Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] FUEL COLORADO 3.0 doesnt work

Hi Daniel, The reason of this problem is a recent change in ubuntu repositories, systemd package was moved from proposed repository to updates https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/trusty-changes/2016-December/023368.html It leads to situation when this package is installed and puppet detects init

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OpenDaylight - OpenStack Newton integration

Hi, I found a bug related to this case https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1614766 Thanks, Michal > On 23 Nov 2016, at 13:00, Michal Skalski <mskal...@mirantis.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I’m currently deploying OpenDaylight Boron with OpenStack Newton, and > ex

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel-plugin] Fuel plug-in to use networking-sfc

Hi, There is existing plugin which install networking-sfc in Fuel 10: https://github.com/openstack/fuel-plugin-networking-sfc Current version of tacker plugin https://github.com/openstack/fuel-plugin-tacker support fuel 9 and it will be uplifted to 10 during preparation to Danube release.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Regarding using OPNFV yardstick over existing Openstack multi-node setup

Hi, About your problems with virtual box deployment is network test fail on access to external repos? I assume that yes since you mentioned fuel-createmirror command. This command is no longer used and not needed since mirrors are included on ISO, you can read how to use them here

[opnfv-tech-discuss] OpenDaylight - OpenStack Newton integration

Hi, I’m currently deploying OpenDaylight Boron with OpenStack Newton, and experience problem related to fact that in Newton the native interface (Open vSwitch python api) is used by default to communicate with OVS [1]. When I create new subnet with dhcp enabled, neutron dhcp agent is trying add

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [apex][ovsnfv][fuel]Problem showed up with OVS/DPDK with Cisco VIC adapter

Hi, Im looking at your fix now [1] as I understand it is only visible when we are using vxlan segmentation right? Currently Fuel support dpdk only with vlan segmentation, and this is how we deploy on linux foundation pod, so we may not seen this problem yet.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel] Setting timeout for puppet commands

Hi Dhaval, To increase timeout and number of tries please modify /etc/puppet/modules/osnailyfacter/manifests/fuel_pkgs/setup_repositories.pp on fuel master like here: https://github.com/openstack/fuel-library/commit/c207efe9627206f1deb6fe684701aa32cfc32465 but first please be sure that network

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [FUEL] Danube - OS Support

Hi Maryam, Do you plan to develop existing plugin collectd-ceilometer [1] or create new one? [1] https://git.opnfv.org/cgit/fastpathmetrics/tree/src/fuel-plugin Thanks, Michal > On 4 Oct 2016, at 10:13, Tahhan, Maryam wrote: > > Thanks Greg. > We are currently

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Configuring LF POD with 2 RQs on VIC profiles

Hi, With Feng's help (thank you once more!) I made this changes also for lf-pod2. Regards, Michal > On 16 Sep 2016, at 15:30, Michal Skalski <mskal...@mirantis.com> wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > Sorry I missed this discussion, is there any updates related to applying this >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Configuring LF POD with 2 RQs on VIC profiles

Hi Tim, Sorry I missed this discussion, is there any updates related to applying this configuration on LF pod? On LF POD2 we currently observe problems with dpdk, and I thought that it could be related. Thanks, Michal > On 29 Aug 2016, at 20:00, Frank Brockners (fbrockne)

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] ODL distro to use for the Fuel and Apex installers

Hi Guys, This distro is now also available on opnfv artifacts: http://artifacts.opnfv.org/fuel/colorado/distribution-karaf-0.5.0-Boron-RC2.tar.gz Here is a change after which we will start use this tarball: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/20233/ Thanks, Michal > On 01 Sep 2016, at 13:19,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel] How to override parameters defined in scenario files

Hi Julien, I agree with what Fedor wrote. I would like to avoid changing scenario workflow before C-release since proposed change will impact more than one scenario. Regarding this specific scenario can you confirm with David (in Cc) if this scenario is suppose to work with vlan segmentation?

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel] using bsdtar instead of fuseiso

Hi Ross, You can find fuel@opnfv code project here: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/admin/projects/fuel You need to have linux foundation account, if you already have one please request to be added to opnfv-gerrit-fuel-contributors group at opnfv-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org. After that