Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-30 Thread douglas germann
Hi-- Peggy Holman's Change Handbook has a description of Conversation Cafés, which raises the question: why would it be good for the facilitator to take part in the conversation? What would be the advantages of taking part? After all, it appears that the host in Conversation Cafés does take part,

Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-02 Thread Raffi Aftandelian
Dear all, Thank you Doug for starting this conversation. And thank you to all who have contributed. And I am especially grateful for your words, Mark, to this exchange. I, too, have difficulty with the word "facilitator" and you have expressed very clearly what is in my mind and heart and taken i

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-30 Thread Chris Corrigan
Hi Doug... There are levels of hosting and facilitating in these processes. In Conversation Cafes, World Cafes and Open Space meetings there are facilitators who are responsible for the overall space and there are hosts within the space that take responsibility for the conversations. In OST we c

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-30 Thread Harrison Owen
[mailto:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Corrigan Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 2:30 PM To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Subject: Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations Hi Doug... There are levels of hosting and facilitating in these processes. In Conversation Cafes

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-30 Thread Gabriel Shirley
Doug, If the facilitator is part of the system, such as at an OSonOS or at a professional association meeting, I think there can be value in participating. I've seen this happen many times, and I think it depends on the situation. At its best, facilitator participation is a way of modelin

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-30 Thread can uludag
tion.. c > Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:01:49 -0400> From: 76066....@compuserve.com> > Subject: Facilitator must be part of the conversations> To: > osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu> > Hi--> > Peggy Holman's Change Handbook has > a description of Conver

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-31 Thread Brendan McKeague
Thanks for the question Dougand my comments would be similar to Chris' response a contextual solution, linking purpose to placeraising a further question: Who holds the space when you don't? In a facilitator co-learning program recently, we talked a great deal about this when t

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-30 Thread douglas germann
Chris, Harrison, Gabriel, can, Brendan and all-- Chris, so it's kind of a Russian dolls theory of hosting, is it? (I kind of like the metaphor.) Brendan and Gabriel have pointed up a key question it seems to me: trust, being clear when you are stepping from role to role, and risk. These seem to

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-30 Thread Elwin and Joan
te.edu] On Behalf Of > Chris > Corrigan > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 2:30 PM > To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu > Subject: Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations > > > > Hi Doug... > > There are levels of hosting and facilitating in these pr

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-31 Thread kerry napuk
Doug I agree with Elwin. The theme is owned by the sponsor and participants. It is not the facilitator's theme. Why then should s/he interfere in the process by adding their two cents? The facilitator's role is to open and hold space, no thing more. Regards Kerry Edinburgh www.openfutures

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-31 Thread Phelim McDermott
Doug, I'm a theatre director and over the last three years I've facilitated some exciting open space events about theatre. I wrote the invitations, I facilitated and I sometimes joined in discussions and sometimes didn't. It changes but they are all possible. Phelimx On 31 Jul 2007, at 0

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-31 Thread douglas germann
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 08:21 +0100, kerry napuk wrote: > Why then should s/he interfere Kerry-- Perhaps it is not interfering. Martin Buber says we must not only hear the other, but face him or her with our whole, real self. To be present may demand our presence The observer is always part of

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-31 Thread douglas germann
Hi all-- The difficulty may be that we see ourselves as influencing, actually over-influencing, the results, for we might not be there to help with the implementation of what we have influenced. Our passion and our responsibility will separate from the group after the event; the group will be left

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-31 Thread Lisa Heft
Hello, all, and thanks for this conversation -- Personally, it is very important for me to be aware of the inherent power dynamic I carry with me. Whether I see myself as this or not, others can often see me (the facilitator) as the expert, the person who knows so much, the person who has wide ex

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-31 Thread Barry Owen
4 Participants - The Leadership Team for our highly productive 130 agent Real estate office 2 days (3 hours each day) 20 Issues posted I was the facilitator and (against all odds) was a frequent contributor. It worked . . . We emerged with a vision, MANY actionable items, and just as many it

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-31 Thread douglas germann
Lisa is so articulate, that she has given us a wonderful starting point. Thank you Lisa! Here is some of what Lisa said, kind of a found poem: ...inherent power dynamic ...To be a clean and clear holder of space so that they can do their best work. ...I try to be aware of my body language ...it is

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-01 Thread Alan Stewart
With love Alan - Original Message - From: "Lisa Heft" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 4:21 AM Subject: Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations Hello, all, and thanks for this conversation -- Personally, it is very important for me to be aware of the inhe

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-31 Thread Elwin and Joan
--- douglas germann <76066@compuserve.com> wrote: > Lisa is so articulate, that she has given us a wonderful starting > point. WHAT A WONDERFUL UNDERSTATEMENT! > All of which raises the question, what is behind this? What are the > assumptions that lead us all to say things like this (I h

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-31 Thread douglas germann
> > All of which raises the question, what is behind this? What are the > > assumptions that lead us all to say things like this (I have said > > them, too, and often)? What is beneath the surface of these waters? > > SIMPLY LIFE'S ESSENTIAL: SPIRIT! Elwin-- Please say more

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-31 Thread Elwin and Joan
Barry- Congratulations!! What a testament to OST. As to the facilitator/participant question, it seems to me the answer is CRITICAL STAKEHOLDER who also just happens to know how to get things started i.e., opening space. eg --- Barry Owen wrote: > 4 Participants - The Leadership Team for our

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-31 Thread Jack Ricchiuto
Lisa, your words are as always wise. They remind me of some of the many rich dynamics of opening space, along the two dimensions of what we're willing and able to be/do and what the group wants us to be/do. What do we owe the group and to ourselves? The integrity of transparency - letting people kn

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-07-31 Thread Elwin and Joan
Douglas, Oh Boy! What a challenge particularly when Harrison has articulated the meaning, power and critical importance of Spirit (always capitalized) in his many writings. Here’s Elwin’s cryptic take on Spirit: It’s that something inside that not all possess that allows those who do to stand i

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-01 Thread Marc Steinlin
Indeed wonderful words! Really appreciated. In addition to serving the group, I additionally felt I should serve the sponsor. I have managed several times to convince a sponsor to try doing an OST against all his doubts and objections. I have advised him to trust the process as I myself am

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-01 Thread Lisa Heft
Dear all - Jack's and Marc's comments make me think that our holding space for the group - for both the client and the participants - is the embodiment of trust. We breathe, we believe, we trust the people and the process, we are always there (in physical presence and or in Harrison's case at ti

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-01 Thread douglas germann
Thanks, Elwin! Can we then trust ourselves? :- Doug On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 20:45 -0700, Elwin and Joan wrote: > Douglas, > > Oh Boy! What a challenge particularly when Harrison has articulated > the meaning, power and critical importance of Spirit (always > capitalized)

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-01 Thread douglas germann
Lisa and all-- Yes! Yes. There is value in being the witness. We are inside the system, a part of what is going on. Whether we touch or withhold our touch, we are touching. In a trial, each witness plays a crucial part. Each not only observes but speaks her or his truth. Each affects the verdict.

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-01 Thread Mark R. Jones
mark.r.jo...@sunyata.ws -- From: Lisa Heft Reply-To: OSLIST Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:06:27 -0400 To: Subject: Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations Dear all - Jack's and Marc's comments make me think that our hold

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-01 Thread Chris Corrigan
uot;integration without > differentiation". > > So while "hosting", I continually challenge myself to hold a view of > system "wholeness" > that includes every aspect of what I can sense and imagine regarding -- > (1) Consciousness (Self-Awareness) > (2) Whole-Person (physical | emotional | intellectual | consciousness) > (3) Whole-System (al

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-02 Thread douglas germann
Chris and all-- Fields work... Hosting... living in open space... You seem to have these evocative phrases swimming about you, Chris. Would you be so kind as to wax a little more poetic about them, put some more meat on the bones? They are, I think, getting to the heart of the question that start

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-02 Thread Chris Corrigan
Doug wrote: Chris and all-- Fields work... Hosting... living in open space... You seem to have these evocative phrases swimming about you, Chris. Would you be so kind as to wax a little more poetic about them, put some more meat on the bones? They are, I think, getting to the heart of the questi

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-02 Thread douglas germann
Chris-- On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 12:55 -0700, Chris Corrigan wrote: > Hosting has to do with all of the capacities we use when we engage > with clients around an open space. Some of these might include: > > * Seeing and sensing patterns in the organization that help to > find "accu

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-02 Thread Elwin and Joan
Doug, Let me play Chris for a minute. Here are my replies (ALL CAPS) to your questions: * Seeing and sensing patterns in the organization that help to find "accupuncture points" for change, Q- How do you do that unless you are immersed, somehow, (how?) in the conversations? FOR ME THIS IS ESSEN

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-02 Thread Chris Corrigan
First thanks to Elwin for stepping into my skin. Good points. On 8/2/07, douglas germann <76066@compuserve.com> wrote: > > Chris-- > > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 12:55 -0700, Chris Corrigan wrote: > > Hosting has to do with all of the capacities we use when we engage with > clients around an ope

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-03 Thread can uludag
Hi Doug and all, thank you very much for the conversation. it smells spirit :-)) the nature of our self seem to be about silence rather than thought, and silence is not the background of our lives, it's the foreground. We are actual, we do some things and we have some sense of self, yes

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-05 Thread douglas germann
Can-- Thanks for carrying this conversation deeper! On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 11:02 +, can uludag wrote: > the nature of our self seem to be about silence rather than thought, > and silence is not the background of our lives, it's the foreground. That's taking me new places, Can. Would you say

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-05 Thread douglas germann
Elwin as Chris and yourself-- Thank you for giving more details to help me understand. :) What I am seeing in replies of various people is that they are coming from what they have experienced in their lives. Of course, where else would they approach from? From imagination, is one direction L

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-07 Thread Alan Stewart
ds space which may be beyond our conscious awareness and knowing - as Lisa, Mark and others refer to - these may be taken into account through the manner of being of people who dwell in open space. Does this have a bearing on 'The facilitator must be part of the conversations'? :-)

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-08 Thread can uludag
5 Aug 2007 19:34:24 -0400> From: 76066@compuserve.com> > Subject: Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations> To: > osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu> > Can--> > Thanks for carrying this > conversation deeper!> > > > On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 11:02 +, ca

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-08 Thread douglas germann
Alan-- Thanks for this twist on the subject, Alan! Open Space as Opera as Open Space! I like this phrase, changed as you suggest: "That's what's so liberating about open space, because nobody can do it alone. The soprano is dependent on the oboe player, who is dependent o

Re: Facilitator must be part of the conversations

2007-08-08 Thread douglas germann
Can-- What a powerful pair of stories, Can! Thank you for telling us. These were perhaps life living you, and new way to understand Whatever happens...: as something that (continues to) happen without regard to the passage of time. Not sure if that makes sense, but your "will be with me all the ti