Re: [opensuse-factory] SUSE-Linux10.1-Beta9-Extra problems

2006-04-04 Thread houghi
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 08:58:12AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > "Michael DePaulo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > First of all, it looks like the non-OSS software repository for opensuse > > beta9 isn't setup right. > > > > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/install/10.1/SU

Re: [opensuse-factory] Where can I dump Translation 'bug'-reports?

2006-04-04 Thread houghi
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 01:19:22AM +0200, Azerion wrote: > I found some Dutch-translation problemsin Setup that may exist in other > languages too. Where do I post the report? http://en.opensuse.org/Submit_a_Bug That will give some information and then point you to the Novell site. You have to re

Re: [opensuse-factory] Where can I dump Translation 'bug'-reports?

2006-04-04 Thread Azerion
Op dinsdag 4 april 2006 10:52, schreef houghi: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 01:19:22AM +0200, Azerion wrote: > > I found some Dutch-translation problemsin Setup that may exist in other > > languages too. Where do I post the report? > > http://en.opensuse.org/Submit_a_Bug > That will give some informat

Re: [opensuse-factory] Where can I dump Translation 'bug'-reports?

2006-04-04 Thread houghi
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:58:12AM +0200, Azerion wrote: > How is you're xml-thing going? (switch topic :P ) Lousy. I just can't get the hang of XML. I am afraid I will have to give up on it, because my technical knowledge is not sufficent. After all this time I still don't have anything real to s

Re: [opensuse-factory] Houghi's project

2006-04-04 Thread Azerion
Op dinsdag 4 april 2006 11:31, schreef houghi: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:58:12AM +0200, Azerion wrote: > > How is you're xml-thing going? (switch topic :P ) > > Lousy. I just can't get the hang of XML. I am afraid I will have to give > up on it, because my technical knowledge is not sufficent. A

Re: [opensuse-factory] Houghi's project

2006-04-04 Thread houghi
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 01:28:09PM +0200, Azerion wrote: > Op dinsdag 4 april 2006 11:31, schreef houghi: > > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:58:12AM +0200, Azerion wrote: > > > How is you're xml-thing going? (switch topic :P ) > > > > Lousy. I just can't get the hang of XML. I am afraid I will have to

Re: [opensuse-factory] SUSE-Linux10.1-Beta9-Extra problems

2006-04-04 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:47:46AM +0200, houghi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 08:58:12AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > "Michael DePaulo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > First of all, it looks like the non-OSS software repository for opensuse > > > beta9 isn't setu

Re: [opensuse-factory] SUSE-Linux10.1-Beta9-Extra problems

2006-04-04 Thread houghi
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 01:56:35PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote: > This security thing is very new thats why not much of it is documented yet. OK, I understand that. > - The content.key is a GPG public key, ascii armor protected. > > - With this key, the content file is signed. The content file

Re: [opensuse-factory] SUSE-Linux10.1-Beta9-Extra problems

2006-04-04 Thread Joachim Werner
Hi all! Andreas Jaeger asked me to jump in and say a few words on the metadata signing we have added recently to make remote (and potentially insecure) installation and update sources more secure to use. Marcus Meißner has posted a short answer a few minutes ago. Here is the long version: > >

Re: [opensuse-factory] SUSE-Linux10.1-Beta9-Extra problems

2006-04-04 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi, having the (public) signing key on the same media as signed data doesn't add much security, but I'm sure you know. As a poor man's compromise, you could add a md5sum file for every directory, and clear-sign that. That way people could check the MD5 sums the simple way, and if they want to

Re: [opensuse-factory] SUSE-Linux10.1-Beta9-Extra problems

2006-04-04 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:44:25PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi, > > having the (public) signing key on the same media as signed data doesn't add > much > security, but I'm sure you know. As a poor man's compromise, you could add a > md5sum file for every directory, and clear-sign that. That

[opensuse-factory] beta9 - installation hiccups

2006-04-04 Thread Per Jessen
I'm just now installing beta9 on a test-machine - and I'm seeing some unusual behaviour. I don't really have much info/diagnostics, which is why I thought I'd ask here before going to bugzilla. The installation is now on CD2, and I've seen 6-7 popups saying "unable to install blahblah ... file

Re: [opensuse-factory] SUSE-Linux10.1-Beta9-Extra problems

2006-04-04 Thread houghi
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:29:58PM +0200, Joachim Werner wrote: > Now for the problems with YaST and installation sources you may have faced in > the last couple of days: > > The problem is that the signature checks are already in place, but the GUI > and > command line options that let you im

Re: [opensuse-factory] SUSE-Linux10.1-Beta9-Extra problems

2006-04-04 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 03:23:56PM +0200, houghi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:29:58PM +0200, Joachim Werner wrote: > > > Now for the problems with YaST and installation sources you may have faced > > in > > the last couple of days: > > > > The problem is that the signature checks are alr

Re: [opensuse-factory] beta9 - installation hiccups

2006-04-04 Thread Andreas Vetter
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Per Jessen wrote: > I'm just now installing beta9 on a test-machine - and I'm seeing some > unusual behaviour. I don't really have much info/diagnostics, which is > why I thought I'd ask here before going to bugzilla. > > The installation is now on CD2, and I've seen 6-7 pop

[opensuse-factory] Update Configuration step fails - sometimes

2006-04-04 Thread David Wright
I've installed Beta 9 around 8 times now - tracking down various problems. The Update Configuration page sometimes comes up with a failed message with the text "Transaction already in progress. No product to register."... Also the user authentication page only gives me local or ldap now, is thi

Re: [opensuse-factory] makeSUSEdvd broken for beta9

2006-04-04 Thread David Bolt
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:- >On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:21:29PM +0100, David Bolt wrote: >> Now, the bad news. I think I've found a bug in the script. If I don't >> have the ISOs in the current directory, and pass the path to them using >> -d the script can't find the

Re: [opensuse-factory] Update Configuration step fails - sometimes

2006-04-04 Thread David Wright
Am Dienstag, 4. April 2006 16:16 schrieb David Wright: > I've installed Beta 9 around 8 times now - tracking down various problems. > > The Update Configuration page sometimes comes up with a failed message with > the text "Transaction already in progress. No product to register."... OK, this one

[opensuse-factory] Beta 9: Automatic entries in Installation Source?!

2006-04-04 Thread David Wright
Just added gwdg.de factory to YaST and went back in to see if the ordering bug has been fixed (it hasn't), and I found that YaST had automatically added a new entry to the list for me that wasn't there on my first viewing of the form! It had automatically added http://ftp.lug.ro/suse/suse/updat

Re: [opensuse-factory] Beta 9: Automatic entries in Installation Source?!

2006-04-04 Thread David Wright
Am Dienstag, 4. April 2006 17:13 schrieb David Wright: > Just added gwdg.de factory to YaST and went back in to see if the ordering > bug has been fixed (it hasn't), and I found that YaST had automatically > added a new entry to the list for me that wasn't there on my first viewing > of the form! >

Re: [opensuse-factory] makeSUSEdvd broken for beta9

2006-04-04 Thread houghi
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 03:58:32PM +0100, David Bolt wrote: > I only noticed it because of the way I store the images. I use the > deltas to build the full images and keep both the deltas and the full > images in separate directories. You'll probably find that most (all?) of > the users are calling

Re: [opensuse-factory] Beta 9: Automatic entries in Installation Source?!

2006-04-04 Thread David Wright
Am Dienstag, 4. April 2006 17:13 schrieb David Wright: > Just added gwdg.de factory to YaST and went back in to see if the ordering > bug has been fixed (it hasn't), and I found that YaST had automatically > added a new entry to the list for me that wasn't there on my first viewing > of the form! >

Re: [opensuse-factory] Beta 9: Automatic entries in Installation Source?!

2006-04-04 Thread Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 17:23, David Wright wrote: > Interesting, trying to delete the .ro source comes up with the error: > "Unable to save changes to installation source configuration. > Details: > Corrupt source, Expected SHA1 90056eab2d58a51a1a69f..., got 351c0dfaaa... > for /var/lib/zypp/cach

Re: [opensuse-factory] Beta 9: Automatic entries in Installation Source?!

2006-04-04 Thread David Wright
Am Dienstag, 4. April 2006 18:36 schrieb Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett: > On Tuesday 04 April 2006 17:23, David Wright wrote: > > Interesting, trying to delete the .ro source comes up with the error: > > "Unable to save changes to installation source configuration. > > Details: > > Corrupt source, Expecte

Re: [opensuse-factory] Beta 9: Automatic entries in Installation Source?!

2006-04-04 Thread Philipp Wollermann
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 18:43, David Wright wrote: > Am Dienstag, 4. April 2006 18:36 schrieb Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett: > > On Tuesday 04 April 2006 17:23, David Wright wrote: > > > Interesting, trying to delete the .ro source comes up with the error: > > > "Unable to save changes to installation so

[opensuse-factory] Konqueror can't connect to any site

2006-04-04 Thread Mauricio Teixeira (netmask)
After recent updates, Konqueror can't open any sites, while Firefox works perfectly. I get this message on Konqueror's window: -- An error occurred while loading http://www.google.com: Could not connect to host http://www.google.com/. -- On the terminal I can see: -- ~> LANG=en konqueror ASSERT:

Re: [opensuse-factory] Beta9 Minimal Install

2006-04-04 Thread Mauricio Teixeira (netmask)
Martin Schlander wrote: > and it also needed a few packages from cd2 - among others windowmaker, BTW, why WindowMaker would be needed on a default KDE install? I understant it could be interesting on minimal X install (although I think fluxbox or blackbox would fit better on "minimal" than WM),

Re: [opensuse-factory] Beta9 Minimal Install

2006-04-04 Thread jdd
Mauricio Teixeira (netmask) wrote: > Martin Schlander wrote: > >> and it also needed a few packages from cd2 - among others windowmaker, > > BTW, why WindowMaker would be needed on a default KDE install? > > I understant it could be interesting on minimal X install (although I > think fluxbox o

Re: [opensuse-factory] Konqueror can't connect to any site

2006-04-04 Thread Chad Groneman
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 14:53 -0300, Mauricio Teixeira (netmask) wrote: > After recent updates, Konqueror can't open any sites, while Firefox > works perfectly. I get this message on Konqueror's window: > > -- > An error occurred while loading http://www.google.com: > Could not connect to host http:

Re: [opensuse-factory] Houghi's project

2006-04-04 Thread Pascal Bleser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 houghi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 01:28:09PM +0200, Azerion wrote: >> Op dinsdag 4 april 2006 11:31, schreef houghi: >>> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:58:12AM +0200, Azerion wrote: How is you're xml-thing going? (switch topic :P ) >>> Lousy. I

[opensuse-factory] XEN and 3rd party drivers (nvidia)

2006-04-04 Thread Chad Groneman
Hi, My observation / question is twofold. In playing with XEN, I've found that I can't start an X session, because of my NVidia driver that works with my regular kernel. The NVidia kernel module doesn't load when I use the XEN kernel. Is there an easy way to have graphical XEN and a 3D regula

Re: [opensuse-factory] SUSE-Linux10.1-Beta9-Extra problems

2006-04-04 Thread Ulrich Windl
On 4 Apr 2006 at 14:29, Joachim Werner wrote: [...] > This file will be signed with a SUSE key on all products coming from SUSE. > The > public key (GPG public key, ascii armor protected) for this key that can be > used to verify the signature is in the file "products.key" for convenience. > >