Still off-topic.
Rickard Öberg wrote:
Goodbye Jonathan.
Jonathan is bashing on me off-line. Has anyone read the Velocity thread
and found my characterization of it as "disgusting" to be way out of
line and bordering on harassment of Jonathan?
He sez:
"And you had no fucking business badmout
I ran into this one as well. I have to check my home configuration, but I
think you do have to add your jars to the project classpath -
Eclipse/Sysdeo seem to effect the Tomcat classpath settings.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Thomas
Hi,
I have a problem, runnung Eclipse 2.1 on W2K with the tomcat 4.12 plugin
from Sysdeo. If I use the webwork classes in my project and start tomcat within
the eclipse ide, tomcat returns the error "HTTP Status 503 - Servlet action
is currently unavailable" after calling an webwork action. JSP pa
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Nokleberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> When is the next
> WebWork release planned for?
>
> -Chris
Good question :-)
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + Li
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:43:22AM +1100, Scott Farquhar wrote:
> Anyone actually want to commit something now? Don't forget if you don't
> have CVS access - email me your diffs & I'll commit them.
I do have some basic support working (value stack exposed as a
FreeMarker TemplateModel), but it i
sorry to come in so late...;-)
>I think the default should be how it is now, since after the
>last change, people
>have on the whole adapter their code to the new behaviour.
no problem with that, but then it should be remembered to adapt the
webwork table jsp template to mirror the original (1.
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:19 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] ActionContext clarification
> Konstantin,
>
> I think the problem here is that you're not using the Model2 paradigm,
> which Webwork
Konstantin,
I think the problem here is that you're not using the Model2 paradigm,
which Webwork is based upon. It sounds like you are hitting the JSPs
directly, whereas, in Webwork, we would hit foo.action, which (because
*.action is mapped to the Webwork ServletDispatcher) would be handled by
W
> Jonathan Revusky wrote:
>But again, I repeat, that if people are asking about
>features on a Velocity list that are present in
>FreeMarker, I see *no* problem with telling them that
>the features they want are present in FreeMarker. If
>you think there's a moral or ethical problem with
that, >the
+1.
Anyone actually want to commit something now? Don't forget if you don't
have CVS access - email me your diffs & I'll commit them.
Cheers,
Scott
boxed wrote:
Anybody who reads the thread and was not born yesterday will see that
the Velocity people started all the personal attacks, all the a
I'll bite. Just this once.
Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Absolutely, go read it.
I think you should go read it too, Rickard. Your comments here do not
seem to be based on any grasp of what really happened.
Just re-read it, and it re-confirmed my assesment of what happened, and
my comments still st
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 03:13 PM, Hani Suleiman wrote:
A flamewar wouldn't be complete without a few kindlings thrown in by
me, so herw
goes...
Do you think I'm the only guy around who doesn't like it when people
spread disinformation about him behind his back? Other than that, do
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 03:09 PM, boxed wrote:
Anybody who reads the thread and was not born yesterday will see that
the Velocity people started all the personal attacks, all the ad
hominem and character assastination stuff against me specifically
because they could not deal with me i
A flamewar wouldn't be complete without a few kindlings thrown in by me, so herw
goes...
>
> Do you think I'm the only guy around who doesn't like it when people
> spread disinformation about him behind his back? Other than that, do
> you think that *I* have any interest in showing up on a webw
> Anybody who reads the thread and was not born yesterday will see that
> the Velocity people started all the personal attacks, all the ad
> hominem and character assastination stuff against me specifically
> because they could not deal with me in legitimate debate. That you,
> Rickard, cannnot see
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 06:24 AM, Rickard Öberg wrote:
Jonathan Revusky wrote:
François, I don't believe that you should take Rickard's account of
what happened as definitive, particularly when there is a complete
electronic record of all of this that anybody can look at.
Absol
Dick Zetterberg wrote:
Isn't it possible to get a problem even if you do all your work in actions,
for example if you are doing some Model-1 coding? For example if you have an
action that you call many methods on, in a page like:
Later on in the page you decide to get some property from it:
If
Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
What is correct way to obtain ActionContext
which was initialized with HttpSession data if
there
is
HttpSession around?
I think ServletActionContext.getSession() works.
This method does not exists in current CVS version
of webwork...
Sorry, that should be Acti
- Original Message -
From: "Rickard Öberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] ActionContext clarification
>
> The WebWorky way is to have all code that does stuff in actions, and in
> that case you'd never have an
> > What is correct way to obtain ActionContext
> > which was initialized with HttpSession data if
> there
> > is
> > HttpSession around?
>
> I think ServletActionContext.getSession() works.
This method does not exists in current CVS version
of webwork...
Another question:
It seems to me that
Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
Well, not quite webworky :)
The idea is to not reinvent the wheel.
I would like to be servlet-agnostic...
Ok, then put the code that initializes the context in a class and call
it from a ServiceContextListener.
What is correct way to obtain ActionContext
which w
--- Rickard_Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
> >>Regardless, the initialization should probably be
> >>done using a
> >>ServiceContextListener.
> >
> > What is ServiceContextListener? Nothing in webwork
> > docs
> > about it, neither in servlet api
>
> Sorry, I mea
Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
Regardless, the initialization should probably be
done using a
ServiceContextListener.
What is ServiceContextListener? Nothing in webwork
docs
about it, neither in servlet api
Sorry, I meant this one:
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.3/techdocs/api/javax/servlet/Servl
> Just an observation from your error description:
> Is the initial framset file a html file or a jsp
> file? If it is html and
> then if the frames are JSP files then I think you
> could get the behaviour
> you are describing with different sessions since no
> session is created when
> the frames
- Original Message -
From: "Konstantin Priblouda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] ActionContext clarification
>
> Yep. I have to live with frameset, and on couple the
> first executions of various jsps it delivers different
> objects. But then it stabilizes...
> Kind of weir
> Hm.. this is not application-global. It is
> session-specific.
My mistake...
> > Then i was in need to perform the same from action
> > - so I modified this method to luse Map instead
> of
> > session
> > and added another static method which just feeds
> first
> > one with ActionContext.getSes
Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
Is there webwork example for such factory actions?
What are you using the factory for? Sounds like the
dispatcher to me.
I need a application-global object.
Original version was:
---%<-
public static getFoo(HttpSession bar) {
Foo foo = bar.getValue(FOO_K
> > Is there webwork example for such factory actions?
>
> What are you using the factory for? Sounds like the
> dispatcher to me.
I need a application-global object.
Original version was:
---%<-
public static getFoo(HttpSession bar) {
Foo foo = bar.getValue(FOO_KEY);
if(foo == nul
Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
So you suggest that I convert my factory class into
action, and this action shall deposit my desired class
in [say] thread local upon execution?
Is there webwork example for such factory actions?
What are you using the factory for? Sounds like the dispatcher to me.
> Well, if you're using scriptlets then I guess you
> can use the request
> directly.
>
> The WebWorky way is to have all code that does stuff
> in actions, and in
> that case you'd never have any problem.
So you suggest that I convert my factory class into
action, and this action shall deposi
Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
Yep. I have to live with frameset, and on couple the
first executions of various jsps it delivers different
objects. But then it stabilizes...
Kind of weird.
I think I will provide 2 methods for my factory:
from jsp feed it with session and extract object from
t here
--- Rickard_Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I tried to get map of values stored in
> > HttpSession by calling ActionContext.getSession()
> >
> > Docs state that it shall return map of values in
> > actual HttpSession while in servlet environment,
Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to get map of values stored in
HttpSession by calling ActionContext.getSession()
Docs state that it shall return map of values in
actual HttpSession while in servlet environment, and
just a map
( global one? ) if called elsewhere.
I used it from JP
Hi all,
I tried to get map of values stored in
HttpSession by calling ActionContext.getSession()
Docs state that it shall return map of values in
actual HttpSession while in servlet environment, and
just a map
( global one? ) if called elsewhere.
I used it from JPS , and different documents g
- Original Message -
From: "Rickard Öberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 2003. január 29. 6:24
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Freemarker WAS Using SiteMesh for the UI tags
> Now back to our regular programming.
+1. I'm here with the sole reason of kickstarting a WW+FM
35 matches
Mail list logo
