my advice is, don't rely on official tags like "stable" or "unstable".
download each version and do your testing with your application(s). during
the past 2 years of working with orion sometimes the more serious bugs were
in stable sometimes in unstable versions.
just my 2c
On Thursday 28
I think stable versions are declared when a version has been out for a while
and doesn't do things like blow up unexpectly. Many people will run the
development versions of orion on production boxes, since they provide many
bugfixes over the last known 'stable' version. Of course, this is assuming
,
Hello,
Does anybody know if 1.5.5 (full EJB 2.0) will be considered a stable version?
Actually, let me ask the full question: Is there any correlation between
Orion's version number and whether it is considered stable or unstable? Is
their concept of stability just what they recommend ba
Is it possible to use SSL with the EJB container of the Orion server? For
example the client is a standalone Java application that makes only RMI-IIOP
calls to EJB-s (no JSP, no servlets, no HTML involved) in the EJB container.
And I want to do this with security in mind, for example using SSL. Is
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 12:09:47PM -0800, Ray Harrison wrote:
>
> Moving among different app servers, I still use ejb-ql functionality
> in the ejb-jar.xml file, its just that when it is deployed on Orion,
> I have to add the finder functionality to the orion-ejb-jar.xml
> file. I think in 1.5.4,
, March 27, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: Orion EJB 2.0 final
Apologies, I probably didn't make myself sufficiently clear. With EJB
2.0, aren't finder queries meant to be specified in the ejb-jar.xml
file using EJB-QL? Consequently, Orions's lack of support for EJB-QL
mean
Moving among different app servers, I still use ejb-ql functionality in the
ejb-jar.xml file, its
just that when it is deployed on Orion, I have to add the finder functionality to the
orion-ejb-jar.xml file. I think in 1.5.4, it deploys, it just doesn't do anything.
Cheers
Ray
--- Simon Stewar
Apologies, I probably didn't make myself sufficiently clear. With EJB
2.0, aren't finder queries meant to be specified in the ejb-jar.xml
file using EJB-QL? Consequently, Orions's lack of support for EJB-QL
means that it's currently not possible to write portable CMP EJBs.
Yes, I realise that you
Simon -
No its not tricky, I write them all the time. Orion has always had a rather
sophisticated finder
mechanism to provide (at least) some of the functionality of ejb-ql. And I haven't
worked with the
JBoss 3.0 beta so I can't comment there.
Cheers
Ray
--- Simon Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 04:36:44PM -0800, The elephantwalker wrote:
> sans ejb-ql, 1.5.4 is compatible.
Silly question, but doesn't this make writing EJB 2.0 CMP beans a
little tricky? And if it's not too far off topic, how does JBoss
compare?
Cheers,
Simon
--
"Dark under floor, hard to read,
At 12:17 PM 3/25/2002, you wrote:
>Hi,
>does anyone know when Orion will be 100% EJB 2.0 compatible including
>local/remote inerfaces EJB-QL ...
>
>Michael
I would just be happy with the JMS working correctly, have the JMS message
types don't work at all!
This includes most of the really ne
sans ejb-ql, 1.5.4 is compatible.
I understand from some Oracle types that ejb-ql will be out later this
summer.
many-many is broken in 1.5.4, but Magnus et al indicate its fixed in
bugzilla for 1.5.5
regards,
the elephantwalker
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
At this point, Orion does support local/remote interfaces, CMP/CMR, etc (The
experimental Orion
1.5.4), with some bugs they are still working out (many-to-many CMR for instance).
EJB-QL isn't in
there yet - don't know when it will be. You may try contacting Ironflare directly for
more concise
i
13 matches
Mail list logo
