Hi,there,
I installed opensuse10.3beta2 to a dmraid (raid1)function machine,
At the end of installation, the yast can not create initrd and
install bootloader.
Because the creating initrd missed 70-kpartx.rule file, the
mkinitrd is failed.
Can we fix the bug in the beta3?
Than
The last days I got more than 5 crashes with the rpmdb, and must
rebuild it with "rpm --rebuilddb", and in one case, after rebuilding,
in the first case I woluld to install a rpm package.
The last case was installing a package compiled in the system and
created by checkinstall:
rpmdb: PANIC: Argum
2007/9/3, James PEARSON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello
>
> In the "/etc/hosts" file on opensuse 10.2, I have the
> "Full-Qualified-Hostname" on my
> machine in like this:
> # IP-Address Full-Qualified-Hostname Short-Hostname
> 127.0.0.2 my_hostname.my_dns my_hostname
>
> This was not the case wi
2007/9/2, Florin Samareanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is this happening to anyone here with a current -FACTORY?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -l /dev/*null*
> -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root0 2007-09-02 22:45 /dev/null
> -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2173 2007-09-02 22:24 /dev/null.2007-09-02.0
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root r
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 10:24:11PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Florin Samareanu wrote:
> > Is this happening to anyone here with a current -FACTORY?
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -l /dev/*null*
> > -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root0 2007-09-02 22:45 /dev/null
> > -rwxrwxrwx 1 roo
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 03:03:13PM -0400, Richard C Creighton wrote:
>
>
> Donn Washburn wrote:
> > Hey Group;
> >
> > The KDE "user" SuSE Updater seems to be broken. Every rime KDE comes
> > up it does also. It checks online and then shows a circled "?".
> > Click on it and up comes a error me
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Florin Samareanu wrote:
> Is this happening to anyone here with a current -FACTORY?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -l /dev/*null*
> -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root0 2007-09-02 22:45 /dev/null
> -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2173 2007-09-02 22:24 /dev/null.2007-09-02.0
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root
On Monday 03 September 2007 13:06, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
> > And for instance:
> > 301716Cri P5 open NEW Pidgin segfaults when sending
> > AIM message to yourself.
> >
> > Taking the type of application is it really critical?
> > Is that mean that critical is used for any c
Hello
In the "/etc/hosts" file on opensuse 10.2, I have the "Full-Qualified-Hostname"
on my
machine in like this:
# IP-Address Full-Qualified-Hostname Short-Hostname
127.0.0.2 my_hostname.my_dns my_hostname
This was not the case with 10.3 after I installed it - so I tried to add it
(for r
Donn Washburn wrote:
> Hey Group;
>
> The KDE "user" SuSE Updater seems to be broken. Every rime KDE comes
> up it does also. It checks online and then shows a circled "?".
> Click on it and up comes a error message stating "openSUSE Updater ->
> " Unable to check if updates are available". Be
> And for instance:
> 301716Cri P5 open NEW Pidgin segfaults when sending AIM
> message to yourself.
>
> Taking the type of application is it really critical?
> Is that mean that critical is used for any crash?
Funny, indeed.
The reporter is Bryan Perry @ Novell, so it
> Right. And after all, this is only GNOME and everybody reasonable uses
> KDE anyways (because it has much less bugs, for example) :P
I don't agree. We had already a buggy GNOME, to the limit of being
unusable, on 10.2. I would like not to see that again in 10.3.
> To be serious, I'm working my
Hey Group;
The KDE "user" SuSE Updater seems to be broken. Every rime KDE comes up
it does also. It checks online and then shows a circled "?".
Click on it and up comes a error message stating "openSUSE Updater -> "
Unable to check if updates are available". Beside it never works and
sugges
> This looks like an other 10.1 fiasco.
I don't think so. As Henne said, we are still in beta stage. That's why
I asked how fixes are progressing.
Regards,
Alberto
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional co
On Sunday 02 September 2007 10:52:54 am Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> during a discussion on IRC it emerged that GNOME still has a very high
> number of blockers and critical bugs.
> As it can be seen here:
The numbers seems to be lower today.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/report.c
Henne Vogelsang wrote:
On Monday, September 03, 2007 at 06:58:14, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
From what I see in bugzilla there are too many bugs to really release
on schedule. I think the release needs to be postponded.
If we would always draw in our horns because of this we would still be
in th
Hi,
On Monday, September 03, 2007 at 06:58:14, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> From what I see in bugzilla there are too many bugs to really release
> on schedule. I think the release needs to be postponded.
If we would always draw in our horns because of this we would still be
in the process of relea
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
> > > I suppose for the quality of GNOME it would be more helpful if people
> > > would report issues upstream. At least if the perception is correct
> > > that bugs in openSUSE GNOME are only fixed by pul
On Sunday 02 September 2007 16:15, Wolfgang Woehl wrote:
...
> > Be aware that abandoning mount by device path was forced by increasing
> > number of devices that can be mounted in different order on each boot
> > which results in different path. All SATA and USB devices are prone to
> > that.
>
>
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
> > I suppose for the quality of GNOME it would be more helpful if people
> > would report issues upstream. At least if the perception is correct
> > that bugs in openSUSE GNOME are only fixed by pulling new releases
> > from upstream.
>
> That's ok
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 11:47 +0200, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
>
> That's ok, but it should have been clarified at the beginning of the
> development stage, I think. Now, 17 days before the release, it is
> probably too late to get them fixed for 2.20, which will be included in
> openSUSE 10.3.
>
> I suppose for the quality of GNOME it would be more helpful if people
> would report issues upstream. At least if the perception is correct
> that bugs in openSUSE GNOME are only fixed by pulling new releases
> from upstream.
That's ok, but it should have been clarified at the beginning of the
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Francis Giannaros wrote:
> On 9/2/07, Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Alberto Passalacqua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-02 17:52]:
> > > during a discussion on IRC it emerged that GNOME still has a very high
> > > number of blockers and critical bugs.
> >
> > GNO
23 matches
Mail list logo
