com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:22 AM
> To: Linda Dunbar ; opsawg@ietf.org
> Cc: i2...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monitoring
network functions?
>
> Linda
>
> I looked at the draft and think that it needs some work before it is
g
> Cc: i2...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monitoring network
> functions?
>
> Linda
>
> I looked at the draft and think that it needs some work before it is a
> YANG module:-)
>
> - NMDA conformance is not mentioned
>
> - the
t.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:22 AM
To: Linda Dunbar ; opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: i2...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monitoring network
functions?
Linda
I looked at the draft and think that it needs some work before it is a YANG
module:-)
- NMDA conforman
Linda
I looked at the draft and think that it needs some work before it is a
YANG module:-)
- NMDA conformance is not mentioned
- the reference to RFC2119 is out of date
- the format for tree diagrams is now specified in RFC8340
- YANG import statements lack 'reference' as in
import ietf-
OpsaWG:
I2NSF WG has a draft on data models (and information model) of monitoring
network security functions:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
It includes data models to retrieve System Alarms, System Events, counters, NSF
Events/logs, etc.
Want to see
