lleviate them. It would be very beneficial to get
> IETF's participants feedback and suggestions on what is the better next step
> to take for BBF or its members towards IETF to get an IETF solution for the
> scalability issue identified.
> An IETF response liaison to BBF w
S and DNSSD”, another WG LC, albeit shorter (1
>> week), would be in order.
>
> Works for me.
Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanand...@gmail.com
___
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
e
what order they should be read in.
Time for me to write my own set of Cliff notes for the drafts that Warren so
good about.
Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanand...@gmail.com
___
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
Mahesh will decide to skip that or not.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
> Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
>
>
>
Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanand...@gmail.com
___
OP
references draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-09, but -13 is
the latest available revision.
Document references draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-07, but -11 is the
latest available revision.
Document references draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-09, but -11 is the latest
available revisio
itu-t-sg-11-ietf-ls-on-the-new-work-item-itu-t-qmud_iot-framework-for-testing-and-monitoring-iot-devices-networks-using-technica-attachment-1.pdf
>
>LS196
>
> https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2024-05-22-itu-t-sg-11-ietf-ls-on-the-new-work-item-itu-t-qm
al K but
other times it is used with a small k.
Document references draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-28, but -32 is the latest
available revision.
Document references draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-08, but -10 is the latest
available revision.
Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanand...@gmail.com
___
etf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh.txt>.
>
> Please see more context inline.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
> De : Mahesh Jethanandani <mailto:mjethanand...@gmail.com>>
> Envoyé : dimanche 14 avril 2024 21:42
> À : draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v...@ietf.org
> <mailto:draft-
e for more context.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
> De : Mahesh Jethanandani <mailto:mjethanand...@gmail.com>>
> Envoyé : dimanche 14 avril 2024 05:21
> À : draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fi...@ietf.org
> <mailto:draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fi...@ietf.org>
> Cc : opsawg@ietf.
identifying root causes of performance degra
> ^^^
The verb "help" is used with an infinitive.
Section 4.2, paragraph 6
> [RFC8883] for a behavior of an intermediate nodes that encounters an unknown
> ^
The plural noun "nodes" cannot be used with the article "an". Did you mean "an
intermediate node" or "intermediate nodes"?
Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanand...@gmail.com
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
eshold event. Values for t
> ^
If "type" is a classification term, "a" is not necessary. Use "type of". (The
phrases "kind of" and "sort of" are informal if they mean "to some extent".).
Section 6.23.1, paragraph 4
> | | | table below, and section Section 5.1. | | 2 | PmA | Pe
> ^^^
Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Section 6.24.2, paragraph 1
> SHOULD have this flag set, and vice-versa.) | ++--+-
>^^
The expression "vice versa" is spelled without hyphens.
Section 7.2.1, paragraph 1
> SHOULD have this flag set, and vice-versa.) | ++--+-
>^^
The expression "vice versa" is spelled without hyphens.
Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanand...@gmail.com
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
le from the manufacturor. In a way,
>> one could see this as a firmware that has a bit of external firmware hosted
>> elsewhere. And these two can get out of sync. To me that just seems like
>> broken firmware and building a protocol mechanism to resolve thi
] Added a new section.
>
>> Is there any way to merge some of these drafts together or do they all
>> have to be separate. It makes it difficult for the reader to follow
>> the solution.
>>
>> Nits:
>> Remove all the bold of lines within the draft. AFAIK it makes it
>> difficult for the user to read.
>>
>
> [Med] Done
>
>> ! Additional drafts reviewed
>> draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-05
>>
>> Major Issues:
>> None
>>
>> Minor Issues:
>>
>> Is the goal of this draft to take items that are common between all
>> ACs for the L2NM & L2SM modules. Why not make this part of one of the
>> other drafts like the ac-glue or even the ACAAS draft.
>>
>> I would recommend showing how all 4 drafts work together in each of
>> the 4 drafts as they all work together to provide the overall AC
>> solution.
>>
>> draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-06
>> draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-05
>> draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-06
>> draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-05
>>
>
> [Med] Done.
>
>> Is there any way to merge some of these drafts together or do they all
>> have to be separate. It makes it difficult for the reader to follow
>> the solution.
>>
>> Nits:
>> None
>>
>>
>
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu
> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
> this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanand...@gmail.com
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Mahesh Jethanandani has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph
much later in the document.
Please define in a Terminology Section or somewhere before first use.
> IoT Devices SHOULD prefer doing DNS to with the DHCP provided DNS servers.
Grammar?
> The ADD WG has written [I-D.ietf-add-dnr] and [I-D.ietf-add-ddr] to provided.
Same here.
Mahesh Jet
And here is some background on the talk on Monday. Begin forwarded message:From: Jeffrey Haas Date: June 2, 2023 at 10:15:49 AM PDTTo: RTGWG Cc: Mahesh Jethanandani Subject: Fwd: Network Modeling (netmod) WG Interim Meeting: 2023-06-05Sorry for the late forward. This coming Monday, Mahesh and I
ation:
>> Virtual,
>>
>>
>> Agenda:
>> Title: YANG Modelling in IETF WGs – Sharing Lessons Learned
>>
>> Description: Expanding on the IETF116 presentation “Lessons from Working
>> on BGP YANG” from Jeffrey Haas and Mahesh Jethanandani.
url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-14>
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by
I have fixed these warning. Eliot, I am including the updated ACL models. Can you verify?These changes will be uploaded as part of the next update that Sonal is planning to post on Oct. 2.
ietf-access-control-list@2017-09-21.yang
Description: Binary data
ietf-packet-fields@2017-09-21.yang
19 matches
Mail list logo
