Hello,
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
What is the current status of factory? Is it now: factory = beta9 and
frozen until Monday? Bye,
A final sync is needed :-(
Does that mean, that some Radeon and PPC fixes can slip in? I was sad to
see, that they are still not in the factory ChangeLog... Bye,
Pascal Bleser wrote:
> Doing it the proper way is a pain in yast2 btw: select categories, go to
> "zzz", and choose "update all" (or something like that). That's not very
> intuitive.
I don't know if it's really the same discussion... I can
open a new thread if you think so :-)
but there are alw
Peter Czanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>> What is the current status of factory? Is it now: factory = beta9 and
>>> frozen until Monday? Bye,
>>>
>> A final sync is needed :-(
>>
> Does that mean, that some Radeon and PPC fixes can slip in? I was sad
> to see,
jdd wrote:
Pascal Bleser wrote:
Doing it the proper way is a pain in yast2 btw: select categories, go to
"zzz", and choose "update all" (or something like that). That's not very
intuitive.
I don't know if it's really the same discussion... I can
open a new thread if you think so :-)
but there
Hello,
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> No, it should be just libzypp-zmd-backend, suseRegister,
> installation-images and yast*,
>
When is it to be expected? I would like to make an install from factory
on a test server, and I'm just arrived at the location...
Bye,
CzP
---
Peter Czanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> No, it should be just libzypp-zmd-backend, suseRegister,
>> installation-images and yast*,
>>
> When is it to be expected? I would like to make an install from factory
> on a test server, and I'm just arrived at the
Hello,
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> When is it to be expected? I would like to make an install from factory
>> on a test server, and I'm just arrived at the location...
>>
>
> You can go ahead and start right away, everything is working besides
> registration (repository setup for patches).
>
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 12:19:32PM +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> - YOU: online updates: packages provided by SUSE to fix security
> issues and sometimes severe bug fixes. No feature upgrades, only for
> security fixes.
> - update: well... that's what is kind of missing in yast2 (to do it,
> it's
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 12:56:23PM +0200, houghi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 12:19:32PM +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> > - YOU: online updates: packages provided by SUSE to fix security
> > issues and sometimes severe bug fixes. No feature upgrades, only for
> > security fixes.
> > - update:
Peter Czanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>> When is it to be expected? I would like to make an install from factory
>>> on a test server, and I'm just arrived at the location...
>>>
>>
>> You can go ahead and start right away, everything is working besides
On 31 Mar 2006 at 12:56, houghi wrote:
[...]
> Concerning updates: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. On Usenet I always
> ask the question WHY people do a certain update (e.g. aa KDE update) and
> in about 90% that an answer is given, people don't know. Also most people
> do not know that when they
Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Czanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
When is it to be expected? I would like to make an install from factory
on a test server, and I'm just arrived at the location...
>>>
>>> You can go ahe
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 01:19:02PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Occasionally I think: "It can only become better" (reason for upgrade)
The golden rule is still: If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
It can only become better" is wrong, because there is a second option to
becoming better. It can become
Seems like makeSUSEdvd is broken in combination with beta9. The md5sums of
the iso's are okey. When I wanted to install it reported that it could not
found the packages. So I makeSUSEdvd-ed again and tried with y2pmsh.
That one reports this:
source -a /setup/beta9repo
failed to detect sources
Sorry, I wasn't root. Now y2pmsh does work. Will do another install-try.
ps. Why can you start y2pmsh when you are no root? You can start it but you
cannot use it, so why not a root-check?
Azerion
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 02:04:24PM +0200, Azerion wrote:
> Seems like makeSUSEdvd is broken in combination with beta9. The md5sums of
> the iso's are okey. When I wanted to install it reported that it could not
> found the packages. So I makeSUSEdvd-ed again and tried with y2pmsh.
As Beta9 is n
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 02:38:16PM +0200, houghi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 02:04:24PM +0200, Azerion wrote:
> > Seems like makeSUSEdvd is broken in combination with beta9. The md5sums of
> > the iso's are okey. When I wanted to install it reported that it could not
> > found the packages.
houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 02:04:24PM +0200, Azerion wrote:
>> Seems like makeSUSEdvd is broken in combination with beta9. The md5sums of
>> the iso's are okey. When I wanted to install it reported that it could not
>> found the packages. So I makeSUSEdvd-ed ag
Pascal Bleser wrote:
> - YOU: online updates: packages provided by SUSE to fix security issues
> and sometimes severe bug fixes. No feature upgrades, only for security
> fixes.
wrong :-(
YOU have
* security (red in the YOU window)
* recommanded (blue)
* optional (not selected by default)
so...
houghi wrote:
> Concerning updates: If it ain't broke, don't fix it
right now I use:
*mediawiki. security update any 15 days strongly recommended
by the developper
*digikam: many many changes nearly each day :-) compiled
from svn :-)
*kdenlive: not even able to run properly, stable expected
for
jdd wrote:
> except for mediawiki _opensuse_ is severely in danger
> (1.5.6, last security 1.5.8, 1.6 due next week)
quotes from the dev list:
1.5.6!? WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING RUNNING SOFTWARE THAT
OLD? UPGRADE,
> MAN!
so, Novell, upgrade, please :-)
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dod
Hi,
>From AJ's announcement:
> The distribution comes with 5 CDs. You need:
> * CD1 only for a minimal text installation (English)
> * CDs 1-3 for a default KDE or GNOME installation in German or English
> * All CDs for other selections
I just did an i386 minimal text install, it took approx 45
On 06/03/29 10:37 Henne Vogelsang apparently typed:
> On Wednesday, March 29, 2006 at 10:33:50, Felix Miata wrote:
>> I've been running Mandriva devel (Cooker) for several years. Last week I
>> installed factory from ftp. Now I want to update. This was a simple 2
>> step process in Cooker: 1-urpm
Chad Groneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
>>From AJ's announcement:
>
>> The distribution comes with 5 CDs. You need:
>> * CD1 only for a minimal text installation (English)
>> * CDs 1-3 for a default KDE or GNOME installation in German or English
>> * All CDs for other selections
>
> I j
On Friday 31 March 2006 16:50, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Chad Groneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> The distribution comes with 5 CDs. You need:
> >> * CD1 only for a minimal text installation (English)
> >> * CDs 1-3 for a default KDE or GNOME installation in German or English
> >> * All CDs fo
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Chad Groneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> >From AJ's announcement:
>>
>>> The distribution comes with 5 CDs. You need:
>>> * CD1 only for a minimal text installation (English)
>>> * CDs 1-3 for a default KDE or GNOME installation in German or English
>>> * A
Martin Schlander wrote:
> How about the minimal graphical install? It's not mentioned in the above
> layout. How many cds should be needed?
is "super" abandoned? it's exactly that
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.
Hello,
Am Freitag, 31. März 2006 09:35 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
> I agree, it would better be called "system upgrade"
> [...]
> and... it will force the reinstallation of the kernel.
Known bug - and fixed in 10.1:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=117461
Regards,
Christian Boltz
--
Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 31 March 2006 16:50, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Chad Groneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> The distribution comes with 5 CDs. You need:
>> >> * CD1 only for a minimal text installation (English)
>> >> * CDs 1-3 for a default KDE or GNOME
On Friday 31 March 2006 17:55, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > It would be nice if all the packages for minimal
> > graphical install could also be fitted on cd1.
>
> We cannot make everybody happy - there are too many different
> constraints.
No problem, just liked to know if it was intended. As long a
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> We cannot make everybody happy - there are too many different
> constraints,
of course, we can :-)
http://en.opensuse.org/SUPER
was quite sleeping :-( but recently there was an update, I
will see if it's better
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_phot
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 03:29:00PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> The problem might come from the fact that we now sign the repository
> data to gurantee integrity of the complete repository/media and
> Houghi's script might not do so. The signing should be optional...
I see the following happeni
I try to install my extremely lowend laptop :-).
from cd, no luck, extremely slow.
I could copy the cd (beta 8) on the hard drive and boot from
there, with an acceptable speed.
I choose minimal text install;
problems:
a manual install was required.
*first for a dependency problem. libX11.so.6
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 22:00 +0200, jdd wrote:
> I try to install my extremely lowend laptop :-).
>
> from cd, no luck, extremely slow.
>
> I could copy the cd (beta 8) on the hard drive and boot from
> there, with an acceptable speed.
>
> I choose minimal text install;
>
> problems:
>
> a manu
Chad Groneman wrote:
> My bet is this is because of the mono components needed to do the
> install.
??
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos
--
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 22:27 +0200, jdd wrote:
> Chad Groneman wrote:
>
> > My bet is this is because of the mono components needed to do the
> > install.
>
> ??
>
> jdd
>
I seem to recall seeing that the package manager in 10.1 is ZLM based.
ZLM runs on mono. If you go out to the console duri
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 07:07:54PM +0200, houghi wrote:
> What causes this and how can I get rid of it? At this moment makeSUSEdvd
> can not add the non-OSS CD to the ISO. Well, it can, but then you can not
> install. Screenshot at http://houghi.org/shots/susescreen009.jpg
It is worse then I thoug
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:-
>On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 07:07:54PM +0200, houghi wrote:
>> What causes this and how can I get rid of it? At this moment makeSUSEdvd
>> can not add the non-OSS CD to the ISO. Well, it can, but then you can not
>> install. Screenshot at http:/
I tried 3 times today on two mirrors, mirrors.kernel.org, &
ftp.cise.ufl.edu. Each time it failed with: "Cannot read package data
from installation media. Media error?" This looks rather like the other
thread today about "makeSUSEdvd broken for beta9".
--
"Blessed are they whose ways are blameless
First off, package request. There is a neat program called xtraceroute. It's
pretty much eye candy for traceroute but I would like to see it come with
SUSE 10.1 This program was once in SUSE 9.1 I would also like to see MythTV
come with SUSE 10.1. I have future plans to build a home theater
Hi,
Nathaniel Dube schrieb:
> First off, package request. There is a neat program called xtraceroute
Add it to http://en.opensuse.org/Wishlist_Network
> I would also like to see MythTV
Already at http://en.opensuse.org/Wishlist_Packages_that_were_already_there
> Recently I've come to noticed
Hi,
I am just trying to upgrade beta8 to beta9.
My crux is: I have to click each single dependency conflict without seeing
the total situation.
My guess is: impossible.
BLOCKER!
Beware to ask back, I will immediately shoot all I have.
Incredible!
It ducks the user to a stupid child.
Cheers -
Hi,
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
I am just trying to upgrade beta8 to beta9.
My crux is: I have to click each single dependency conflict without seeing
the total situation.
My guess is: impossible.
BLOCKER!
Beware to ask back, I will immediately shoot all I have.
Incredibl
Eberhard Moenkeberg schrieb:
> Back to the former state!
Go to sleep, Eberhard. And use y2pmsh when you wake up again.
Hint: Going from beta3 to factory with y2pmsh works.
Good night!
Carl-Daniel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
David Bolt wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:-
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 07:07:54PM +0200, houghi wrote:
What causes this and how can I get rid of it? At this moment makeSUSEdvd
can not add the non-OSS CD to the ISO. Well, it can, but then you can not
install.
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 12:18:04AM +0100, David Bolt wrote:
> There must be a subtle difference between how your script builds the DVD
> image to how my script does it. I'm installing beta9 now after adding
> building a DVD with CDs 1-6 and I've not been asked to insert CD1.
>
> If you're interest
46 matches
Mail list logo
