Hello,
Attila Szegedi wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Rickard Öberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Freemarker WAS Using SiteMesh for the UI tags
Actually if I understand it rig
> IF FM has something like Velocity's context chaining, you could
> transparently support finding objects on the ValueStack.
FM sports the interface based design quite extremely, so it's pretty easy to
place any data model under it.
> See
> WebWorkVelocityServlet. For more specific access to the
- Original Message -
From: "Kirk Rasmussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 8:59 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Freemarker WAS Using SiteMesh for the UI tags
> Just off the top of my head...
>
> Doesn't Free
- Original Message -
From: "James Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Freemarker WAS Using SiteMesh for the UI tags
> The one thing that may prevent FreeMarker from being "
this.
Regards,
Kirk Rasmussen
Lucasfilm Ltd.
> -Original Message-
> From: James Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Freemarker WAS Using SiteMesh for
> the UI tags
>
>
>
The one thing that may prevent FreeMarker from being "drop-in"
replacement for the WebWork JSP is the expression language supported by
the WebWork taglibs. It also affects JSTL integration and Velocity
integration. It concerns the hierarchical nature of the ValueStack.
Most of these third-party
- Original Message -
From: "Rickard Öberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Freemarker WAS Using SiteMesh for the UI tags
> Francois Beauregard wrote:
> > Just wanted to emp
Francois Beauregard wrote:
Just wanted to emphasize the fact that supporting Freemarker as a view
technology in WebWork and integrating Freemarker as an OpenSymphony project
are two really separate issues.
Oh absolutely. If someone wants to integrate FreeMaker go right ahead. I
have no problem
Sent: January 28, 2003 11:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Freemarker WAS Using SiteMesh for the UI tags
Francois Beauregard wrote:
> I was not aware of that fact.
> You are right. OpenSymphony seem to have got lately to a point where there
> is a good exchange of idea
Francois Beauregard wrote:
I was not aware of that fact.
You are right. OpenSymphony seem to have got lately to a point where there
is a good exchange of ideas and the community moves forward. This must stay
the way it is right now.
Do you remeber the reasons for the ranting?
Yes, his belief th
On the contrary, that makes it perfect for OS! ;)
Quoting Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Francois Beauregard wrote:
> > A few developers here have used freemarker a little while ago and loved
> it.
> > It seems to be a very good alternative to velocity.
> >
> > Since it worked for WebWork
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Freemarker WAS Using SiteMesh for the UI tags
Francois Beauregard wrote:
> A few developers here have used freemarker a little while ago and loved
it.
> It seems to be a very good alternative to velocity.
>
> Since it worked for WebWo
Francois Beauregard wrote:
A few developers here have used freemarker a little while ago and loved it.
It seems to be a very good alternative to velocity.
Since it worked for WebWork and after some little discensions the community
seems be very well and alive, I would like to throw the suggestion
A few developers here have used freemarker a little while ago and loved it.
It seems to be a very good alternative to velocity.
Since it worked for WebWork and after some little discensions the community
seems be very well and alive, I would like to throw the suggestion the
freemarker joins OpenSy
14 matches
Mail list logo
