To: Eric Pugh,
Hi.. Saw your following post. Can you expound on what you mean regarding
web-work extensions? We don't follow this thread very often, but we might be
interested in a workflow related application
Regards,
Bruce Douglas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Then maybe it should be a request-level component? Or maybe you've
outgrown the mini-IOC services XWork provides :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Anoop Ranganath
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 10:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
I too would like to see something like a sourceforge project that had
web-work extensions. I understand that there is a webwork extensions
project, however, not sure what the level of committment is required to get
access to that CVS.. I am thinking of something with a relatively low
barrier to e
Yes, you can access these properties using ognl expressions. The
VisitorValidator is there to allow you to encapsulate those validations
for the component classes in one spot, but you can do it this way too.
> -Original Message-
> From: news.gmane.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mo
Is there a way to validate components without using the visitor validator?
Perhaps something like an ognl style of work with the properties such as:
field: component.compInternalProperty
validator: requiredstring
Then, instead of using visitor and writing a validaiton.xml for the
component, I ca
I checked out the code to use to integrate xwork/webwork with spring. I was
utilizing the interceptor classes posted to the JIRA.
But I ran into an issue. It's not entirely a critical one, but just thought
perhaps people should know.
The issue is that when you set the property to have webwork d
I think what you are looking for is the
following:
type="hidden"
name="storyid"
value="
value="parameters['storyid']"
/>"/>
There are
four Map variables that are exported by webwork for access in
ognl:
application
session
parameters
request
I believe
those are the correct var
+1 for a Intercept repository! What ever happened to the webwork-ext project? Is it alive?
Cheers,
matthew
On Dec 8, 2003, at 10:53 AM, Thompson, Christopher C (Kris) wrote:
I want an interceptor to check the preconditions of an Action, for example verify that all the request parameters that
A para name/value?
Cheers,
matthew
On Dec 8, 2003, at 11:13 AM, Thompson, Christopher C (Kris) wrote:
That would be a good option, how would that be done?
-Original Message-
From:Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Monday, December 08, 2003 10:00 AM
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
Title: Message
That would be a good option, how would that be done?
-Original Message-
From: Jason Carreira
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003
10:00 AM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Request
for a new Interceptor maybe?
Well, we
Title: Message
Well,
we could make the return code from DefaultWorkflow settable... I think
we've talked about having this stuff in
webwork-extensions...
-Original Message-From: Thompson,
Christopher C (Kris) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:53
Thanks a lot, i'll try that...
L
Francisco Hernandez wrote:
if you were using webwork2 you would be able to use those jsp tags in
velocity, i believe displaytag even packaged with ww2 now.
Leonidas Papadakis wrote:
Greetings,
i have recently been trying to migrate from velocity templates to
I
want an interceptor to check the preconditions of an Action, for example verify
that all the request parameters that should have been passed in indeed
did. I thought about using the DefaultWorkFlowInterceptor but it has to
problems (not with it but with me trying to use it with this prob
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Anoop Ranganath wrote:
> > Yeah. It's not a big task, after all. (Maybe it is and I just don't
> > notice, since it's so trivial to do with ant.)
>
> The latter is the case. It is a very big task, and you could easily
> increase your development efficiency by 100% if you worke
Yeah. It's not a big task, after all. (Maybe it is and I just don't
notice, since it's so trivial to do with ant.)
The latter is the case. It is a very big task, and you could easily
increase your development efficiency by 100% if you worked with an
exploded ear rather than earing and deploying
so you create a .ear and deploy that everytime you test some changes?
currently im not even using ant to build up a ear or war, just compiling classes into the webapp's classes dir.
Joseph Ottinger wrote:
I use Orion. I deploy in an .ear, and it works fine for me...
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Francisco
Yeah. It's not a big task, after all. (Maybe it is and I just don't
notice, since it's so trivial to do with ant.)
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Francisco Hernandez wrote:
> so you create a .ear and deploy that everytime you test some changes?
>
> currently im not even using ant to build up a ear or war, j
Deploying wars is slow (orion should pick up the new war though). It's
inifinitely faster during dev to use an open dir. Just point orion at
your web dir and you're all set.
Wayland Chan wrote:
I've noticed that when I deploy wars to Orion, it doesn't restart either.
If we ned to touch the web
I've noticed that when I deploy wars to Orion, it doesn't restart either.
If we ned to touch the web.xml, then I take it we shouldn't be deploying via wars
(can't touch web.xml until it's been deployed/extracted)?
> Use ww1.4!
>
> Alternatively just touch web.xml and it'll restart automatically
I use Orion. I deploy in an .ear, and it works fine for me...
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Francisco Hernandez wrote:
> i've been using orionserver for development but im so tired of having to restart to
> test things (yes, development mode
> is turned on), what app server are you guys using or tools to
Use ww1.4!
Alternatively just touch web.xml and it'll restart automatically, have
an ant task do it.
Francisco Hernandez wrote:
i've been using orionserver for development but im so tired of having to
restart to test things (yes, development mode is turned on), what app
server are you guys us
i've been using orionserver for development but im so tired of having to restart to test things (yes, development mode
is turned on), what app server are you guys using or tools to help accomplish this?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: S
if you were using webwork2 you would be able to use those jsp tags in velocity, i believe displaytag even packaged with
ww2 now.
Leonidas Papadakis wrote:
Greetings,
i have recently been trying to migrate from velocity templates to jsp
because i would like to use the jsp tags (i.e. displaytag.
There's an example of using the displaytag from velocity in the WW2
example war...
> -Original Message-
> From: Leonidas Papadakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OS-webwork] How to integrate veltag with webwork
> an
I
have a request to a .JSP that has in it a variable of storyid (/wafer/addcomment.jsp?storyid=5)
Next, on that page I use the ActionTag to simple calls ActionSupport.
This is done because I want the interceptors to be called but there isn’t
any real Action class that needs to be fired to
See below
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan-Peter Hagenmueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Spam:[OS-webwork] Webwork2: VALIDATION
>
>
> Hi!
>
> i've got some questions hoping you can give me some short advices:
>
Greetings,
i have recently been trying to migrate from velocity templates to jsp
because i would like to use the jsp tags (i.e. displaytag.org ). I am
using webwork 1.0. The problem is that if i call an action i.e. myres
that returns a jsp file on SUCCESS the veltag does not access the
propert
Hi!
i've got some questions hoping you can give me some short advices:
- must i use webwork tags for , etc. to make field-validation
work?
if yes:
- why is there always a surrounding the in resulting
code?
- why do i must like labelling my inputs () can i
customize it?
On Dec 8, 2003, at 6:12 AM, Craig Raw wrote:
This seems to work, but I need to perform further testing to be sure.
I am, I admit, confused as to the reason of the reload property. Why
would you not want to reload the configuration. Performance reasons?
Yep, enabling this causes the timestamp of
People mostly set the configuration reloading for development, so you
can edit your config files and have the changes show up immediately.
There is a performance hit to checking the file timestamp every time.
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig Raw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday
Petri Wessman wrote:
On Friday 05 December 2003 17:53, Jason Carreira wrote:
Actually, there is a way to do that. With JBoss 3.2.x, if you package your
war inside an .ear and place the following as jboss-app.xml in the ear
META-INF directory, JBoss will use a separate classloader for the applic
Hi all,
I commited very first version of plugin generating
views.properties for webworkj 1.3 ( would do for 1.4
of course )
those who are brave enough can give it a try.
You will need some patches though
- qdox shall be patched with patch attached to
qdox-36,
- xdoclet 2 shall get new file att
32 matches
Mail list logo
