far seen
examples of JSP without any comments in it, and have done so myself for the
most part).
> -Original Message-
> From: Fyffe Carl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 12:34 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: JSP vs Servlet
>
>
>
es are watching :)
--Carl
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christian Sell
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 3:11 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: JSP vs Servlet
> Anyway, IMHO adding a methodology on top of the purpose of the article -
>
e-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kemp
> Randy-W18971
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 6:16 AM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: JSP vs Servlet
>
>
> I did address this same question to the folks at www.jollem.com
> and their sugg
d VCM.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Juan Lorandi
> (Chile)
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 7:59 AM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: JSP vs Servlet MVC - CMV
>
>
> it's a circular pattern...
> you
In general, you can consider JSPs the easy way to make a servlet.
Basically, it becomes a matter of location of files.
The way I suggest doing it (and we do on our projects) is to have all of the
'GUI'(or html) portions of the JSP in a separate location. We have our top
level 'logic' jsp's in
Sent: Viernes, 05 de Enero de 2001 9:25
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: JSP vs Servlet MVC - CMV
I've seen the abbreviation MVC on a lot of places, but shouldn't it be
CMV
for Controller / Model / View
where Controller receives a request, handles it using model and displays it
using
my 2 cents,
Amir
-Original Message-
From: Johan Fredriksson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 6:25 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: JSP vs Servlet MVC - CMV
I've seen the abbreviation MVC on a lot of places, but shouldn't it be
CMV
for Controller /
: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: JSP vs Servlet
Interesting point. I agree, and infact I found the CMP primer a bit hard to
read because it wasn't so clean (as far as the code used). However, for the
sake of brevity I am sure they had to cut corners so as not to have a
200-page book. I would have
I did address this same question to the folks at www.jollem.com and their suggestion,
which was a fine one, was to create a tutorial. Jollem has a mechanism in place to
create tutorials (see website). Since I am not an expert, I would ask if some expert
(with some spare time) could show us ho
,
etc.) to see how the pieces fit together.
-Original Message-
From: Christian Sell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 5:11 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: JSP vs Servlet
> Anyway, IMHO adding a methodology on top of the purpose of the article -
> showing t
I've seen the abbreviation MVC on a lot of places, but shouldn't it be
CMV
for Controller / Model / View
where Controller receives a request, handles it using model and displays it
using view?
Not important to me, just wondered... =)
//Johan
- Original Message -
From: "Fyffe Carl
> Anyway, IMHO adding a methodology on top of the purpose of the article -
> showing the CMP stuff - would have been yet more to learn. I'm of the
> opinion that something like that needs to show off one aspect of the
> technology rather than all aspects, so MVC - while useful - would have
> been
Well, Ernst did a fine job, but it'd be better if he'd done those things
in XML... *runs*
Anyway, IMHO adding a methodology on top of the purpose of the article -
showing the CMP stuff - would have been yet more to learn. I'm of the
opinion that something like that needs to show off one aspect o
Interesting point. I agree, and infact I found the CMP primer a bit hard to
read because it wasn't so clean (as far as the code used). However, for the
sake of brevity I am sure they had to cut corners so as not to have a
200-page book. I would have liked to seen a bit more detail and info on the
14 matches
Mail list logo
