So, what needs to be done to get this going (besides announcing a day)?
I'm in favor of doing it soon - and repeat if needed ;-)
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform / openSUSE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5,
To the right list this time; this reply-to business will really be
the death of me ;)
On 6/4/07, Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what needs to be done to get this going (besides announcing a day)?
I'm in favor of doing it soon - and repeat if needed ;-)
Andreas
After
Francis Giannaros [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To the right list this time; this reply-to business will really be
the death of me ;)
On 6/4/07, Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what needs to be done to get this going (besides announcing a day)?
I'm in favor of doing it soon -
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 14:47 +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Francis Giannaros [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To the right list this time; this reply-to business will really be
the death of me ;)
On 6/4/07, Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what needs to be done to get this
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Do we need to write some policies for this? Or is what we have
sufficient?
scan the bug list right now and add you as bugs mail recipient (fix
this sentence, I don't know the exact wording) to be up and running
when the day begin
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
Den Sunday 03 June 2007 01:19:55 skrev Ted Bullock:
Why do you believe that waiting until later is a good idea?
AJ said he'd like a bugday sometime before feature freeze. So sometime between
last alpha and first beta, seems a good idea.
Having an earlier bugday too might be doable and would be
Martin Schlander wrote:
That would mean the devs are aware of them and haven't been able to fix them
for ages? Do you mean community people should be able to fix them in an
afternoon? If not all we can do is provide info and perhaps alter status of
some bugs.. house cleaning.
don't forget
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jdd schreef:
Martin Schlander wrote:
That would mean the devs are aware of them and haven't been able to
fix them for ages? Do you mean community people should be able to fix
them in an afternoon? If not all we can do is provide info and perhaps
Il giorno sab, 02/06/2007 alle 17.19 -0600, Ted Bullock ha scritto:
Why do you believe that waiting until later is a good idea?
Because many of the most important changes still have to take place in
openSUSE 10.3.
Regards,
A.
That would mean the devs are aware of them and haven't been able to fix them
for ages?
Ignored is the right word, at least for many of them.
Do you mean community people should be able to fix them in an
afternoon? If not all we can do is provide info and perhaps alter status of
some
Hi Ted,
On Friday 01 June 2007 08:34, Ted Bullock wrote:
Now is probably the latest time to run this bug day thing if it is going
to have any sizable effect on 10.3. Alpha period is almost over (only
two alpha releases left to make changes in).
Suggessted Wiki Node for Bug Triage Day
Why do you believe that waiting until later is a good idea?
Novell/openSUSE are not agile. If the bug day(s) identify anything that
will require major changes, it needs to occur BEFORE or during early
alpha (like when this idea was first floated several months ago).
Waiting until beta is FAR to
Now is probably the latest time to run this bug day thing if it is going
to have any sizable effect on 10.3. Alpha period is almost over (only
two alpha releases left to make changes in).
Suggessted Wiki Node for Bug Triage Day
(http://en.opensuse.org/Bug:Triage_Day)
I'd like to schedule this
Well, yes. Bug day(s) is very important for our project.
--
-Alexey Eremenko Technologov
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Il giorno ven, 01/06/2007 alle 07.34 -0600, Ted Bullock ha scritto:
Now is probably the latest time to run this bug day thing if it is going
to have any sizable effect on 10.3.
We still are in alpha stage. I'd wait for the latest alpha first, and
then plan it.
With kind regards,
A.
On Saturday 10 March 2007 03:57:29 Rajko M. wrote:
BTW, is there any other activity, except this here.
I haven't really announced it anywhere yet, but I've got a bugbot (information
at http://francis.giannaros.org/bugbot) in #openSUSE-bugs (on Freenode of
course) where it reports all new
Il giorno gio, 08/03/2007 alle 12.20 +, Francis Giannaros ha
scritto:
A couple of months before release time sounds good to me.
I agree with Francis on this. If the release is on september, June-July
should be OK, considering the off-work period of August 8-)
Regards,
Alberto
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 13:13 +0100, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
Il giorno gio, 08/03/2007 alle 12.20 +, Francis Giannaros ha
scritto:
A couple of months before release time sounds good to me.
I agree with Francis on this. If the release is on september, June-July
should be OK,
Magnus Boman wrote:
How about if we start going through the bugs for 10.1 and 10.2
yes
NO bug should stay for old version open if nobody works on it.
Old bugs should be noted:
wontfix if fixing is not an issue
critical is this one needs really be solved even on this old version
moved to
On Friday 09 March 2007 07:41, jdd wrote:
NO bug should stay for old version open if nobody works on it.
Old bugs should be noted:
The problem is that bugs are there and simply closing is not good option, as
even very old ones are usually just carried over:
Il giorno mer, 07/03/2007 alle 13.50 -0700, Ted Bullock ha scritto:
Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
I disagree with this,
I think that a bug review should be scheduled as soon as reasonable.
While your statements about it being too early are true for the bugs
listed against the 10.3 release, the
Den Wednesday 07 March 2007 21:50:52 skrev Ted Bullock:
I think that a bug review should be scheduled as soon as reasonable.
While your statements about it being too early are true for the bugs
listed against the 10.3 release, the bugs listed against the older
releases should really be
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 20:50:52 you wrote:
Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
Il giorno dom, 04/03/2007 alle 13.18 +, Francis Giannaros ha
scritto:
Just a note that I don't necessarily think that the Bug triage day(s)
should happen just yet -- I think the ideal time is just a couple or
On Saturday 03 March 2007 19:07:19 Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
Hello,
With all the great discussion on the topic, We need to get it going. I
like the IRC, but really think a summeray is needed on the email list to
keep consistency across time zone.
I don't see any problem with adding a summary
Il giorno dom, 04/03/2007 alle 13.18 +, Francis Giannaros ha
scritto:
Just a note that I don't necessarily think that the Bug triage day(s) should
happen just yet -- I think the ideal time is just a couple or so months
before release, where changes can still be made, but there's feature
On Saturday 03 March 2007 13:07, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
Hello,
With all the great discussion on the topic, We need to get it going. I
like the IRC, but really think a summeray is needed on the email list to
keep consistency across time zone.
You are right.
While presence of bug owners
On Sunday 04 March 2007 08:56, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
Il giorno dom, 04/03/2007 alle 13.18 +, Francis Giannaros ha
scritto:
Just a note that I don't necessarily think that the Bug triage day(s)
should happen just yet -- I think the ideal time is just a couple or so
months before
Hello,
With all the great discussion on the topic, We need to get it going. I
like the IRC, but really think a summeray is needed on the email list to
keep consistency across time zone.
--
Boyd Gerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 84047
Il giorno sab, 03/03/2007 alle 12.07 -0700, Boyd Lynn Gerber ha scritto:
Hello,
With all the great discussion on the topic, We need to get it going. I
like the IRC, but really think a summeray is needed on the email list to
keep consistency across time zone.
Yes of course. I called this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boyd Lynn Gerber schreef:
Hello,
With all the great discussion on the topic, We need to get it going. I
like the IRC, but really think a summeray is needed on the email list to
keep consistency across time zone.
Offcourse, that is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alberto Passalacqua schreef:
Il giorno sab, 03/03/2007 alle 12.07 -0700, Boyd Lynn Gerber ha scritto:
Hello,
With all the great discussion on the topic, We need to get it going. I
like the IRC, but really think a summeray is needed on the
31 matches
Mail list logo
