On 03/16/2015 07:07 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
> On 16/03/15 18:43, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
>> Right, but isn't this also, I suppose implicitly, reforming the
>> unchanged sparsity structure?
>
> "It depends".
>
> Specifically, it depends specifically on what you mean by the term
> "sparsity struc
On 16/03/15 18:43, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
On 03/16/2015 06:34 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
On 16/03/15 18:28, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
On 03/16/2015 05:07 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
We currently implement the second approach. The matrix sparsity
(connection) structure does not change between call
On 03/16/2015 06:34 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
> On 16/03/15 18:28, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
>> On 03/16/2015 05:07 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
>>> We currently implement the second approach. The matrix sparsity
>>> (connection) structure does not change between calls to solve(),
>>> although the num
On 16/03/15 16:51, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
On 03/16/2015 04:43 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
As for the overall construction approach, it basically boils down to
which is more expensive:
* Having two copies of the matrix in memory and re-forming
the (unchanging) sparsity structure on ea
On 03/16/2015 04:43 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
> On 16/03/15 16:11, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
> in the periodic case, it uses plain assignment S_[i][j] = x,
>> whereas in all the other cases it uses +=.
>
> Do you mean *Dirichlet* case rather than periodic in the above statement?
>
> I ported it to
Sorry,
I hit "reply" rather than "reply all".
Bård
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [OPM] Porsol: IncompFlowSolverHybrid - decrypting the procedure
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:43:23 +0100
From: Bård Skaflestad
To: Jørgen Kvalsvik
On 16/03/15 16:11, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
in t
On 03/16/2015 04:06 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
> On 16/03/15 15:51, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
>> On 03/16/2015 02:49 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
>>> On 26/01/15 13:00, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
In the periodic case, will some indices be encountered twice?
>>>
>>> I'm not sure I understand the questio
On 16/03/15 15:51, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
On 03/16/2015 02:49 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
On 26/01/15 13:00, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
In the periodic case, will some indices be encountered twice?
I'm not sure I understand the question. All indices may, and typically
will, be encountered multipl
On 03/16/2015 02:49 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
> On 26/01/15 13:00, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry about the delay. I was just going through my old e-mail and
> noticed that I didn't see an answer to this question. I'll provide one
> for the mailing list record, even it much ti
On 26/01/15 13:00, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Sorry about the delay. I was just going through my old e-mail and
noticed that I didn't see an answer to this question. I'll provide one
for the mailing list record, even it much time has passed since the
question was posed.
Can the Dir
10 matches
Mail list logo
