Mark Goldstein wrote:
On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have 10.1
with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have read
the thread and, as I recall, noone with
Hi,
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 07:45, Mark Goldstein wrote:
On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have 10.1
with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have read
the thread and, as I recall,
Mark,
Reply on 20-12-2006 9:55:47
On 12/20/06, Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
me thinks it not be a 10.2 problem, but a kernel problem. I have
10.1
with 2.6.18.5-jen40-default and cannot access the site. I have
read
the thread and, as I recall, noone with 2.6.18+ could
49 matches
Mail list logo
